July 14, 2006

Russia Challenges UN Power on Kosovo, Calls for Talks

 

Russia Challenges UN Power on Kosovo, Calls for Talks

Created: 14.07.2006 09:45 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 11:08 MSK , 20 hours 26 minutes ago

 

MosNews 

Russia said on Thursday the United Nations had no authority to impose a solution on Serbia over the status of its breakaway Kosovo province and only a negotiated deal was acceptable, the Reuters news agency reported.

The statement by Russian UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin was significant as the leaders of Kosovo and Serbia have dug their heels in the international talks aimed at determining whether Kosovo wins independence or remains a part of Serbia, making an imposed solution more likely.

“I stated today in the closed meeting of the Security Council that I do not believe that the international community has legal, political or moral ground to force Serbia into a solution on this issue,” Churkin told reporters. “There is plenty of opportunity for the sides to have their discussions, and the only stable solution, the only solution good for regional and global stability, would be a solution negotiated between the two sides,” Churkin said.

Ethnic Albanians, 90 percent of the impoverished province’s 2 million people, demand independence while Serbia insists Kosovo must remain within its borders, albeit with substantial autonomy.

Kosovo has been run by the United Nations since June 1999 when NATO bombs drove out Serb forces accused of atrocities against civilians while battling a guerrilla insurgency.

Martti Ahtisaari of Finland is leading the U.N.-backed process set up to determine Kosovo’s eventual status. Direct talks on the fate of Kosovo began in February in Vienna, and he hopes for a result by the end of this year.

Churkin spoke after Ahtisaari briefed the council Ã¢â‚¬â€- and then talked to reporters Ã¢â‚¬â€- on his talks.

During the closed-door meeting, Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica again ruled out independence and accused the international community of seeking to change Serbia’s borders by force, diplomats attending the session said.

Ahtisaari, asked before Churkin spoke whether he thought a solution might have to be imposed because of Kostunica’s hard line, said it was “entirely premature to start talking how the end result of this exercise is going to be.”

But other council diplomats said an imposed solution would clearly be in order if a deal could not be negotiated. Ahtisaari said he had strong council support for his work. “I think everyone is interested that we have a thorough process Ã¢â‚¬â€- in the end of the day that we can say that we have done our utmost to try to find a negotiated settlement,” he said

http://mosnews.com/news/2006/07/14/kosovo.shtml

Russia challenges UN power to impose Kosovo ruling

 

Russia challenges UN power to impose Kosovo ruling

By Irwin Arieff2 hours, 25 minutes ago

Russia said on Thursday the United Nations had no authority to impose a solution on Serbia over the status of its breakaway Kosovo province and only a negotiated deal was acceptable.

The statement by Russian U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin was significant as the leaders of Kosovo and Serbia have dug in their heels in the international talks aimed at determining whether Kosovo wins independence or remains a part of Serbia, making an imposed solution more likely.

"I stated today in the closed meeting of the Security Council that I do not believe that the international community has legal, political or moral ground to force Serbia into a solution on this issue," Churkin told reporters.

"There is plenty of opportunity for the sides to have their discussions, and the only stable solution, the only solution good for regional and global stability, would be a solution negotiated between the two sides," Churkin said.

Ethnic Albanians, 90 percent of the impoverished province's 2 million people, demand independence while Serbia insists Kosovo must remain within its borders, albeit with substantial autonomy.

Kosovo has been run by the United Nations since June 1999 when NATO bombs drove out Serb forces accused of atrocities against civilians while battling a guerrilla insurgency.

Martti Ahtisaari of Finland is leading the U.N.-backed process set up to determine Kosovo's eventual status. Direct talks on the fate of Kosovo began in February in Vienna, and he hopes for a result by the end of this year.

Churkin spoke after Ahtisaari briefed the council -- and then talked to reporters -- on his talks.

During the closed-door meeting, Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica again ruled out independence and accused the international community of seeking to change Serbia's borders by force, diplomats attending the session said.

Ahtisaari, asked before Churkin spoke whether he thought a solution might have to be imposed because of Kostunica's hard line, said it was "entirely premature to start talking how the end result of this exercise is going to be."

But other council diplomats said an imposed solution would clearly be in order if a deal could not be negotiated.

Ahtisaari said he had strong council support for his work. "I think everyone is interested that we have a thorough process -- in the end of the day that we can say that we have done our utmost to try to find a negotiated settlement," he said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060714/wl_nm/serbia_kosovo_un_dc&printer=1;_ylt=AhVB2eIsXwkX8e.yXrRTbIRn.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-

Back to the Balkans: Serbia's Darkest Year

 

 
Serbia's Darkest Year

By Erich Wiedemann and Renate Flottau

It hasn't been a good year for Serbia: First Montenegro voted to secede and now Kosovo wants independence. The football catastrophe suffered by the country's team during the World Cup in Germany has merely added insult to injury.

