July 14, 2006

Back to the Balkans: Serbia's Darkest Year

 

 
Serbia's Darkest Year

By Erich Wiedemann and Renate Flottau

It hasn't been a good year for Serbia: First Montenegro voted to secede and now Kosovo wants independence. The football catastrophe suffered by the country's team during the World Cup in Germany has merely added insult to injury.

 
"A present for your chancellor," he says. "Please, take it, it's free." The tousle-headed merchant in Belgrade's Pioneer Park unwraps a yellow porcelain cup and places it on a cardboard box. The inscription reads: "You can take the lives of our heroes, but not our country." What would German Chancellor Angela Merkel do with this patriotic coffee cup? "It'll make her understand that you can't just push around a great people," he explains.

He certainly means what he says, but the man's premise is false. The Serbian people, after storming themselves into irrelevance in a blind rage, are now sitting on the edge of Europe. Because of this, they now feel resentful. It's an understatement to say that 2006 so far hasn't been a good year for Serbia. Indeed, it's rare to see a country -- in peacetime -- forced to endure so many setbacks and disgraces in such a short time span.

The European Union slammed its door in Serbia's face in early March, indefinitely suspending talks over future Serbian EU membership. It was punishment for Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica's government's failure to hand over former General Ratko Mladic, the man accused of the mass murder of almost 8,000 Muslims in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica.

On March 20, unflattering television coverage of the funeral service for deceased dictator Slobodan Milosevic was broadcast around the globe. Montenegro then declared its independence from Serbia in May.

And, of course, there was Serbia's catastrophic showing at the World Cup in Germany, where its national football team lost 0:1 against the Netherlands, 0:6 against Argentina and 1:2 against Ivory Coast. After the match against Argentina, Belgrade newspaper Politika summed up its dejection over the fiasco in an acerbic cartoon depicting an empty football goal and six headstones lined up in front of it. Tabloid Blic wrote that what Serbian fans were witnessing "a descent into hell," clearly the lowest possible point for team and country.

Kosovo pushes for independence

But 2006 isn't over yet -- nor is Serbia's steady disintegration. The next item on the region's agenda is a decision over the future of breakaway province Kosovo. It'll likely end with Albanian-dominated enclave declaring independence from the Republic of Serbia. And then there isVojvodina, an autonomous province threatened by separatism. Balkanization has undoubtedly returned to the Balkans.

Not all the blame lies with Belgrade, of course. The European Union, which sees its role in providing order and stability in the Balkans, has also dropped the ball. EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana now faces precisely the kind of secessionist domino effect he had wanted to avoid. And now that Montenegro is independent, yet another tiny state will be pushing for EU membership.

Controversial Austrian poet Peter Handke has written that Serbia is "Europe's most forlorn country." Handke's political assessments are always a step away from the truth, but when he's right, he's right. Indeed, detractors call him "Serbian Peter."

Is there no light at the end of the tunnel for Serbia? The last politician thought capable of leading Serbia out of the darkness was the pro-European former Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic. He battled corruption and nepotism and turned over Milosevic to the United Nations War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague. He was assassinated in 2003 by gunshots ordered up from the swamp he had tried to drain.

The retired university professor with a Communist Party pin on his label is drowning his sorrows in red wine in the Writers Club at Franzuska 7. He believes that it will take something on the order of the 1389 Battle of Kosovo Polje for Serbia to regain some of its national pride. What exactly he means by this comparison isn't quite clear.

The Battle of Kosovo Polje figures prominently in the Serbs' nationalist mythology. On June 28, 1389, the Serbian Prince Lazar led an army of 30,000 knights and soldiers against 70,000 Turks. Lazar and his forces lost the battle.

Nationalist zealots have embellished Serbia's woes to a point beyond recognition. In their view, no one has suffered more than the Serbs. They even believe that their ancestors' heroic battle against the Turks somehow set the stage for the idea of a united Europe. It must come as a slap in the face to Serbs that Romania and Bulgaria will be joining the EU first.

Dwelling on their dreams and the good days over glasses of homegrown red Vranac is a favorite pastime among the members of Belgrade's retired intellectual elite. The Writers Club is the kind of place where one can acquire an educated perspective on Serbia's miseries and their presumed causes. Or on Serbia's sacrifices as a result of a European conspiracy leading up to World War II, a conspiracy that led to oppression of the Serbs at the hands of the Europeans -- at least according to the prevailing view here.

The Writers Club was the epicenter of political heresy in the days of former Yugoslav dictator Josip Tito. But it has lost much of its aura of rebellious charm, now that practically everything is allowed -- at least politically -- in Serbia.

Three young men are standing in the street in front of a bridal gown rental shop, vocally discussing Serbia's woes. The tenor of their conversation is the same as it is in the Writers Club, but the delivery is a little more direct. Our problems are the fault of the Jews, says the leader. But the gypsies, Croats and Muslims are also at fault, he adds -- they're the ones who stirred up so much hatred for Serbia in the EU. One of the men has the flag of football club Red Star Belgrade wrapped around his midsection. Red Star is about the only bright light shining for them in the current Serbian darkness.

A war invalid leans against a shop window next door. A cardboard sign informs passersby that the man lost both arms in the Bosnian war and needs money for bread.

Deep-seated misery

Belgrade's misery is so deep-seated that all hopes for improvement are shattered as quickly as they appear. Fifty percent of the city's youth are unemployed. The average monthly income is €200, with incomes four times as high in neighboring Croatia. Unlike Serbia, Croatia enjoys excellent economic ties to the rest of Europe. According to Germany's ambassador in Belgrade, even Bulgaria seems more attractive than Serbia, with more and more German companies moving their Belgrade offices to the neighboring country.

Ironclad nationalism shows its ugly face all over the city. Street vendors sell T-shirts depicting war criminal Mladic. A giant portrait of Milosevic, soiled by tossed eggs, hangs from the top of a four-story office building opposite a bank building.

His death in a prison cell made Milosevic a martyr to many Serbs. Austrian poet Handke says that the UN War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague has essentially accepted his death. Most Serbs, Prime Minister Kostunica included, would likely agree. Nevertheless, they are also pleased to be rid of him.

Young people are forming right-wing parties and action groups with names like "Marching Column," "Blood and Honor" and "Serbia Now." Their heroes are Bishop Nikolaj Velimirovic -- who was canonized by the Serbian Orthodox Church and who considered Adolf Hitler "Europe's savior" -- and people wanted for war criminals like Ratko Mladic.

Prime Minister Kostunica obviously knows where Mladic's old boy network is hiding the leader of the Bosnian Serb army. But he faces pressure from the right-wing radicals who tolerate his government, as well as from their leader, Vojislav Seselj, who is also awaiting trial in The Hague. For the far right, Mladic's extradition to UN tribunal would be treason.

Radicals in the wings

If Kostunica's administration collapsed and elections were held tomorrow, the radical left and right could expect to capture the majority of seats in the Serbian parliament. But this is less a reflection of the country's political preferences than of its desperate emotional state. After a decade and a half of misfortune, the Serbs want nothing more than a way out of their crisis. But propping up Kostunica's government must be in the EU's interest, because it has been reluctant to force the prime minister to finally hunt down General Mladic and agree to a formal separation from Kosovo.

 
Before its wars of secession, Yugoslavia was almost the size of the former West Germany. Now Serbia, stripped of Montenegro, is only a rump just larger than Bavaria. Foreign Minister Vuk Draskovic told SPIEGEL that he hopes that the referendum over Montenegrin independence has finally put a stop to the country's steady disintegration. Prime Minister Kostunica, who recently paid a symbolic visit to the Serb Gracanica Monastery in Kosovo, apparently agrees.

Draskovic doesn't expect any further amputations. All appearances to the contrary, he continues to count Kosovo as part of Serbian territory. The majority Albanian breakaway province has been under a UN protectorate since the NATO bombardment of Serbia in the summer of 1999. "We will not recognize" the declaration of an independent state, says Draskovic, adding that the Serbs could retaliate by establishing a Serb state within Bosnia. He also rejects demands for autonomy by Vojvodina's Hungarian majority.

The US government has summoned Prime Minister Kostunica to Washington this week to secure his commitment to a joint program of reforms with President Boris Tadic, as well as to pledge economic aid to Serbia. But convincing the two Serb leaders, who are bitter enemies, to join forces and pull their country out of its quagmire will be an uphill battle.

Translated from German by Christopher Sultan

Interview with Serbia's Vuk Draskovic: "The Time for Demagogues has Returned"

 

 
INTERVIEW WITH SERBIA'S VUK DRASKOVIC

"The Time for Demagogues has Returned"

In an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE, Serbia's Foreign Minister Vuk Draskovic warned about the danger Kosovo's possible independence poses for the Balkans and the legacy of Slobodan Milosevic.

 
SPIEGEL ONLINE. Mr Draskovic, Serbia is a shrinking state. Are you bitter?

Draskovic: I would have liked for Serbia and Montenegro to co-exist under one umbrella. But we accept reality. The disintegration of former Yugoslavia is now complete.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Not necessarily. The province of Kosovo could soon become independent as well.

Draskovic: In that case the Kosovo Contact Group, the UN Security Council and the governments of those states that are calling for the independence of Kosovo ought to come out and say plainly that Serbs have no right to protection in Kosovo, because they're Serbs.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Why would it not be possible to protect the rights of Serbs in an independent Kosovo -- through the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) or other international bodies, for example?

Draskovic: The talk about a multiethnic community is farcical. Ever since the NATO entered Kosovo, about 220,000 Serbs and non-Albanians have been driven out of the province; 40,000 Serbian houses have been destroyed and more than 1,000 Serbian civilians have been killed. Now the Albanians want a state of their own as a reward. Europe is just soothing its own conscience with its ostensible concern for these tiny Serbian enclaves in Kosovo. Almost 80 percent of Kosovo's territory is ethnically pure.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: How would Belgrade react if Kosovo should indeed become independent?

