July 25, 2018

Serbia would rather die than recognize Kosovo

pravdareport.com

Serbia would rather die than recognize Kosovo

Lyuba Lulko

6-8 minutes


Belgrade has come very close to recognizing the independence of the province of Kosovo and Metohija. The European press has written a lot on the subject prior to the meeting between Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and Kosovo leader Hashim Thaci in Brussels on July 18. What prevented the signing of the fateful document?

European officials assured that everything was ready for signing the agreement on the comprehensive normalization of relations. This is one of the main conditions for Serbia's admission to the EU, which was the main pre-election promise of Aleksandar Vucic. On the eve of the "fateful meeting," he visited Paris, where he received approval for the negotiations from Emmanuel Macron. Why Paris, but not Brussels or Berlin? Perhaps, these two centers of European influence lose their role of "Washington's poodle."

In turn, Hashim Thaci had a meeting with Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev on July 9. The two officials met in Ankara, Turkey, during the inauguration ceremony of Turkish President Recep Erdogan. Thaci asked Medvedev about mediation at the talks with Serbia. Nevertheless, the news about the failure of the talks came on Wednesday, July 19. Vucic and Thaci failed to find a compromise.

According to B92 website, Thaci's meeting with his Serbian counterpart was "the most complicated one in the last six years." The Kosovo leader still sees light at the end of the tunnel, but it will be "extremely difficult" to come close to it to see it better,

"Serbia still considers Kosovo as part of its territory. Both Serbia and Montenegro should understand that Kosovo is a sovereign state. We will work to reach the final agreement that will be good for both countries, but there will be more difficulties in the coming days and months," concluded Thaci.

In his brief statement to the press, Aleksandar Vucic said that the talks were not easy. "We agreed on two things. First - to continue the talks and try to find a common denominator for a common solution. Secondly, we agreed to preserve peace and stability in relations between Belgrade and Pristina," Vucic said, B92 reports.

When asked whether Belgrade could accept Kosovo's independence, the Serbian president said: "I discuss this every day - whether we are going to reach a compromise, and what kind of a compromise it will be. The only compromise solution offered by all Kosovo political forces, especially Hashim Thaci and all the rest, is the recognition of the independent state of Kosovo, which does not work."

Thus, the recognition of Kosovo by Serbia and the subsequent accession of these territories to the EU is postponed, although the Kosovars had hoped that Paris would put good pressure on Belgrade with Washington's help, at least to remove obstacles for the province on the way to international organizations. One could hold a referendum afterwards.

Serbia de facto recognized Kosovo a long time ago. All Serbian state institutions in Kosovska Mitrovica were liquidated, the local police became part of the Kosovo police. The parties even agreed on the demarcation of the border, which they only call differently. Why was it hard for Vucic to take the decision through the parliament, where his party has a majority? Perhaps, he failed to do it because of the opposition, which Serbia refers to as "pocket" opposition.

"Vucic wants to present his betrayal as patriotism, to make everyone believe that it was him who concluded an agreement and found a compromise with the Albanians to ensure peace and future for our children. In fact, however, he had abandoned Kosovo on Serbia's way to the EU," Bosko Obradovic, the leader of the "Doors" party said.

The second reason behind the failure in the talks could be as follows: Macron must have said something to Vucic, whereas Medvedev must have said something to Thaci. Probably, the matter is about global shifts in the policy of Russia and Europe in connection with the "perestroika" in the United States.

One thing will remain unchanged: both Russia and Serbia will always be the "bad guys" for the West. After the Serbs recognize Pristina, they will be forced to give away Bujanovac and Presevo - "historically Albanian territories." Their Orthodox churches and monasteries will be closed, and many other pretexts will be found not to welcome them to the EU. A report from the British Foreign Affairs Committee published for the NATO summit in London said that it would take Serbia 50-60 years to prepare for EU membership. In addition to the "chronic economic stagnation," Serbia has many other obstacles, such as constant bilateral disputes and ethnic conflicts, the report said.

