June 16, 2006

USA uses Bulgarian intelligence service in the Balkans

 

USA uses Bulgarian intelligence service in the Balkans - Montenegrin daily
BBC Monitoring Europe (Political) - June 14, 2006

Excerpt from report by M.V.R. and D.Z: "Bulgarian spies followed Pedja" published by Montenegrin newspaper Dan on 13 June

The chairman of the Socialist People's Party [SNP - Predrag Bulatovic] who is also the leader of the pro-union bloc was being followed by foreign intelligence services. This fact was confirmed by Georgi Koritarov, member of the Bulgarian State Security Service, in his confession published by the Belgrade-based Blic newspaper. He admitted that this service was very interested in Montenegrin opposition leader Predrag Bulatovic.

[Passage omitted: Parts of the Blic article]

Military-political analyst Milovan Drecun believes that the fact that foreign intelligence services were following Montenegrin opposition leader Predrag Bulatovic is not an unexpected development, considering the fact that he has so many supporters that it was always a possibility that he might take over as the leader of Montenegro. He believes that there was a time when such an event definitely did not suit the American interests in the Balkans.

"Lately the Bulgarian intelligence service has become a faithful long arm serving the American interests in the Balkans. Three American bases are to be opened in that country, but it is particularly interesting to note that the Bulgarian intelligence service now has a new role to play in the Balkans. Whenever the American intelligence services cannot or do not want to do something efficiently, they do it through Bulgarian services. My sources tell me that Koritarov's statement is absolutely true," Drecun says.

He adds that everything the Bulgarian intelligence service has been doing in Montenegro and Kosovo-Metohija has been done on behalf of the USA and in the course of executing orders issued by its intelligence services.

"One former Bulgarian general from the Macedonian area is intensely busy among members of the Albanian National Army [ANA] and the [Kosovo] protection corps. His task is to control actions of the Albanian mafia and [Kosovo politician] Hasim Taci, because America is starting to lose control over that mafia.

[Passage omitted: Drecun comments on other alleged Bulgarian intelligence services' activities

He points out that, beside the CIA, Al-Qa'idah has its headquarters in Sofia, too. Its head was the ideologist of this terrorist organization, Ayman al-Zawahiri, and then his brother Muhammad.

"Daut Haradinaj, brother of [former Kosovo Prime Minister] Ramus Haradinaj, visited Sofia in order to contact him after Kfor arrived in Kosovo. Daut Haradinaj is the main connection between the former KLA [Kosovo Liberation Army], which has now become the Kosovo Protection Corps, and Al-Qa'idah.

[Passage omitted: Drecun says that Bulgarian intelligence services helped dissolve Serbia-Montenegro]


Source: Dan, Podgorica, in Serbian 13 Jun 06, p7

Copyright 2006 British Broadcasting Corporation
Posted for Fair Use only.


Quiet Bulgarian
http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/dan061406.htm




Apostle of Electrification

 

http://news.serbianunity.net/bydate/2006/June_15/23.html

Serbian Unity Congress

Letter to President of Serbia regarding

International Nikola Tesla Day and the Year of Electrification

June 15, 2006

Boris Tadic, President
Republic of Serbia

Dear President Tadic,

The Serbian Unity Congress is joining the other organizations around the World that are proposing to the United Nations to declare the year 2006 as «The Year of Electrification» in honor of the 150th anniversary of Tesla's birth and proclame July 10 as «International Nikola Tesla Day». Nikola Tesla was born in 1856 in Smiljane, Lika. His father Milutin was a Serbian Orthodox priest, and mother Djuka a self-taught inventor of many household items. Tesla came to the USA in 1884 and became one of the greatest inventors in the World. Tesla was a visionary genius whose inventions established the basis for the widespread electrification and wireless communications across the Globe. In writings about Tesla, one often finds statements such as that he "invented the twentieth century" or "the twenty first century", or even that he "invented the future".

Tesla created the polyphase alternating current based system of motors and generators that remains at the heart of electric power generation to this day. Among the more than 700 of Tesla's other inventions/patents are the rotating magnetic field principle, polyphase alternating-current system, Tesla Coil, induction motor, wireless communication, fluorescent lights, use of high-frequency (h.f.) currents in medicine and remote control.

However, he is still not recognized for many of his fundamental inventions. Such is the case of radio for which even the U.S. Supreme Court in 1943 determined Tesla as inventor. Tesla is one of only two Americans to have a unit of electrical measurement named in his honor. In 1956, Tesla's peers at the Electrotechnical Conference in Munich acknowledged his monumental contributions to science by designating his name to represent a unit of magnetic measurement: the "tesla" (T) became the Unit of Magnetic Flux Density in the MKS system. Throughout the entire history of electrical science only fifteen men worldwide have received this honor. The IEEE, which considers Tesla one of the 12 "apostles" of electrical science, continues to offer an annual prize in the field of power engineering in his name.

We ask the Government of Serbia and Montenegro to submits an official requests to the UN to declare the year 2006 as «The Year of Electrification» and to proclame July 10 as «International Nikola Tesla Day».

Sincerely yours,
Prof. Dr. Jasmina Vujic
Executive Vice President

Beware Kosovo independence

 

Letters to the editor

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
June 16, 2006


Beware Kosovo independence
    In the well-written Commentary column regarding the global metastasis of al Qaeda ("Reconnecting al Qaeda dots," Wednesday), Arnaud de Borchgrave omits one important regional milestone: the Balkans. Today, while America's and the world's attention is focused on Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan, the establishment of a rogue Islamic terrorist state in the belly of Europe is nearing enactment by misguided moves to create an independent Kosovo controlled by terrorist and organized-crime elements.
    A Wall Street Journal (European edition) article of Nov. 1, 2001, headlined "Al Qaeda's Balkan Links," states: "For the past 10 years, the most senior leaders of al Qaeda have visited the Balkans, including [Osama] bin Laden himself on three occasions between 1994 and 1996. The Egyptian surgeon turned terrorist leader Ayman Al-Zawahiri has operated terrorist training camps, weapons of mass destruction factories and money-laundering and drug-training networks throughout Albania, Kosovo, Macedonia (FYROM), Bulgaria, Turkey and Bosnia. This has gone on for a decade."
    The Washington Times' own Jerry Seper wrote as far back as 1999: "Some members of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), which has financed its war effort through the sale of heroin, were trained in terrorist camps run by international fugitive Osama bin Laden." Since then, Kosovo has become Europe's center for drug trafficking, sex slavery and terrorism.
    According to Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily (Oct. 25, 2005): "Deeply placed sources within the Islamist community in Kosovo have identified the source and type of the explosives used in the jihadist terrorist bombings in London on July 7, 2005, and the Madrid commuter railway bombings of March 11, 2004.
    "The man at the center of the provision of the explosives in both instances was an Albanian, operating mostly out of Kosovo (with links into Bosnia) who is a second-ranking leader in the Kosovo Liberation Army."
    Only firm action by the United States can stop another U.N. fiasco: Kosovo independence.
    
    COL. GEORGE JATRAS
    Air Force (retired)
    Camp Hill, Pa.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20060615-084010-9571r.htm

June 05, 2006

UN Closes Book On Milosevic Cover-up

UN Closes Book On Milosevic Cover-up

Investigators clear themselves despite overwhelming evidence of foul play

Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com May 31 2006

The Hague Tribunal's final verdict on Slobodan Milosevic's death has concluded that he was not poisoned and there was no foul play involved. Imagine my shock. The truth is that the circumstances of Milosevic's death and why it had to happen prove foul play even absent allegations of poisoning.
How can an investigation that, if evidence of murder was uncovered, would result in criminals charges for the investigators themselves be impartial?
The BBC reported on the nature of Milosevic's death,
"Guards knocked on his door for an 0900 wake-up, but assumed he was still sleeping and left him alone until 1000 when they saw "that he was still lying on his bed".
"As he approached the bed he saw that Mr Milosevic's face was greyish in colour and that his arm was hanging over the side of the bed," says the report.
The guards tried to find a pulse, but realised the prisoner was dead."
Milosevic's prison cell was under 24 hour video surveillance. At first the UN ridiculously claimed he had poisoned himself by having someone smuggle in drugs past armed guards before changing their story to a heart attack. If Milosevic had died of a sudden heart attack surely his reaction to it would be captured on the tape. All the UN had to do was show the Dutch authorities the tape and no investigation would have even been necessary.

