January 26, 2011

NATO allegedly knew of Thaci criminal activities

NATO allegedly knew of Thaci criminal activities

 

26.01.11 | by: Nine oClock | in: worldnews

 

NATO was aware that current PM Hashim Thaci is ringleading major criminal networks in Kosovo at the time of NATO's operations in Serbia, shows an internal report leaked to the Guardian, quoted by Novinite. The report, produced by NATO's Kosovo force KFOR and dated 2004, states that Thaci is among three persons pinpointed as the "biggest fish" in the criminal organizations, the other being Xhavit Haliti, a former head of logistics for the Kosovo Liberation Army, who is said to have extensive criminal connections in the region. Kosovo's PM came into worldwide focus after end of 2010 a special report by the Council of Europe found that he is involved in a network organizing forceful organ harvesting in Kosovo.

 

http://www.nineoclock.ro/index.php?issue=4787&page=detalii&categorie=worldnews&id=20110126-23209

 

January 25, 2011

Report identifies Hashim Thaci as 'big fish' in organised crime

Report identifies Hashim Thaci as 'big fish' in organised crime

Kosovo's prime minister accused of criminal connections in secret Nato documents leaked to the Guardian

·         

Kosovo's Prime Minister Hashim Thaci identified in secret Nato reports as having involvement in criminal underworld. Photograph: Valdrin Xhemaj/EPA

Kosovo's prime minister, Hashim Thaçi, has been identified as one of the "biggest fish" in organised crime in his country, according to western military intelligence reports leaked to the Guardian.

The Nato documents, which are marked "Secret", indicate that the US and other western powers backing Kosovo's government have had extensive knowledge of its criminal connections for several years.

They also identify another senior ruling politician in Kosovo as having links to the Albanian mafia, stating that he exerts considerable control over Thaçi, a former guerrilla leader.

Marked "USA KFOR", they provide detailed information about organised criminal networks in Kosovo based on reports by western intelligence agencies and informants. The geographical spread of Kosovo's criminal gangs is set out, alongside details of alleged familial and business links.

The Council of Europe is tomorrow expected to formally demand an investigation into claims that Thaçi was the head of a "mafia-like" network responsible for smuggling weapons, drugs and human organs during and after the 1998-99 Kosovo war.

The organ trafficking allegations were contained in an official inquiry published last month by the human rights rapporteur Dick Marty.

His report accused Thaçi and several other senior figures who operated in the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) of links to organised crime, prompting a major diplomatic crisis when it was leaked to the Guardian last month.

The report also named Thaçi as having exerted "violent control" over the heroin trade, and appeared to confirm concerns that after the conflict with Serbia ended, his inner circle oversaw a gang that murdered Serb captives to sell their kidneys on the black market.

The Council's of Europe's parliamentary assembly in Strasbourg will debate Marty's findings and vote on a resolution calling for criminal investigations. The vote is widely expected to be passed.

Kosovo functioned as a UN protectorate from the end of the Kosovo war until 2008, when it formally declared independence from Serbia.

Thaçi, who was re-elected prime minister last month, has been strongly backed by Nato powers. His government has dismissed the Marty report as part of a Serbian and Russian conspiracy to destabilise the fledgling state.

However, the latest leaked documents were produced by KFOR, the Nato-led peacekeeping force responsible for security in Kosovo. It was KFOR military forces that intervened in the Kosovo war in 1999, helping to put an end to a campaign of ethnic cleansing by Slobodan Milosevic's Serbian forces.

Nato said in a statement tonight that it had instigated an "internal investigation" into the leaked documents, which are intelligence assessments produced around 2004, shortly before tensions with ethnic Serbs fuelled riots in Kosovo.

In the documents, Thaçi is identified as one of a triumvirate of "biggest fish" in organised criminal circles. So too is Xhavit Haliti, a former head of logistics for the KLA who is now a close ally of the prime minister and a senior parliamentarian in his ruling PDK party. Haliti is expected to be among Kosovo's official delegation to Strasbourg tomorrow and has played a leading role in seeking to undermine the Marty report in public.

However, the Nato intelligence reports suggest that behind his role as a prominent politician, Haliti is also a senior organised criminal who carries a Czech 9mm pistol and holds considerable sway over the prime minister.

Describing him as "the power behind Hashim Thaçi", one report states that Haliti has strong ties with the Albanian mafia and Kosovo's secret service, known as KShiK. It suggests that Haliti "more or less ran" a fund for the Kosovo war in the late 1990s, profiting from the fund personally before the money dried up. "As a result, Haliti turned to organised crime on a grand scale," the reports state.

They state that he is "highly involved in prostitution, weapons and drugs smuggling" and used a hotel in the capital, Pristina, as an operational base. Haliti also serves as a political and financial adviser to the prime minister but, according to the documents, is arguably "the real boss" in the relationship. Haliti uses a fake passport to travel abroad because he is black-listed in several countries, including the US, one report states.

Haliti is linked to the alleged intimidation of political opponents in Kosovo and two suspected murders dating back to the late 1990s, when KLA infighting is said to have resulted in numerous killings.

One was a political adversary who was found "dead by the Kosovo border", apparently following a dispute with Haliti. A description of the other suspected murder – of a young journalist in Tirana, the Albanian capital – also contains a reference to the prime minister by name, but does not ascribe blame.

Citing US and Nato intelligence, the entry states Haliti is "linked" the grisly murder, going on to state: "Ali Uka, a reporter in Tirana, who supported the independence movement but criticised it in print. Uka was brutally disfigured with a bottle and screwdriver in 1997. His roommate at the time was Hashim Thaçi."

Haliti is also named in the report by Marty, which is understood to have drawn on Nato intelligence assessments along with reports from the FBI and MI5.

Marty's report includes Haliti among a list of close allies of Thaçi said to have ordered – and in some cases personally overseen – "assassinations, detentions, beatings and interrogations" during and immediately after the war.

Haliti was unavailable for comment. However, in an interview with the media outlet Balkan Insight last week he dismissed the Marty report as "political" and designed to "discredit the KLA". "I was not surprised by the report. I have followed this issue for years and the content of the report is political," he said.

But he accepted that the Council of Europe was likely to pass a resolution triggering investigations by the EU-backed justice mission in the country, known as EULEX.

"I think it's a competent investigating body," he said, "It's a European investigation body. I think that there is no possibility that EULEX investigation unit to be affected by Kosovo or Albanian politics."

Responding to the allegations in the NATO intelligence reports tonight, a Kosovo government spokesman said: "These are allegations that have circulated for over a decade, most recently recycled in the Dick Marty report. They are based on hearsay and intentional false Serbian intelligence.

"Nevertheless, the prime minister has called for an investigation by EULEX and has repeatedly pledged his full cooperation to law enforcement authorities on these scandalous and slanderous allegations.

"The government of Kosovo continues to support the strengthening of the rule of law in Kosovo, and we look forward to the cooperation of our international partners in ensuring that criminality has no place in Kosovo's development."

Road to Strasbourg

It has taken more than two years for an inquiry into organ trafficking in Kosovo to reach the Palace of Europe, a grand building in Strasbourg that serves as the headquarters of the Council of Europe.

The formal inquiry into organ trafficking in Kosovo was prompted by revelations by the former chief war crimes prosecutor at The Hague, Carla Del Ponte, who said she had been prevented from properly investigating alleged atrocities committed by the Kosovo Liberation Army.

Her most shocking disclosure – unconfirmed reports the KLA killed captives for their organs – prompted the formal inquiry by human rights rapporteur Dick Marty.

His report, published last month, suggested there was evidence that KLA commanders smuggled captives across the border into Kosovo and harvested the organs of a "handful" of Serbs.

His findings, which will be subject to a parliamentary assembly vote tomorrow, went further, accusing Kosovo's prime minister and several other senior figures of involvement in organised crime over the last decade.

Criminal Kosovo: America's Gift To Europe

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22931

Global Research/CounterPunch
January 24, 2011

Criminal Kosovo: America's Gift to Europe
by Diana Johnstone


U.S. media have given more attention to hearsay allegations of Julian Assange's sexual encounters with two talkative Swedish women than to an official report accusing Kosovo prime minister Hashim Thaci of running a criminal enterprise which, among almost every other crime in the book, has murdered prisoners in order to sell their vital organs on the world market.

The report by Swiss liberal Dick Marty was mandated two years ago by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE). Not to be confused with the European Union, the Council of Europe was founded in 1949 to promote human rights, the rule of law and democracy and has 47 member states (compared to 27 in the EU).