Slobodan Nikolic, chairman of the Russian Party of Serbia, told Pravda.Ru that Vucic has been in power since 2012. "He has long agreed with the West to recognize Kosovo. He wants to hold a referendum in 2019 to change the status of the province in order to be given a free hand for his actions. Vucic has a lot of power among MPs, and all structures connected with the business sector and politics support him. We are a country that virtually remains under occupation. We signed an agreement enabling NATO troops pass through Serbia freely. The quantity of joint activities that we have with NATO outnumbers those with Russia three or four times," Slobodan Nikolic said in an interview with Pravda.Ru.

In 2008, the province of Kosovo and Metohija, by EU's behest, unilaterally proclaimed independence from Belgrade.

The reason for the violation of the inviolability of European borders after WWII is the bloody war that can no longer continue. In Europe, they prefer not to recollect the fact that it was NATO that started that war and destroyed the sovereign state of Yugoslavia. Today, most countries of the world recognize the sovereignty of the region. However, Serbia, Russia, China, India, Spain, Greece, Slovakia, Cyprus, Romania and several other countries do not recognize it a sovereign territory. Kosovo is currently home to about 100,000 Serbs, who mainly reside in the north of the province, in Kosovska Mitrovica.

Lyuba Lulko (Stepushova)
Pravda.Ru

Read article in Russian

 

July 22, 2018

The Painstaking Hunt for War Criminals in the United States

newyorker.com

The Painstaking Hunt for War Criminals in the United States

By Eric Lichtblau5:00 A.M.

20-25 minutes


 

Mike MacQueen has spent three decades tracking down war criminals who have been hiding in the United States. His job description is akin to that of a police detective.

Illustration by Brian Stauffer

A few years ago, Mike MacQueen, a historian working for the Department of Homeland Security, was at his desk combing through decades-old Bosnian military records, in search of war criminals who had eluded justice. The documents listed the names of top officers in a batallion implicated in the massacre of at least a thousand Muslim prisoners at a schoolhouse and dam in eastern Bosnia, in 1995. He noticed that the name of one Bosnian Serb officer kept showing up in the logs: Ilija Josipović.

MacQueen had turned himself into an unlikely expert on the war that unfolded in the Balkans two decades ago, mastering the Serbo-Croatian language, making two dozen trips to the region, and becoming so well schooled in the war crimes that Bosnian prosecutors had flown him over repeatedly to testify at trials. He had familiarized himself with the names of many of the key figures involved in the atrocities, but he had never come across Josipović (pronounced yoh-SIP-oh-vitch). He made a note to himself to find out what happened to the Serb officer.

MacQueen, who is sixty-eight, has spent the last three decades tracking down war criminals who have been hiding in the United States. His role, first with the Justice Department and then with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has been to find offenders who made it into America posing as refugees. His official title is senior historian, but MacQueen's job description is more akin to that of a police detective.

 

Mike MacQueen in his office in Washington, in February, 2015. He works for the Human Rights Violators and War Crimes Unit, part of the Department of Homeland Security.

Photograph by Drew Angerer / The New York Times / Redux

His obsession with war crimes has taken him overseas to interview survivors or obtain documents from authorities in Bosnia, Croatia, and Lithuania. Sometimes, it has meant knocking on the doors of unwitting suspects in the United States. But on many days, it has meant simply sitting in his office, not far from the Capitol, and examining one document after another from some three hundred thousand pages of records about the conflict that he has gathered.

It can be tedious work, MacQueen told me. A tiny phonetic mistake in a foreign dialect can imperil a case. MacQueen's other preoccupation is building race cars. He uses the same detached precision to describe how he pieces together war-crimes cases as he does when explaining how he rebuilt an engine that blew out on his MG Midget during a recent race in West Virginia. Acts of mass killing can sound almost mundane as he recounts zeroing in on a suspected war criminal. "I guess it's the banality of investigating evil," he told me, a variation of Hannah Arendt's famous phrase.