Draskovic: If an internationally recognized Albanian state should be formed on Serbian territory, we wouldn't recognize it.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What consequences would an independent Kosovo have for the region?

Draskovic: This criminal solution would turn the entire region into a dangerous flahs point and cause political earthquakes in the neighboring countries. No authority in the world could then explain to the Serbs why they don't have a right to an autonomous state, while the Albanians do.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Would Russia allow for this scenario to become a reality?

Draskovic: Russian President Vladimir Putin certainly doesn't support an independent Kosovo. Speaking to the Kosovo Contact Group in January, he didn't mince his words, but said clearly that if Kosovo becomes independent there will be no guarantees that this won't be cited as a precedent by the Caucasus, Karabakh and numerous other regions. It's also an open question how the Turkish part of Cyprus would react to such a development. And what would happen in Catalonia, in the Basque territories of Spain, in Scotland or in Taiwan?

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What is the maximum you would be willing to concede in negotiations over the future status of Kosovo?

Draskovic: We're making large concessions. We're saying to the Albanians: Rule Kosovo by yourself; you're the majority. You'll receive internal independence for Kosovo -- but within Serbia. You can follow your own path to Europe and become a member of international organizations directly -- with the exception of the United Nations, NATO and those organizations that strictly represent international independence. The only demand would be that the current borders of the Serbian state are respected, that the Serbs living there are protected along with their churches and monasteries and that there be special cultural and economic relations between the Kosovo-Serbs and Serbia.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Such a model doesn't exist anywhere in the world...

Draskovic: Specific situations require specific solutions.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What do your discussion partners from Western governments have to say about this proposal?

Draskovic: They agree as far as the right to the inviolability of our borders is concerned. But they point out that the Albanians would be very unsatisfied with this solution and would perhaps opt for terror. But isn't it absurd for the world to go as far as to congratulate the Albanians just because they're giving their "word of honor" that they will respect the rights of Serbs in case of independence?

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Belgrade doesn't rank behind the Kosovo Albanians as far as empty promises are concerned. Don't you think it's shameful how the Serbian government is making a fool of the international community with its ostensible search for Ratko Mladic? Now it's been openly admitted that he was in Belgrade until the end of 2005.

Draskovic: I have no explanation and no justification for the fact that Mladic is still a free man. But I believe Premier Vojislav Kostunica when he says Mladic has become a nightmare and that he would do anything to arrest him. Kostunica will present his plan of action for better cooperation with the Hague War Crimes Tribunal to the EU in mid-July. There will be a radical break with the legacy of Milosevic -- in all areas. Then Europe should tell us where it can help us -- especially in the seizure of war criminals.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: You say support for Mladic comes mainly from the army, the police and the intelligence service. Why did the current government not purge dangerous individuals from these institutions when it overthrew Milosevic?

Draskovic: We've lost much time and paid dearly for our fatal mistakes. Following the overthrow of Milosevic, we should have used the referendum in order to destroy the intelligence service, open the secret files and build a new security agency with the help of European experts. The remaining functionaries from Milosevic's regime have killed our former Prime Minister Djindjic, and they've tried to murder me twice.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: But why are the murderers still being protected? Consider how slowly the trial against the assassins of Zoran Djindjic is proceeding, and you'll understand the people's disappointment.

Draskovic: Of course something isn't quite right there. The trial is being slowed down and obstructed. It almost seems as if someone wanted to gain time.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Time? To do what?

Draskovic: To re-establish the system we had before October 5, 2000 -- before the fall of Milosevic. Look at the polls. If elections were held tomorrow, the radicals and the socialists could get back into power. The people quickly forget their misery and who was responsible for it. The time for demagogues has returned.

 
SPIEGEL ONLINE: Given the danger of a return to the Milosevic regime, why don't you form an oppositional democratic bloc, instead of bickering within the government?

Draskovic: Of course the current government deserves to be criticized not just on 100, but on 1,000, and we've made thousands of mistakes. But there is one mistake we haven't made: We haven't played with human lives, we haven't provoked war and no one has lost their life because of our policies. But Milosevic hasn't just left us a political catastrophe -- several million people were also shaped mentally by his regime.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Is Serbia's population even still interested in EU membership today?

Draskovic: More than 80 percent are in favor of EU membership; 60 percent are in favor of the Partnership for Peace. But if Kosovo should become independent, the pro-European attitude could change quickly. Then our people would feel humiliated, and that's no foundation on which to build a European policy.

-- Interview conducted by Renate Flottau


July 13, 2006

Justice for Serbia

 

Justice for Serbia

By Vojislav Kostunica

Kosovo Independence Imperils Our Democracy

Washington Post
July 12, 2006

The demands for the independence of Kosovo present Southeast Europe and the rest of the world with a compelling question: Will absolute justice be made to yield to relative political interests -- and will authentic democratic values be sacrificed for a mere semblance of peace?

The arguments given by Serbia against independence for its southern province are well known. From the point of view of international law, these arguments are simply irrefutable. They are based on the fundamental documents and pillars of international order: the U.N. Charter, the Helsinki Final Act and relevant resolutions of the U.N. Security Council.

Depriving a democratic country of a part of its territory simply because one ethnic group that has aspirations for that territory threatens violence is impermissible, not only morally but also from the perspective of historical experience. Indeed, tragic occurrences have taught mankind that a policy of appeasement toward those who threaten force only opens the way to more and even greater violence.

There is another, purely pragmatic argument that is equally indisputable: An independent Kosovo could not help becoming a hotbed of chronic tension in the region, both because of the probability of new territorial demands and because of its economic unviability and its widespread network of organized crime.

Viewed strategically, and not just with regard to preserving stability in the Balkans, the arguments against an independent Kosovo are equally strong: Independence for Kosovo would surely be viewed as a precedent, setting off similar demands elsewhere. Those who argue otherwise are, quite simply, closing their eyes to the hard facts. Resolving the problems of national minorities through self-determination (especially in the case of nationalities that already have their own countries nearby) inevitably leads to border changes and all the dangerous complications that this entails.

But even if it remained deaf to all of these arguments, the international community would have to take account of the impact that Kosovo's eventual independence would have on democratic Serbia. Let us recall that Serbia liberated itself from a communist regime on its own by investing enormous effort and taking huge risks. Can such a country, by any measure a democratic one, survive the forcible taking of 15 percent of its territory? What democratically elected government could explain to its voters after such an act that they should continue to believe in the principles of tolerance, liberalism and the sacrosanct will of the people -- the values of enlightened Western civilization, in the name of which they toppled an evil, authoritarian regime?

To put it simply, a young democracy, which in a mere six years has achieved impressive results in developing its economy, building institutions, protecting human rights, battling corruption and crime, and fostering international relations, would stand little chance of survival under such circumstances.

Democracy, in Serbia as anywhere else, is essentially based on the equality of all and, no less important, on trust. If people stop believing in the rules of democracy, if they start thinking that a set of rules is applicable to one nation but not to others, if they feel betrayed by powerful institutions, and if the standards and norms of behavior for relations among individuals and nations alike are trampled upon, then people will lose faith. And where faith is lost, there can be no democracy.

In attempting to preserve the province of Kosovo within its borders, Serbia has acted in the most reasonable and constructive way possible. It is prepared to accept any form of compromise that does not entail independence, and it offers Albanians the greatest possible autonomy, including all legislative, executive and judicial powers, while expecting in return only the inviolability of borders and safety for the non-Albanian population of the province.

In its struggle for Kosovo, Serbia is also struggling for fundamental principles of international justice and order. And, by defending an inalienable part of its territory, Serbia may even be defending the future of democracy as a way of life and a view of the world.

 

 


http://www.globalpolicy.org/nations/sovereign/sover/emerg/2006/0712serbia.htm

July 12, 2006

Serbia rejects independent Kosovo

 

Serbia rejects independent Kosovo

By Nicholas Kralev
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
July 12, 2006


Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica told Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday that Belgrade would not agree to Kosovo's independence, offering instead "the highest possible autonomy" for the United Nations-run province.
    During the first visit of a high-level Serbian official to Washington since Belgrade lost Montenegro, the last of the former Yugoslav republics to break away, Mr. Kostunica said independence for Kosovo is "out of the question."
    "I had a chance to explain the advantage of the position Serbia stands for, the highest possible autonomy," he told reporters at the State Department after meeting with Miss Rice. "It's a solution based on international legal standards regarding territorial integrity."
    Talks on Kosovo's final status began in February but have not produced results. The next round is scheduled for later this month in Vienna, Austria.
    The United States has avoided making definitive statements that would prejudge the outcome, but along with other Western countries, it supports the aspirations for independence among Kosovo's ethnic Albanian majority. Russia has sided with Serbia.
    "Independence is something the Serbian authorities cannot accept," Mr. Kostunica said yesterday.
    Kosovo, although still a Serbian province, has been ruled by the United Nations since the 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia in response to President Slobodan Milosevic's treatment of the Albanians there.
    Mr. Milosevic was arrested in 2000 under the presidency of Mr. Kostunica and sent to The Hague war-crimes tribunal, where he died in March before his trial had ended. Other suspects including former Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic and his military commander, Gen. Ratko Mladic, remain at large.
    Certain U.S. assistance to Serbia is contingent on its cooperation with The Hague tribunal, and this year, Miss Rice refused to certify Belgrade's compliance, resulting in the withholding of $7 million in aid.
    The secretary urged Mr. Kostunica to do everything possible to deliver the suspects to The Hague.
    The May referendum in Montenegro that led to its independence prompted some changes in the Serbian government structure, although they have been smooth so far, said Jelena Cukic Matic, spokeswoman for the Serbian Embassy in Washington.
    The Foreign and Defense ministries, which used to be part of the union government of Serbia and Montenegro, have been folded into the Serbian Cabinet headed by Mr. Kostunica.
    The ministers and all other Serbian personnel remain the same, while the representatives of Montenegro in those agencies now work for the new Montenegrin government, Mrs. Matic said.