While U.S. legal experts feverishly try to trump up charges they can use to demand extradition of Assange to the United States, to be duly punished for discomfiting the empire, U.S. State Department spokesman Phillip Crowley piously reacted to the Council of Europe allegations by declaring that the United States will continue to work with Thaci since "any individual anywhere in the world is innocent until proven otherwise".

Everyone, that is, except, among others, Bradley Manning who is in solitary confinement although he has not been found guilty of anything. All the Guantanamo prisoners have been considered guilty, period. The United States is applying the death penalty on a daily basis to men, women and children in Afghanistan and Pakistan who are innocent until proven dead.

Embarrassed supporters of Thaci's little self-proclaimed state dismiss the accusations by saying that the Marty Report does not prove Thaci's guilt.

Of course it doesn't. It can't. It is a report, not a trial. The report was mandated by the PACE precisely because judicial authorities were ignoring evidence of serious crimes. In her 2008 memoir in Italian La caccia. Io e i criminali di guerra (The Hunt. Me and the War Criminals), the former prosecutor at the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague, Carla del Ponte, complained that she had been prevented from carrying out a thorough investigation of reports of organ extraction from Serb and other prisoners carried out by the "Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA)" in Albania. Indeed, rumors and reports of those atrocities, carried out in the months following the occupation of Kosovo by NATO-led occupation forces, have been studiously ignored by all relevant judicial authorities.

The Marty report claims to have uncovered corroborating evidence, including testimony by witnesses whose lives would be in danger if their names were revealed. The conclusion of the report is not and could not be a verdict, but a demand to competent authorities to undertake judicial proceedings capable of hearing all the evidence and issuing a verdict.

Skepticism about atrocities

It is always prudent to be skeptical about atrocity stories circulating in wartime. History shows many examples of totally invented atrocity stories that serve to stir up hatred of the enemy during wartime, such as the widely circulated World War I reports of the Germans "cutting off the hands of Belgian babies".

Western journalists and politicians abandoned all prudent skepticism regarding the wild tales that were spread of Serb atrocities used to justify the 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia. Personally, my skepticism extends to all such stories, regardless of the identity of the alleged perpetrators, and I have refrained for years from writing about the Albanian organ transplant stories for that reason.

I never considered Carla del Ponte a reliable source, but rather a gullible and self-aggrandizing woman who had been selected by the U.S. sponsors of the ICTY because they thought they could manipulate her. No doubt the sponsors of the Tribunal she was working for, which was set up by and for the United States and NATO allies in order to justify their choice of sides in the Yugoslav civil wars, would have called a halt before she could stray from her assigned path to stick her nose into crimes committed by America's Albanian protégés. But that does not prove that the alleged crimes actually were committed.

However, the Marty report goes beyond vague rumors to make specific allegations against the KLA's "Drenica group" led by Hashim Thaci. Despite refusal of Albanian authorities to cooperate, there is ample proof that the KLA operated a chain of "safe houses" on Albanian territory during and after the 1999 NATO war against Serbia, using them to hold, interrogate, torture and sometimes murder prisoners. One of these safe houses, belonging to a family identified by the initial "K", was cited by Carla del Ponte and media reports as "the yellow house" (since painted white). To quote the Marty Report (paragraph 147):

"There are substantial elements of proof that a small number of KLA captives, including some of the abducted ethnic Serbs, met their death in Rripe, at or in the vicinity of the K. house. We have learned about these deaths not only through the testimonies of former KLA soldiers who said they had participated in detaining and transporting the captives while they were alive, but also through the testimonies of persons who independently witnessed the burial, disinterment, movement and reburial of the captives' corpses (…)"

An undetermined but apparently small number of prisoners were transferred in vans and trucks to an operating site near Tirana international airport, from which fresh organs could be flown rapidly to recipients.

"The drivers of these vans and trucks – several of whom would become crucial witnesses to the patterns of abuse described – saw and heard captives suffering greatly during the transports, notably due to the lack of a proper air supply in their compartment of the vehicle, or due to the psychological torment of the fate that they supposed awaited them" (paragraph 155).

Captives described in the report as "victims of organised crime" included "persons whom we found were taken into central Albania to be murdered immediately before having their kidneys removed in a makeshift operating clinic" (paragraph 156).

These captives "undoubtedly endured a most horrifying ordeal in the custody of their KLA captors. According to source testimonies, the captives 'filtered' into this final subset were initially kept alive, fed well and allowed to sleep, and treated with relative restraint by KLA guards and henchmen who would otherwise have beaten them up indiscriminately" (paragraph 157).

"The testimonies on which we based our findings spoke credibly and consistently of a methodology by which all of the captives were killed, usually by a gunshot to the head, before being operated on to remove one or more of their organs. We learned that this was principally a trade in 'cadaver kidneys', i.e. the kidneys were extracted posthumously; it was not a set of advanced surgical procedures requiring controlled clinical conditions and, for example, the extensive use of anaesthetic" (paragraph 162).

Skepticism about liberation"

The Marty report also recalls what is common knowledge in Europe, namely that Hashim Thaci and his "Drenica Group" are notorious criminals. While "liberated" Kosovo sinks ever further into poverty, they have amassed fortunes in various aspects of illicit trade, notably enslaving women for prostitution and controlling illegal narcotics across Europe.

"Notably, in confidential reports spanning more than a decade, agencies dedicated to combating drug smuggling in at least five countries have named Hashim Thaci and other members of his "Drenica Group" as having exerted violent control over the trade in heroin and other narcotics" (paragraph 66).

"Similarly, intelligence analysts working for NATO, as well as those in the service of at least four independent foreign Governments, made compelling findings through their intelligence-gathering related to the immediate aftermath of the conflict in 1999. Thaci was commonly identified, and cited in secret intelligence reports, as the most dangerous of the KLA's 'criminal bosses'" (paragraph 67).

The leftists who fell hook, line and sinker for the "war to rescue the Kosovars from genocide" propaganda that justified NATO's debut as aggressive bomber/invader in 1999 readily accepted the identification of the "Kosovo Liberation Army" as a national liberation movement deserving their support. Isn't it part of romantic legend for revolutionaries to rob banks for their cause? Leftists assume such criminal activities are merely a means to the end of political independence. But what if political independence is in reality the means to sanctuarize criminal activities?

Assassinating policemen, the KLA specialty prior to being given Kosovo by NATO, is an ambiguous activity. Is the target "political oppression", as claimed, or simply law enforcement?

What have Thaci and company done with their "liberation"? First of all, they allowed their American sponsors to build a huge military base, Camp Bondsteel, on Kosovo territory, without asking permission from anyone. Then, behind a smokescreen of talk of building democracy, they have terrorized ethnic minorities, eliminated their political rivals, fostered rampant crime and corruption, engaged in electoral fraud, and ostentatiously enriched themselves thanks to the criminal activities that constitute the real economy.

The Marty Report recalls what happened when Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic, under NATO threat of wiping out his country, agreed to withdraw from Kosovo and allow a U.N. force called KFOR (quickly taken over by NATO) to occupy Kosovo.

"First, the withdrawal of the Serb security forces from Kosovo had ceded into the hands of various KLA splinter groups, including Thaci's "Drenica Group", effectively unfettered control of an expanded territorial area in which to carry out various forms of smuggling and trafficking" (paragraph 84).

"KFOR and UNMIK were incapable of administering Kosovo's law enforcement, movement of peoples, or border control, in the aftermath of the NATO bombardment in 1999. KLA factions and splinter groups that had control of distinct areas of Kosovo (villages, stretches of road, sometimes even individual buildings) were able to run organised criminal enterprises almost at will, including in disposing of the trophies of their perceived victory over the Serbs" (paragraph 85).

"Second, Thaci's acquisition of a greater degree of political authority (Thaci having appointed himself Prime Minister of the Provisional Government of Kosovo) had seemingly emboldened the "Drenica Group" to strike out all the more aggressively at perceived rivals, traitors, and persons suspected of being "collaborators" with the Serbs" (paragraph 86).

In short, NATO drove out the existing police, turning the province of Kosovo over to violent gangsters. But this was not an accident. Hashim Thaci was not just a gangster who took advantage of the situation. He had been hand-picked by U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and her right-hand man, James Rubin, for the job.

"You ought to be in movies…"

Until February 1999, Hashim Thaci's only claim to fame was in Serbian police records, where he was wanted for various violent crimes. Then suddenly, at a French chateau called Rambouillet, he was thrust into the world spotlight by his American handlers. It is one of the most bizarre twists to the whole tragi-comic Kosovo saga.