After finding Josipović's name in the logs that day, MacQueen set out to learn what Josipović did during the war. Records listed him as an officer in an important logistics role at a time when the Bosnian-Serb Army was murdering eight thousand Muslim men and boys at Srebrenica, in what would become Europe's first genocide since the Second World War. He didn't appear to be a low-level triggerman but, rather, an officer who rose in rank and gained responsibility as the violence grew. Where Josipović lived now was unclear. MacQueen knew that someone with his record should not have been able to get into the United States. But he also knew that the immigration system in the late nineties had allowed hundreds of Bosnian wartime offenders to enter America amid a mass influx of about a hundred and twenty thousand Bosnian refugees. As a precaution, MacQueen searched for Josipović's name in ICE's databases. A hit soon came back—from Akron, Ohio. "Josipović had fallen through the cracks," MacQueen told me. He realized that one of the highest-ranking Bosnian war-crimes suspects he had ever identified had been living quietly in the United States since 2003.

Federal agents with "ICE" emblazoned on their jackets, conducting workplace raids and taking undocumented immigrants into custody, have become a notorious sight under President Trump. But investigators at a separate ICE unit, where MacQueen works, who are largely removed from the raging immigration debate, have carried out a much less visible mission during the past nine years, targeting human-rights offenders who came to America from dozens of countries.

The immigration group, officially known as the Human Rights Violators and War Crimes Unit, currently has more than a hundred and thirty-five active investigations of suspected foreign offenders now thought to be living in the United States, officials said. In April, the unit's investigation into a Liberian warlord living outside of Philadelphia, who had been implicated in murders, rapes, and enslavement in his native country in the nineties, resulted in a thirty-year prison sentence for immigration fraud and perjury—the longest criminal sentence in the team's history.

Most of MacQueen's cases have involved Bosnian Serbs, the group blamed for the bulk of the war crimes during the conflict, but his unit has also moved to jail or deport a number of Bosnian Croats and Muslims who were also accused of atrocities. He says more than fifty of the Bosnian immigrants he investigated have been forced out of the country. (Many cases have not become public, because they came in sealed immigration proceedings.) In January, after thirty years in the federal government, MacQueen officially retired, but ICE asked him to stay on for another five years as a private contractor, because his work on the Balkan front was "invaluable," Lisa Koven, the chief of ICE's human-rights law section, said.

MacQueen is determined to continue working on the investigations of the suspects he has already identified, and help prosecutors prepare to take them to court. His aim is to finish what he began and get as many war criminals as he can forced out of the country. "I don't really need the money," he said.

A native New Yorker, MacQueen comes across as soft-spoken and stoic, with a wry sense of humor, but he admits to losing his temper with suspects whom he believes are lying to him. In an angry confrontation a few years ago with a Bosnian woman in Wisconsin who concealed her involvement with a Serbian military unit, he used a vulgar sexual expression in Serbo-Croatian to show what he thought of her claims of innocence. A judge "gave me a little talking to," MacQueen said. "I have a stunning lack of sympathy for anyone with an unclean record. They can go fuck themselves."

I first interviewed MacQueen five years ago, about his earlier work in hunting Nazis. I was writing a book about the thousands of Nazi war criminals who came to America after the Second World War, and a source mentioned MacQueen's role in breaking a critical case, in 1994, when he was at the Justice Department. For years, prosecutors suspected that a Lithuanian immigrant and naturalized American citizen in Massachusetts named Aleksandras Lileikis, who had led a special police force in Vilnius during the war, was a top Nazi collaborator who ordered the roundup of Lithuanian Jews in the nineteen-forties and turned them over to the Nazis for execution. But the Justice Department couldn't prove it, and Lileikis denied any role in the massacres. "Show me something that I signed," Lileikis had dared a prosecutor who showed up at his door, in Boston, in 1983.

The case languished for a decade, until MacQueen went to Lithuania to examine dog-eared Nazi records that had become available to Americans after the fall of the Soviet Union. MacQueen scoured the Lithuanian archives for days without success. Finally, he found a canvas-bound book with the names of nearly twenty-nine hundred wartime prisoners held in Vilnius typed in Russian. (MacQueen speaks six languages, including Russian, which he brushes up on by watching "The Americans," on FX.) The logs listed hundreds of Jews, many of them children, who were jailed, turned over to the Nazis, marched to an excavation site six miles away, and methodically gunned down. In all, some sixty thousand Lithuanian Jews were massacred. In thick black ink at the bottom of an arrest order, MacQueen finally spotted the signature: Aleksandras Lileikis, chief of the special security police in Vilnius. Then he found twenty more signatures just like it.

