April 24, 2018

Fake Democracy: The CIA and their NGOs Target China and Yugoslavia in the 1990s

Fake Democracy:The CIA and their NGOs Target China and Yugoslavia in the 1990s


Published time: 19 April, 2018

Failed CIA attempt to bring down the Communist state apparatus in China; George H.W. Bush's involvements in China; US influences Chinese economic policy; 1989 student pro-democracy protests in Tiananmen Square; Albert Einstein Institute; Gene Sharp's From Dictatorship to Democracy: A Conceptual Framework for Liberation; non-violence as a weapon of warfare; Soros' Fund for the Reform and Opening of China; Western media report Tiananmen massacres; fake news about a fake massacre; Operation Yellowbird; US considers independent Europe a threat; US strategy for war in the heart of Europe; controlled oil crises create unsustainable Yugoslav IMF debt; 1991 US Foreign Operations Appropriations Act; US funding of fascist organizations; Milosevic tries to prevent break-up of Yugoslavia; Izetbegovic reneges on Lisbon Treaty; Mujahideen terror-war model brought into minority Muslim Bosnia-Herzegovina; Yugoslavia civil war revives the role of NATO in Europe; Nasr Oric; Srebrenica massacre; Operation Deliberate Force against Serbia; Clinton's 79-day bombing of Belgrade; Milosevic taken down by Otpor!; Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo ... To read / listen further, click here

 

April 14, 2018

Limited US action against Syria suggests conflict unlikely to escalate

theguardian.com

Limited US action against Syria suggests conflict unlikely to escalate | World news

Ewen MacAskill

7-9 minutes


The US-led operation against Syria, which included contributions from the UK and France, was a modest one, limited to a short, sharp attack against targets alleged to be linked to chemical weapons.

It is intended as a one-off, with no further strikes planned unless the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, conducts chemical attacks in the future.

There had been speculation in advance of the attack that there was a risk it could lead to world war three. It was far from that.

The operation involved more weapons than the strike the US conducted unilaterally against a Syrian airbase last year. On that occasion, 20 Syrian planes were destroyed, estimated at 20% of the Syrian air force. The US fired 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles in that attack: no planes were used, to minimise the risk of American losses.

What you need to know about the Syria strikes – video report

The attack in the early hours of Saturday morning involved almost twice as many, 110 missiles. That is not a major escalation. There were only three targets, including a research and scientific institute on the outskirts of Damascus and a storage space west of Homs, alleged to have been used to store precursors, which was hit by the RAF.

The main overall aim, apart from sending a message to Assad to desist from chemical weapons attacks, was to keep as far away as possible from Russian and Iranian positions, to avoid widening the conflict by directly drawing in Russia or Iran.

In spite of Russian rhetoric during the week of potential retaliation in the event of the attack, in reality Russia is far short of the military strength it enjoyed as part of the Soviet Union, with Moscow as anxious as Washington to avoid conflict. In almost every area other than nuclear weapons, Russia is heavily outnumbered in terms of defence spending and equipment compared with the US.

The US spends about $550bn annually on defence compared with Russia's $70bn. To take just one indicator, Russia has one ageing aircraft carrier while the US has 20.

To help avoid conflict, the US warned the Russians in advance that the attack was coming and the air corridors that would be used, but not the targets.

'A strong deterrent': Trump announces strikes on Syria – video

The US aim in Syria, as Donald Trump indicated before the Douma attack, is to leave Syria as soon as the US judges Islamic State to have been totally defeated. The attack does not change that. It was not used to attempt regime change. Assad's presidential palace, exposed on a high hill above Damascus, was left off the target list.

Assad could well be relatively happy with the outcome and the impact on him may be even less than the US raid last year. Most of his air force, as well as helicopters allegedly used to deliver the chemical weapons, remains intact.

The US, British and French escaped unscathed. There was a risk from the relatively sophisticated air defence system that Russia has or even from the more antiquated Syrian ones. An Israeli plane crashed in February, which the Syrians claimed they had downed. The RAF had four Tornados in action, but at no point did they enter Syrian air space, instead flying close to the the RAF Akrotiri base in Cyprus, and firing the Storm Shadow missiles, which have a range of about 300 miles.