 
"A present for your chancellor," he says. "Please, take it, it's free." The tousle-headed merchant in Belgrade's Pioneer Park unwraps a yellow porcelain cup and places it on a cardboard box. The inscription reads: "You can take the lives of our heroes, but not our country." What would German Chancellor Angela Merkel do with this patriotic coffee cup? "It'll make her understand that you can't just push around a great people," he explains.

He certainly means what he says, but the man's premise is false. The Serbian people, after storming themselves into irrelevance in a blind rage, are now sitting on the edge of Europe. Because of this, they now feel resentful. It's an understatement to say that 2006 so far hasn't been a good year for Serbia. Indeed, it's rare to see a country -- in peacetime -- forced to endure so many setbacks and disgraces in such a short time span.

The European Union slammed its door in Serbia's face in early March, indefinitely suspending talks over future Serbian EU membership. It was punishment for Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica's government's failure to hand over former General Ratko Mladic, the man accused of the mass murder of almost 8,000 Muslims in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica.

On March 20, unflattering television coverage of the funeral service for deceased dictator Slobodan Milosevic was broadcast around the globe. Montenegro then declared its independence from Serbia in May.

And, of course, there was Serbia's catastrophic showing at the World Cup in Germany, where its national football team lost 0:1 against the Netherlands, 0:6 against Argentina and 1:2 against Ivory Coast. After the match against Argentina, Belgrade newspaper Politika summed up its dejection over the fiasco in an acerbic cartoon depicting an empty football goal and six headstones lined up in front of it. Tabloid Blic wrote that what Serbian fans were witnessing "a descent into hell," clearly the lowest possible point for team and country.

Kosovo pushes for independence

But 2006 isn't over yet -- nor is Serbia's steady disintegration. The next item on the region's agenda is a decision over the future of breakaway province Kosovo. It'll likely end with Albanian-dominated enclave declaring independence from the Republic of Serbia. And then there isVojvodina, an autonomous province threatened by separatism. Balkanization has undoubtedly returned to the Balkans.

Not all the blame lies with Belgrade, of course. The European Union, which sees its role in providing order and stability in the Balkans, has also dropped the ball. EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana now faces precisely the kind of secessionist domino effect he had wanted to avoid. And now that Montenegro is independent, yet another tiny state will be pushing for EU membership.

Controversial Austrian poet Peter Handke has written that Serbia is "Europe's most forlorn country." Handke's political assessments are always a step away from the truth, but when he's right, he's right. Indeed, detractors call him "Serbian Peter."

Is there no light at the end of the tunnel for Serbia? The last politician thought capable of leading Serbia out of the darkness was the pro-European former Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic. He battled corruption and nepotism and turned over Milosevic to the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague. He was assassinated in 2003 by gunshots ordered up from the swamp he had tried to drain.

The retired university professor with a Communist Party pin on his label is drowning his sorrows in red wine in the Writers Club at Franzuska 7. He believes that it will take something on the order of the 1389 Battle of Kosovo Polje for Serbia to regain some of its national pride. What exactly he means by this comparison isn't quite clear.

The Battle of Kosovo Polje figures prominently in the Serbs' nationalist mythology. On June 28, 1389, the Serbian Prince Lazar led an army of 30,000 knights and soldiers against 70,000 Turks. Lazar and his forces lost the battle.

Nationalist zealots have embellished Serbia's woes to a point beyond recognition. In their view, no one has suffered more than the Serbs. They even believe that their ancestors' heroic battle against the Turks somehow set the stage for the idea of a united Europe. It must come as a slap in the face to Serbs that Romania and Bulgaria will be joining the EU first.

Dwelling on their dreams and the good days over glasses of homegrown red Vranac is a favorite pastime among the members of Belgrade's retired intellectual elite. The Writers Club is the kind of place where one can acquire an educated perspective on Serbia's miseries and their presumed causes. Or on Serbia's sacrifices as a result of a European conspiracy leading up to World War II, a conspiracy that led to oppression of the Serbs at the hands of the Europeans -- at least according to the prevailing view here.

The Writers Club was the epicenter of political heresy in the days of former Yugoslav dictator Josip Tito. But it has lost much of its aura of rebellious charm, now that practically everything is allowed -- at least politically -- in Serbia.

Three young men are standing in the street in front of a bridal gown rental shop, vocally discussing Serbia's woes. The tenor of their conversation is the same as it is in the Writers Club, but the delivery is a little more direct. Our problems are the fault of the Jews, says the leader. But the gypsies, Croats and Muslims are also at fault, he adds -- they're the ones who stirred up so much hatred for Serbia in the EU. One of the men has the flag of football club Red Star Belgrade wrapped around his midsection. Red Star is about the only bright light shining for them in the current Serbian darkness.