Lileikis was ultimately stripped of his citizenship and returned to Lithuania, in 1996, where he died awaiting trial for war crimes. MacQueen considers this one of the most important achievements of his career. For years, he kept on his bulletin board in his office the Nazis' neatly typed "execution cards" for two of the Lithuanian victims—a six-year-old Jewish girl named Fruma Kaplan and her mother. Lileikis's men had jailed them after they were found hiding in a Catholic family's home. Below Fruma's name on the card was the local Nazi euphemism for what befell her and tens of thousands of others: Befehlsgemass behandelt—"treated according to orders." MacQueen rarely displays much emotion over his investigations, but he had nightmares for years over victims like Fruma. "If you have any human sensibility, it sticks," he told me.

MacQueen switched in 2004 to hunting for the perpetrators of war crimes in Bosnia. "The Nazis were all dying," he said, and a new generation of war criminals were beginning to surface in the United States. In both eras, holes in America's immigration system allowed offenders into the country based on little more than their word about what they did during the war. "We didn't learn our lesson," MacQueen said. "That the whole situation was allowed to repeat itself in Bosnia was historical amnesia."

On July 11, 1995, Srebrenica, a predominantly Muslim enclave in eastern Bosnia that had been declared a United Nations protected safe area, fell to Bosnian Serb forces after U.N. and NATO forces did little to save it. Thousands of Bosnian Muslim men were bused to schools, warehouses, and other buildings that served as makeshift prisons. In the nearby village of Petkovci, soldiers from the 6th Infantry Battalion of the Bosnian Serb Army's Zvornick Brigade herded more than a thousand Muslim men into hot, crowded classrooms. With no food or water, some prisoners "became so thirsty they resorted to drinking their own urine," according to the U.N.'s International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Shouting "Long live Serbia, Srebrenica is Serbian," the soldiers shot some prisoners to death outside the school on July 15th, the tribunal found, then took the rest to a nearby dam and executed them, burying them in mass graves.

Relatives pray during a funeral ceremony in July, 2014, for victims from Srebrenica whose remains were exhumed from a mass grave.

Photograph by Samir Yordamovic / Anadolu Agency / Getty

All told, the U.N. tribunal has implicated the 6th Infantry Battalion in the murders of more than a thousand Muslims from Srebrenica, at the school and elsewhere. Using Bosnian documents and U.S. government records, MacQueen managed to identify a handful of immigrants in Las Vegas, Phoenix, and elsewhere who served in the notorious unit. In 2014, he began focussing on Josipović. "I just kept finding more and more stuff on this guy," he told me. The other 6th Battalion members he had found living in the United States were lower-level soldiers, but the logs placed Josipović several rungs above them, with a rank of company commander and the role of the chief logistics officer for the battalion in mid-1995. Piecing together Bosnian Serb Army personnel records from 1992 to 1995, he was able to track Josipović's whereabouts in those years, his promotions in rank, and, most important, his senior role at the 6th Battalion headquarters in July, 1995, in Petkovci, at the time of the killings of the Muslims from Srebrenica. There were no eyewitness accounts of Josipović's role, but MacQueen found documents that showed he had significant responsibility for a range of operations, including summoning the trucks needed to shuttle prisoners to the execution site and dispatching personnel to clean up the blood and waste from the school. Josipović "was a key functionary without whom mass-murder operations could not be carried out," MacQueen told me. A former prosecutor in Bosnia, speaking on condition of anonymity, described Josipović as a "medium to big fish" in the Petkovci operation.

In 2003, Josipović settled in the United States. On the surface, his life looked like that of many other Bosnian refugees. He was married, with three children. He spoke spotty English, but held a steady factory job. He had a house and a mortgage in a blue-collar area of Akron near a local diner. He'd received a few traffic tickets but had no major run-ins with the law.