Another potential risk that failed to materialise was that an attack on chemical weapons might spread the poison, engulfing Syrian military personnel and civilians. Chemical weapons inspectors suggested such an outcome was unlikely, as a missile would blow up chemical weapons.

The other risk was for a miscalculation that led to high civilian casualties. Although the US and UK military insist missiles are more precise and intelligence better, mistakes happen. In the 1991 Iraq war, the al-Amiriyah bomb shelter in Baghdad was hit killing more than 400 civilians, and there was the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999.

Amateur footage shows missiles falling over Damascus as airstrikes begin – video

To try to avoid Russian or Iranian or civilian casualties, the US, British and French planners opted for targets they believed were far enough away to avoid such an outcome.

Trump contributed to the hysteria that the world was on the verge of WWIII with his tweet: "Russia vows to shoot down any and all missiles fired at Syria. Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and "smart!"

In spite of rhetoric on the Russian side to match Trump's hysteria, claiming they would shoot down incoming missiles and retaliate against US and other targets, they settled only for monitoring the incoming missiles and did not attempt to shoot them down.

Moscow could respond, as it has threatened, by upgrading Syria's air defence systems, which could worry Israel. And they could yet retaliate in some other region or by using deniable hybrid warfare, such as a cyber-attack. But equally, looking to showcase the upcoming World Cup, they might opt for a period of calm.

The UN secretary general, António Guterres, had warned just hours before the raid that the cold war was back with a vengeance, potentially more dangerous because the old mechanisms for managing conflict seemed to have disappeared.

But, as the night demonstrated, the mechanisms are still in place, still intact and worked as they were meant to. The US was in communication with the Russians. And the Russians did not retaliate.

In the end, this raid was about as modest a one as the US-led coalition could mount, more symbolic than anything else.

 

In Third World War Now Going On, ‘Russia has No Allies,’

windowoneurasia2.blogspot.ca

Window on Eurasia -- New Series: In Third World War Now Going On, 'Russia has No Allies,' Venediktov Says

3 minutes


Paul Goble

            Staunton, April 14 – A third world war has been going on since at least NATO's bombing of Belgrade in 1999 and Russia's intervention in Georgia in 2008, Aleksey Venediktov says. But it is a very different war than those in the past, one where the participants are not trying to seize territory but rather secure influence over other states.

            In this conflict, which may go from cold to hot, the editor of  Ekho Moskvy tells Kazan's Business Gazeta in an interview portions of which were posted online today, "Russia has no allies" and thus can depend on no one but itself as events both planned and unplanned unfold (business-gazeta.ru/article/378902).

            This war or more hopefully conflict "really is a world wide one; it is simply that certain players like China are not very visible, but they are taking an active part in it."  The goal in this conflict is different than that in the past: earlier states sought to gain territory; now, however, they are seeking not the territorial re-division of the world but rather one of influence.

            Putin, Venediktov continues, constantly refers to the need to return to the Yalta-Potsdam system in which "every great power has its own sphere of influence."  But Ronald Reagan in 1987 made clear that there would never be a Yalta-type system again. That has remained US policy.

            But the important thing for Moscow to remember is that "in this war, Russia does not have any allies," the Ekho Moskvy editor says.  "Putin," he continues, "is an extraordinarily careful individual … Therefore, I think, if he were to sense the chance of a shift of the war into a hot phase, he would take measures," knowing the capacities of the Western allies and China.

            The danger of escalation even to a nuclear exchange nonetheless exists because of the possibilities of accidents. When the militaries of various countries are in one place, their commanders may respond "without waiting for a call from Moscow or Washington or Jerusalem or Damascus" and then things can go wrong.

            According to Venediktov, the forces of both Russia and the Western allies "have received orders to avoid any clash. But I am concerned because an accident is possible," one that was like the downing of a Russian plane by Turkey. If something like that happened again, then there is "a high degree of probability" that it could "lead to an escalation, political at a minimum."