Heart attacks are not usually considered a subtle and quiet way to die. The symptoms are chest pain, discomfort, sweating, weakness, nausea and vomiting. Are we really expected to believe Milosevic experienced all this while remaining in a peaceful sleep and without his watchers noticing?
"They kept cameras and lights on in Slobodan's cell non-stop, so that he could not sleep. That is an officially recognised form of torture," said Milosevic's wife.
The fact that Milosevic was under constant surveillance coupled with the total lack of response from medical personnel to his heart attack proves foul play in itself, absent of any allegations of poisoning.
Milosevic wrote a letter one day before his death claiming he was being poisoned to death in jail. The lawyer who advised Milosevic during his trial, Azdenko Tomanovic, showed journalists a handwritten letter in which Milosevic wrote: "They would like to poison me. I'm seriously concerned and worried."
Milosevic's trial was coming to an end and the only verifiable evidence to emerge from it was proof that the real Butcher's of Serbia were Wes Clark and Bill Clinton. The US government's financial and military support of Al-Qaeda, after the embassy bombings, was also being exposed.
The Globalists have wanted to eliminate Milosevic for a long time. Former MI6 agent Richard Tomlinson said he saw documents in 1992 that discussed assassinating Milosevic by means of a staged car accident, where the driver would be blinded by a flash of light and remote controlled brake failure enacted to cause the crash. This exact same technique was utilized for real in the murder of Princess Diana.

The illegal Clinton-NATO bombing of Serbia was fueled in part by a staged ITN news report purporting to show evidence of a Bosnian Serb death camp. Pictures of emaciated 'prisoners' behind a barbed wire fence were used to claim the Serbians were running internment camps. In reality the emaciated man was a tuberculosis victim and the film screw were the ones inside he barbed wire enclosure, filming out to refugees who had willingly entered the refugee camp.
Milosevic, just like Saddam Hussein when his testimony was shut off after he discussed the US' role in staging bombings in Iraq, had to be silenced and the trial prematurely aborted before its credibility completely collapsed.
-------------------------------------------
Related: Why Milosevic Was Murdered
Related: The Real Butchers Of Serbia: Clinton, Clark, NATO
Related: Milosevic Autopsy: The Murderers Clear ThemselvesShortcut to: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/310506closesbook.htm

Could Milosevic's death have been averted?

Could Milosevic's death have been averted?
By Elisabeth Rosenthal International Herald Tribune

SUNDAY, JUNE 4, 2006

As Slobodan Milosevic's family and the United Nations war crimes tribunal in The Hague spar over whether his death in prison on March 11 was avoidable, a slew of medical information released in the past week has provided new details about the former Yugoslav leader's demise, his medical ailments and his stormy relationship with his court-appointed doctors.The Milosevic family contends that his medical treatment in detention was inadequate. The court, in an internal review released last week, concluded that its doctors had delivered "proper care," and that Milosevic was an uncooperative patient.But the new medical facts suggest that there were a number of times when either Milosevic or the court could have done things differently, possibly altering the course of his illness.Much of the court's inquiry that was released last week documents a turbulent, distrustful relationship between Milosevic and the detention center's officials, which almost certainly affected his care.He sometimes refused to take pills, or took doses dictated by doctors consulted by telephone. Visitors sometimes brought unapproved medicines and alcohol into his cell.The inquiry accuses him of secretly taking Rifampicin, a tuberculosis drug that would have blunted the effect of his blood pressure drug and made it hard to control. The drug was found in a screening blood test in January. Milosevic denied taking Rifampicin and said that someone was trying to kill him.On the last day of Milosevic's life, prison guards who unlocked his cell decided not to examine him when he failed to move or respond to their greeting. Ironically, given his medical problems, they decided he needed rest.An hour later, when he still had not moved, they noticed his gray color. Milosevic's autopsy, conducted by a Dutch coroner, estimated the time of death at between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. Could he have been alive, or revivable during the guard's first visit?The court and Milosevic spent the months before his death wrangling over where he should get a cardiac work-up, which never happened. Milosevic refused hospitalization for important cardiac testing on at least one and possibly more occasions."If he had been in a monitored setting on March 11, he certainly wouldn't have died," said Patrick Barriott, a French doctor and longtime friend of Milosevic.Twice in the past six months, Milosevic petitioned the court to be sent for urgent treatment in Moscow - he refused to be treated in a NATO country. The last petition was on March 2.Noting that the tests could be performed in the Netherlands, the court rejected the first petition. An appeal was pending when he died.In its internal review, the International War Crimes Tribunal said: "In these circumstances it cannot be concluded that there was a failure to provide proper care."Still, the report acknowledged that some of the detention center's systems for monitoring Milosevic's health were inadequate and that some prominent doctors believed that additional tests and procedures should have been performed - measures that could have been lifesaving.Ren� Tavernier, a cardiologist from Belgium who reviewed the case at the behest of the court, concluded: "There is no test that if carried out would have helped detect or prevent the cause of death."But on April 5, a Russian cardiac surgeon, Leo Bockeria, wrote to the court that Milosevic "could have been treated easily at any place of the world" with a minimally invasive procedure in which a tube is used to open an artery.In either case, it is clear from the documents that Milosevic was a sometimes difficult patient who defied doctors orders.Zdravko Mijailovic, who treated Milosevic at the Military Hospital in Belgrade in 2001, said that important studies had never been completed, because of the patient's "lack of motivation."From studies conducted around that time, Milosevic was known to have serious high blood pressure and a thickened heart wall - the result of years of hypertension. He was on a slew of medicines.All doctors agree that Milosevic was at high risk for stroke, heart attack or fatal heart rhythm. What is less certain is whether his death on March 11, at that particular moment, was inevitable. But little is known about the progression of Milosevic's heart disease during his time in the detention center.In 2002, Milosevic refused the recommendation of a Dutch cardiologist that he be hospitalized for a cardiac work-up. In 2004, a Russian doctor who he had called to examine him made a similar recommendation, although Milosevic and his lawyer never disclosed that to the court.In November, a French cardiologist hired by Milosevic, Florence Leclercq, again recommended immediate heart testing, particularly a scan called scintigraphy. She was surprised, she said, that it had not already been performed.Shortly thereafter, Milosevic requested temporary release for a work-up in Moscow. That plea was rejected and there was no effort made to schedule it elsewhere, in part because the court- appointed cardiologist believed that new testing was not urgent."Mr. Milosevic wanted full medical treatment in Russia because they started to control his health from the start," said Milosevic's lawyer, Zdenko Tomanovic, noting that he had frequently consulted Russian doctors by phone. "He did not want medical treatment in a country that was a member of NATO. The charges against him stem from the NATO conflict."Doctors disagree about whether those tests would have changed anything.An independent autopsy by the Dutch government showed that one of Milosevic's main coronary arteries was 50 percent narrowed - not generally enough to cause a heart attack in itself. At the same time, he had a severely thickened heart, with an unusual structure called myocardial bridge, where a coronary artery plunges into the heart's muscle rather than lying on its surface.The significance and proper treatment of such bridges is controversial, according to the medical literature, since many produce no symptoms or problems. But some, especially in combination with other heart disease, can precipitate chest pain, abnormal rhythms and heart attacks.Such bridges are sometimes treated by placing a stent in the narrowed artery to hold it open. Since Milosevic did not undergo a full cardiac work-up for years before his death, it is impossible to have a good sense of whether he would have been a candidate for the procedure.Marlise Simons of The New York Times contributed reporting for this article.