Ms Albright was eager to use the ethnic conflict in Kosovo to make a display of U.S. military might by bombing the Serbs, in order to reassert U.S. dominance of Europe via NATO. But some European NATO country leaders thought it politically necessary to make at least a pretense of seeking a negotiated solution to the Kosovo problem before bombing. And so a fake "negotiation" was staged at Rambouillet, designed by the United States to get the Serbs to say no to an impossible ultimatum, in order to claim that the humanitarian West had no choice but to bomb.

For that, they needed a Kosovo Albanian who would play their game.

Belgrade sent a large multi-ethnic delegation to Rambouillet, ready to propose a settlement giving Kosovo broad autonomy. On the other side was a purely ethnic Albanian delegation from Kosovo including several leading local intellectuals experienced in such negotiations, including the internationally recognized leader of the Albanian separatist movement in Kosovo, Ibrahim Rugova who, it was assumed, would lead the "Kosovar" delgation.

But to the general surprise of observers, the seasoned intellectuals were shoved aside, and leadership of the delegation was taken over by a young man, Hashim Thaci, known in law-enforcement circles as "the Snake".

The American stage-managers chose Thaci for obvious reasons. While the older Kosovo Albanians risked actually negotiating with the Serbs, and thus reaching an agreement that would prevent war, Thaci owed everything to the United States, and would do as he was told. Moreover, putting a "wanted" criminal at the top of the delegation was an affront to the Serbs that would help scuttle negotiations. And finally, the Thaci image appealed to the Americans' idea of what a "freedom fighter" should look like.

Albright's closest aide, James Rubin, acted as talent scout, gushing over Thaci's good looks, telling him he was so handsome he should be in Hollywood. Indeed, Thaci did not look like a Hollywood gangster, Edward G. Robinson style, but a clean-cut hero with a vague resemblance to the actor Robert Stack. Joe Biden is said to have complained that Madeleine Albright was "in love" with Thaci. Image is everything, after all, especially when the United States is casting its own Pentagon superproduction, "Saving the Kosovars", in order to redesign the Balkans, with its own "independent" satellite states.

The pretext for the 1999 war was to "save the Kosovars" (the name assumed by the Albanian population of that Serbian province, to give the impression that it was a country and that they were the rightful inhabitants) from an imaginary threat of "genocide". The official U.S. position was to respect the territorial integrity of Yugoslavia. But it was always quite obvious that behind the scenes, the United States had made a deal with Thaci to give him Kosovo as part of the destruction of Yugoslavia and the crippling of Serbia. The chaos that followed the withdrawal of Yugoslav security forces enabled the KLA gangs to take over and the United States to build Camp Bondsteel.

Cheered on by a virulent Albanian lobby in the United States, Washington has defied international law, violated its own commitments (the agreement ending the 1999 war called for Serbia to police Kosovo's borders, which was never allowed), and ignored muted objections from European allies to sponsor the transformation of the poor Serbian province into an ethnic Albanian "independent state". Since unilaterally declaring independence in February 2008, the failed statelet has been recognized only by 72 out of 192 U.N. members, including 22 of the European Union's 27 members.

EULEX versus Clan Loyalty

A few months later, the European Union set up a "European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo" (EULEX) intended to take over judicial authority in the province from the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) that had ostensibly exercised such functions after NATO drove out the Serbs. The very establishment of EULEX was proof that the EU's recognition of Kosovo's independence was unjustified and dishonest. It was an admission that Kosovo, after being delivered to KLA bands (some in war against each other), was unable to provide even a semblance of law and order, and thus in no way prepared to be "an independent state".

Of course the West will never admit this, but it was the complaints of the Serb minority in the 1980s that they could not count on protection by police or law courts, then run by the majority ethnic Albanian communist party, that led to the Serbian government's limitation of Kosovo's autonomy, portrayed in the West as a gratuitous persecution motivated by racial hatred of Hitlerian proportions.

The difficulties of obtaining justice in Kosovo are basically the same now as they were then – with the difference that the Serbian police understood the Albanian language, whereas the UNMIK and EULEX internationals are almost entirely dependent on local Albanian interpreters, whose veracity they are unable to check.

The Marty Report describes the difficulties of crime investigation in Kosovo:

"The structure of Kosovar Albanian society, still very much clan orientated, and the absence of a true civil society have made it extremely difficult to set up contacts with local sources. This is compounded by fear, often to the point of genuine terror, which we have observed in some of our informants immediately upon broaching the subject of our inquiry.

"The entrenched sense of loyalty to one's clansmen, and the concept of honour … rendered most ethnic Albanian witnesses unreachable for us. Having seen two prominent prosecutions undertaken by the ICTY leading to the deaths of so many witnesses, and ultimately a failure to deliver justice, a Parliamentary Assembly Rapporteur with only paltry resources in comparison was hardly likely to overturn the odds of such witnesses speaking to us directly.

"Numerous persons who have worked for many years in Kosovo, and who have become among the most respected commentators on justice in the region, counseled us that organized criminal networks of Albanians ('the Albanian mafia') in Albania itself, in neighbouring territories including Kosovo and 'the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia', and in the Diaspora, were probably more difficult to penetrate than the Cosa Nostra; even low-level operatives would rather take a jail term of decades, or a conviction for contempt, than turn in their clansmen."

A second report submitted this month to the Council of Europe by rapporteur Jean-Charles Gardetto on witness protection in war crimes trials for former Yugoslavia notes that there is no witness protection law in Kosovo and, more seriously, no way to protect witnesses that might testify against fellow ethnic Albanians.

"In the most serious cases, witnesses are able to testify anonymously. However, it was made clear to the rapporteur that these measures are useless as long as the witness is physically in Kosovo, where everybody knows everybody else. Most witnesses are immediately recognised by the defence when they deliver their testimony, despite all the anonymity measures."

"There are many limitations to the protection arrangements currently available, not least because Kosovo has a population of less than two million with very tight-knit communities. Witnesses are often perceived as betraying their community when they give evidence, which inhibits possible witnesses from coming forward. Furthermore, many people do not believe that they have a moral or legal duty to testify as a witness in criminal cases.

"Moreover, when a witness does come forward, there is a real threat of retaliation. This may not necessarily put them in direct danger, losing their job for example, but there are also examples of key witnesses being murdered. The trial of Ramush Haradinaj, the former leader of the Kosovo Liberation Army, well illustrates this. Mr. Haradinaj was indicted by the ICTY for crimes committed during the war in Kosovo but was subsequently acquitted. In its judgment, the Tribunal highlighted the difficulties that it had had in obtaining evidence from the 100 prosecution witnesses. Thirty-four of them were granted protection measures and 18 had to be issued with summonses. A number of witnesses who were going to give evidence at the trial were murdered. These included Sadik and Vesel Muriqi, both of whom had been placed under a protection program by the ICTY."

Europes Dilemma

Naturally, European accomplices in putting the Thaci gang in charge of Kosovo have been quick to dismiss the Marty report. Tony Blair apologist and former Labour minister Dennis MacShane wrote in The Independent (UK) that, "There is not one single name or a single witness to the allegations that Thaci was involved in the harvesting of human organs from murdered victims." To someone unfamiliar with the circumstances and with the report, that may sound like a valid objection. But Marty has made it clear that he can supply names of witnesses to competent judicial authorities. Thaci himself acknowledged that they exist when he stated that he would publish the names of Marty's witnesses – a statement understood as a death threat by those familiar with the Pristina scene.

One of the most prominent Europeans to hope that the Marty report will disappear is the French media humanitarian Bernard Kouchner, until recently Sarkozy's foreign minister, who officially ran Kosovo as the first head of UNMIK after the NATO occupation. Contrary to Kouchner's protests of ignorance, the UNMIK police chief in 2000 and 2001, Canadian Captain Stu Kellock, has called it "impossible" that Kouchner was not aware of organized crime in Kosovo. The first time a reporter queried Kouchner about the organ transplant accusations, a few months ago, Kouchner responded with a loud horse laugh, before telling the reporter to go have his head examined. After the Marty report, Kouchner merely repeated his "skepticism", and called for an investigation… by EULEX.

Other NATO defenders have taken the same line. One investigation calls for another, and so on. Investigating the charges against the KLA is beginning to look like the Middle East peace process.

The Marty Report itself concludes with a clear call on EULEX to "to persevere with its investigative work, without taking any account of the offices held by possible suspects or of the origin of the victims, doing everything to cast light on the criminal disappearances, the indications of organ trafficking, corruption and the collusion so often complained of between organized criminal groups and political circles" and "to take every measure necessary to ensure effective protection for witnesses and to gain their trust".