In 2012, Bosnian officials asked the U.S. government to interview Josipović, because they thought he might have information that could help in their investigation into the 6th Battalion's top commander, Ostoja Stanišić. F.B.I. agents questioned Josipović in Akron—not as a suspect but as a possible witness. He told them that he hadn't served in the battalion and knew nothing about the commander. Two years later, MacQueen began his own investigation and learned about the F.B.I. interview. He was frustrated to read in the F.B.I.'s report just how easily Josipović had evaded scrutiny. Josipović "blew smoke" and "Bureau agents wrote it all down," MacQueen said. The F.B.I. declined to comment on the case.

In September, 2014, MacQueen obtained a search warrant and, accompanied by four immigration agents, knocked on Josipović's door. After the visitors showed Josipović their credentials, Josipović became agitated, but he agreed to answer some questions, MacQueen told me. The conversation started civilly, in English, but he began cursing in Serbo-Bosnian as questions turned to the war.

Josipović again denied serving in the military. MacQueen brought out the records showing Josipović's name, rank, and identification number. "How do you square what you're telling me with this?" he recalled asking. Josipović got his eyeglasses and began reading. He declared the records a forgery. "I don't know who made this document," MacQueen recalled him saying. It had been authenticated, MacQueen told him. Josipović's story shifted. He had served in the 6th Battalion, he admitted, but he wasn't in Pekovci. He had "granted himself leave," he said, and was visiting relatives across the river in Serbia. MacQueen didn't believe him. The bloodletting at Petkovci involved the entire unit, and Josipović's name was in the officer staffing logs. MacQueen finally left, convinced that Josipović had been lying to American officials for more than a decade.

A military roster for the 6th Battalion of the Bosnian Serb Army's Zvornik Brigade, from July, 1995, lists the name of Ilija Josipovic. War crimes investigators say members of the unit massacred more than a thousand Muslims from Srebrenica on July 15, 1995.

For two years, Josipović's case was stalled owing to a backlog of immigration cases. Photos that Josipović posted on Facebook during that time show him smiling, his graying hair cropped short, as he posed with his children at a family wedding and at a graduation ceremony for his daughter with balloons in hand. Early last year, things changed. Federal prosecutors in Ohio charged Josipović with immigration fraud, and, three weeks later, just days after his sixtieth birthday, he walked into the federal courthouse in Akron. He had decided to plead guilty, which meant near-certain deportation. His wife, who came from Bosnia with him, had died of cancer two months earlier, and he was eager to take a deal rather than face more serious war-crimes charges. "I figured it was the easiest route to go," he told the judge through a translator, before admitting he had concealed his military service in the Bosnian Serb Army. Prosecutors wanted the sure thing, as well. "This was someone we wanted to get out of the United States as soon as possible," Jason Katz, the federal prosecutor who brought the case with MacQueen's help, told me.

A deportation order came three months later. The U.S. Attorney's Office in Cleveland put out a short press release, picked up by a few media outlets in Ohio, that said Josipović was being deported "for failing to disclose his involvement in a military unit engaged in war crimes in the former Yugoslavia." The statement made no mention of his role as a ranking officer in the 6th Battalion or the unit's involvement in the Srebrenica massacre.

ICE agents put Josipović on a plane back to Bosnia last summer. Boro Josipović, his thirty-one-year-old son, told me that it was "heartbreaking" for him and his two sisters, who all remained in Ohio, to see their father deported after fourteen years in America. His father had no real choice but to conceal his military service from U.S. immigration officials in his application papers, Boro maintained, or he and his wife and three children would never have been let into the country. "He just basically wanted to provide a better life for his family," Boro said. "It was a civil war. From what I knew, he was just a regular officer."

Josipović has been living with a cousin in Zvornik since his deportation, Boro said. I asked to speak to the elder Josipović, but Boro declined several requests to put me in touch with him directly and said his father was uninterested in being interviewed. His health has not been good, Boro told me, and "he doesn't feel like talking about it." Asked whether he thought his father was involved in war crimes, Boro Josipović said he did not really know. He has heard accounts of the Srebrenica killings, he said, ''but there's so many different stories. I really don't know what happened. God only knows.''