A war invalid leans against a shop window next door. A cardboard sign informs passersby that the man lost both arms in the Bosnian war and needs money for bread.

Deep-seated misery

Belgrade's misery is so deep-seated that all hopes for improvement are shattered as quickly as they appear. Fifty percent of the city's youth are unemployed. The average monthly income is €200, with incomes four times as high in neighboring Croatia. Unlike Serbia, Croatia enjoys excellent economic ties to the rest of Europe. According to Germany's ambassador in Belgrade, even Bulgaria seems more attractive than Serbia, with more and more German companies moving their Belgrade offices to the neighboring country.

Ironclad nationalism shows its ugly face all over the city. Street vendors sell T-shirts depicting war criminal Mladic. A giant portrait of Milosevic, soiled by tossed eggs, hangs from the top of a four-story office building opposite a bank building.

His death in a prison cell made Milosevic a martyr to many Serbs. Austrian poet Handke says that the UN War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague has essentially accepted his death. Most Serbs, Prime Minister Kostunica included, would likely agree. Nevertheless, they are also pleased to be rid of him.

Young people are forming right-wing parties and action groups with names like "Marching Column," "Blood and Honor" and "Serbia Now." Their heroes are Bishop Nikolaj Velimirovic -- who was canonized by the Serbian Orthodox Church and who considered Adolf Hitler "Europe's savior" -- and people wanted for war criminals like Ratko Mladic.

Prime Minister Kostunica obviously knows where Mladic's old boy network is hiding the leader of the Bosnian Serb army. But he faces pressure from the right-wing radicals who tolerate his government, as well as from their leader, Vojislav Seselj, who is also awaiting trial in The Hague. For the far right, Mladic's extradition to UN tribunal would be treason.

Radicals in the wings

If Kostunica's administration collapsed and elections were held tomorrow, the radical left and right could expect to capture the majority of seats in the Serbian parliament. But this is less a reflection of the country's political preferences than of its desperate emotional state. After a decade and a half of misfortune, the Serbs want nothing more than a way out of their crisis. But propping up Kostunica's government must be in the EU's interest, because it has been reluctant to force the prime minister to finally hunt down General Mladic and agree to a formal separation from Kosovo.

 
Before its wars of secession, Yugoslavia was almost the size of the former West Germany. Now Serbia, stripped of Montenegro, is only a rump just larger than Bavaria. Foreign Minister Vuk Draskovic told SPIEGEL that he hopes that the referendum over Montenegrin independence has finally put a stop to the country's steady disintegration. Prime Minister Kostunica, who recently paid a symbolic visit to the Serb Gracanica Monastery in Kosovo, apparently agrees.

Draskovic doesn't expect any further amputations. All appearances to the contrary, he continues to count Kosovo as part of Serbian territory. The majority Albanian breakaway province has been under a UN protectorate since the NATO bombardment of Serbia in the summer of 1999. "We will not recognize" the declaration of an independent state, says Draskovic, adding that the Serbs could retaliate by establishing a Serb state within Bosnia. He also rejects demands for autonomy by Vojvodina's Hungarian majority.

The US government has summoned Prime Minister Kostunica to Washington this week to secure his commitment to a joint program of reforms with President Boris Tadic, as well as to pledge economic aid to Serbia. But convincing the two Serb leaders, who are bitter enemies, to join forces and pull their country out of its quagmire will be an uphill battle.

Translated from German by Christopher Sultan

Interview with Serbia's Vuk Draskovic: "The Time for Demagogues has Returned"

 

 
INTERVIEW WITH SERBIA'S VUK DRASKOVIC

"The Time for Demagogues has Returned"

In an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE, Serbia's Foreign Minister Vuk Draskovic warned about the danger Kosovo's possible independence poses for the Balkans and the legacy of Slobodan Milosevic.

 
SPIEGEL ONLINE. Mr Draskovic, Serbia is a shrinking state. Are you bitter?

Draskovic: I would have liked for Serbia and Montenegro to co-exist under one umbrella. But we accept reality. The disintegration of former Yugoslavia is now complete.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Not necessarily. The province of Kosovo could soon become independent as well.

Draskovic: In that case the Kosovo Contact Group, the UN Security Council and the governments of those states that are calling for the independence of Kosovo ought to come out and say plainly that Serbs have no right to protection in Kosovo, because they're Serbs.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Why would it not be possible to protect the rights of Serbs in an independent Kosovo -- through the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) or other international bodies, for example?