Copyright � 2006 The International Herald Tribune www.iht.com
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/04/news/serbs.php

June 03, 2006

Serb tragedy needs epilogue

 

Serb tragedy needs epilogue

By JIRI DIENSTBIER

PRAGUE -- Serbia's long tragedy looks like it is coming to an end. The death of Slobodan Milosevic has just been followed by Montenegro's referendum on independence. Independence for Kosovo, too, is inching closer.

The wars of the Yugoslav succession have not only been a trial for the peoples of that disintegrated country; they also raised huge questions about the exercise of international justice.

Do international tribunals of the sort Milosevic faced before his death promote or postpone serious self-reflection and reconciliation in damaged societies? Do they strengthen or undermine the political stability needed to rebuild wrecked communities and shattered economies?

The evidence on these questions is mixed. Indeed, the record of the International War Crimes Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), based in The Hague, may be instructive in judging the credibility of the strategy of using such trials as part of the effort to end civil and other wars. In 13 years, the ICTY, with 1,200 employees, spent roughly $ 1.25 billion to convict only a few dozen war criminals.

Moreover, whereas members of all ethnic groups committed crimes, in its first years, the ICTY indicted and prosecuted far more Serbs than others, fueling a perception, even among opponents of Milosevic's regime, that the tribunal was political and anti-Serbian.

We may regret that Milosevic's own trial ended without a conclusion. But a conviction only of Milosevic, however justified, without parallel penalties for his Croat, Bosnian and Kosovo-Albanian counterparts would hardly have contributed to serious self-reflection within the post-Yugoslav nations.

To be sure, the arrest of Gen. Ante Gotovina, adored by many Croats as a hero, but responsible for the brutal expulsion of a quarter-million Serbs from Croatia and northwest Bosnia -- the biggest ethnic cleansing in Europe since World War II -- improves the ICTY's standing. But Milosevic's Croatian and Bosnian counterparts, Franjo Tudjman and Alija Izetbegovic, respectively, remained unindicted when they died.

So, too, the main commanders of the Kosovo Liberation Army (UCK). Ramush Haradinaj, the prime minister of Kosovo, was accused but later released from detention.

I have always been convinced that Milosevic should have been put on trial in Belgrade. After all, Milosevic's critics and political rivals such as the journalist Slavko Curuvija and Milosevic's former mentor, Ivan Stambolic, were assassinated by Serb police agents, who also tried three times to murder the opposition leader Vuk Draskovic. There was, moreover, ample evidence of corruption among Milosevic's inner circle, including members of his immediate family.

Holding the trial in Belgrade might have served better to catalyze a sober examination of the past. The atmosphere was certainly favorable. The majority of Serbs hold Milosevic responsible for the decline of their society.

Even before his fall, the opposition controlled most big Serbian cities, and in 2000 he lost the election that he called to shore up his authority. The relatively small turnout at his funeral confirmed that only a minority of Serbs considers him a national hero.

Meanwhile, with the exception of Slovenia, the democratic transformation in the post-Yugoslav region remains uneasy. Wars, ethnic cleansing, embargoes and sanctions created not only psychological traumas, but also black markets, smuggling, large-scale corruption and de facto rule by mafias. The bombing of Serbia by NATO in 1999 heavily damaged its economy, with serious consequences for neighboring countries.

The definitive end of what remains of Yugoslavia may -- at least today -- pose no danger of war, but the Muslim Sandjak region will now be divided by state boundaries, and Albanian extremists, with their dreams of a Greater Albania, believe their influence in a separate Montenegro will be reinforced with a yes vote on independence.

Most Serbs and Croats in Bosnia believe that the best solution to the problems of that sad country would be to join the territories that they inhabit with their "mother" countries.

Then there is the unresolved status of Kosovo, where the Albanian majority demands independence, and extremists threaten to fight for it. As one Kosovo Liberation Army commander warned, "If we kill one KFOR soldier a day, these cowards will leave."

With independence, the extremists would gain a territorial base from which to undermine Macedonia, southern Montenegro, and southern Serbia, jeopardizing stability in the entire region.

Serbia is offering Kosovo the formula "less than independence, more than autonomy." It demands security guarantees for the Serbian minority and cultural monuments, as well as control of the borders with Albania and Macedonia to stop traffic in arms, drugs and women, and to prevent the use of Kosovo by Albanian extremists.

Any resolution of Kosovo's status is problematic, but the international community should not repeat old mistakes. In 1991, the principle that only a politically negotiated division of Yugoslavia would be recognized was abandoned. Now, as then, a change of boundaries without the consent of all concerned parties would not only violate international law, but could also lead to violence.

The international community must not be gulled into thinking that war-crime trials marginalize, rather than mobilize, extremists and nationalists. Pressure on Croatia and Serbia to arrest and hand over suspects -- a condition of EU accession negotiations -- has yielded several extraditions and may result in more. But further trials alone are unlikely to bring about the long-term settlements that the region's fragile states need in order to ensure stability and democratic development. The people of the Balkans should feel that the EU offers them political and economic support. They deserve it.

Jiri Dienstbier was foreign minister of Czechoslovakia and special rapporteur of the UNHRC in the Balkans.

Copyright 2006 Project Syndicate (www.project-syndicate.org)
 

Is Europe's separatist specter a ghost of former self?

HoustonChronicle.com -- http://www.HoustonChronicle.com | Section: Viewpoints, Outlook

June 2, 2006, 10:03PM


Is Europe's separatist specter a ghost of former self?
By AUSTIN BAY


A SPECTER haunts Europe, an old and once-murderous scourge: the specter of ethnic and neo-nationalist separatism.

Modernity, in the form of two of the world's most appealing "country clubs," however, may have tempered the specter's threat. The allure of belonging to the clubs of wealth and security - the wealth of the European Union and the security of NATO - has reshaped the new separatists' demands for autonomy and independence. Many would-be "new separatist" leaders have seen wealth created and the common security well served through transnational economic and defense cooperation.

Perhaps the "specter" is now a ghost of its former self. Let's hope so. In the 21st century, EU money and NATO safety should convince all but the most fanatic of 12th century European tribalists that autonomy cannot mean closed borders, isolation and warfare. The country clubs' rules: Violence is verboten; cooperation is encouraged.

Montenegro is Europe's latest public display of "new separatism." Last week, the Montenegrin people voted, by a narrow margin, to split from neighboring Serbia. The plebiscite in the tiny Balkan nation did not quite conclude Yugoslavia's long war of devolution. The former Serb province of Kosovo might have that distinction, depending on the outcome of the United Nations' decision on Kosovo independence

As it was, the Serb-Montenegrin state was a squabbling leftover. Still, consider the progress since 1991, when Croatia and Serbia went to war. This Yugoslav divorce was resolved by an angry referendum, not another bout of ethnic cleansing. (Remember the rule: Violence is forbidden.)

Montenegro's bye-bye to Serbia was about local control, not virulent ultra-nationalism. Like its neighbors (including Serbia), Montenegro wants to eventually join the European Union.

NATO is another goal. Western Europeans and Americans puzzle over NATO's 21st century purpose, though NATO now has troops in Afghanistan and may collaborate with the United Nations when and if the United Nations sponsors a Darfur (Sudan) peacekeeping mission. Eastern Europeans, including most citizens of the former Yugoslav republics, see admission to NATO as the ultimate stamp of political approval. It is also a bulwark against Russian recidivism.