 

April 10, 2018

In a New Cold War With Russia, Balkans Become a Testing Ground

nytimes.com

In a New Cold War With Russia, Balkans Become a Testing Ground

Steven Erlanger

11-14 minutes


 

A view of Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina. After years of neglect, the European Union is again turning its attention again to the Western Balkans. Andrew Testa for The New York Times

SARAJEVO, Bosnia and Herzegovina — Cradle of the First World War, the Balkans have been a flash point, a place where empires, ethnicities and religions abut and contest. Now, analysts warn, the region is becoming a battleground in what feels like a new Cold War.

Russia, they say, is expanding its influence and magnifying ethnic tensions in countries that hope to join the European Union. Its involvement has already spurred Brussels to revive dormant aims for enlargement. It is also prompting fresh attention from Washington about security risks to NATO members.

After the concerted Western response to the poisoning in Britain of a former Russian spy and his daughter, expelling around 150 Russian diplomats and intelligence officers, "the Balkans become even more important," said Mark Galeotti, a senior researcher at the Institute of International Relations in Prague.

"Russia is looking for ways to retaliate that are asymmetric and provide Moscow opportunities," he said.

In a new paper for the European Council on Foreign Relations, Mr. Galeotti says that "Russia looks to the Balkans as a battlefield in its 'political war,' " seeking "to create distractions and potential bargaining chips with the European Union."

Charles A. Kupchan, who was Europe director of the National Security Council under President Barack Obama, said that "the Russians are taking advantage of the last part of Western Europe that remains politically dysfunctional."

The situation bears distant echoes of Ukraine, where Russia originally agreed that Kiev could join the European Union — though not NATO — and then changed its mind, leading to the revolution that prompted Moscow to annex Crimea and foment secession in eastern Ukraine.

In the Balkans, the competition with Russia has the potential to sow fresh instability in a region still emerging from the vicious war of 1992-95 that broke apart the former Yugoslavia.

In Sarajevo, many of the scars of the war have been erased. The former Holiday Inn, once a nearly windowless shelter for reporters near Snipers' Alley during the Bosnia war, is restored and busy. The neo-Moorish City Hall, a monument to multiculturalism that was shelled and burned, has been burnished to a high standard.

Yet Bosnia and Herzegovina, the broken country patched together in 1995 at the end of the war, remains a fragile construct, riven by corruption, weak leadership, and ethnic and nationalist strains among communities — a metaphor for the Balkans.

 

Greeks demonstrating in Athens in February over neighboring Macedonia's use of that name. Valerie Gache/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

It is one of several key entry points that Russia is seeking to exploit, Mr. Kupchan said, as the leader of the Serb semiautonomous region known as Republika Srpska, Milorad Dodik, continues to press for an independence referendum. The others include Macedonia, where relations between ethnic Albanians and ethnic Slavs remain tense, and between Kosovo and Serbia.

Wary of Russian meddling, the European Union is holding out a renewed prospect of membership to Bosnia and to the other five nations of the Western Balkans — Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Albania and Kosovo — in return for fundamental structural reform.

The skepticism among these countries about Brussels is deep, however. Many doubt the sincerity of a European Union that is turning more inward, more populist, more wary about migration and more cautious, after Romania and Bulgaria, about taking in nations before they are ready for membership.

No one believes any of these countries is yet ready to join. But the urgency for reform fell away as the goal receded.

Four years ago, the head of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, said there would be no more quick enlargement of the bloc, sending the process into somnolence.

It has been, as the Macedonian foreign minister, Nikola Dimitrov, often says, like "being locked in a waiting room with no exit."

"Juncker made a mistake to say that he was not interested in enlargement," said Carl Bildt, a former Swedish foreign minister and United Nations special envoy to the Balkans. "The E.U. took its eye off the ball for several years, with detrimental effects."

But with Britain leaving the bloc and Russia playing on the fissures of the region, the European Union has now laid out a relatively detailed plan for the Balkans.

It has even gone on record to say that if all goes well, Serbia and Montenegro, the only two countries now engaged in an accession process and hence the front-runners, could join by 2025.

The bloc's strategy for the Western Balkans, published in February, laid out six initiatives: rule of law; security and migration; socio-economic development; transport and energy connectivity; digital agenda; and "reconciliation and good neighborly relations."