http://www.washtimes.com/world/20060711-103039-6212r.htm

July 11, 2006

Greece and the Balkans

 

 

Greece and the Balkans

By Alexandros P. Mallias
July 11, 2006


Greece's involvement in the Balkans is not new. Even before the foundation of the modern Greek state, the idea of a Balkan cooperation existed. The idea of a Balkan Federation, which Greece would lead, was conceived, toward the end of the 18th century, by Rigas Velestinlis, a man inspired by the ideals of freedom and democracy. Rigas visualized a Balkan region where people could move freely from country to country, where trade would be conducted without barriers, a region of prosperity for its peoples.
    Now, more than 200 years after its conception, this idea, modified to some extent, is to become a reality. The Balkans are now at the doorstep of the European Union. Greece gave a historic boost to the Western Balkans' legitimate European aspirations at the 2003 Thessaloniki Summit, during its EU presidency.
    Greece devised a long-term policy based on three solid pillars: (a) integration of the countries of the region into the EU and NATO, (b) economic development and investment and (c) regional cooperation.
    The integration of Greece's neighborhood into the European and Euro-Atlantic institutions, upon fulfillment of specific criteria and conditions, has become our policy's fundamental strategic goal. In January 2007, Bulgaria and Romania will be the first Balkan countries to join the EU. Greece was the first among its EU partners, in the mid-'90s, to advocate Bulgaria's and Romania's accession. European integration and the prospect of EU membership is the strongest single soft power mechanism for encouraging reforms, consolidating democracy, establishing the rule of law, strengthening institutions and eventually bringing economic prosperity.
    Greece has become a leading investor in the Balkans, with investments of more than $10 billion, and the generation of 200,000 new jobs. The volume of trade between Greece and its Balkan neighbors is more than $4 billion. In addition, Greece launched in 2002 a five-year development aid initiative called the Hellenic Plan for the Economic Reconstruction of the Balkans, which amounts to a $670 million program, and aims at promoting the economic development of Greece's neighboring Balkan countries.
    Many problems that the Balkans face are common to the countries of the region. It is therefore natural to deal with them in common. Regional cooperation is essential for ethnic reconciliation, to increase regional ownership and allow the Balkan counties to address, in a coordinated manner, issues of mutual concern. Greece was the driving force in revival of the South East European Cooperation Process (SEECP) in the 1990s. It has gradually evolved into the only genuine scheme of cooperation in the Balkans, acting at the same time as the region's authentic voice.
    Now, in 2006, we are about to witness the closing of another chapter in the history of the Balkans, begun by the disintegration of the former Yugoslavia. Montenegro's peaceful secession from its state union with Serbia and the settlement of Kosovo's status will be the epilogue of this chapter.
    On Kosovo, especially, Greece, with strategic interests at stake, has contributed concrete ideas both within the EU and within the framework of the Greek-U.S. strategic partnership. We need a win/win or at least a win/no lose solution, which will have the support or at least consent of both Belgrade and Pristina.
    Greece opposes partition of Kosovo. We cannot afford to have a Kosovo divided exclusively along ethnic lines, or to have Kosovo annexed by or united with any neighboring country or part of a country. We cannot have our region integrated into the European Union while, at the same time, we promote a solution that perpetuates division. We want to see a solution for a multi-ethnic and multicultural Kosovo based on European standards and values.
    A new chapter will soon open; a chapter which will be remembered by generations to come as an era of stability, prosperity and cooperation; an era when respect for the different is the rule and not the exception; an era when the Balkans are embraced by the European family, where they have always belonged.
    
    Alexandros P. Mallias is ambassador of Greece to the United States.
http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060710-082052-1159r.htm

July 08, 2006

Kosovo on Ahtisaari�s shopping list

 

  UN Kosovo Envoy Buying Kosovo

 8 July 2006 | 11:32 | FOCUS News Agency



Pristina. In his wish to preserve his position European Union's Special Envoy for Kosovo Marti Ahtisaari has sent a new unexpected proposal to Serbia: to recognize Kosovo’s independence and in return receive money and concessions. In the language of diplomacy this is called a “shopping list”, Serbian newspaper Vecerne Novosti reads. From diplomatic sources the newspaper found out that the so-called shopping list includes five points:

1. Serbia to join in NATO’s Partnership for Peace program (without being obliged to capture General Ratko Mladic)
2. An agreement Serbia to join the European Union (also without being obliged to hand in Mladic)
3. Financial aid from the US
4. Access to EU funds
5. Increase of direct foreign investments.

Marti Ahtisaari’s proposal to the southern Serbia region does not sound bad at all – at least on paper. But it means: “Give Kosovo up and we will give you everything else!” the newspaper comments.
According to an anonymous government source there is no official document for Ahtisaari’s shopping list.
 

July 06, 2006

Kosovo's limbo suits both sides

Kosovo's limbo suits both sides 

Mirjana Tomic International Herald Tribune

Published: July 6, 2006


MADRID Negotiations under way in Vienna, Brussels and New York on the future political status of Kosovo are expected to end this year. While Kosovo Albanians want independence, Serbia's prime minister, Vojislav Kostunica, declared during his recent controversial trip there that Kosovo "will always be part of Serbia."

Kostunica visited Kosovo on June 28, the day Serbs mark the 1389 Battle of Kosovo, when the defeat of the Serbs enabled the Ottoman Turks to invade the Balkans and stay there for almost five centuries.

When Western news media refer to Kosovo, they often remind their audience that for Serbs, it represents the cradle of Serbian civilization. They repeat what Serbian politicians tell them. But as the liberal Belgrade monthly Republika writes, Kosovo was "the heart of Serbia during Middle Ages." Today, "80 percent of the population has never been to Kosovo and has no links to the region, except for the mythology that has been consciously produced."

I am the only one among my friends and acquaintances who has actually been to Kosovo on vacation. Like most people of my generation, who attended Belgrade schools during the 1960s and early '70s, I had to memorize epic songs about the Kosovo battle and Serbian heroes. In our free time we listened to the Beatles and dreamed about visiting Western Europe. I never heard anyone say: "Let's spend our vacation visiting Kosovo."

In the absence of massive tourist demand to visit Kosovo, Yugoslavia's Communist authorities organized trips for employees and schoolchildren to visit the region. It was the only contact that most Serbs had with the "cradle of civilization."

The first time I visited Kosovo was in the late '60s. My parents took me on a tour of Serbian medieval monasteries, sources of culture and literacy before the Ottoman invasion and defenders of Christianity and tradition during the Muslim domination. Most monasteries were left to rot, but thanks to the efforts of monks and nuns, they functioned. In my early teens, Kosovo was a cultural shock: I remember veiled Albanian women in traditional costume selling food and crafts on filthy sidewalks.

Thirty years later, when I traveled to Kosovo as a journalist for a major Spanish daily and witnessed omnipresent underdevelopment, I wondered what had happened to the aid that had gone to Kosovo. According to a friend who had a leading position in the League of Serbian Communists, before Slobodan Milosevic came to power, all development aid was channeled to Kosovo Albanian Communist officials. Belgrade had no say on how it was spent.

As a reporter of Serbian origin, I did not feel welcome in Kosovo. In Albania, however, where I also went on a professional assignment, this was not the case. Our common Balkan cultural heritage created an immediate bond. My conclusion was simple: It was politics that created animosity, rather than a difference in cultural heritage.

Nowadays, after the 1999 war, deaths, expulsions, massacres and innumerable violations of human rights, the chance is small that young Kosovo Albanians and young Serbs would ever meet. If they did meet, it would be abroad. And if they became friends, they would not boast about it. A Vienna-based Albanian from Kosovo told me: "My mother's best friend is Serbian. When we go to Kosovo she has to hide it."

The Serbs who remained in Kosovo live in enclaves protected by international troops, while hundreds of thousands of Serbs, poor and rich, have emigrated from Kosovo during the past decades.

The poor live in Serbia's shantytowns; local Serbs consider them primitive. Some would like to go back, but fear prevents them. The rich, on the other hand, do not plan to return to Kosovo, where crime prospers and the electricity supply is unreliable.

Serbia's foreign minister, Vuk Draskovic, claims that the future status of Kosovo is of utmost importance for Serbia's future, but like other Serbian politicians, he does not specify why it is so important. Does Serbia's economic or political future depend on the status of Kosovo? Or would the loss of Kosovo mean that Belgrade politicians had to face the real issues affecting Serbia's population: crime, corruption, quality of education, unemployment, health care, democracy and human rights, low living standards, isolation from the European Union?

At the same time, the ambivalence about the status of Kosovo suits politicians: Serbian politicians evoke the Kosovo myth in order to postpone addressing their real problems; their Kosovo Albanian counterparts can always blame the lack of independence as the source of all evils, including unemployment, crime, corruption, crumbling infrastructure and the failing economy.

Mirjana Tomic, a freelance media consultant, lives in Madrid.
 MADRID Negotiations under way in Vienna, Brussels and New York on the future political status of Kosovo are expected to end this year. While Kosovo Albanians want independence, Serbia's prime minister, Vojislav Kostunica, declared during his recent controversial trip there that Kosovo "will always be part of Serbia."

Kostunica visited Kosovo on June 28, the day Serbs mark the 1389 Battle of Kosovo, when the defeat of the Serbs enabled the Ottoman Turks to invade the Balkans and stay there for almost five centuries.