Montenegro's vote has focused attention on other demands for ethnic and cultural autonomy in Europe. Europe has a quilted history - the cultural and tribal fabrics are many. There are numerous examples of unresolved and historical rivalries in virtually all of the current European states.

Though the Balkans are no longer quite the powder keg they once were, the potential for ethnic explosion increases when Muslims and Christians are involved. This is why Macedonia and particularly Bosnia remain volatile. Bosnian Serbs, now living in a curious statelet that comprises roughly a third of federal Bosnia, want to withdraw from the federation. If Montenegro can do it, Bosnia's Serbs argue, they can, too. Odds are the Bosnian Serb separatists would secede, then attempt to rejoin Serbia, violating the Clinton administration's Dayton Accords.

Some demands for autonomy will surprise Americans used to looking at the maps of France and Spain and thinking, "Oh, yes, homes of the French and Spanish." France struggles with a weak but occasionally violent independence movement in Corsica. Spain continues to struggle with Basque nationalists, but an even bigger challenge may be the Catalans, with their would-be national capital in Barcelona. Unlike the Basques, the Catalans have controlled their terrorists and struck a working economic and cultural bargain with Spain. But no astute Spanish politician should take Catalonian stability for granted.

Last year, the people of Holland and France rejected the proposed EU constitution. The Dutch and French "no's" suggested even the most solid of Western European citizens have issues with a pan-European government. Few object, however, to the original notion of a "Common Market" (the European Economic Community).

A common market (if not a common currency), open communication and common security - these are the "greater identities" shaping Europe, through the EU and NATO.

Yes, ethnic and historical differences in Europe still create wars of words, which a handful of violent fanatics would turn into wars of bombs and bullets.

But violence and isolation produce poverty - and the people of Europe's "could-be" statelets know it.

Bay, a nationally syndicated columnist based in Texas, specializesin military and foreign affairs.

May 30, 2006

WT: Objections remain to independence

Objections remain to independence

By Bruce I. Konviser
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
May 30, 2006


PODGORICA, Serbia-Montenegro -- A declaration of independence making Montenegro the world's newest nation could come as early as Friday, but lingering objections to the results of a May 21 referendum have spoiled some of the fun for Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic.
    The ballot, in which pro-independence forces narrowly achieved a supermajority threshold demanded by the European Union, was the crowning glory of Mr. Djukanovic's career.
    But the pro-unionist bloc, which favors maintaining the Serbia-Montenegro federation, is refusing to accept the results even after international observers declaring the plebiscite to be free, fair and in accordance with international standards. The bloc claims thousands of ballots were cast illegally by registered voters from neighboring countries.
    "I'm not surprised by such a position," Mr. Djukanovic said in an interview. "This is part of their political tradition. Over the past 10 years or so, there have been only two outcomes for them. Either they will have won, or the vote has been stolen."
    Mr. Djukanovic charged that the pro-unionists, made up largely of ethnic Serbs, are encouraged in their intransigence by the Belgrade government of Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica.
    "What is happening now in Montenegro is directly inspired by, and from, Mr. Kostunica's office in Belgrade," Mr. Djukanovic said. "Mr. Kostunica, as a through-and-through nationalist, would like to leave to Serb nationalists an open issue that some [territorial issues] are open to dispute for Serbia beyond its border."
    Congratulations on the referendum result have already come in from Mr. Djukanovic's counterparts in neighboring Croatia, Macedonia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. But Mr. Kostunica has been silent.
    Still, the prime minister maintained that opposition challenges couldn't change the results, which he said are indisputable and represent the will of the Montenegrin people.
    Before the referendum, the European Union, skittish about reigniting the ethnic tensions that tore apart the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s, mandated that the pro-independence bloc obtain at least a 55 percent majority in order for the EU to accept the desire for independence.
     The pro-independence bloc cleared that threshold by about half a percentage point. The election commission is expected to ratify the results this week and send them to parliament for confirmation. That should be followed by a parliamentary declaration of independence, which the prime minister said could come as soon as Friday.
     That would formally end the Serbia-Montenegro federation that was born three years ago out of the last remnants of the former Yugoslavia. Civil war tore Yugoslavia apart in the 1990s, as Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Macedonia all left the federation to form their own separate states.  

 

Objections remain to independence
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20060529-110959-6447r.htm

New Europe: "End Balkanization Now!" by Aleksandar Mitic

 

 

 

 

 

May 28- June 3, 2006. Issue Number 679

 

Page 2 – Opinion

 

 

End Balkanization Now!

 

By Aleksandar Mitic

 

An old saying in Montenegro used to say “Crna Gora i Srbija – to je jedna familija†(“Montenegro and Serbia – one familyâ€). Today, pro-independence graffiti in Montenegro read “Crna i Gora i Baskija – to je jedna familija†(“Montenegro and the Basque Country – one familyâ€).

 

Indeed, if the preliminary results of the Montenegrin referendum on independence are confirmed, the process of the balkanization of the Balkans will have scored one more point.

 

Some say it also paved a chance for many independence-hopefuls around Europe, be it in Catalonia, the Basque Country or Scotland, which have sent their observer missions to Podgorica to monitor the mechanics of intra-state divorce.


It might be contrary to the logic of European integration and the equation mark between the European Union and “borderless Europeâ€, but it is real and it is happening in 2006, just a few weeks before the June summit on  “the future of Europeâ€.

 

As far as enlargement is concerned, EU leaders should answer the question: “Does a European future imply further balkanization of the Balkans?†or “Do the Balkans have to choose a nationalistic past in order to pave their way to their European future?â€.

 

If the answer is yes, EU finance ministers should start planning a budget for more crisis management and Balkan nations should start digging out marching songs cds back from the basement.

 

If not, the “balkanization of the Balkans†must end. Now!

 

It must end now, because Montenegrin independence at least had a legal basis. Under the findings of the 1991-92 Badinter Commission on the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia, all six Yugoslav republics – and only republics not provinces -- had the legal right to become independent.

 

After Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Macedonia, Montenegro is the last former Yugoslav republic to seize the opportunity.

 

It means that Kosovo, a province of Serbia, does not have the right to secession. Indeed, an independence of Kosovo – against the will of Serbia – can only be illegal, one-sided and imposed.

 

As such, an independent Kosovo would be the real, universal opener of the Pandora box of separatism.

 

According to the UNDP, there are some 5,000 different ethnic groups living in some 200 countries in the world. According to the figures of the study “Minorities at riskâ€, some 509 ethnic groups in the world consider themselves as politically discriminated and want autonomies or states.

 

All separatist or independence-seeking movements in the world already have their eyes set on the resolution of the Kosovo talks, especially since most of them have suffered much more tragic conflicts and have waited for the solution to their problems much longer than has the southern Serbian province, populated by an Albanian majority.

 

Indeed, a Kosovo precedent would have world ramifications.

 

It could impact on the tense relations between two nuclear powers – India and Pakistan – disputing Kashmir, a region very much like Kosovo in terms of ethnic proportions, violence or religious symbolism.

 

It could have an impact on the world’s largest country – Russia – with Transdniestria in Moldova, Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia seeking to integrate it and Chechnya seeking to separate.

 

The world’s most populous country – China – could face separatism in Xinjiang, not forgetting Taiwan and Tibet.

 

Eternal pragmatists should think about the impact of imposed independence on some of the world’s most important pipelines – winding their way through disputed territories around Georgia, Nagorno-Karabakh or a Kurdistan.

 

Back to the Balkans, people still do not know whether they will be part of the next wave of EU enlargement due to its “absorption capacityâ€, but they surely are themselves still digesting the last wave of balkanization from the 1990s.

 

In the news today, the High representative in Bosnia-Herzegovina Christian Schwarz-Schilling expressed his worry about the slow progress of reintegration of the southern Bosnian town of Mostar, divided between Croats and Muslims since a conflict which ended 12 years ago.