This is a tall order, considering that EULEX is ultimately dependent on EU governments deeply involved in ignoring Kosovo Albanian crime for over a decade. Still, some of the most implicated personalities, such as Kouchner, are nearing the end of their careers, and there are many Europeans who consider that things have gone much too far, and that the Kosovo cesspool must be cleaned up.

EULEX is already prosecuting an organ trafficking ring in Kosovo. In November 2008, a young Turkish man who had just had a kidney removed collapsed at Pristina airport, which led police to raid the nearby Medicus clinic where a 74-year-old Israeli was convalescing from implantation of the young man's kidney.

The Israeli had allegedly paid 90,000 euros for the illegal implant, while the young Turk, like other desperately poor foreigners lured to Pristina by false promises, was cheated of the money promised. The trial is currently underway in Pristina of seven defendants charged with involvement in the illegal Medicus organ trafficking racket, including top members of the Kosovo Albanian medical profession. Still at large are Dr. Yusuf Sonmez, a notorious international organ trafficker, and Moshe Harel, an Israeli of Turkish origin accused of organizing the illicit international organ trade. Israel is known to be a prime market for organs because of Jewish religious restrictions that severely limit the number of Israeli donors.

The Marty Report notes that the information it has obtained "appears to depict a broader, more complex organized criminal conspiracy to source human organs for illicit transplant, involving co-conspirators in at least three different foreign countries besides Kosovo, enduring over more than a decade. In particular, we found a number of credible, convergent indications that the organ-trafficking component of the post-conflict detentions described in our report is closely related to the contemporary case of the Medicus Clinic, not least through prominent Kosovar Albanian and international personalities who feature as co-conspirators in both."

But EULEX prosecution of the Medicus case does not automatically mean that the European judicial authorities in Kosovo will pursue the even more criminal organ trafficking denounced in the Marty Report. One obstacle is that the alleged crimes took place on the territory of Albania, and so far Albanian authorities have been uncooperative, to say the least.

A second inhibition is fear that the attempt to prosecute leading KLA figures would lead to unrest. Indeed, on January 9, several hundred Albanians carrying Albanian flags (not the Western-imposed flag of Kosovo) demonstrated in Mitrovica against the Marty report shouting "UCK, UCK" (KLA in Albanian). Still, EULEX has indicted two former KLA commanders for war crimes committed on Albanian territory in 1999 when they allegedly tortured prisoners, ethnic Albanians from Kosovo either suspected of "collaborating" with legal Serb authorities or because they were political opponents of the KLA.

A striking and significant political fact that emerges from the Marty report is that:

"The reality is that the most significant operational activities undertaken by members of the KLA – prior to, during, and in the immediate aftermath of the conflict – took place on the territory of Albania, where the Serb security forces were never deployed" (paragraph 36).

Thus, to a very large extent, the Serbian province of Kosovo was the object of a foreign invasion from across its border, by Albanian nationalists keen on creating "Greater Albania", and aided in this endeavor by diaspora lobbies and, decisively, NATO bombing. Far from being an "aggressor" in its own historic province, Serbia was the victim of a major two-pronged foreign invasion.

America's disposable puppets

NATO could not have waged a ground war against Serbian forces without suffering casualties. So it waged a 78-day air war, ravaging Serbia's infrastructure. To save his country from threatened annihilation, Milosevic gave in. For its ground force, the United States chose the KLA. The KLA was no match for Serbian forces on the ground, but it aided the United States/NATO war in peculiar ways.

The United States provided KLA fighters on the ground with GPS devices and satellite telephones to enable them to spot Serb targets for bombing (very inefficiently, as the NATO bombs missed almost all their military targets). The KLA in some places ordered Kosovo Albanian civilians to flee across the border to Albania or to ethnic Albanian parts of Macedonia, where photographers were waiting to enrich the imagery of a population persecuted by Serb "ethnic cleansing" – an enormous propaganda success. And crucially, before the NATO bombing, the KLA pursued a strategy of provocation, murdering policemen and civilians, including disobedient Albanians, designed to commit acts of repression that could be used as a pretext for NATO intervention. Thaci even boasted subsequently of the success of this strategy.

Thaci has played the role assigned to him by the empire. Still, considering the history of American disposal of collaborators who have outlived their usefulness (Ngo Dinh Diem, Noriega, Saddam Hussein…), he has reasons to be uneasy.

Thaci's uneasiness could be sharpened by a recent trip to the region by William Walker, the U.S. agent who in 1999 created the main pretext for the NATO bombing campaign by inflating casualties from a battle between Serb police and KLA fighters in the village of Racak into a massacre of civilians, "a crime against humanity" perpetrated by "people with no value for human life". Walker, whose main professional experience was in Central America during the Reagan administration's bloody fight against revolutionary movements in Nicaragua and El Salvador, had been imposed by the United States as head of a European mission ostensibly mandated to monitor a cease-fire between Serb forces and the KLA. But in fact, he and his British deputy used the mission to establish close contacts with the KLA in preparation for joint war against the Serbs. The grateful gangster regime has named a street in Pristina after him;

In between receiving a decoration in Kosovo and honorary citizenship in Albania, Walker took political positions that could make both Thaci and EULEX nervous. Walker expressed support for Albin Kurti, the young leader of the radical nationalist "Self-Determination" movement (Vetëvendosje), which is gaining support with its advocacy of independence from EU governance as well as in favor of "natural Albania", meaning a Greater Albania composed of Albania, Kosovo and parts of southern Serbia, much of Macedonia, a piece of Montenegro and even northern Greece. Was Walker on a talent-scouting mission in view of replacing the increasingly disgraced Thaci? If Kurti is the new favorite, a U.S.-chosen replacement could cause even more trouble in the troubled Balkans.

The West, that is, the United States, the European Union and NATO, may be able to agree on a "curse on both their houses" approach, concluding that the Serbs they persecuted and the Albanians they helped are all barbarians, unworthy of their benevolent intervention. What they will never admit is that they chose, and to a large extent created, the wrong side in a war for which they bear criminal responsibility. And whose devastating consequences continue to be borne by the unfortunate inhabitants of the region, whatever their linguistic and cultural identity.

Diana Johnstone is author of Fools'Crusade: Yugoslavia, NATO and Western Delusions.

January 23, 2011

A dark cloud hangs over Kosovo

A dark cloud hangs over KosovoDescription: http://www.gulf-times.com/site/images/spacer.gif

 

By Ian Bancroft/Pristina

 

The serious allegations made against Kosovo's current prime minister and former political leader of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), Hashim Thaci, by the Council of Europe's special rapporteur, Dick Marty, have raised profound questions about the role of the international community in Kosovo prior to, during and since the Nato-led bombing campaign in 1999.

In particular, Marty's assertion that the interests of stability were placed before those of justice further undermines the already discredited claim that intervention was based upon humanitarian principles.

By providing de facto impunity from criminal investigation, the international community has further undermined efforts to strengthen the rule of law in Kosovo; the prime motivation for the deployment of EULEX. When it debates Marty's report on January 25, the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly (PACE) will therefore have a vital opportunity and obligation to provide greater momentum to an in-depth and unhindered investigation into the alleged crimes and their perpetrators.

Having previously led a Council of Europe investigation into extraordinary rendition and alleged CIA secret detention centres in Europe, Marty's latest report, entitled "Inhuman treatment of people and illicit trafficking in human organs in Kosovo", was adopted by PACE's committee on legal affairs and human rights in mid-December.

Aside from the allegations of "disappearances, organ trafficking, corruption and collusion between organised criminal groups and political circles in Kosovo", one of the most damning indictments is Marty's assertion that "the international organisations in place in Kosovo favoured a pragmatic political approach, taking the view that they needed to promote short-term stability at any price, thereby sacrificing some important principles of justice".

The international community's complicity in down-playing and even ignoring suspected crimes by the KLA demonstrates the paucity of their supposed humanitarian concerns, particularly when contrasted with the grand statements of Blair, Kouchner et al.

The Kosovo government's response has revolved around denial and accusations of racism.

Thaci has vowed to publicly reveal the names of those who had co-operated with Marty, threatened to sue the Council of Europe's rapporteur and compared the report to Nazi propaganda; an assertion that caused considerable dismay in Marty's native Switzerland.