When Western news media refer to Kosovo, they often remind their audience that for Serbs, it represents the cradle of Serbian civilization. They repeat what Serbian politicians tell them. But as the liberal Belgrade monthly Republika writes, Kosovo was "the heart of Serbia during Middle Ages." Today, "80 percent of the population has never been to Kosovo and has no links to the region, except for the mythology that has been consciously produced."

I am the only one among my friends and acquaintances who has actually been to Kosovo on vacation. Like most people of my generation, who attended Belgrade schools during the 1960s and early '70s, I had to memorize epic songs about the Kosovo battle and Serbian heroes. In our free time we listened to the Beatles and dreamed about visiting Western Europe. I never heard anyone say: "Let's spend our vacation visiting Kosovo."

In the absence of massive tourist demand to visit Kosovo, Yugoslavia's Communist authorities organized trips for employees and schoolchildren to visit the region. It was the only contact that most Serbs had with the "cradle of civilization."

The first time I visited Kosovo was in the late '60s. My parents took me on a tour of Serbian medieval monasteries, sources of culture and literacy before the Ottoman invasion and defenders of Christianity and tradition during the Muslim domination. Most monasteries were left to rot, but thanks to the efforts of monks and nuns, they functioned. In my early teens, Kosovo was a cultural shock: I remember veiled Albanian women in traditional costume selling food and crafts on filthy sidewalks.

Thirty years later, when I traveled to Kosovo as a journalist for a major Spanish daily and witnessed omnipresent underdevelopment, I wondered what had happened to the aid that had gone to Kosovo. According to a friend who had a leading position in the League of Serbian Communists, before Slobodan Milosevic came to power, all development aid was channeled to Kosovo Albanian Communist officials. Belgrade had no say on how it was spent.

As a reporter of Serbian origin, I did not feel welcome in Kosovo. In Albania, however, where I also went on a professional assignment, this was not the case. Our common Balkan cultural heritage created an immediate bond. My conclusion was simple: It was politics that created animosity, rather than a difference in cultural heritage.

Nowadays, after the 1999 war, deaths, expulsions, massacres and innumerable violations of human rights, the chance is small that young Kosovo Albanians and young Serbs would ever meet. If they did meet, it would be abroad. And if they became friends, they would not boast about it. A Vienna-based Albanian from Kosovo told me: "My mother's best friend is Serbian. When we go to Kosovo she has to hide it."

The Serbs who remained in Kosovo live in enclaves protected by international troops, while hundreds of thousands of Serbs, poor and rich, have emigrated from Kosovo during the past decades.

The poor live in Serbia's shantytowns; local Serbs consider them primitive. Some would like to go back, but fear prevents them. The rich, on the other hand, do not plan to return to Kosovo, where crime prospers and the electricity supply is unreliable.

Serbia's foreign minister, Vuk Draskovic, claims that the future status of Kosovo is of utmost importance for Serbia's future, but like other Serbian politicians, he does not specify why it is so important. Does Serbia's economic or political future depend on the status of Kosovo? Or would the loss of Kosovo mean that Belgrade politicians had to face the real issues affecting Serbia's population: crime, corruption, quality of education, unemployment, health care, democracy and human rights, low living standards, isolation from the European Union?

At the same time, the ambivalence about the status of Kosovo suits politicians: Serbian politicians evoke the Kosovo myth in order to postpone addressing their real problems; their Kosovo Albanian counterparts can always blame the lack of independence as the source of all evils, including unemployment, crime, corruption, crumbling infrastructure and the failing economy.

Mirjana Tomic, a freelance media consultant, lives in Madrid.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/06/opinion/edtomic.php

Russia delays West�s date for Kosovo�s freedom

Russia delays West’s date for Kosovo’s freedom

Published: Thursday, 6 July, 2006, 12:37 PM Doha Time

By Matt Robinson

RUSSIA is frustrating the West’s plan for Kosovo independence this year, resisting US pressure and raising a risk of fresh Albanian violence in the breakaway Serbian province, senior Western officials say.

Seven years after Nato bombing drove out Serb forces and the United Nations took control, the United States and the European Union say a decision on Kosovo’s "final status" is overdue and should be made in the next six months.

Ethnic Albanians who form 90% of Kosovo’s 2mn people want independence. Dipomats expect they will get it, in a form limited for a time by EU supervision and secured by Nato, to continue protecting minority Serbs from possible attacks. But Moscow – partner of Britain, France, Germany, Italy and the US in the Contact Group on Kosovo – is in no hurry. Its view reflects concern in some EU capitals that a sudden amputation of Kosovo, on top of other recent Serb humiliations, could put Serb ultra-nationalists back in power in Belgrade.

Differences came sharply into focus in the past few days.

US Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, in Brussels on Friday as envoys met, said Washington was "confirmed in our judgment that 2006 must be the year of decision for Kosovo ... the final status talks must conclude this year".

But a senior Russian official said on Sunday that Moscow saw no need for an "artificial timeframe". Russia stood by the Contact Group’s January 30 statement which made clear that "all efforts" should be made for a 2006 settlement, but it "does not say that by all means this has to be over", he said.

"We need to find solution to many so-called technical issues related to the position of minorities in Kosovo," the Russian said. If talks produce "mutually acceptable and sustainable results" a timetable can be set, but now is "too early to prejudge" whether the process will be completed this year.

"The Russians’ focus now is on timing," said a senior Western official in Kosovo. "This is where the Contact Group will find things could become difficult."

Others say delay is too risky. Even if independence heads off a risk of renewed Albanian unrest, the UN has contingency plans in case of an exodus of half the remaining 100,000 Serbs, and Nato is braced for a Serb bid to partition the province.

While Serbia officially opposes independence, diplomats say it knows the West has made up its mind. Yet there is no sign of the "mutually acceptable" deal that Moscow wants to see.

A political source in Belgrade says Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica wants a delay to April 2007 and a face-saving formula giving Kosovo wide autonomy, years before sovereignty.

If not, ultanationalists already riding high in the polls could come to power, arguing that if Kosovo gets independence then so should the Serbs of Bosnia. A Serb secession from Bosnia would have dramatic consequences in the still turbulent Balkans.

The Albanians expect UN special envoy Martti Ahtisaari to make his recommendation to the Security Council by November and to give them the green light for independence. But it is the Council, where Russia has a veto, that must finally decide.

The Russian official said Serbia has a lot on its plate, citing its recent split with longtime sister republic Montenegro which chose independence, and the freeze on its EU membership bid over its failure to net top war crimes suspect Ratko Mladic.

Asked about fears of violence by Albanian extremists if they sense any delay in independence, the Russian said: "We don’t like to be blackmailed. If any party resorts to violence it will be very detrimental to that party in negotiations."

One Western official who now predicts a delay says any stalling longer than three or four months means trouble.

Albanians impatient over life in limbo rioted in March 2004, killing 19 people and driving out 2,000 Serbs. Belgrade said it proved Kosovo was nowhere near stability or democracy, and it would redouble the argument if violence erupted again.

Meanwhile, Serbs in north Kosovo threaten to secede in the case of independence, a move that could reignite conflict next door with the Albanians of southern Serbia and Macedonia.

After Serbia lost control of Kosovo in 1999, when Nato bombed for 11 weeks to halt the killing of Albanians in a two-year guerrilla war, it was only with EU diplomacy that a smaller insurgency was smothered in south Serbia, while Macedonia got Western help in 2001 to stifle ethnic war.

There is concern that ethnic tensions are being kept in check only by the prospect of independence for Kosovo.

"If the light goes out ... by February or March, this will be an impossible mission to manage," said the Western official. – Reuters
 http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=95894&version=1&template_id=46&parent_id=26

SERBIA: Russia Hints Veto Over Kosovo

 

SERBIA: Russia Hints Veto Over Kosovo
Russia for the first time hinted at a possibility to exercise its veto rights at the UN Security Council provided that the Western countries imposed independence for Kosovo, Belgrade's daily Politika said.
The paper says Russia presented its stands to the Contact Group members, and had for the first time mentioned the possibility to veto a resolution granting Kosovo independence.
Politika daily says at the Contact Group meeting, held on 30 June in Brussels, Russian representative put on the table an unofficial document containing four paragraphs reflecting Russia's position on Kosovo status talks.


Source: Makfax
http://www.seeurope.net/en/Story.php?StoryID=61515

July 05, 2006

Burgeoning Balkans

 