 

Near Prizren, in Kosovo, an Albanian mob clashed with UN police after attacking and injuring Serb lawyers investigating a war crimes case for the Hague tribunal. A local Albanian leader later explained it was a mistake: they thought they were attacking Serb refugees trying to visit their homes seven years after being brutally expelled.

 

So, what kinds of signals would the pursuit of balkanization send to the Muslims in the Sandzak area, the Albanians in southern Serbia or in western FYROM, the Hungarians in northern Vojvodina, the Serbs in eastern Slavonia, eastern Montenegro or eastern Bosnia?

 

Indeed, if “yes†to an independent Kosovo, why not a “yes†to an independent Republika Srpska for example – which also has a 90-percent majority seeking to break away?

 

I can almost feel some eyebrows raising.

 

But can there be any more “taboos†if there are no more principles?

 

Aleksandar Mitic is the Brussels correspondent of the Tanjug news agency, a Lecturer at the University of Belgrade and analyst at the Institute 4S, Brussels.

 



Bosnian Serbs Call For Independence Referendum



http://news.scotsman.com/latest_international.cfm?id=795432006


Reuters
May 29, 2006


Calls for Bosnia Serb referendum
By Olga Lola Ninkovic


BANJA LUKA, Bosnia - Long-standing calls by Serb nationalists [sic] for the
Serb Republic to secede from Bosnia grew louder on Monday, following
Montenegro's vote in a referendum earlier this month to split from Serbia.

The Serb National Movement, made up mostly of Serbs forced out of Croatia in
1995, said it had collected nearly 50,000 signatures of Serbs across the
country for a petition to demand an independence referendum.

"The will of the citizens cannot be ignored. The Serb people do not want to
live in a Bosnia imposed on them. The Serb people want a free Republika
Srpska, separated from an imposed Bosnia and Herzegovina,"
said movement president Dane Cankovic.

An apparent endorsement of the referendum demand by Bosnian Serb Prime
Minister Milorad Dodik was sharply rebuked on Monday by the country's
international peace overseer, Christian Schwarz-Schilling, part of whose job
is to keep Bosnia together.

"The international community will not allow the sovereignty and territorial
integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina to be endangered," his office said in a
statement on Monday.
....
The U.S.-sponsored Dayton accord ended Bosnia's war of secession from
Serb-dominated Yugoslavia in 1995, making Bosnia a single state comprising
two "entities"
- the Serb Republic and the Muslim-Croat federation.

Although its 18-month initiative for secession has been ignored officially,
the Serb National Movement gained popularity after Montenegro voted for
independence, dissolving its loose union with Serbia.
....
Montenegro was one of Yugoslavia's federal republics with a legal right to
secession which it retained in the looser Serbia-Montenegrin union.

Under Bosnia's peace accord Republika Srpska had no such right. Kosovo is
still nominally a province of Serbia but is under U.N. control.

Dodik proposed Bosnia be organized as a federal unit, giving each ethnic
group the right to self-determination through referendum....

Serb radicals urged Dodik on Monday to put the referendum issue on the
parliamentary agenda to prove he was serious, not simply fishing for votes
ahead of the October general election.

May 27, 2006

Belgrade Burndown

Newsweek
 

Belgrade Burndown
Was a bitter secret feud over an alleged intelligence lapse during the Clinton years behind Porter Goss's efforts to push out some top CIA officials?

WEB EXCLUSIVE
Column/Terror Watch
 
Updated: 5:21 p.m. ET May 24, 2006

May 24, 2006 - As controversial CIA Director Porter Goss exits the agency, NEWSWEEK has discovered new details about a purge of top agency operatives shortly after Goss's arrival in 2004. A bitter secret feud over a Clinton-era counterintelligence case was apparently a major motivation behind the loss of those seasoned intelligence veterans, sources say. Gen. Michael Hayden, President Bush's nominee to replace Goss as CIA chief, has signaled that when he is confirmed by the Senate, probably later this week, he intends to appoint one of the principal victims of the feud, former CIA operations chief Stephen Kappes, as deputy CIA director—a move that is regarded inside the intelligence world as a final insult to Goss and his inner circle.

The secret feud revolves around how CIA management, led by former director George Tenet, handled a 1999 counterintelligence problem that arose as a result of the Clinton administration's bombing of Belgrade to oust Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic. Though the counterintelligence investigation ended years ago, egos and reputations were so deeply bruised that participants on both sides of the dispute (who spoke to NEWSWEEK anonymously because the matter is still considered sensitive) still fume when discussing the case. The CIA declined to comment on the matter.

After President Clinton ordered the bombing of Belgrade to begin in the spring of 1999, the American Embassy in the Serbian capital was evacuated of all personnel, including the entire CIA station. Before leaving the building, allegedly in haste, CIA officers were supposed to destroy all secret documents. Current and former intelligence officials called this procedure a "burndown" or "burnout." When they believed they had burned everything, CIA officials left the Belgrade embassy, but not before locking the heavy vault door at the entrance to the office suite that housed the CIA station.

American diplomats and CIA officials didn't return to the embassy until around nine months later, after the U.S. bombing of Belgrade stopped. When they opened the vault door into their suite, however, CIA officials were alarmed to discover that some secret documents had not been destroyed. Instead, they were found left lying either behind desks and file cabinets or in open sight, depending upon which version of the story is being told. According to some accounts, the unburned material included papers or microfiche identifying undercover informants—the kind of information that is among the most sensitive of all secrets the CIA is supposed to protect.

The agency launched a big investigation to determine whether any of the secret papers had been compromised. The inquiry was led by Kappes, the man who headed the counterintelligence office of the CIA's operations directorate. This group—which Goss renamed the National Clandestine Service—is the CIA branch principally responsible for recruiting informants and stealing secrets from foreign governments and groups believed to pose a threat to U.S. interests.

Kappes's investigation, which former intelligence officials familiar with the matter describe as exhaustive, determined there was no evidence that any classified materials had been compromised. According to the sources, the investigation found no evidence the door to the vault sealing CIA offices from the rest of the embassy had been tampered with; "counters," which logged the number of times the vault had been opened and shut, showed no evidence that the door had been opened during the months the embassy was vacant.

CIA security experts could find no other evidence of intrusion. The only way a hostile power could have gotten into the CIA offices, said one official who worked on the case, was to have torn down the wall to the CIA station, entered the CIA offices, copied any unburned secret documents, put them back in place and reconstructed the office's outer wall—all without leaving any trace.

But when the House Intelligence Committee, chaired at the time by Goss, a Florida GOP congressman and one-time CIA spy, was informed about the investigation, senior staffers who ran the committee for Goss became highly suspicious. For a start, according to an official familiar with the Goss camp's views, Goss's aides believed the CIA had inordinately delayed informing Capitol Hill about the counterintelligence investigation. According to this account, the CIA did not inform the committee of the problem until weeks after it was first discovered.

Goss's aides pressed the CIA for more information, but the agency continued to insist there was no evidence that any secrets in Belgrade had been compromised, according to sources. Goss's aides were unsatisfied with the agency's responses, however, and came to believe, according to a source in the Goss camp, that the agency was "stonewalling."

As a result, Goss's House committee staff launched their own investigation into the incident, complete with field trips to Europe. According to a source familiar with the committee probe, the Goss team concluded that there were unspecified "anomalies" indicating that as many as three foreign intelligence services—including the Serbs and the Russians—had gotten inside the abandoned CIA station, copied the unburned CIA files, and then cleaned up any evidence of intrusion so brilliantly as to make their presence undetectable.

The CIA group, led by Kappes and his superiors, continued to maintain there was no evidence of any intrusion. The more the CIA argued this, however, the more Goss's aides began to suspect a cover-up. At the very least, said a source close to Goss's team, the House investigators wanted the CIA to acknowledge the possibility that secrets in Belgrade might have been compromised.