Draskovic: The talk about a multiethnic community is farcical. Ever since the NATO entered Kosovo, about 220,000 Serbs and non-Albanians have been driven out of the province; 40,000 Serbian houses have been destroyed and more than 1,000 Serbian civilians have been killed. Now the Albanians want a state of their own as a reward. Europe is just soothing its own conscience with its ostensible concern for these tiny Serbian enclaves in Kosovo. Almost 80 percent of Kosovo's territory is ethnically pure.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: How would Belgrade react if Kosovo should indeed become independent?

Draskovic: If an internationally recognized Albanian state should be formed on Serbian territory, we wouldn't recognize it.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What consequences would an independent Kosovo have for the region?

Draskovic: This criminal solution would turn the entire region into a dangerous flahs point and cause political earthquakes in the neighboring countries. No authority in the world could then explain to the Serbs why they don't have a right to an autonomous state, while the Albanians do.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Would Russia allow for this scenario to become a reality?

Draskovic: Russian President Vladimir Putin certainly doesn't support an independent Kosovo. Speaking to the Kosovo Contact Group in January, he didn't mince his words, but said clearly that if Kosovo becomes independent there will be no guarantees that this won't be cited as a precedent by the Caucasus, Karabakh and numerous other regions. It's also an open question how the Turkish part of Cyprus would react to such a development. And what would happen in Catalonia, in the Basque territories of Spain, in Scotland or in Taiwan?

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What is the maximum you would be willing to concede in negotiations over the future status of Kosovo?

Draskovic: We're making large concessions. We're saying to the Albanians: Rule Kosovo by yourself; you're the majority. You'll receive internal independence for Kosovo -- but within Serbia. You can follow your own path to Europe and become a member of international organizations directly -- with the exception of the United Nations, NATO and those organizations that strictly represent international independence. The only demand would be that the current borders of the Serbian state are respected, that the Serbs living there are protected along with their churches and monasteries and that there be special cultural and economic relations between the Kosovo-Serbs and Serbia.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Such a model doesn't exist anywhere in the world...

Draskovic: Specific situations require specific solutions.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What do your discussion partners from Western governments have to say about this proposal?

Draskovic: They agree as far as the right to the inviolability of our borders is concerned. But they point out that the Albanians would be very unsatisfied with this solution and would perhaps opt for terror. But isn't it absurd for the world to go as far as to congratulate the Albanians just because they're giving their "word of honor" that they will respect the rights of Serbs in case of independence?

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Belgrade doesn't rank behind the Kosovo Albanians as far as empty promises are concerned. Don't you think it's shameful how the Serbian government is making a fool of the international community with its ostensible search for Ratko Mladic? Now it's been openly admitted that he was in Belgrade until the end of 2005.

Draskovic: I have no explanation and no justification for the fact that Mladic is still a free man. But I believe Premier Vojislav Kostunica when he says Mladic has become a nightmare and that he would do anything to arrest him. Kostunica will present his plan of action for better cooperation with the Hague War Crimes Tribunal to the EU in mid-July. There will be a radical break with the legacy of Milosevic -- in all areas. Then Europe should tell us where it can help us -- especially in the seizure of war criminals.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: You say support for Mladic comes mainly from the army, the police and the intelligence service. Why did the current government not purge dangerous individuals from these institutions when it overthrew Milosevic?

Draskovic: We've lost much time and paid dearly for our fatal mistakes. Following the overthrow of Milosevic, we should have used the referendum in order to destroy the intelligence service, open the secret files and build a new security agency with the help of European experts. The remaining functionaries from Milosevic's regime have killed our former Prime Minister Djindjic, and they've tried to murder me twice.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: But why are the murderers still being protected? Consider how slowly the trial against the assassins of Zoran Djindjic is proceeding, and you'll understand the people's disappointment.

Draskovic: Of course something isn't quite right there. The trial is being slowed down and obstructed. It almost seems as if someone wanted to gain time.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Time? To do what?

Draskovic: To re-establish the system we had before October 5, 2000 -- before the fall of Milosevic. Look at the polls. If elections were held tomorrow, the radicals and the socialists could get back into power. The people quickly forget their misery and who was responsible for it. The time for demagogues has returned.

 
SPIEGEL ONLINE: Given the danger of a return to the Milosevic regime, why don't you form an oppositional democratic bloc, instead of bickering within the government?

Draskovic: Of course the current government deserves to be criticized not just on 100, but on 1,000, and we've made thousands of mistakes. But there is one mistake we haven't made: We haven't played with human lives, we haven't provoked war and no one has lost their life because of our policies. But Milosevic hasn't just left us a political catastrophe -- several million people were also shaped mentally by his regime.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Is Serbia's population even still interested in EU membership today?

Draskovic: More than 80 percent are in favor of EU membership; 60 percent are in favor of the Partnership for Peace. But if Kosovo should become independent, the pro-European attitude could change quickly. Then our people would feel humiliated, and that's no foundation on which to build a European policy.

-- Interview conducted by Renate Flottau