 

In Bosnia, the leader of the Serb autonomous region known as Republika Srpska, Milorad Dodik, continues to press for an independence referendum. Laura Boushnak for The New York Times

Bulgaria, the current president of the bloc, will hold a special Balkans summit meeting in May; the Balkans are on the agenda for the European Council in June; and the British will be hosts of a Western Balkans summit meeting in July, just before NATO has its own meeting in Brussels.

"It is time to finish the work of 1989," said Johannes Hahn, the European Union commissioner in charge of enlargement. "We have set 2025 as an indicative date for Serbia and Montenegro, which is realistic but also very ambitious."

Mr. Bildt said tartly: "Whether this is realistic or not remains to be seen."

Many think it is too ambitious, given that the bloc insists that all these countries settle their numerous, passionate border disputes. There are also serious internal problems, the bloc's report acknowledged.

"Today the countries show clear elements of state capture, including links with organized crime and corruption at all levels of government and administration, as well as a strong entanglement of public and private interests," it said.

There is strong evidence of "extensive political interference in and control of the media" and lack of independence in the judiciary, it noted.

Add to that uncompetitive economies and the flight of young people looking for better jobs, and prospects seem dim.

But now the Americans are suddenly more interested, too. Renewed Washington concern "stems in part from concerns about expanded Russian influence," said A. Ross Johnson, noting that Congress now demands that the Defense Department provide "an assessment of security cooperation between each Western Balkan country and the Russian Federation."

Russia has made it clear that it considers new NATO expansion to the Western Balkans as unacceptable, and Moscow was implicated in a strange coup attempt in Montenegro in 2016 before that country joined NATO.

Russia is trying to establish itself in the region, both with government and business, so that when these countries do finally enter the European Union, "they will bring Russian influence with them," Mr. Galeotti said.

The strategy is similar to what China and Russia are doing with Greece and Cyprus, widely considered places where Russian money can be laundered into euros.

 

The river Ibar divides the Albanian and Serbian areas in Mitrovica, Kosovo. Andrew Testa for The New York Times

Russia is also deeply engaged in local language media, both with Kremlin-owned websites like Sputnik and with bots that harp on local grievances.

Mr. Bildt points in particular to Russian investment in critical Serbian infrastructure, like energy. Though Russian investment pales compared with that of the European Union countries, Serbia has a natural affinity to its Russian Orthodox brethren and remembers Russian support during the Kosovo war.

"Is the E.U. sensitive enough to what is happening in Serbia?" Mr. Galeotti asked.

He thinks not. "E.U. policy has generally been to support whatever keeps the Western Balkans quiet," Mr. Galeotti said. "It's deeply dangerous and creates the perfect environment for Moscow to play its games."

Brussels, he and others say, should put more weight behind both the carrots and the sticks — offering genuine incentives for institutional reform and accession, and genuine sanctions if not.

A former senior United States official called the region a new Cold War battlefield, and said that Brussels was too rigid with the ways it tries to keep people on the good behavior track, while the money is not as connected as it should be to reform goals.

The official, who asked for anonymity to preserve influence in the region, said that the countries reformed only when Brussels and Washington worked together to push leaders hard to break old habits of corruption, state capture, a politicized judiciary and Russian shell companies trying to take over key infrastructure and media.

But Europe is not eager to import more problems. "The argument is that only by taking in the Balkan states are we assured to strengthen stability," said Norbert Rӧttgen, the chairman of the German Bundestag's foreign affairs committee. "But is that true?"

"If we import fragile states into the E.U., we import fragility," he added. "If we compromise on conditions, we let in fragile countries open to foreign influences, so we have to be tough on the entry requirements."

The irony of history, Mr. Bildt mused, is that had Yugoslavia remained together, it almost surely would have been in the European Union by now, having been well ahead in 1990 of current members Romania and Bulgaria.

"If the wars of dissolution hadn't happened, all of this area would have been an E.U. member," he said. "The Balkans have always lived best when integrated into a wider framework, as necessary today as in the past, and the one available today is the European Union."

Mr. Kupchan remains an optimist. "We know where this story will ultimately end, with all the former Yugoslav states integrated into the European Union," he said. "But when?"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/world/europe/european-union-balkans.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Feurope&action=click&contentCollection=europe®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=sectionfront

 

 

Envoyé de mon iPad