The CIA continued to insist there was no security breach; officials pointed out that it was virtually impossible to "prove a negative," namely to prove 100 percent that no sinister forces got into the Belgrade CIA station. Goss's aides pressed for the CIA to fire or discipline the CIA's station chief in Belgrade, but Kappes, heading the CIA's internal investigation, refused. Goss's team grew more and more irate at the agency's attitude. Eventually, Goss's aides persuaded him to sign a secret letter cutting the CIA's counterintelligence budget by $3 million; this was intended as a deliberate rebuke to the agency's handling of the Belgrade incident and its aftermath, according to former and current intelligence officials familiar with the matter. But CIA management, under Tenet, ignored the budget-cut order, and the agency eventually returned to business as usual, with no officials being fired over the Belgrade incident (or nonincident, depending on whom you believe).

Goss's aides continued to seethe at what they perceived to be Clintonite dissembling by Kappes and other permanent CIA officials. After the Senate in 2004 confirmed Goss as Tenet's permanent replacement as CIA director, Goss brought with him to the CIA at least two former congressional aides who had worked on the Belgrade investigation; one of them, Patrick Murray, became Goss's chief of staff. Almost immediately the Goss staffers, most of whom had worked years earlier at the agency but left after truncated careers, encountered friction with career agency officials, who derisively began referring to the Goss's aides as "Gosslings."

Within weeks of the Gosslings' arrival at CIA headquarters, Murray got into an argument with Kappes—who by then had been promoted to head the entire Operations Directorate—and his chief deputy, Michael Sulick (who also worked on the Belgrade investigation). The argument became so heated that Murray ordered Kappes to fire Sulick. When Kappes refused, both he and Sulick, regarded as two of the agency's most skilled field operatives and espionage managers, left the agency. "It was his decision to leave," Kappes's father, Bob Kappes, told NEWSWEEK.

But a source close to the Goss team said that because of the bitterness over Belgrade, a fierce clash between Kappes and the Gosslings was perhaps inevitable. Also driven from the agency soon after the Gosslings' arrival was the CIA's No. 3 official, Executive Director A.B. (Buzzy) Krongard, who had defended agency handling of the Belgrade investigation, and other senior CIA operatives connected to the case.

Two weeks ago, Goss suddenly announced he was stepping down as CIA director, amid only lukewarm praise from President Bush and other officials regarding how he managed the agency. By the end of this week, Goss and most of his coterie of Gosslings are expected to have left CIA headquarters for good.

Shortly after the White House announced the president's intention to nominate General Hayden to succeed Goss as CIA chief, John Negroponte, the national-intelligence czar whose office was set up by Congress after 9/11 to better coordinate the activities of the CIA and other spy agencies, announced that he wanted Kappes, who has been working in London for a private security firm, to come back to CIA headquarters as Hayden's deputy. Kappes's father told NEWSWEEK last weekend that his son would only take the job if he was not going to be treated like a "political pawn." So far, indications are that Kappes will get the assurances he wants and will be joining Hayden in the CIA director's seventh-floor executive suite in the relatively near future.

© 2006 MSNBC.com

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12957885/site/newsweek/

May 26, 2006

The lingering death of Yugoslavia

The lingering death of Yugoslavia

Montenegro this week became the latest Balkan region to vote for independence. But what have the trappings of statehood done for the rest of Tito's former empire?

Peter Popham reports

Published: 27 May 2006

Once upon a time there was a plausibly modern, enlightened Communist country called Yugoslavia which manufactured cars called Yugos and staged the Winter Olympics and which for many, including millions of Western holidaymakers, was the acceptable face of Eastern Europe, the bit that worked and that we could do business with - all dominated by the benign Mr Tito.
And today? With the decision for independence last week of tiny Montenegro, Yugoslavia is no more. Instead there is a multiplying proliferation of statelets that belong more to the world of Tintin than to what was once thought of as modern Europe.
Tintin would have felt perfectly at home in Podgorica, the Montenegrin capital. The Belgian boy detective, you will remember, arrived in the Balkan kingdom of Syldavia by aeroplane, dropped through a trap door in the fuselage by the dastardly twin brother of Professor Alembick, and landing in a bale of hay. Once there he encountered a world of revolutionaries, spies, moustachioed bandits and anarchists, all in the shade of the gigantic mountains.
Today the grandson of the last king of Montenegro travels regularly to the nation's tiny former capital, Cetinje, by motorcycle, from Paris. He denies he aims to revive the monarchy, but who could be sure? The leader of the country is a musclebound character in a chalk-stripe suit who has been a Communist and an apostle of Serbian expansionism and is now a Montenegrin nationalist. Today he mutters angrily about Serbian "meddling".
In reality (according to the testimony of an Italian gangster) he is a big-time cigarette smuggler. But he is not the only bad hat in town: the Russians are coming! They have bought the country's only factory and huge strips of the beautiful coastline.
It is a country out of comic opera or a period cartoon, with a population one-tenth the size of London. But in a year or two, if Montenegro's tall, sleek, handsome and wily Prime Minister, Milo Djukanovic, gets his way, his sovereign nation will sit alongside the UK, Germany, France and the rest in the councils of the European Union. And jostling behind him in the queue to join will be several other even more improbable specimens.
Yugoslavia ended, but what came into being? We have no handy term for what has replaced the Union of the South Slavs. We are back to the geographical term, the Balkans - from which derives the verb "to balkanise", which means "to break up into small, mutually hostile political units". We are back at the view of the Balkans immortalised by Herg�: a collection of tiny, exotic countries, racked by violence and intrigue, each with their own proud and ancient traditions but ultimately indistinguishable from one another.
And while the end of the Union of Serbia and Montenegro was inevitable, the Balkans have not achieved steady state. That churning, balkanising momentum is still at work. The break-up proceeds. Next up, heartened by the Montenegrins' example, is Kosovo, where the overwhelming Albanian majority favours independence. The Kosovars are expected to get their wish by the end of this year.
And this will set a precedent, because unlike all the bits of Yugoslavia that have broken off so far, Kosovo is not an autonomous republic within the Yugoslav federation but was merely a province within Serbia. When Kosovo breaks away, other disgruntled minorities in other corners of the Balkans will see their moment and hope that time is on their side.
The most universally execrated is Republika Srpska (aka Bosnian Serb Republic), the Serb mini-state that was fashioned by Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic during the Bosnian war as part of the Milosevic fantasy of a Greater Serbia. That mini-state, partially brought into existence by the massacre in Srebrenica, a town that today is firmly within Republika Srpska territory, may have no serious hope of international recognition, but it remains a thorn in the flesh of the High Representative in Sarajevo. And it remains a semi-spectral presence within the immensely complicated polity of Bosnia. It provides, for example, one of the republic's three presidents.
And there are others waiting in the wings. As Kosovo prepares to go independent, the Serbs who constitute the overwhelming majority of the population of the region of northern Kosovo called Mitrovica dream of getting their own state, too. Serbs clustered in the north of Montenegro who resent the decision to break away from Belgrade have separatist dreams of their own, as do Albanians in the south of that republic, and as do Albanians in Macedonia, where a civil war boiled up in 2001.
No one imagines the balkanisation of the Balkans will go that far. But then 15 years ago no one predicted the independence of Yugoslav republics such as Slovenia and Croatia, which are now on their way to joining the European Union. And what's wrong, after all, with states the size of Elephant and Castle or Maida Vale? Perhaps we should all live in countries that size.
From the cane chairs of the long pavement caf� of the Crna Gora Hotel in the centre of Podgorica, it's hard to disagree. On first blush Montenegro seems an excellent idea, and a very satisfactory little country.
Podgorica, the Montenegrin capital, formerly one of Yugoslavia's several Titograds, was bombed flat by the British during the war, though a small Ottoman old town survived. But although the architecture is not up to much (the Communists did their best to vandalise it with tower blocks), it is a bewitching town in the May sunshine, full of parks with mature trees, with two fast-flowing, azure rivers and a caf� life to rival anywhere else in the Mediterranean (and reinforcing the Montenegrins' reputation for idleness).
Rising behind the town are the mountains for which the country is named, and which account for the fact that this was the only corner of the Balkans that the Turks never conquered ("They were lazy, too," explained a Belgrade friend). Go up into the mountains and you find ski slopes, the deepest canyon in the world after the Grand Canyon, rivers that are fantastic for rafting; head for the coast and there is a fjord, bizarrely misplaced from Scandinavia, and picturesque islands and inlets reminiscent of Japan's Inland Sea. There is the huge Skadar lake, shared with Albania, that is home to hundreds of exotic varieties of birds.
All this and no Serbia: by severing the link with Big Brother, Montenegro at a stroke removes the taint of war crimes and expansionism (even though both Slobodan Milosevic and Radovan Karadzic came from Montenegro). But Serbia has hospitals and colleges and universities far more advanced than those in Montenegro. Ambitious and clever Montenegrins head to Belgrade to study. Sick Montenegrins head to Belgrade to get better. Till now they have not paid a bean for the privilege. Negotiations on the future status of clever or sick Montenegrins in Serbia have not yet started, but everyone expects the Montenegrins will henceforth have to pay. Hence at least a proportion of the 45 per cent of votes against independence.
Which brings us to the key question: where is the money coming from? Montenegro has only one productive factory, a belching Soviet-style aluminium manufacturing complex outside Podgorica - recently bought by the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska. The nation's tourism potential is obvious - but long stretches of the coast have been bought up by Russians. There is no guarantee that this bewitching corner of the Adriatic will not be destroyed by hideous hotels within a few years.
During the war, when the Yugoslav economy ground to a halt, Montenegro fell back on what has long been an important standby, smuggling. In particular the large-scale smuggling of cigarettes, very cheap here and expensive everywhere else in Western Europe, became rampant - and according to the testimony of an Italian mafia supergrass, Gerardo Cuomo, the trade involved Milo Djukanovic himself, the formerly Communist politician who has run Montenegro for 16 years.
Mr Djukanovic denied the allegations flatly, and cannot be questioned in court because of parliamentary immunity. But the claimed involvement of the most powerful man in the country in organised crime is only the most glaring irregularity. Of Montenegro's population of 650,000, only 120,000 are formally employed, the rest working in the black market or in smuggling. Hence the spectre of the new mini-states, even the pretty ones like Montenegro, becoming what one diplomat called "sovereign kleptocracies", states run by and for the benefit of wealthy criminals.
Kosovo presents a far starker example. Criminal gangs "operate with impunity," according to Marek Antoni Nowicki, who was the UN's international ombudsman in Kosovo until 2005. "You have a criminal state in real power. It needs underground illegal structures to survive. These networks can rely on the weakness of the public institutions to sanction their operations."
And while in Montenegro the smuggling is counter balanced by the new hotels and resorts, Kosovo has nothing else to fall back on. International aid is complemented by the profits from cigarette, cement and petrol smuggling.
Prostitution is the other core business, catering to the peacekeepers. What happens when they leave is anybody's guess.