Burgeoning Balkans

TODAY'S COLUMNIST
By Nikola Gruevski
July 4, 2006 
     
    The good news from the Balkans is that the wars which have plagued the region for the past 15 years appear to be finished. The bad news is that there is still unfinished business at hand which, if not handled properly, could lead to more troubles.
    Kosovo is still an open question. While the outcome is important, how final status negotiations are handled is just as important. With the decision by Montenegro to become independent now finalized, our friends in Serbia must be treated with dignity, respect and, above all, fairness to avoid a backlash. Those who are guiding this process must also take into consideration neighbors to Kosovo and Serbia and how the final outcome -- whatever it may be -- will affect them.
    Other issues are also on the table that affect the internal stability and politics of each country in the region. Tomorrow, Macedonians will go to the polls to elect a new parliament and a new government. This will be the fourth time in our young history as a modern-day nation-state that we will elect those who will govern us for the next four years. There is much at stake in these elections.
    Membership in the European Union is something Macedonia still strives for, as is NATO membership. While we strongly believe that NATO membership for us, along with our friends in Croatia and Albania, is just a few years away, membership in the European Union is further off. The EU, however, must accept all countries in the Balkans who aspire to EU membership -- assuming we fulfill our commitments -- to avoid having a black hole in Europe.
    But the most important question as we go to the polls now is a question of basic economics and trust. The current government led by the Social Democrats has been acting more and more like the party they once were -- the Communists. As a result, the economy is suffering and along with it, so are the people. At the same time, Macedonia has seen levels of trust in the government plummet to new lows. People trust the government about as much as they trust that gas prices will go down.
    This is why our party, if elected with our coalition partners, has promised a new direction. We believe that Macedonians want to do more than just survive -- they want to succeed. And to succeed we need a stronger, healthier economy -- one that delivers jobs and growth, that frees individuals to pursue their God-given potential with a minimum of government interference and that opens up the creative spirit in people.
    When my party, VMRO-DPMNE, was in government from 1998 to 2002, we saw the economy steamroll forward. In our first three years in office, we brought in more than $650 million in foreign direct investment. By comparison, the current government brought in a less-than-stellar $295 million in its first three years. (In contrast, next-door neighbor Bulgaria attracted over $1.4 billion in FDI during 2004 alone, while Macedonia has brought in $1.3 billion since gaining independence in 1991.)
    In its Index of Economic Freedom for 2006, the Heritage Foundation, quoting an EBRD report, notes that FDI "is at a low level as many foreign investors continue to be deterred by a difficult investment climate" and that "FDI has dried up since then because of... continued weaknesses in the business environment." The blame for this lies squarely with the government.
    At the same time, GDP has not advanced as it should. We need growth rates of 6 percent to 8 percent per year to achieve our dream of EU membership by 2010. The current government has given Macedonians rates of 0.9 percent in 2002, 3.4 percent in 2003, 4.1 percent in 2004 and estimates of 3.2 percent for 2005. These are hardly inspiring numbers.
    The current government was elected on promises of bringing higher rates of economic growth, increased employment, more FDI and increased salaries for the people. Instead, they have brought the opposite and with it contempt from the voters who believe the government has betrayed them.
    As Heritage points out, there is a key correlation between economic freedom and democracy. If a country is rich, or least economically stable and moving toward becoming a rich country, then it is more than likely to be stable and peaceful internally and with its neighbors. Our new government will provide the economic growth which the current government has failed to deliver thereby providing greater stability and peace in a region which has experienced little of either.
    
    Nikola Gruevski is president of the Macedonia party VMRO-DPMNE. He has served as trade minister (1998-99) and finance minister (2000-02).
http://www.washtimes.com/op-ed/20060703-102601-4840r.htm

Russia delays West's date for Kosovo independence

 

Russia delays West's date for Kosovo independence

PRISTINA, Serbia, July 3 (Reuters) - Russia is frustrating the West's plan for Kosovo independence this year, resisting U.S. pressure and raising a risk of fresh Albanian violence in the breakaway Serbian province, senior Western officials say.

Seven years after NATO bombing drove out Serb forces and the United Nations took control, the United States and the European Union say a decision on Kosovo's "final status" is overdue and should be made in the next six months.

Ethnic Albanians who form 90 percent of Kosovo's 2 million people want independence. Dipomats expect they will get it, in a form limited for a time by EU supervision and secured by NATO, to continue protecting minority Serbs from possible attacks. But Moscow -- partner of Britain, France, Germany, Italy and the U.S. in the Contact Group on Kosovo -- is in no hurry. Its view reflects concern in some EU capitals that a sudden amputation of Kosovo, on top of other recent Serb humiliations, could put Serb ultra-nationalists back in power in Belgrade.

Differences came sharply into focus in the past few days.

U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns, in Brussels on Friday as envoys met, said Washington was "confirmed in our judgment that 2006 must be the year of decision for Kosovo ... the final status talks must conclude this year".

But a senior Russian official told Reuters on Sunday that Moscow saw no need for an "artificial timeframe". Russia stood by the Contact Group's Jan. 30 statement which made clear that "all efforts" should be made for a 2006 settlement, but it "does not say that by all means this has to be over", he said.

"We need to find solution to many so-called technical issues related to the position of minorities in Kosovo," the Russian said. If talks produce "mutually acceptable and sustainable results" a timetable can be set, but now is "too early to prejudge" whether the process will be completed this year.

"The Russians' focus now is on timing," said a senior Western official in Kosovo. "This is where the Contact Group will find things could become difficult."

SHOCK WAVES

Others say delay is too risky. Even if independence heads off a risk of renewed Albanian unrest, the U.N. has contingency plans in case of an exodus of half the remaining 100,000 Serbs, and NATO is braced for a Serb bid to partition the province.

While Serbia officially opposes independence, diplomats say it knows the West has made up its mind. Yet there is no sign of the "mutually acceptable" deal that Moscow wants to see.

A political source in Belgrade says Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica wants a delay to April 2007 and a face-saving formula giving Kosovo wide autonomy, years before sovereignty.

If not, ultanationalists already riding high in the polls could come to power, arguing that if Kosovo gets independence then so should the Serbs of Bosnia. A Serb secession from Bosnia would have dramatic consequences in the still turbulent Balkans.

The Albanians expect U.N. special envoy Martti Ahtisaari to make his recommendation to the Security Council by November and to give them the green light for independence. But it is the Council, where Russia has a veto, that must finally decide.

The Russian official said Serbia has a lot on its plate, citing its recent split with longtime sister republic Montenegro which chose independence, and the freeze on its EU membership bid over its failure to net top war crimes suspect Ratko Mladic.

Asked about fears of violence by Albanian extremists if they sense any delay in independence, the Russian said: "We don't like to be blackmailed. If any party resorts to violence it will be very detrimental to that party in negotiations."

One Western official who now predicts a delay says any stalling longer than three or four months means trouble.

Albanians impatient over life in limbo rioted in March 2004, killing 19 people and driving out 2,000 Serbs. Belgrade said it proved Kosovo was nowhere near stability or democracy, and it would redouble the argument if violence erupted again.

Meanwhile, Serbs in north Kosovo threaten to secede in the case of independence, a move that could reignite conflict next door with the Albanians of southern Serbia and Macedonia.

After Serbia lost control of Kosovo in 1999, when NATO bombed for 11 weeks to halt the killing of Albanians in a two-year guerrilla war, it was only with EU diplomacy that a smaller insurgency was smothered in south Serbia, while Macedonia got Western help in 2001 to stifle ethnic war.

There is concern that ethnic tensions are being kept in check only by the prospect of independence for Kosovo.

"If the light goes out ... by February or March, this will be an impossible mission to manage," said the Western official.
 
http://kosovareport.blogspot.com/2006/07/russia-delays-wests-date-for-kosovo.html

July 03, 2006

Corrected // Naser Oric, Bosnian Muslim war criminal freed!

 

NO JUSTICE
SCANDALOUS DECISION AT THE U.N. WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL
Naser Oric, Bosnian Muslim war criminal freed!

Naser ORIC, who was handed a lenient two-year sentence by the ICTY in The
Hague (June 30, 2006) for murder and torture of Serbs and for destruction of
Serbian villages in Eastern Bosnia, was freed since he had been in jail for
more than three years.

The ICTY judges found that between 24 September 1992 and 16 October 1992,
Naser ORIC detained number of Serbs at the Srebrenica Police Station. "He
physically abused them, which included beatings by various objects:
including wooden sticks, wooden poles, steel pipes, metal bars, baseball
bats, rifle butts, bare fists, kicking with boots and forced teeth
extractions with rusty pliers. These beatings and physical abuse caused
severe pain and injuries such as fractured bones, severe injuries to limbs
and broken teeth. On numerous occasions, detainees were beaten into a state
of unconsciousness." Seven detainees were beaten to death. [1]

Muslim armed units under the command of Naser ORIC engaged in various
military operations against the Army of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and
Herzegovina forces in Eastern Bosnia. In the course of such operations,
Oric's Muslim armed units in the Municipalities of Bratunac, Srebrenica and
Skelani, burnt and otherwise destroyed and plundered a minimum of fifty
predominantly Serb villages and hamlets. As a result, thousands of Serb
individuals fled the area.

ORIC described theses crimes as his "Greatest hits" while talking to Bill
Schiller of the Toronto Star and showing Schiller his shocking video of what
he and his Muslim army units did to the Serbs. [2]

By sentencing Naser ORIC, a Muslim, to two years in prison for despicable
crimes against the Serbs, the U.N. Tribunal in The Hague encourages those
who want us to believe that Muslims have always been victims in the Balkans.

Srdja Trifkovic stresses in his article " Jihadist hotbed in the Balkans",
that " Western policy in the Balkans should be reappraised because.. [it]..
continue[s] encouraging the Muslim sense of pure victimhood…",  and
"nourishes their hate. The obstacle to doing so is often the apologetics and
the tradition of pro-Muslim appeasement of the Clinton decade; but that
appeasement must stop." [3]

War crimes and crimes against humanity committed against the Serbs by the
Bosnian Muslims, Croats and  Squiptars (Albanians) in the former Yugoslavia
have never been investigated and properly trailed at the ICTY. The Naser
ORIC's sentence proves again that the ICTY at The Hague is incapable of
serving the justice and therefore must be closed.