The Kosovo Liberation Army's Veterans Association, meanwhile, launched an "aggressive smear campaign" against a respected journalist, Halil Matoshi, who accused certain individuals of wanting to "police a 'patriotic anarchy'" by labelling people either 'good' or 'bad' patriots.

Reporters Without Borders called on the Kosovo government to condemn the remarks, insisting that "the guilty silence must end at once. The entire political class has a duty to respond to these indirect but real threats". Such a climate of fear and intimidation bodes ill for the prospects of justice being served any time soon.

Indeed, another Council of Europe report, entitled "The protection of witnesses as a cornerstone for justice and reconciliation in the Balkans", is set to shed further light on the challenges facing any potential criminal investigation. The report's author, Jean Charles Gardetto, notes a lack of effective witness protection and talks of cases where "many potential witnesses in Kosovo claim to be perceived as traitors if they testify" and "witnesses who are on the point of testifying (are) being assassinated".

Such witness intimidation, as Gardetto notes, makes the role of the international community even more vital in order to ensure that the investigation and prosecution of cases remain free from political and other forms of interference.

By adopting Marty's report on January 25, the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly can provide additional impetus to an international investigation into, and possible prosecution of, alleged crimes in Kosovo and Albania.

The EU will have a key role to play in conducting and ensuring full co-operation with such an inquiry. Should Albania and Kosovo refuse to co-operate, then the EU should employ the very conditionality that has worked so effectively with respect to ensuring Serbia's full co-operation with the ICTY.

Political pragmatism must no longer be placed before the principles of justice. A failure to credibly investigate all alleged crimes will only further impede the process of reconciliation and the prospects of achieving a sustainable political settlement between Serbia and Kosovo. It will also leave Kosovo tangled up in a web of organised crime and corruption, and devoid of the international recognition that it so desperately seeks. - Global Experts (www.theglobalexperts.org), a project of the UN Alliance of Civilisations

**** Ian Bancroft is the co-founder and executive director of TransConflict (www.transconflict.com), an organisation undertaking conflict and post-conflict transformation projects and research throughout the Western Balkans.

http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=411426&version=1&template_id=46&parent_id=26

January 22, 2011

Fact And Propaganda: Yugoslavia And "Politics Of Genocide"

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=22909

Global Research/Politika Daily
January 22, 2011

Fact and Propaganda: Yugoslavia and The "Politics of Genocide"
by Stanko Stojilkjovic


Is it possible that the prevailing current usage of the word genocide is "an insult to the memory of the Nazi regime's victims"?

This incisive thought of Noam Chomsky was taken from the preface he wrote to an astonishing book titled "The Politics of Genocide" by Edward Herman and David Peterson, published in Belgrade in 2010 by Vesna info.

Edward Herman is a professor emeritus teaching finance at the University of Pennsylvania and David Peterson is a free-lance journalist. What an unusual match, you might think at first. However, if you check the exhaustive list of references you will find out that they have worked on at least two more published books, both dedicated to the former Yugoslavia and its disintegration. David Peterson is author of another dozen published books, either alone or in cooperation with other authors.

According to Noam Chomsky, the end of the Cold War "opened an era of Holocaust denial," in which the humanitarian bombing of Yugoslavia (read: Serbia) is far from being the last piece of the puzzle.

According to "Counter-Revolutionary Violence: Bloodbaths in Fact and Propaganda," written by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky, in the period between 1945 and 2009 the USA organized "major" military interventions in as many as 29 countries. "Thanks to its dominant position and its global counter-revolutionary efforts, the US has been the key single instigator, organizer and provider of moral and material support for some of the heaviest bloodshed that took place after the World War Two.

"US officials, supported by the media and intellectuals close to the administration ("genocide intellectuals"), have mastered the skills of "crime management" used to draw the attention of the public away from the violence instigated and endorsed by the leading global super-power and direct the public eye towards the violence perpetrated by US enemies."

In line with this the authors [Herman and Peterson] have come up with an unusual classification of the bloodbaths into four categories: constructive, benign, criminal and mythical.

"The largest genocidal act undertaken in the last thirty years was the economic sanctions imposed on Iraq following the invasion of Kuwait in 1990, both in respect of the number of victims and in respect of full awareness of the impact of this policy among its creators," reads the introductory section of the book.

The New York Times revealed that "in the long run, Iraq has been pushed back into pre-industrial times, though it still suffers from post-industrial dependence on energy and technology." And the Washington Post, quoting a reliable source, stated that "the bombs… were targeted at everything that was vital for survival of the country." Sounds familiar, doesn't it?

Denis Halliday, the leading UN humanitarian coordinator in Iraq, resigned, issuing a statement that the overall effects of the sanctions were comparable to that of genocide. And Eleanor Robinson, lecturer at the Old Soul College in Oxford (England), added: "You will have to go back in time as far as the Mongol invasion of Baghdad in 1258 to find an example of pillage of comparable magnitude." You can guess who was doing the pillage!

Edward Herman and David Peterson have exposed the ill doings of politicians, intellectuals and reporters who used the word genocide in their reports on the most deadly world crisis since the end of the World War Two (5.4 million dead between 1998 and 2007 in DR Congo) only 17 times, while the killing of 4,000 Albanians in Kosovo and Metohija was qualified as genocide as many as 323 times!

George Robertson, British Defense Minister, admitted during a hearing before Parliament: "Before Račak this year (24 March 1999), the KLA was responsible for more deaths in Kosovo than the authorities of Yugoslavia". The number of killings since 1998 was estimated at 2,000, and 500 of these killings were attributed to Serbian forces.

"During the civil wars in the wake of the disintegration of the former SFR Yugoslavia in the nineties, the USA, Germany, NATO and EU supported national minorities which insisted on breaking away from the federal state and acted against the national group of Serbs who persisted in their efforts to save the former Yugoslavia. That is why the Western powers strongly supported first Croats and Slovenes, later Bosnian Muslims, and finally Kosovo Albanians," explained Edward Herman and David Peterson, quoting a number of critically acclaimed works.

We are also informed that the NATO forces supported, "even coordinated war operations, and as there were numerous cases of ethnic cleansing and ethnically motivated killings, it was only natural that expressions such as ethnic cleansing, massacre and genocide were applied primarily to the war acts of the Serbs." Regarding the "Srebrenica massacre", they say that there is no proof that Serbian forces killed anyone but "Muslim men capable of army service," taking care to evacuate all children, women and the elderly by buses.

"If Račak was a contrived crime, and we believe that it was, then the war sold to the world on the strength of this crime was based on a lie, and therefore any claims that the war was waged on humanitarian grounds must be disputed, if for no other reason then on account of this fact alone," said Edward Herman and David Peterson, referring to their own article "CNN: Sale of a NATO War on a Global Scale" from 2009.

"The Račak massacre" perfectly suited the needs of Bill Clinton's administration and NATO and provided them with an excuse to launch the air attacks against Yugoslavia (Serbia), which had been prepared for a long time, soon after the failure of the negotiations in Rambouillet, "one of the greatest staged deceptions in recent history."

When Madeleine Albright was first informed that the attacks had been launched, she commented with delight: "Spring has come early to Kosovo this year."

This valuable book meticulously reveals the double standards applied to war acts in Darfur (Sudan), Rwanda, Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Guatemala, El Salvador, and so on.

__._,_.___

January 20, 2011

Serbian birthrates languish

Serbian birthrates languish

20/01/2011

Many say they cannot afford children, and the cash-strapped government has only scarce funds available to provide assistance.

By Biljana Pekusic for Southeast European Times in Belgrade – 20/01/11

Serbia has one of the lowest rates in Europe. [Reuters]

In terms of the number of children born each year, Serbia is close to the bottom among European countries. The country currently has a negative population growth rate of minus 3.5%.

The stagnating birth rate will soon cause one of the oldest municipalities in Serbia, Crna Trava, to die out. Each year only around ten babies (eight in 2010) are born in the town, while the average number of deaths is 80 annually. Similar examples can be found across Serbia.

Some couples say economic woes are the reason. "We cannot afford children because my husband and I make less than 200 euros a month," 24-year-old Svetlana Miladinovic, from Knjazevac in eastern Serbia, told SETimes.

"Rent is 50 euros and little remains for the two of us. What would happen if we had a child? A pair of children's shoes costs at least 20 euros, and then there are clothes, food, school and other expenses," she said.

Two years ago, the state officially adopted a strategy for turning the demographic tide. But the assistance it offers is limited. New parents receive a single payment of 300 euros for their first child, upon birth. For a second, third or fourth child, the grant is even lower, and distributed over 24 installments.