http://news.independent.co.uk/europe/article620190.ece

Kosovo Serb convoy stoned; UN troops fire tear gas

 



Kosovo Serb convoy stoned; UN troops fire tear gas

PRISTINA (Reuters) - United Nations police in Kosovo fired tear gas to disperse a crowd of ethnic Albanians who stoned a convoy of Serbs in the west of the UN-run province yesterday, police said. A Kosovo Albanian police spokesman said two UN personnel were lightly wounded in the incident in the ethnic Albanian village of Mala Krusa, near Prizren. «A UN police convoy taking Serbs there was stopped and stoned. Police fired tear gas,» said spokesman Fatmir Gjurgjeala. Two UN vehicles were also damaged. Witnesses said the main Prizren-Djakovica road was closed and several villagers had been taken to hospital for treatment for the effects of tear gas. The stoning of Serb convoys in Kosovo is not uncommon.

                              "The stoning of Serb convoys in Kosovo is not uncommon" .

                   If the so called "oppression"of Albanians in the  nineties was  not "uncommon "and was punished by the NATO bombing of Serbia,

                               today for the stoning and the mistreatment of Serbs,which is not "uncommon", ,the reward is the independence .

                Like we say in France: "Les voies du Seigneur sont impĂ©nĂ©trables", but the question is who gives wh o the right to act like Allmighty.

 

                             Dragan RAKIC

                     F-Strasbourg      

          

                   

 

 

 

 

Balkan ghosts awakened

 

International Herald Tribune
Balkan ghosts awakened
 
THURSDAY, MAY 25, 2006
 
PARIS Milovan Djilas was one of Tito's closest associates in the Yugoslav partisan resistance to the Nazis in World War II. He became a major figure in the postwar Communist government and was considered the likely successor to Tito, but he actually became Yugoslavia's first and most important dissident.

He published a critique - essentially a moral critique - of what he called the "new class" of privilege and indulgence formed by the Communist officials ruling Yugoslavia and the Warsaw Pact countries during the early postwar period.

This was the most important early critical examination of Marxist rule from inside the system, which was to culminate four decades later in Mikhail Gorbachev's glasnost and perestroika and the collapse of the Communist system from its "internal contradictions."

Djilas was a Montenegrin, which is why I am writing about him here. In another book ("Land Without Justice," 1958), he recounted his early life and the cruel historical burden of Montenegrin existence, saying that his family was "typical in one respect, the men of several generations have died at the hands of Montenegrins, men of the same faith and name.

"My father's grandfather, my own two grandfathers, my father, and my uncle, were killed as if a dread curse lay on them. ... It seems to me that I was born with blood on my eyes. Generation after generation, and the bloody chain was not broken. My first sight was of blood, my first words were blood and bathed in blood."

In the 14th century Montenegro was a semi-independent principality of Serbia, and it continued to resist the expansion of the Ottoman Turk empire after Serbia itself was conquered. Montenegro was never itself subdued, although parts of it were held by the Turks and others by Venice.

In modern times, Montenegro, incorporating part of Albania, was recognized as an independent state, and in 1918 its national assembly voted for union with Serbia. The two together became the core of a new Yugoslavia - reconstituted after World War II as a Communist people's republic.

Now the Montenegrins have voted for independence from Serbia. As always, their independence is entangled with history, which in the Balkans possesses an intensity and power that warrants William Faulkner's remark on the history of his own American South, that here the past is never past.

Last Sunday, more than 55 percent of the Montenegrin voters - including an estimated 16,000 Montenegrins living abroad, who returned for the election - chose independence. Since the terrible wars and ethnic cleansing that destroyed the old six-nation Yugoslavia in the 1990s, Serbia and Montenegro had survived in a union largely without substance. The Serbians today appear grudgingly willing to sacrifice their link to Montenegro.

Whether the Serbians inside Montenegro will agree is not entirely sure. They form the largest part of the Albanian-Serb national minority that together makes up nearly half the total Montenegrin population of less than 700,000. The Albanian minority consists of about 50,000 people.

The consequences of Montenegrin independence for the neighboring and largely ethnic Albanian province of Kosovo are also unclear. Kosovo is now under interim UN administration, but its majority wants independence, while Serbia, for powerful historical reasons, is resolved to keep Kosovo.

The Kosovo conflict has already seen much violence by both sides, leading up to the NATO intervention in 1999 that produced 78 days' bombing of Serbia.

The new Montenegro naturally wants early EU membership. It will not get it. The EU leadership does not rejoice in Montenegro's independence: It will encourage Serb separatism in Bosnia, and Hungarian autonomists in the Serbian province of Vojvodina, and it may exacerbate Slav-Albanian tensions in Macedonia.