Source:
[1]  http://www.srebrenica-report.com/Oric2.htm 
 [2] http://www.un.org/icty/indictment/english/ori-2ai041004e.htm
[3] http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/News/Trifkovic04/NewsST011004.html


BOBA BOROJEVIC
ckcuboba@yahoo.ca

Athens fears spread of Balkans turmoil

 

Athens fears spread of Balkans turmoil

By Andrew Borowiec
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
July 3, 2006


NICOSIA, Cyprus -- Greek officials and analysts are increasingly worried about trouble signs in the Balkans, an area remembered for triggering World War I.
    "History lives on in the Balkans, ready to break out in more bloodshed," one Athens analysis has warned.
    Conservative Athens daily Kathimerini ran an article titled "Greece caught in the Balkan maelstrom," which asserted that "hopes for a universal, European equilibrium in the Balkans are fading into the distant future."
    The concern centers on the restive province of Kosovo, formerly one of Yugoslavia's two autonomous regions, now an enclave within Serbia administered by the United Nations.
    With Kosovo's Albanian majority clamoring for independence and Serbs vowing to prevent it, Soren Jessen-Petersen, head of the U.N. mission in Kosovo, cautioned last week that the area could become "a ticking social time bomb, which in time will be impossible to manage."
    Serbia's official position, as summed up by President Boris Tadic, is that "Serbia is dedicated to the preservation of Kosovo as part of Serbia." The Brussels-based International Crisis Group think tank warned of violence if Serbia insisted on this policy.
    Kosovo and its Orthodox shrines have been considered by Serbs as their heartland since the 1389 battle of Kosovo Polje, when an Ottoman Turkish army defeated the Serbian troops of Prince Lazar. The emotional aspect of this claim has affected Belgrade's policy in the area for years.
    Montenegro's independence in May completed the breakup of the six republics that had made up the Yugoslav federation. Serbia, once the dominant power in the Balkans, has yet to come to terms with its diminishing status and the spectacular collapse of the nation-building effort by dictator Josip Broz Tito.
    Events in the former Yugoslavia have left Greece as the "richest and most stable country in the Balkans, but threatened by the fallout of the area's instability," a Western diplomatic assessment said.
    Diplomatic sources say Greece has alerted the European Union to the danger of admitting more Balkan candidates, some of them in the throes of contagious ethnic conflicts.
    Bulgaria and Romania are preparing their EU entry for January, but EU officials in Brussels are not certain of their qualifications. The European Union appears lukewarm to the membership ambitions of such Balkan countries as Montenegro, Macedonia, Albania and Bosnia-Herzegovina.
    Diplomats generally attribute the rising Balkan tensions to Yugoslavia's disintegration after years of forced stability under Mr. Tito's iron fist.
    Albania's chaotic emergence from its longtime communist isolation and its ambition to annex part of Kosovo have added to the tension, with repercussions also expected to affect Macedonia's Slavic and ethnic Albanian populations.

http://www.washtimes.com/world/20060702-102210-8989r.htm

SCANDALOUS DECISION AT THE U.N. WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL

NO JUSTICE

SCANDALOUS DECISION AT THE U.N. WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL

Naser Oric, Bosnian Muslim war criminal freed!

July 3, 2006 -- Naser ORIC, who was handed a lenient two-year sentence by
the ICTY in The Hague (June 30, 2006)  for murder and torture of Serbs and
for destruction of Serbian villages in Eastern Bosnia, was freed since he
had been in jail for more than three years.

The ICTY judges found that between 24 September 1992 and 16 October 1992,
Naser ORIC detained number Serbs at the Srebrenica Police Station. He
physically abused them, which included beatings by various objects including
wooden sticks, wooden poles, steel pipes, metal bars, baseball bats, rifle
butts, bare fists, kicking with boots and forced teeth extractions with
rusty pliers. These beatings and physical abuse caused severe pain and
injuries such as fractured bones, severe injuries to limbs and broken teeth.
On numerous occasions, detainees were beaten into a state of
unconsciousness. Seven detainees were beaten to death.

Muslim armed units und the command of Naser ORIC engaged in various military
operations against the Army of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and
Herzegovina forces in Eastern Bosnia. In the course of such operations,
Oric's Muslim armed units in the Municipalities of Bratunac, Srebrenica and
Skelani, burnt and otherwise destroyed and plundered a minimum of fifty
predominantly Serb villages and hamlets. As a result, thousands of Serb
individuals fled the area.

ORIC described theses crimes as his "Greatest hits" while talking to Bill
Schiller of the Toronto Star and showing Schiller his shocking video of what
he and his Muslim army units did to the Serbs.

War crimes and crimes against humanity committed against the Serbs by the
Bosnian Muslims, Croats and  Squiptars (Albanians) in the former Yugoslavia
have never been investigated and properly trailed at the ICTY. The Naser
ORIC's sentence proves again that the ICTY at The Hague is incapable of
serving the justice and therefore must be closed.



BOBA BOROJEVIC
Source:  http://www.srebrenica-report.com/Oric2.htm
http://www.un.org/icty/indictment/english/ori-2ai041004e.htm

Officer gets two years for ignoring Srebrenica atrocities

 
 

Officer gets two years for ignoring Srebrenica atrocities
Saturday, July 01, 2006
Arthur Max
Associated Press

Amsterdam, Netherlands - A former police officer who commanded troops defending the Bosnian Muslim enclave of Srebrenica was handed a lenient two-year sentence Friday for failing to prevent murder and torture of Serb captives.

The U.N. war crimes tribunal, which imposed the sentence, ordered Naser Oric's immediate re lease since he has been in jail for more than three years.

Oric, 39, was acquitted of direct involvement in the murder of prisoners in the early years of the 1992-95 Bosnia war. But the court found he had closed his eyes to their mistreatment and failed to punish their killers.

 Advertisement


 

The three judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia acquitted him of all charges related to the wanton destruction of Serb villages.

The trial was closely watched in the Balkans. Muslims, who hail Oric as a war hero for his three-year defense of the enclave against Serb forces, had anticipated exoneration.

Serbs had hoped a conviction would counterbalance earlier judgments that found Bosnian Serbs guilty of genocide at Srebrenica. More than 8,000 Muslims were slaughtered there in one week in July 1995, Europe's worst civilian massacre since the Holocaust.

Prosecutors had sought an 18-year prison term. Defense lawyers said any punishment would be inappropriate.

The judges found that during two periods in 1992 and 1993, Oric's troops battered Serb prisoners with wooden planks, iron rods and baseball bats, and pulled the teeth of some of them with rusty pliers. At least six prisoners died in custody.

Oric should have known the prisoners were at risk and taken steps to prevent their mistreat ment, the judgment said. But the judges said they unanimously decided on leniency because of the untenable situation in the besieged town.

Oric, then 25, was responsible for a population swelled by refugees, without food, and in charge of ill-equipped and poorly trained forces. He had no military or administrative experience, his authority was scorned by other Muslim leaders and he had no communications with his superiors outside the area, the judges found.

"It was a continuous uphill struggle that, in actual fact, achieved very few results," the verdict said.

Bosnian Serbs denounced the sentence as "a farce," while some Muslims survivors of Srebrenica were disappointed he was found guilty of anything. In Belgrade, Serbia's President Boris Tadic called the sentence "scandalous."

"People who steal at supermarkets are given two-year prison sentences," Tadic said.

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1151754912315440.xml&coll=2

July 02, 2006

Officer gets two years for ignoring Srebrenica atrocities

Officer gets two years for ignoring Srebrenica atrocities
Saturday, July 01, 2006

Arthur MaxAssociated Press

Amsterdam, Netherlands - A former police officer who commanded troops defending the Bosnian Muslim enclave of Srebrenica was handed a lenient two-year sentence Friday for failing to prevent murder and torture of Serb captives.
The U.N. war crimes tribunal, which imposed the sentence, ordered Naser Oric's immediate re lease since he has been in jail for more than three years.
Oric, 39, was acquitted of direct involvement in the murder of prisoners in the early years of the 1992-95 Bosnia war. But the court found he had closed his eyes to their mistreatment and failed to punish their killers.
Advertisement



');
}
-->
The three judges of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia acquitted him of all charges related to the wanton destruction of Serb villages.
The trial was closely watched in the Balkans. Muslims, who hail Oric as a war hero for his three-year defense of the enclave against Serb forces, had anticipated exoneration.
Serbs had hoped a conviction would counterbalance earlier judgments that found Bosnian Serbs guilty of genocide at Srebrenica. More than 8,000 Muslims were slaughtered there in one week in July 1995, Europe's worst civilian massacre since the Holocaust.
Prosecutors had sought an 18-year prison term. Defense lawyers said any punishment would be inappropriate.
The judges found that during two periods in 1992 and 1993, Oric's troops battered Serb prisoners with wooden planks, iron rods and baseball bats, and pulled the teeth of some of them with rusty pliers. At least six prisoners died in custody.
Oric should have known the prisoners were at risk and taken steps to prevent their mistreat ment, the judgment said. But the judges said they unanimously decided on leniency because of the untenable situation in the besieged town.
Oric, then 25, was responsible for a population swelled by refugees, without food, and in charge of ill-equipped and poorly trained forces. He had no military or administrative experience, his authority was scorned by other Muslim leaders and he had no communications with his superiors outside the area, the judges found.
"It was a continuous uphill struggle that, in actual fact, achieved very few results," the verdict said.
Bosnian Serbs denounced the sentence as "a farce," while some Muslims survivors of Srebrenica were disappointed he was found guilty of anything. In Belgrade, Serbia's President Boris Tadic called the sentence "scandalous."
"People who steal at supermarkets are given two-year prison sentences," Tadic said.
http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/1151754912315440.xml&coll=2

Kosovo a Serbian Jerusalem

Bishop Artemy calls Kosovo a Serbian Jerusalem

Moscow, June 29, Interfax - Administrator of the Raska and Prizren diocese of the Serbian church bishop Artemy called Kosovo �a spiritual and cultural cradle� of the Serbs, �a Serbian Jerusalem.��The entire Serbia is a church, while Kosovo is this church�s sanctuary,� the hierarch said at the divine worship in the Gracanica monastery, Vremya Novostey daily writes on Thursday. Serbian prime minister Vojislav Kostunica visited the monastery last Wednesday. He met with the leaders of the Serbian community and had a meal with the brethren. His visit was timed to the anniversary of the Battle of Kosovo between the Serbs and the Turks on 28 June 1389.An expert of the Serbian Academy of Sciences Institute of History Slavenco Terzic said that the defeat of the Serbs tragic implications for the entire Balkan region.He noted that the Ottoman yoke had delivered a �strong blow on the rich heritage of the Christian nations in the Balkans. Their political, social and cultural elite was exterminated, and medieval towns, Orthodox churches and other monuments of culture had been destroyed.�The tragedy was exacerbated by the fact that the coming of the Ottoman Empire to the Balkans �had brought about contacts of the Balkan people with the militarized branch of Islam, rather then with high achievements of the Arab Muslim civilization,� the scholar added. Deputy director of the Institute of Slavonic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences Dr. of history Andrey Shemyakin said that from historical perspective Kosovo was indeed the cradle of the Serbian statehood and Orthodox culture. �If these are taken away from the Serbs, they will never accept it and will be quite right,� he underscored. Serbian Jerusalem
http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=news&div=1642