The government simply cannot afford to do more, says Minister of Labour and Social Policy Rasim Ljajic. Without enough funds in the budget, it can only provide a minimal amount of maternity leave and other aid.

"Only some 200,000 families receive a allowance for the children's and 61,000 families receive a parents' allowance," he said. "The percentage of child poverty is higher than for adults. Nearly 10% of under age children live under the poverty level."

According to Vladimir Jesic, founder of the child's portal "Bebac", key steps are not being taken.

"Inspectors need to start doing their job and penalise employers who lay off expecting mothers," he said. "Health service must better organise, so that pregnant women do not pay doctors for childbirth, and kindergartens should co-ordinate their hours with parents' working hours. But the state does nothing to help the parents."

In the absence of sufficient state funds, it falls to the municipalities to cover the childcare gap, and only the larger and wealthier ones are able to do so. Belgrade, for instance, still pays 100% maternity leave -- the only city in Serbia where this is the case.

Meanwhile, the town of Jagodina plans to launch an unusual incentive for potential parents. Any couple that decides to marry will receive a gift of 3,000 euros, but only if one of the partners is older than 38.

And there's a string attached: they must give birth to a baby within a set time frame.

"If the couple do not stay together for five years, or have no child in this period, they will have to repay the money, with interest," explains mayor Dragan Markovic Palma.

This content was commissioned for SETimes.com.

http://www.setimes.com/cocoon/setimes/xhtml/en_GB/features/setimes/features/2011/01/20/feature-03

January 17, 2011

Adriatic Sea Ruined By NATO Weapons, Depleted Uranium, Toxic Waste

http://rt.com/news/features/italy-nato-toxic-waste/

RT
January 17, 2011

Dangerous paradise: journalist claims Adriatic polluted by NATO waste

-"Following the war in 1999, the fish have practically disappeared from our waters. The chemicals have affected our health, too, causing skin rashes, blurred vision and so forth."
-"There should be an economic compensation for those affected. Europe, NATO and, above all, the United States must be held accountable."

Sandy beaches, gentle sea and charming tourist harbors: Italy's Adriatic coast can be described as a paradise for sea-lovers. However, few are aware that tons of toxic waste disposed by NATO are piled up below the luminous surface.

According to investigative journalist Gianni Lannes, waters splashing against the coast of the southern Italian region of Puglia hide real hazards.

"An enormous amount of weaponry and toxic waste is present in these waters: US bombs from the 40s, and NATO weapons used in the 1999 war against Serbia, including depleted uranium ammunition," he said. "These weapons often contain toxic substances, such as sulfur, mustard gas and phosphorous."

Local fishermen say the presence of NATO weapons is seriously affecting their lives, and posing a threat to the local ecosystem.

"There are areas where these bombs keep ending up in our nets," said local fisherman Vitantonio Tedesco. "We try to avoid them."

"Following the war in 1999, the fish have practically disappeared from our waters," he added. "The chemicals have affected our health, too, causing skin rashes, blurred vision and so forth."

Fishermen have had to quit their jobs because of the scarcity of fish. The fishing cooperative in the seaside town of Molfetta was once comprised of almost 200 members, now there are just five.

Although NATO says there are six contaminated areas along the Adriatic coast, Lannes claims that is just the tip of the iceberg.

"NATO is lying, 24 areas are affected, not six," he said. "The location of these areas have not even been made public. The population is being kept in the dark."

Lannes' repeated attempts to raise the issue with Italy's Defense Minister have led to nothing. US military spokesman Colonel Greg Julian claims the US Army does its best to remove all dangerous weaponry after its military campaigns.

"We do everything we can, first of all, to comply with environmental law when we conduct operations and exercises," he said. "Following the jettison operations during the Kosovo campaign we conducted those clearing operations and did everything we could to remove the hazards."

However, Gianni Lannes believes NATO has not yet owned up to its responsibilities.

"There should be an economic compensation for those affected," he said. "Europe, NATO and, above all, the United States must be held accountable."

January 16, 2011

California custody battle sparks overseas outrage - Yahoo! News

California custody battle sparks overseas outrage

By JASON DEAREN, Associated Press – Sat Jan 15, 5:31 pm ET

SAN FRANCISCO – When a Serbian man in California gave his work computer to an office technician last July, it prompted a chain of events that have stripped him and his wife of their kids and sparked fury in his home country at the state's child protective services system.

Among about 5,000 personal digital photographs on the Stockton resident's hard drive, the technician noticed a few dozen pictures of the man's two naked children. He reported the pictures to the sheriff's office.

The father, a 20-year resident of the U.S., and his wife were arrested briefly in June on suspicion of child pornography-related charges and released after prosecutors viewed the photos. The San Joaquin County district attorney's office said it had no plan to file any charges unless new evidence came to light.

But the children, ages 8 and 5, who are dual Serbian-U.S. citizens, were placed into protective custody, then foster care, where they remain seven months later.

The family members are not named in this story because The Associated Press does not directly or indirectly identify alleged victims of sexual assault.

The case attracted the attention of the Serbian government and of local and federal law enforcement agencies here which so far have found no basis for criminal charges. But the state's child protection system, with the consent of a judge, deemed that the children remain at risk and has kept them from their parents.

The U.S. Attorney's Office in Sacramento reviewed the photographs after being contacted by Serbia's Consul General, and sent a letter in December to the state Department of Social Services, saying it had determined the offending photos were taken by the son, not the parents.

"Both the San Joaquin district attorney's office and this office declined prosecution of the parents, concluding that the photographs were actually taken by one of the children," U.S. Attorney Benjamin Wagner wrote in the letter obtained by the AP.

Yet San Joaquin County's Child Protective Services agency has refused the couple's requests to return their children, saying there is now evidence that the little girl was molested by the father.

CPS produced a videotaped interview with the 5-year-old girl to make a case that the father had inappropriately touched her, said an attorney for the father, Robert Powell. He said the questions were ambiguous and that the father's conduct amounted to routine contact between a parent and young child, such as drying her off with a bath towel.

Janine Molgaard, an attorney for San Joaquin County's Child Protective Services, said she could not discuss the case but said the agency has a duty to make its own decisions.

"Whenever a case is referred by law enforcement to us, it's our duty to make an independent determination if the children are at risk," Molgaard said. "If continued care by a caretaker endangers them, if we believe it does, then we file a petition to the court."

In this case, the court has sided so far with CPS, keeping the children in foster care.

The affair has triggered outrage in Serbia, with officials there saying they would try to get the children back to the parents as soon as possible — even if it takes intervention through the highest diplomatic channels.

"There are indications of major human rights violations by the Child Protective Service, which is acting on its own," Serbian justice ministry official Slobodan Homen told the AP.

Serbia is now providing funds for the father's attorney, and its Consul General in Chicago, Desko Nikitovic, is advocating on behalf of the couple. He said so far it has been an uphill battle with an agency and local judge with power to do what they want with the children.

"You feel totally powerless, like a mouse in front of an elephant," Nikitovic said.

The couple declined to be interviewed for this article, citing fear of compromising the ongoing legal process. But they have denied the allegations, saying the ordeal has torn a previously happy family apart.

They acknowledge certain of the photographs may "look and feel" inappropriate to some people, but all were taken by the couple's son while playing with the camera.

"The parents do not dispute that they (also) took photographs of their children without their clothes on," said a statement from Powell, a San Jose-based attorney who specializes in child custody cases involving CPS. "However, not a single one of those photos was of a pornographic nature in any way.

"They were commonly seen photos taken by parents of their children, such as in the bathtub and lounging on the couch."

He said the father, who attended college at Auburn University and worked in Modesto as a financial analyst, routinely dumped all of his digital photographs into his work computer, had purchased an external hard drive and had given the machine to his office technician to make the transfer, triggering the custody battle.

Powell said the children have not only been separated from their parents, but from each other and have been denied access to the family's Serbian Orthodox Christian priest, unless the priest speaks to the children in English.

The U.S. Attorney referred the clergy matter to the FBI, and a spokesman said it is "trying to determine if there's been a federal violation."

Nikitovic said the children could not attend Orthodox Christmas services with them in Sacramento on Jan. 6-7, but that the court is now considering allowing the children to attend a Greek Orthodox church in the area.

Meanwhile, the couple continue fighting for their children, and said through their attorney that the children have asked the mother during visits if they are abandoning them.

"They remain in utter disbelief, that although the only pictures that social workers felt were inappropriate are so clearly, and confirmed to be, the result of child's play," Powell said.