Bosnian authorities had told MacQueen that they would consider prosecuting Josipović on war-crimes charges. MacQueen was hopeful but not confident. Over the years, he had seen many suspects—both Nazis and Bosnians—escape the punishment he thought they deserved, and human-rights advocates have long complained of uneven justice for Balkan war criminals. The U.N. war-crimes tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, which closed last December, after twenty-four years, brought charges against a hundred and sixty-one higher-level offenders, including former Yugoslav President Slobodan Milošević, who died while on trial; the Bosnian Serb commander Ratko Mladić, the so-called Butcher of Bosnia, who oversaw the Srebrenica massacres; and the Bosnian Croat general Slobodan Praljak, who killed himself in court last year by drinking a vial of poison seconds after his sentence was affirmed.

But justice has been more erratic in the cases that have been brought before the Bosnian state court. MacQueen testified as an expert in state court in the joint trial of Stanišić, the 6th Battalion commander, and his top deputy, Marko Milošević (no relation to Slobodan), for crimes of genocide in the killings at the school in Petkovci and nearby dam. Stanišić was found guilty and imprisoned, but his deputy was acquitted because of what the court called a lack of evidence.

Trying accused war criminals remains politically contentious in Bosnia two decades after the conflict. The Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik has called for a referendum to reject the authority of the state court, saying it is biased against Serbs. The state court has an enormous backlog and hopes to resolve five hundred and fifty war-crimes cases involving more than forty-five hundred perpetrators by 2023. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, which monitors war-crimes trials in Bosnia, has observed a dramatic decrease in conviction rates in the state court in the past few years. A 2016 report by the group found that "many potential witnesses have died or emigrated" and acknowledged that it would be impossible to try every perpetrator: "Innumerable crimes were committed by innumerable people. Available resources render it impossible to prosecute all those who committed crimes."

In the case of Josipović, a Bosnian prosecutor "reviewed the available evidence" and "issued an order not to initiate an investigation," Boris Grubešić, a spokesman for the Bosnian state prosecutor's office, told me. That will stand, he said, "unless we find some additional and sufficient evidence."

Free for now from the threat of prosecution, Josipović has been trying to find work in Zvornik, without success, Boro said. Father and son talk on Skype when they can. MacQueen had heard nothing about Josipović for months after his deportation and didn't know about Bosnia's decision not to initiate an investigation. He expressed disappointment but was not altogether surprised. MacQueen's main goal—getting Josipović deported—was accomplished. "We got done what we could do," he said. "He'll never be coming back."

Valerie Hopkins contributed reporting to this article.

Video

The Haunting Cries of Immigrant Children

ProPublica obtained an audio recording reportedly of crying children who had been separated from their parents and detained in a Customs and Border Protection facility in Texas. In the past two months, the government has separated almost two thousand immigrant children from their parents.

 

July 09, 2018

With Serbia and Kosovo both vying for EU membership, the question remains: who won the war?

independent.co.uk

With Serbia and Kosovo both vying for EU membership, the question remains: who won the war?

Robert Fisk Belgrade

57-72 minutes


Who won the war? There are a few ruins left from the Nato bombing of 1998, and outside the parliament building in Belgrade – of "Serbian democracy", more later – there is a long banner containing photographs of the Serbs who were killed in Kosovo two decades ago. Men, women children, civilians, soldiers and, of course, the occasional war criminal or two, or three.

Nato were not exactly surgery clean in its airstrikes, and the "UCK terrorists" (Kosovar Muslim militia) killed civilians. A point to be remembered here: the mass dead of Kosovo itself (from both mass murders by Serbs and promiscuous airstrikes by Nato) have no place on this record of suffering.

So it was a relief to see that Aleksandar Vucic, former sympathiser of Saddam Hussein, and Hashem Thaci, former "terrorist" chieftain in Kosovo, could meet in the EU's offices in Brussels last month as presidents of their respective countries to be told that a legally binding agreement between them was "key for their respective European paths [sic] and essential for sustainable regional stability".