Making the Belgrade

Making the Belgrade

By Andrea SachsWashington Post Staff Writer

Sunday, July 2, 2006; Page P03

Q. I will be attending classes in Belgrade. What destinations outside of the city should I see?
Jodi Winship, Arlington
With its cafes, nightclubs and 7,000-year-old history, the Serbian capital never sleeps. But for a break from urban life, just follow the Danube. "There is plenty to see in Belgrade," says Kathy Kutrubes, who runs Kutrubes Travel (800-878-8566, http://www.kutrubestravel.com/ ), a Boston travel agency specializing in the Balkans. "Outside is more of a rural atmosphere."
One of Serbia's best-known destinations is Novi Sad, the capital of Vojvodina province that sits on the river and is crammed with attractions, such as the Petrovardin fortress. Near the city lies Fruska Gora, a national park lush with orchids and linden trees, as well as boars and lynx. Also stop by Sremski Karlovi, home of the 18th-century Grammar School and the art-filled Orthodox Church.
Grab a meal at a salas, wealthy estates offering food, lodging, music and more. "Spending time on salas (one of them is Salas 84) is a unique experience," Serbian Embassy spokeswoman Jelena Cukic Matic said by e-mail, "and worth keeping your stomach empty during the day."
Belgrade has a beach on an artificial lake, but for wild water, go rafting down the Ibar River, which streams past the medieval city of Maglic. If "Black Beauty" is more your scene, the 227-year-old Zobnatica horse farm offers forest rides and the Museum of Horse Breeding. Fifty miles south of Belgrade is Topola, whose distractions include the prehistoric Risovaca cave; the Park of Bukovicka Banja and its sculpture garden; and the village of Orasac, which honors the first Serbian uprising against the Turks. When it's meal time, pair such specialties as Karadjordje's steak (stuffed and fried pork or veal) with local wine: The Oplenac Wine Route features wines that have been compared with French vintages.
For more quietude than cocktails, overnight at a monastery, such as Soko Grad. Find more holy centers in Kraljevo, including the UNESCO-protected Studenica. The region also touts earthly retreats: The Vrnjacka spa, for instance, is Serbia's largest modern spa, with mineral springs and treatments.
Info: Embassy of the Republic of Serbia/ National Tourism Organization of Serbia, 202-332-0333, http://www.yuembusa.org/eng%20.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2006/06/30/AR2006063000269.html

Lighting up the world -- again

Lighting up the world -- again

KEVIN CHONG

Globe and Mail Update

Nikola Tesla harnessed the alternating current, invented radio technology and patented 700 inventions, including the wireless remote control and spark plugs. But by 1943, the inventor died alone of a heart attack in a New York hotel room -- a fringe figure, an also-ran in the scientific community. He was impoverished, obsessed with the number three and saw the Nobel Prize awarded to another man for an invention he had created years earlier.
"Nikola Tesla's ideas," The New York Times wrote in his obituary, "bordered increasingly on what some considered the fantastic as he advanced in age." Still, as Tesla once insisted: "The present is theirs, the future is mine."
That future, it seems, is now. This year -- the 150th anniversary of Tesla's birth -- Belgrade International Airport will be renamed the Nikola Tesla Airport. On the Canadian side of Niagara Falls, a statue will be unveiled to honour the man whose work enabled the construction of the world's first hydroelectric power plant. And starting this month, scientists from around the world are recognizing Tesla at conferences in Serbia, Croatia, Australia, Canada and the United States.
Tesla is also the mad scientist of choice among hipsters. He's appeared in novels, plays, an opera and a Japanese manga comic and is the subject of numerous songs -- including a few by a popular 1980s band named after him. In Jim Jarmush's 2004 film Coffee and Cigarettes musician Jack White demonstrates the Tesla coil. Later this year, David Bowie will play the Serbian-American in The Prestige, a film directed by Christopher Nolan (Memento, Batman Begins).
On the stroke of midnight July 9, 1856, Tesla was born to Serbian parents in Smiljan, Lika, in what is now Croatia. His father was a Serbian-Orthodox priest; his mother was the inventor of a number of household appliances including the mechanical eggbeater.
Tesla's own ability to visualize inventions in precise detail started in early childhood. When he saw a steel engraving of Niagara Falls, for instance, he imagined a wheel being turned by the water -- thirty years before a hydroelectric plant became reality.
After studying mechanics, physics and engineering in Austria and Czechoslovakia, Tesla worked as an electrical engineer in Hungary and France. He then emigrated to New York in 1884, where he joined Thomas Edison's laboratory.
Within a year the two had split over the alternating current. Edison tried to show the dangers of AC by using it to electrocute dogs and horses in public exhibitions. Tesla later responded with a demonstration at the 1893 World's Fair in Chicago. As Paul Auster writes in his novel Moon Palace, Tesla -- who was 6 foot 6 and cut an impressive figure in a black Prince Albert coat and derby hat -- performed "magic tricks with electricity, spinning little metal eggs around the table, shooting sparks out of his fingertips."
Tesla won the "war of the currents," of course. The industrialist George Westinghouse eventually purchased the patent for AC power. And as W. Bernard Carlson, a history professor at the University of Virginia who's writing a biography of Tesla, says, "He was as popular, if not more, than Edison."
Other battles proved more challenging. Though Tesla invented the radio in 1895, Guglielmo Marconi -- who used one of Tesla's oscillators to send signals across the English Channel -- snagged the patent in 1904 and later won the Nobel Prize. Despite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that awarded the patent posthumously to Tesla in 1943, Marconi continues to be considered the father of the airwaves.
Radio proved problematic in other ways, too. In 1899, while experimenting with high-voltage, high-frequency electrical currents on a high plateau in Colorado, Tesla believed he received radio signals from aliens. This made him a laughingstock among his peers (though it did inspire cults who believed Tesla himself was an alien).
Tesla's reputation might not have deteriorated over his lifetime if his financial savvy was anywhere close to his scientific genius. Marconi, a wealthy Italian nobleman, had strong financial backing for his quest to win the radio patent. Tesla was so inept in his finances that he tore up his royalty agreements with Westinghouse -- foregoing millions -- when the industrialist went through a temporary financial crisis brought on by the costly P.R. battle with Edison.
Money troubles also prevented Tesla from continuing research on one of his great obsessions: the wireless transmission of electricity. Tesla's dream was to provide energy freely to everyone, but because financiers did not see much profit in this utopian scheme, the deed to his laboratory had to be sold to settle debts.
Tesla's revival first picked up steam around the 1980s, when his outlandish claims begun to make sense to scientists. Take those alien signals. Dr. Jasmina Vujic, a nuclear engineering professor at UC Berkeley says, "We now know that many stars -- pulsars -- do emit radio emissions."
Science historians also noted that Tesla's work on a "death ray" -- a final project that he claimed could destroy 10,000 airplanes from 260 miles away and that he hoped would end all war -- was similar to Ronald Reagan's Space Defence Initiative or "Star Wars" project. (Conspiracy theorists point out that, after Tesla's death, J. Edgar Hoover's FBI confiscated his research and other belongings.)
Tesla's work on robotics and wireless communications networks have proved prescient as well. And his designs for a bladeless turbine and a pump without any moving parts (modelled after a diode) still intrigue contemporary engineers. "I would say that most of Tesla's concepts have been built upon and extended," says Todd Wilkie, an electrical engineer who's worked with Intel.
According to Mr. Carlson, Tesla is especially relevant in 2006 because "technology is dehumanizing; it debases us. Tesla allows people to celebrate technological progress in a very intuitive, spiritual way."
Moreover, Tesla is a unifying figure in the Balkans. Serbia and Croatia both regard him as a "native son." He appears on the Serbian 100-dinar banknote. He's also been commemorated with his own stamp in the United States, and societies of Tesla admirers burnish his memory in over 20 countries -- including Greece, Brazil and Korea. The scientific community has even honoured him by naming a unit of magnetic-flux density, which is used to calibrate MRI machines, "the tesla."
Then there's the alternating current. Dr. Alan Bristow, a researcher in physics at the University of Toronto says, "AC motors are the workhorse of modern-day society, without which we would not have most of our household appliances or any forms of modern industry."
As for Tesla's presence in pop culture? "He was an inventor and an artist," says playwright Kevin Kerr, who co-wrote Brilliant, a play about Tesla. "He loved beautiful things. The objects he designed were highly practical and usually revolutionary inventions, but they also always had to be aesthetically pleasing."
The story of a visionary who died with his genius unrecognized is of obvious interest to artists too. Tesla appears as a doomed romantic figure in the Handsome Family song Tesla's Hotel Room. The inventor's final days are elegiacally called "the last days of wonder, when spirits still flew/round bubbling test tubes in half-darkened rooms."
In the end, it's not Tesla's now-recognized achievements that capture the public imagination, but his failures -- so idealistically and extravagantly conceived -- and his bold unfulfilled promise.
Kevin Chong is a Vancouver novelist and freelance writer.
> <http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060701.wxtesla01
> /EmailBNStory/Science/home