History lives on in the Balkans, ready to break out in more bloodshed, given a provocation. The international effort to deal with the Balkan situation has involved enormous good will as well as material resources and human commitment. But there are no ultimate resolutions to problems so tortured, where memories are so long.

The Balkans slipped off the main Washington agenda more than a decade ago. The region is unlikely to reappear there at least until a new American administration is elected. This is too bad: Balkan historical and political reality teaches a lesson that Washington should heed as it deepens its commitments in another region, the Middle East.

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel has been in Washington hoping for unspoken burial of the road map that was supposed to lead toward a negotiated two-state agreement with the Palestinians, with Jerusalem as capital for both. He did not get it, but may. He still seeks American support for an eventual unilateral declaration of Israel's borders. That would invite a Balkan-like future for the two countries, in which the past will never be put behind - by either.




The Yugoslav jigsaw

 


 
 
 
Cyprus Mail
 
The Yugoslav jigsaw is not quite over yet

LAST SUNDAY'S independence referendum in Montenegro passed with barely a whimper, a majority voting to break away from the union with Serbia in what has been widely described as the final act in the disintegration of Yugoslavia.

Few today dispute Montenegro's right to secession. Even in Belgrade, there is a relief that the will-they-won't-they charade of recent years is finally over. In recent years, Montenegro had in any case been independent in all but name, the remaining link a mere fig leaf to mask a de facto separation.

What's more, coming at the tail end of a 15-year disintegration that saw a decade of savage wars of succession, there is widespread congratulation that the last piece of the Yugoslav jigsaw has been plucked away without bloodshed.

And yet it isn't the last piece of the jigsaw, because in advocating the absolute right of self-determination when it first recognised the secession of Slovenia and Croatia all those year ago, the international community deployed reflecting mirrors of ethnic conflict that cannot be tidily sealed within tidy state borders.

While saying that multi-ethnic Yugoslavia was untenable, the international community created a mini-Yugoslavia in Bosnia. In freeing Bosnia's Muslims from the tutelage of Belgrade, it placed Bosnia's Serbs under the tutelage of Sarajevo.

Today, Bosnia-Hercegovina is a failed state, still run by a foreign governor appointed by the international community. As indeed is Kosovo, whose final status remains undecided. And why should Kosovo's Albanians – a majority in the province but a small minority in Serbia – be allowed self-determination, but not their ethnic brethren in the neighbouring Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia? Or the Serbs or Croats of Bosnia who want to unite with their motherlands? And so the list goes on…

Few today fear a resurgence of the wars that tore apart the Balkans in the 1990s. The region is simply worn out. What is important now is not to allow seeds of resentment to mature to a stage where they might give rise to future conflict. And the best guarantee for that is to ensure that the Western Balkans are integrated into the European Union as soon as realistically possible.

Just as the Greeks of Cyprus feel more comfortable belonging to the same club as Greece, so the Serbs now spread out over half a dozen micro states will feel more comfortable if those are all united in the greater European family.

More practically, the access to European funds and the improvement of people's living standards that has accompanied every European enlargement so far is the greatest promise of future stability in the region. Prosperous countries do not take rash decisions; they have too much to lose. But those that are poor, that feel isolated, unfairly treated, backed into a corner, they wind up with nothing to lose.

Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2006


May 25, 2006

Factors in Serbia's future

 

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=10032

American Chronicle

The European and American factor in Serbia's future
Dr. George Voskopoulos



May 22, 2006


The recent referendum in Serbia-Montenegro and the marginal victory of those who support an independent Montenegro seems to be defining the future of the country. Yet, a number of parameters need to be clarified before evaluating today's signals as expressed by the Montenegrin people.

First, the referendum constitutes a part of a series of a policy clearly aiming at punishing Serbia for its policy vis-Å•-vis American policy in the Balkans. Serbia's international behaviour and more particularly its policy in Bosnia and Kosovo, did not constitute simply or just a deviation from democratic practices and the need to respect human rights. This goes without saying and may be considered the overt cause of its international isolation.

To those who scrutinize world politics through the spectrum of Political Realism and power politics the real motive for Serbia's territorial mutilation was the perceived arrogance of its senseless leadership (S. Milosevic) to challenge American policy in south-eastern Europe. Actually this led to Serbia's bombing in 1999 without the clear consent of the United Nations Security Council.

Serbia was the first European country bombed after the end of the Second World War, that is on the grounds of protecting human rights. Undeniably the reason was a noble and justified one but those who are aware of world politics realities and the perplexed ethnological map in the Balkans may realize why it may be regarded as an excuse to realize a particular strategic plan.

Serbia defied the macrostrategic plan of powerful intrusive actors to impose a new model of governance, a new local not just world order and had to be punished. The existence of S. Milosevic regime and its defiance of international law simply provided an ethical excuse to dissolve once again a country with inherent power in south-eastern Europe.


Moreover, the establishment of the International Criminal Court meant to realize one specific aim, that is to punish those responsible for the atrocities against individuals by the Serbian militia. Yet, Carla Del Ponte's (the prosecutor in charge) biased attitude and institutional arrogance turned the quest into witch hunting thus delegitimising the whole process.

The problem with Milosevic himself was that he was probably guilty of conceptualizing a plan to institutionally or/and physically eliminate what he saw as a threat to his country's territorial integrity but at the same time he operated as a legitimate leader defending the [mis]perceived interests of his country. Under this spectrum, his trial could also be seen as a blow to state sovereignty and a selective application of a human rights regime. The international community rightfully intervened to put an end to the atrocities against individuals, yet it did not do the same in other blatant cases such as Cyprus.

The Court became one of the political weapons in the hands of those who wished to terminally "deal with" Serbian arrogance. A second powerful weapon, this time devised by Europeans, used to punish the country through the negative conceptual model Serbia has been viewed all these years was the EU's "give-and-take" policy vis-Å•-vis the so wanted for war crimes Serbian leaders Karazic and Mladic.

Serbia's failure to deliver them to the International Criminal Court led to a European policy that eventually punished the average Serb not those considered guilty for genocide. European policy leveled with Washington's wishes to drastically weaken the country by rendering it a politically and economically problematic state in the most backward region of Europe.

To many in Europe this was part of the wider American strategy in the region and the establishment of weak neophyte states or protectorates operating as pockets of instability to remind Europeanists (those who challenge American dominant role in Europe) that European security could only be guaranteed through NATO.

As a result, Kosovo is on its way to independence, while Montenegro's referendum assists directly and indirectly this policy. The problem is that the process results in producing problematic states, epicenters of illegal activities in the region. In both Kosovo and Montenegro drug and weapons trafficking are transnational activities affecting the security of the whole region not to mention human slavery.

American and European policies have to this day failed to impose the rule of law and order allowing local leaders to operate unrestrained. Their initiatives focused exclusively on punishing Serbia, yet, in a way this practice turned certain Serbian leaders to national heroes. What is needed is a new plan for rehabilitating the country, without prejudice and above all without the application of double standards. For as long as the international community pretends to be upholding the law in one only direction south-eastern Europe will have black holes in its security structure.

George Voskopoulos holds a BA from Brock University (Canada), a BA from Ionian University (Greece). He received his MA from Lancaster University (UK) and his Ph.D from Exeter University (UK), Centre for European Studies. He is currently a Visiting Research Fellow at the Luxembourg Institute for European and International Studies and Assistant Professor at the University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece. His latest publication is James Mitchell & G. Voskopoulos (eds.), American Government and Politics in Focus, Whittier publishers, NY, 2005.

seeiia@yahoo.gr






 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SERBIAN NEWS NETWORK" group.
To post to this group, send email to SENET@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to SENET-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SENET
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---