 

California custody battle sparks overseas outrage - Yahoo! News

January 15, 2011

Damage Control in the Balkans

Damage Control in the Balkans

Dumping Thaci to Save 'Kosova'

by Nebojsa Malic, January 15, 2011

 

In March 2004, tens of thousands of Albanians rampaged across Kosovo, the occupied Serbian province then still nominally under UN and NATO authority. After three days of murder, arson, pillage, and ethnic cleansing, the 1999 myth of the noble "Kosovar" victims looked to be in tatters. Within weeks, however, the media machine was in overdrive and working the spin. From being initially described as a modern-day Kristallnacht and unmistakable ethnic cleansing, the pogrom was first sanitized into "ethnic clashes" (implying it was a two-sided affair), and eventually not mentioned at all — except as an argument why Kosovo should become an independent Albanian state (!).

Outfits like the IWPR, a government-funded NGO, gave ample space to KLA partisans to make the case about the pogrom really not being the Albanians' fault. They even published a piece by KLA boss Hashim "Snake" Thaci, who argued that the real culprits were those evil Serbs, and the "international community" for denying his "Kosovars" their statehood.

The support for Thaci and the KLA was bipartisan; though renewed engagement in the Balkans looked like a Kerry policy in 2004, it was adopted as the Bush II platform in early 2005. The end result was the February 2008 "declaration of independence" by the Albanians.

If this sounds like a cautionary tale concerning the possible ramifications of the December 2010 Marty report, well, it should be. A month after the Swiss investigator made public the allegations that Thaci and the KLA were not only terrorists, but also murderers, drug and slave traffickers and dealers in stolen human body parts, the damage control is already in full swing.

The Art of Deflection

"Americans should feel betrayed" by the contents of the Marty report, began a January 8 op-ed in the Washington Post, written by Chuck Sudetic. Once a glory-hound reporter in the Balkans, then from 2001-2005 an employee of the Hague Inquisition (ICTY), Sudetic is noted as the "co-author" of ICTY prosecutor Carla Del Ponte's famous memoir, where the charges of Albanian organ trafficking were first mentioned in the West.

That introductory sentence, however, is the strongest sentiment in the entire article. When it comes to what should actually be done about the hideous atrocities attributed to Thaci, Sudetic calls only for a "forceful public statement and … tough closed-door diplomacy." The Empire should examine Marty's evidence, he argues, then set up yet another para-judicial body (or leave it to the ICTY, perhaps?) to put the suspects on trial. If any witnesses survive by then, of course. If the Albanians stall, the Empire should "force the resignation from public office of those responsible for the lack of cooperation." Scary!

Eventually, however, Sudetic flips all his cards over: "Washington should also ensure that Serbia, Russia and other countries do not misuse the Council of Europe report to undermine Kosovo's legitimacy."

For something to be undermined, it first has to exist. That is not the case with the legitimacy of "Kosovo." There simply isn't any, Empire's pathetic word games aside.

BBC's Manufactured Dissent

During the 1999 attack on what was then Yugoslavia, the BBC was one of the vocal NATO cheerleaders (its correspondent from the NATO HQ later got the job as Alliance spokesman). So it is both amazing and infuriating to hear Alistair Burnett, editor of BBC's The World Tonight, talk about "reassessing Kosovo" today.

On one hand, Burnett is refreshingly frank when he says:

"The offensive against Serbia in 1999 was presented by western leaders as a humanitarian act to prevent widespread ethnic cleansing of Kosovo's Albanian population by Slobodan Milosevic's forces. This was widely accepted by western commentators at the time and since then reporting of the conflict in western media has been largely been framed as a story of Albanian victims and Serb aggressors."

Notice he doesn't mention that every word of this reasoning, and the ensuing media coverage, was a lie. What he says is merely that "some of the recent commentary… has challenged this account and questioned whether the intervention and support for independence were misguided."

Oddly enough, one of the examples he quotes is Sudetic's WaPo op-ed. Yet as his own words show, Sudetic emphatically did not challenge the notion of "independent Kosovo"; quite the contrary. Burnett's other example, Neil Clark, has actually been arguing against the Kosovo war for a decade, and that without using euphemisms such as "misguided."

Burnett then had former UN administrator Gerard Galucci on his show, as yet another critic of the current situation.

Wishful Thinking

Galucci, an American, used to be the UN administrator in the city of Mitrovica. South of Mitrovica, the occupied province is dominated not just by Albanians, but by the KLA. The few non-Albanians that survive there live in ghettos, where the only thing between them and brutal death are barbed-wire enclosures and NATO "peacekeepers" — the very troops responsible for their predicament. In Mitrovica, though, the local Serbs made a stand on the bridge across the Ibar river and stopped the KLA in 1999. In that small strip of land in the north of the occupied province, Serbs actually survive — and other communities live unharmed. Thaci's thugs have been trying to "reintegrate" Mitrovica ever since.

In May 2009, Galucci started a blog dedicated to Kosovo issues, "Outside the Walls." His position has been that of a reasonable individual seeking peace through splitting the difference. Since anything short of unequivocal endorsement of the KLA is taken for radical dissent, the KLA have labeled him a "Serb propagandist."

In a recent essay for TransConflict, Galucci argued that Kosovo was a "mess" that needed to be "cleaned up." But what does he suggest? That the "quint" of KLA sponsors should work with Russia to "clean up the mess." Had they been inclined to do so, they would not have endorsed the KLA's declaration of independence in the first place! And he seems to believe that in return for Serbian recognition of KLA's state, the Empire would recognize "Serbian interests, including economic and commercial and vis-à-vis the Church and the Serbian-majority north."

Even the current quislingocracy in Belgrade, absolutely obedient to Empire's every whim, has not dared recognize the "Republic of Kosova." As for the Empire, its policy towards the Serbs has been rather consistent since the early 1990s: they are not allowed to have any interests at all.

Power and Right

Insofar as there is any dissent among the mainstream Western media concerning Kosovo, it falls in the range between Sudetic and Galucci. Both consider the "independent state of Kosovo" as an established, irreversible, legitimate fact, and have said as much, openly.

Hashim Thaci and his supporters have dismissed Marty's report the same way they lashed out at the coverage of the March 2004 pogrom: it was all "Serbian propaganda," aimed at "tarnishing the image" of the KLA and its glorious war. Though not in the way he intended, Thaci is right. The argument is a gigantic Freudian slip, a glimpse of the KLA leader's understanding what his "republic" is really based on.

Everything about the 1999 war was a lie. The alleged atrocities that NATO was allegedly responding to, the alleged plan for mass ethnic cleansing, the alleged mass murder of Albanians — fiction, all. That fiction was used to commit a crime against peace, seize a portion of a country by force, and turn it over to a criminal enterprise that actually committed atrocities and ethnic cleansing, actually trafficked in drugs, sex slaves, and human body parts.

Thaci's claim to statehood is simple: Albanians deserve a state because the Serbs targeted them for genocide, they are a majority in the province, and they have effective control. The first claim is absolutely false. The second is a consequence of ethnic cleansing and abuse alternately encouraged and tolerated by the post-1945 Communist government in Yugoslavia. And the latter amounts to the "right" of conquest — by Imperial force, at that.

But force can only settle the matters of power, not right. In 1999, NATO's force put the KLA into power. What happens when that power is diminished?

The truly damning part of Marty's report is not the sordid list of KLA's atrocities. It is the revelation that the Empire and European powers backing the KLA have been fully aware of Thaci's crimes, yet chose for years to not just turn a blind eye, but suppress any knowledge of them in general. They may now be willing to throw Thaci under the proverbial bus to get rid of the major inconvenience the Marty report represents, but they are nowhere near abandoning their lethal fantasy of an "independent Kosovo."

Read more by Nebojsa Malic

http://original.antiwar.com/malic/2011/01/14/damage-control-in-the-balkans/

Alastair Campbell diaries: The shaping of a war leader

Exclusive extracts

Alastair Campbell diaries: The shaping of a war leader

As Tony Blair's press secretary, Alastair Campbell was at the heart of events in the early years of Blair's premiership, when conflicts with Iraq and Serbia dominated foreign affairs

Alastair Campbell looks on as Tony Blair makes a point in 1998, the first full year of his decade as prime minister. The diary extracts cover events from 1997-1999. Photograph: Jeremy Sutton Hibbert/Rex Features

The first tentative steps towards the most controversial event of Tony Blair's premiership – the 2003 invasion of Iraq – were taken during the period covered in these diaries. In late 1998 Blair sanctioned his first bombing mission as prime minister – a four-day campaign from 16-19 December 1998 against Iraq over Saddam Hussein's failure to co-operate with UN weapons inspectors. In the spring of 1999 he was the driving force behind the Nato mission to expel Serb forces from Kosovo, the first example of what became known as "liberal interventionism".