Will Vucic hold a referendum for Serbs "so that the people can decide"? But how can he ask that when he said just over a week ago that "there is nothing good about Kosovo that we can get and offer to the people; just trouble and hard things…"

It sounded like blood, sweat and tears in reverse. The referendum, in EU terms, sounds even worse. Didn't Serbia hold a rather bloody referendum 20 years ago when it decided to fight for Kosovo – and for a rather dotty dictator called Slobodan Milosevic? And after a UK referendum on leaving the EU, who wants a referendum on a bloodbath to get into the EU?

 

July 08, 2018

Serbia recovers from ‘cultural genocide’

theartnewspaper.com

Serbia recovers from 'cultural genocide'

Simon Hewitt

4-5 minutes


The Museum of Contemporary Art Belgrade reopened last October after a $6.8m renovation Relja Ivanic

Museum-goers are used to institutions closing for a year or three in pursuit of ambitious modernisations, but the fate of Serbia's top two museums takes some beating. The National Museum, which is due to reopen in Belgrade on 28 June, last welcomed visitors in 2003. The city's Museum of Contemporary Art, which reopened last October, had been closed since 2007.

This dual hiatus was described by the artist and critic Vladimir Bogdanovic in 2012 as "a cultural genocide against the Serbs". In 2015, the Serbian government erected a digital clock on the façade of the National Museum, ticking down the seconds until its planned reopening the following year. The deadline came and went; so did the clock.

Zoran Eric, the chief curator of the Museum of Contemporary Art, says the "lack of political will to deal with culture or cultural institutions" was finally broken by Ivan Tasovac, the former head of the Belgrade Philharmonic, who "persuaded the political establishment that the reconstruction of the two museums was a priority" during his stint as culture minister from 2013 to 2016.

Founded in 1844, the National Museum has occupied a neo-Renaissance former bank on Belgrade's central square, Trg Republike, since 1952. Its RSD824m ($8.2m) refurbishment has increased the exhibition space to 5,000 sq. m by covering the courtyard and converting the basement into galleries.

The works will allow the museum to show more of its 400,000-strong collection, which ranges from prehistoric times to the 20th century. It is rich in antiquities from the Stobi and Trebenista archaeological sites in Macedonia (former Yugoslavia), numismatics and Medieval art, including icons, frescos and the illuminated 12th-century Miroslav Gospel.

"A lack of political will to deal with culture was finally broken"

The fine art department holds 16,000 paintings, drawings and prints, plus 900 sculptures. Its chief strength is Modern art, especially French, with works by Corot, the Impressionists, Gauguin and Matisse, as well as Van Gogh, Kandinsky and Picasso. Many of these were acquired by the Oxford-

educated Prince Paul, the Regent of Yugoslavia from 1934 to 1941. More than 500 pieces come from the collection of Erich Slomovic, a close associate of the legendary French art dealer Ambroise Vollard. Bernard Berenson and Joseph Duveen also donated works to the museum.

When the distinctive post-war building of the Museum of Contemporary Art reopened after a RSD680m ($6.8m) revamp last October, admission was free for the first ten days. Nearly 50,000 visitors poured in, with queues extending for more than 300 yards across its newly landscaped park. The museum could have made a small fortune by selling drinks but it has no café and little incentive to open one, since most of its income goes to the state.

Paying visitor numbers have since dropped to around 170 a day (a standard adult ticket costs RSD300, around $3). "Considering the overall interest of the Serbian public in contemporary art, the current figures are very good—and much higher than before we closed," Eric says. "Our role is to educate the public."

The new Sequences display charts Serbian and Yugoslav art from the early 20th century to the present. A modular design allows sections to be changed or removed depending on the size of temporary exhibitions. A retrospective for the Serbian conceptualist Ilija Soskic is due to open this October. The Serbian government, meanwhile, is expecting 500,000 visitors to come to the mega-exhibition on Belgrade native Marina Abramovic, planned for September 2019.

"The reopening of the museum is a boost for the city's contemporary art scene," says the local art dealer Ksenija Samardzija, although she acknowledges that the market has some way to catch up. "Serbia still has very few art collectors."