Kosovo will always be ours, says Serb PM

Kosovo will always be ours, says Serb PM

Patrick Bishop, Gracanica, SerbiaJune 30, 2006

AN emotional show of defiance against the outside world, the Serb Prime Minister has insisted that Kosovo will always belong to the Serbs.
Vojislav Kostunica made his declaration outside a 14th century monastery on Wednesday, the holiday of Vidovdan or St Vitus' Day when Serbs remember a centuries-old battle.
He spoke to an anxious crowd of about 1000, some of the few Serbs remaining in the province since NATO invaded in 1999 to rescue the Albanian majority.
"Kosovo has always been and always will be part of Serbia," he said to cheers in the town of Gracanica, in a Serb enclave of Kosovo. However, he emphasised his "willingness to talk, to negotiate and to compromise".
Serbia is in the midst of a diplomatic offensive aimed at retaining sovereignty over the province, which it regards as the cradle of the nation. Mr Kostunica, a nationalist but also a sincere democrat, has just been in London to meet British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Belgrade's offer of autonomy has failed to attract any support from the 90 per cent Albanian population, who are increasingly frustrated at their lack of progress towards full independence.
The Serb Government has been accused by the UN, which administers the province, of promoting ethnic tensions in an attempt to hang on to Kosovo.
On the grimmest day in the Serb calendar, one Bosnian Serb recalled his nation's epic defeat more than 600 years ago as if it occurred within his memory.
"We were defending all of Europe, trying to save Christianity," Dejan said of the 14th-century battle of Kosovo, at which the Balkans fell to the Turks. "We were betrayed."
Montenegro abandoned its union with Serbia last month and declared independence. Kosovo is also being taken away. The country's negotiations to join the European Union have been suspended.
The country is at a crossroads.
TELEGRAPH, GUARDIAN
http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/kosovo-will-always-be-ours-says-serb-pm/2006/06/29/1151174331969.html#

June 26, 2006

Handke: Send my award to the Serbs

Handke: Send my award to the Serbs

http://www.kosovo.net/news/archive/2006/June_24/1.html

KiM Info Newsletter24-06-06Peter Handke: Send my award to the SerbsPeter Handke has once again shocked the German public but this time in such a way that not even the most extreme do not dare criticize him for it. He has given up the alternative Heinrich Heine award that the actors and intellectuals of Berlin wished to bestow upon him in favor of the Serbs of Kosovo, who live "surrounded by barbed wire and tanks".www.novosti.co.yu
Vecernje Novosti daily, BelgradeJune 24, 2006By D. Sekulic, June 23, 2006Peter Handke has once again shocked the German public but this time in such a way that not even the most extreme do not dare criticize him for it. He has given up the alternative Heinrich Heine award that the actors and intellectuals of Berlin wished to bestow upon him in favor of the Serbs of Kosovo, who live "surrounded by barbed wire and tanks".The Berlin Ensemble, headed by the also frequently controversial Klaus Peymann, the famous former head of the Vienna Burgtheater, recently organized donations with the help of numerous actors to award Handke an alternative Heinrich Heine award in the amount of 50,000 euros. The highly prestigious German language award was awarded to Peter Handke by an expert jury in Dusseldorf but the city council refused to accept its decision, stating quite literally that the award could not go to a writer who is of pro-Serb orientation!The case provoked spirited discussion and many concluded that it represented an instance of brutal political censure of literature. Local politicians are judging one of the greatest living writers in the German language, warned eminent intellectuals, among them some, like Nobel laureate Gunther Grass who at one time advocated the bombing of Serbia.At the same time Handke informed Peymann and his friends that he is renouncing the alternative award as well because, as he had previously stated, he did not wish his work to be the subject of meddling by local politicians. The money that they collect should be sent to the Serb enclaves in Kosovo and Metohija to people who are living under impossible conditions thanks to the supporters of "freedom" imposed upon them by NATO bombs.Grass dismisses juryIn Dusseldorf it has now been openly admitted that the decision really was of a political nature and that the Heinrich Heine award allegedly has a clearly political character. In response to this, Grass, who is highly influential, has sent a request that in the future the city council be stripped of the right to approve or reject the decision of the expert jury.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Related article:Disputed Author Handke Awarded German Literary PrizeDEUTSCE WELLE25.05.2006Gro�ansict des Bildes mit der Bildunterscrift: Austrian writer Peter Handke is controversial because of his stance on SerbiaControversial Austrian playwright and novelist Peter Handke was awarded the city of D�seldorf's Heine Prize for literature.The Heine Prize, endowed for 50,000 euros ($64,000), is one of the three highest-paying literature prizes in Germany. The jury said Handke -- like Heinric Heine, the German poet after whom the prize is named -- obstinately follows the way to an "open truth." He puts forth his own poetic world view, in contrast to broader public opinion, they said. The prize will be awared on Dec. 13.Handke wrote the groundbreaking experimental play "Offending the Audience" and the novel "The Goalie's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick", but may be best know for writing the novel "Wings of Desire", whic was turned into a film by Wim Wenders.Pro-Serbian stanceHe is controversial because of his pro-Serbian stance during the Balkan wars, and his support for the Serbian regime.Recently, Frenc national theatre Com�die-Fran�aise removed the play "Voyage to the Sonorous Land or the Art of Asking" from its 2007 season lineup, after Handke spoke at the burial of former Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic in Marc.Handke, who lives in France, said in an esay in the Frenc newspaper Lib�ration: "Let's stop laying the masacre . on the backs of the Serbian military and paramilitary. And listen -- at last -- to the survivors of the Muslim masacres in numerous Serbian villages around Srebrenica."'Glad' aceptanceLast year, Handke's publisher, Suhrkamp Verlag, said the author would categorically refuse any more literature prizes; in Paris, however, Handke said he would "gladly" acept the Heine Prize.Up to now, winners of the Heine Prize have included Walter Jens, G�nter Kunert, Max Frisc, Wolf Biermann, Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Elfriede Jelinek und Robert Gernhardt.

Balkan Gains in Peril

Balkan Gains in Peril
By Gordon N. Bardos
Sunday, June 25, 2006; B07

The Bush administration is facing a moment of truth in the Balkans. Montenegro's newly declared independence, the decision on Kosovo's future status expected later this year and ongoing efforts to promote constitutional reform in Bosnia-Herzegovina all bring sharply into focus the irreconcilability of two administration goals: disengagement from the Balkans (so full attention can be given to Afghanistan and the Middle East) and the obligation to manage the political and security changes facing southeastern Europe in the near future.Given the European Union's problems -- an economic downturn in much of the eurozone, weak leadership in Italy and Germany, lame-duck leaders in Britain and France, and enlargement fatigue -- expecting the alliance to provide serious leadership in the region over the next few years is unrealistic.The disintegration of Serbia-Montenegro is only the first of many important changes the region confronts. Montenegro's declaration of independence on June 3 from its union with Serbia was a considerable success for its top politician, Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic. But the independence referendum campaign and its outcome revealed the deep divisions within Montenegrin society. While the referendum passed by a 55 to 45 percent margin, in real terms the difference between the pro-independence and anti-independence blocs (roughly 45,000 votes) was less than the number of people in Yankee Stadium on a Sunday afternoon. Voters identifying themselves as Montenegrins, Albanians, or Muslims voted overwhelmingly in favor of independence, while Montenegrin citizens identifying themselves as Serbs -- more than 30 percent of the population -- voted just as strongly for maintaining the union. These divisions, coupled with an economy in which less than 20 percent of the population is officially employed, suggest future Montenegrin politics could be bitter and divisive.Independent Montenegro faces two important challenges. The first is healing the wounds of the independence campaign and fostering an atmosphere in which the Serb population will be able to play a constructive role in political life. The second is satisfying the demands of Montenegro's ethnic minorities now that the terms of the political game in the country are changed. For several years Djukanovic has enjoyed the support of Albanian and Muslim minorities because they supported his campaign to break the tie with Serbia. Now that this has been achieved, ethnic minorities are likely to up the ante and begin seeking increased cultural and territorial autonomy within the new state. Montenegrin politics could begin to resemble the difficult, ethnically based politics of Bosnia-Herzegovina or Macedonia, which would hamper the country's Euro-Atlantic integration efforts down the road.The spillover effects of Montenegro's independence referendum are already evident. Serb leaders in Bosnia have aired the possibility of holding their own independence referendum, while some Bosnian Muslim politicians have started calling for the Bosnian Serb republic to be eliminated altogether. Either action would mean, in effect, scrapping the Dayton Accords, which have kept the peace in Bosnia since 1995. In Serbia, support for extreme nationalist parties is rising and likely to increase still more if, as is widely expected, Kosovo is granted some form of independence later in the year. In Kosovo, recent reports by the United Nations and Human Rights Watch on corruption in political life and the absence of the rule of law show that place is a long way from becoming a stable democratic polity.All of this suggests how easy it would be, absent strong U.S. leadership, for events to spin out of control and erase 10 years of efforts to stabilize the region. In such an unstable political climate, statements by U.S. policymakers about their eagerness to pull U.S. troops out of the Balkans and turn the job over to the Europeans only embolden extremists. Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia and Serbia are all gearing up for elections, and moderate political forces in these countries need U.S. support now to convince their electorates that the difficult choices being made to adopt economic and political reforms will pay off in the near future, not two or three electoral cycles down the line. The assassination of former Serbian prime minister Zoran Djindjic in March 2003 is a tragic reminder of the great personal risks reformers throughout southeastern Europe are taking. They need and deserve U.S. understanding and support.By visiting Baghdad this month, President Bush sent a strong personal message to Iraqis that the United States intends to support their country until its transition to democracy is completed. The administration should send a similar message to both extremists and moderates in the Balkans that the United States will actively lead the effort to integrate all the countries of southeastern Europe into both NATO and the European Union -- and that it won't pull out until the job is done.

The writer is assistant director of the Harriman Institute at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs. He also serves as a Balkans analyst for Freedom House.
http://kosovareport.blogspot.com/2006/06/balkan-gains-in-peril.html