1998

Saturday 18 April Saudi Arabia We were taken to a ludicrously sumptuous room to wait for the Crown Prince Abdullah. On Iraq, Abdullah said they loved the Iraqi people – they are our brothers. TB [Tony Blair] said we would not threaten the territorial integrity of Iraq. TB said there was always a danger that Saddam would exploit lack of progress in the Middle East.

Wednesday 16 December [first day of bombing] TB was clearly having a bit of a wobble. He said he had been reading the Bible last night, as he often did when the really big decisions were on, and he had read something about John the Baptist and Herod which had caused him to rethink, albeit not change his mind.

[Campbell note John the Baptist denounced the marriage of Herod Antipas, Herod ordered him to be imprisoned and later beheaded.]

Friday 18 December The intelligence guys said SH [Saddam Hussein] had been taken by surprise, and that there had been clear damage to his command structure.

Guthrie [General Sir Charles Guthrie, chief of the UK defence staff] said we were making progress but the chances were we would need all four days to get the job done. TB did his doorstep in the Pillared Room, and was OK on the big argument, but used the line about keeping Saddam in his cage, which none of us really liked.

Saturday 19 December TB was talking to Chirac [Jacques Chirac, president of France] again and working up ideas for a forward containment strategy. Guthrie told us they were going to have to revisit some of the targets because they had not been sufficiently damaged.

TB felt we were in the right place on the strategy of containment. We had to be able to show we had substantially set him back. His doorstep was carried live across the US and elsewhere and with Clinton [Bill Clinton, US president] still mired in the impeachment stuff, the sense was TB had handled things well, but he hadn't enjoyed it one bit.

Sunday 20 December [Sir Charles Guthrie, chief of the defence staff] CDS, George R[obertson, defence secretary] and RC [Robin Cook, foreign secretary], came over to prepare for the morning briefing. Charles was confident we could put over a very good case of the damage done. TB wanted us to emphasise our desire to work closely with the French on the forward diplomatic strategy. He wasn't satisfied with the MoD battle damage assessment paper, and wanted it reordered. Jonathan [Powell, No 10 chief of staff] was arguing against him using the cage line again, but TB felt if we were saying he was worthy of being bombed, we had to be pretty strong in our language about him.

On 26 March 1999 Nato launched its bombing mission against Serbia. The slow pace of the bombing and Nato's struggle to shape a clear message provoked jitters in Downing Street. Amid growing unease in Britain, Downing Street reached out to unlikely bedfellows and Campbell prepared to help out Nato's communications team.

1999

Friday 2 April I was very tired still, and starting to get that achy feeling that exhaustion brings. We were losing the propaganda battle with the Serbs. TB called early on, and wanted a real sense of urgency injected into things. He had spoken to Clinton about the timidity of the military strategy. He had spoken to Thatcher [Margaret Thatcher] last night who was appalled that the NAC and Nato ambassadors discussed [with each other] targeting plans. He wanted the message out that we were intensifying attacks. I said we said that on Wednesday.

Tuesday 6 April Family holiday France

The rightwing commentators were in full cry and we agreed to try to get Thatcher and Charles Powell [former foreign policy adviser to Thatcher] out saying the right hate the left fighting wars but they should be supporting what we are doing. Nato might balk but we were going to have to get a grip of their communications and make sure capitals were more tightly drawn in to what they were saying and doing.

Wednesday 7 April We were having some effect with the strategy for the right, eg Charles Powell and David Hart [former Thatcher adviser] were both going up, but the rightwing papers and commentators so hated us that they were determined to do what they could to help anything fail. If this was a Tory war, they would support it every inch of the way.

Thursday 8 April I was finding it impossible to switch off from it, and was starting to map out more changes I felt we should be making to the communications effort. A lot of this was about communication now. Militarily, Nato is overwhelmingly more powerful than Belgrade. But Milosevic [Slobodan Milosevic, president of Serbia] has total control of his media and our media is vulnerable to their output. So we can lose the public opinion battle and if we lose hands down in some of the Nato countries, we have a problem sustaining this.

Friday 16 April I was up at 5.30 and got the 6.53 train to Brussels. [Nato communications director Jamie] Shea said he had been fascinated how we had changed our approach to the media as New Labour and he was sure there were lessons they could learn. I said we didn't have much time. I felt we needed more people, better integrated. We needed a strategic approach to communications, greater centralisation, so that all capitals felt involved in what we were saying and doing, and also felt obliged at least to know what the line here was, even if they then felt unable to toe it.

I told [Nato secretary general Javier] Solana if he wanted me to come out again, he just had to say. He said he loved the way we had "tamed" the media. I said we hadn't, we'd just made them think we had.

[Nato supreme allied commander, US General Wesley] Clark let me talk for a fair old while. He said "Well, I like a lot of what you're saying. And I kid you not, we have to get something done, because we are on the brink of a disaster." It was pretty alarming to hear him say it so bluntly, just as I found it alarming when, as I was leaving, he took me by the arm and said "Good luck, Alastair, we're all counting on you!" I said "Shouldn't I be saying that to you?"

I found it a bit scary that at the height of a military campaign, I was sitting down telling a general how to run it, or at least run the media side, and complaining that the media campaign lacked the discipline we expected of a military campaign. I also assured him I was no Freedom of Information freak, and indeed felt they were sometimes giving out too much. I said I would not have shown the bombing of the train. It did not benefit us at all. If you are fighting a war, it has to be fought like a war at every level.

As the military campaign dragged on, Blair was determined that Nato should be prepared to deploy ground forces – to the fury of some in Washington. Blair used a visit to Washington for a summit to mark the 50th anniversary of Nato to make the case for ground troops.

Wednesday 21 April The White House

TB said we have to generate more uncertainty in Milosevic's mind re whether we would use ground troops. Bill [Clinton] said he was not as negative as Sandy [Berger, US national security adviser]. He said it would be irresponsible not to do some planning, but in a way that doesn't split the alliance.

Thursday 22 April [TB said] if Bill is unsure, and I go all out to persuade him, as this cannot be done without the US, how much are we putting our relations at risk? Jonathan [Powell] reminded him of the time Thatcher told Bush [US president George HW Bush] this was not the time to go wobbly. [They had been discussing the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait in August 1990.]

The difference, TB pointed out, was that "she had been PM a long time, and I have only been here two years". But he said he wanted to see BC [Bill Clinton] again and emphasise we could not live with a messy deal. He felt strongly that there was a fresh place in history for BC here that blew away all the rubbish about his personal life. He said repeatedly it was a moral question. He was really fired up and even though he was wearing just socks and underpants, it was hard not to take seriously what he was saying, though I was constantly chivvying him to get dressed.

Blair flew to Chicago to deliver one of the most important foreign policy speeches of his premiership in which he established the principle of liberal interventionism. The speech laid down the conditions under which one sovereign state could attack another.

TB was getting more and more steamed up at the idea that we were asked to help in an operation that may end in just such a messy deal. If it did, he said he would never again lend our troops to such an operation.

Sunday 25 April Third Way seminar

[German chancellor Gerhard] Schröder asked me how my disinformation campaign was going. I said it would go a lot better if we had a few more Germans in it. TB took Bill into a private room, just the two of them, where he pressed him again on ground troops, saying we really needed a proper fix on where we were heading, that it could only be done if the US were clear they would be there when the time came. He said afterwards Bill was much more amenable.

He also said I should basically run the whole media operation.

Tuesday 27 April Car journey and then dinner at chateau outside Brussels used by Nato supreme allied commander General Wes Clark He told me of a bomb they were intending to use that could destroy an area the size of four football fields, and then grenades would go off, and spread further. He said the Serbs don't know we have it. The question is do we warn them or just use it?

Not easy. I said if you do end up using it, make sure we have enough time before you do to have a proper explanation for its use.

Thursday 29 April Downing Street

I pointed out [to TB] in BC's defence that most of the others were in the same place on ground forces – Schroeder, Chirac, Yeltsin. But the military say it can't be won without it, he said.

The diary ends on 30 April 1999

This is an edited extract from The Alastair Campbell Diaries Volume Two: Power and the People 1997-1999, by Alastair Campbell, to be published by Hutchinson at £25 on 20 January. To order a copy for £20.00 with free UK p&p go to guardian.co.uk/bookshop or call 0330 333 6846