 

July 06, 2018

Diplomats in shock, amnesty for war crimes

kossev.info

Diplomats in shock, amnesty for war crimes

KoSSev

5-6 minutes


Talks on normalisation of relations in Brussels (illustration)

Amnesty for war crimes could be part of what is announced to be the „final agreement" between the negotiating teams of Belgrade and Pristina, or Kosovo and Serbia, Koha Ditore daily reported today while citing „very credible diplomatic sources." As a result, the Special Court will be dismantled. Diplomats are in shock, Koha also stated.

„Some international diplomats were shocked upon hearing of an amnesty for war crimes in Kosovo might be included in the final agreement between Kosovo and Serbia. Very credible diplomatic sources told Koha Ditore that officials in Pristina heard of such a proposal and that there was a level of readiness among the negotiators to do so, both in Kosovo and Serbia,"the Pristina-based newspaper reported.

Such an amnesty is considered „valid for both parties involved in the Kosovo war", and as a result, the Special Court will be thus dismantled.

Koha claims that the Kosovo Presidency has indirectly confirmed that an amnesty might be possible. The government and the ruling parties refused to comment, while the opposition reacted against it.

„New State and Modern Statesman", the lack of the issue in public, previous international warnings

The issue of the Special Court has been vanishing from the public eye for several months now. During that time, Kosovo President Hashim Thaci, who was the subject of frequent speculations that he could be the subject of  an indictment, has presented his book „New State, Modern Statesman" throughout diplomatic circles, and across European capitals.

„In the biography by British authors, Kosovo president and former guerrilla leader Hashim Thaci is portrayed as a superstar. In Pristina, it is believed that the positive image campaign is connected with the fear of war crimes charges," the newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung wrote after  promoting the book at the Diplomatic Academy in Vienna.

„He could be charged with war crimes by the International Criminal Court in Hague. Thaci, who always denied these allegations, has allegedly signed contracts worth millions of euros in recent years with lobby firms and law firms in the US and England. Now the fifty-year-old, with a slicked-back hair and a smile, is shining on the cover of a freshly printed book. Equally flattering is the title: 'New State, Modern Statesman'"- the same newspaper outlined.

The Kosovo Special War Crimes Court has been officially ready for operation since the 5th of July last year. However, there is still no official public information if the first indictments can be issued. During the last year and earlier this year, there were several high-profile international visits to Kosovo and a series of harsh statements of concern due to obstruction against the court operating; also, clear warnings of the consequences if the obstruction continues, including concerns from the State Department.

Meanwhile, judges held their plenary session in May. In March, former prosecutor, David Swendiman, delivered a speech in a crowded room of the Leiden University, „reflecting on the time spent in the role of a specialized prosecutor and the challenges that arise," sending a message that the court has „analyzed and reviewed about 700,000 pages of data, 70,000 documents, about 6,000 related items – videos, photos, transcripts and other materials collected during the investigation to date." Jack Smith was appointed as the new prosecutor,the list of defense counsels was expanded, and Italian Pietro Spera was appointed as Ombudsperson for the Specialist Chambers.

High expectations

The process of the founding of the court followed the report by former Council of Europe Special Rapporteur Dick Marty, who linked the KLA leaders, including, as it was speculated in the public, Hashim Thaci, with serious crimes in Kosovo and organ trafficking. It also followed an investigation by the special prosecutor of the EU Special Investigative Task Force for crimes in Kosovo since 1999, Clint Williamson. Nevertheless, in 2014, Williamson claimed that his team did not find evidence to initiate an indictment for organ trafficking, saying that the findings in the report of the EU Special Investigative Task Force, which was formed after Dick Marty's report, „fully match". This team also found „unquestionable evidence against certain KLA leaders".

For more details on the Special Court and the founding process, see our thematic page „Special Court for Kosovo".

Comments

comments

 


Preuzimanje i objavljivanje tekstova sa portala KoSSev nije dozvoljeno bez navođenja izvora. Hvala na poštovanju etike novinarske profesije.