May 22, 2007

The "Pro-American" Terrorists

The "Pro-American" Terrorists

By Julia Gorin

FrontPageMagazine.com | May 22, 2007On cue, within minutes of news that four Albanians were involved in a plot to attack American soldiers in New Jersey,
we were treated to the familiar disclaimers of Albanian
pro-Americanism, meant to keep us on program — lest the American people
finally demand a reevaluation of our self-destructive 1990s alliances
which still dictate current policy.



“3 Brothers implicated in Fort Dix plot had roots in fiercely pro-U.S. region,” rang out an International Herald Tribune headline of a widely printed AP story:


 


Three
Muslim brothers who allegedly helped plot to kill soldiers at a U.S.
Army base have roots in one of Europe’s most pro-American corners — a
region that remains grateful to the United States for ending the Kosovo
war.



Albania was among the first countries to answer Washington’s call for troops to help support U.S.-led military offensives in Iraq and Afghanistan. In Pristina, the capital of Kosovo…U.S. flags are commonplace…


 


A Washington Post article began: “They hail from one of the most pro-American and secular parts of the Muslim world — the ethnic Albanian regions of Macedonia, where gratitude for U.S.
assistance in Kosovo during the 1990s still runs high.” The same week,
an Albanian-Canadian broadcaster assured Canucks, “No one loves
Americans more than Albanians do” -- something that one Albanian
spokesman after another repeats.  


 


Albanians
are the most pro-American people in the world! everyone proclaims as
Albanians burn churches, kill nuns and behead monks in Kosovo, the
“most pro-American state-in-progress.” Ah yes, this is who loves
America. A dubious endorsement indeed. Everywhere else, we are hated for trying to beat back jihad. In Kosovo, Albania
and the Albanian Diaspora, they love us for enabling it. Any time you
help Muslims kill Christians, just like any time you help one
nationality clean out its ethnic rival, it’ll thank you. For a little
while.


 


Don’t be fooled. Albanian love is conditional. And it’s waning fast.


 


This was the overnight bus ride from Pristina to Montenegro that Weekly Standard contributor and longtime champion of Balkan Muslims Stephen Schwartz described last year for a site called FamilySecurityMatters.com:


 


A
man behind me began speaking almost immediately and without stopping,
in Albanian — which I understand…insistently focused on the nature of
God…[and on] the evil intentions of Americans,
Iraq,
and bloodshed. I was startled because it is rare to hear Albanians,
after the rescue of Kosovo, badmouth Americans…”God is one, who are
these people like this American who come and try to tell us how to be
Muslims? What about
Iraq? Why is this American here with his friend?”


 


Schwartz then described a rest stop:


 


I
did not find out where I was until I asked a waiter in the restaurant,
because none of the Albanians crowded in the back with me and my Sufi
companion and the whisperer in darkness would speak civilly to me. When
I asked one man, in Albanian, the name of the town, he answered in
Serbian: “ne znam,” “I don’t know.” Another said it was the Montenegrin
capital, Podgorica (it wasn’t). And finally a thin punk who could not
have been over 20, and who, I soon realized, had been encouraging the
voice behind me, said in perfect English, “I don’t understand English.”
At the end of the rest period all three people filed back into the bus
and avoided looking at me.


 


Muhammad
woke up and asked me what was going on. I told him, “Someone back here
is making Wahhabi speeches.” He grinned as if in disbelief, but said,
“I’m not surprised.”


 


The
befuddled Mr. Schwartz continued: “But I am known in the Balkans as an
opponent of radical Islam…I had repeatedly been recognized during this
trip on the streets and in mosques in
Albania and Kosovo, and was previously warmly greeted.”


 


When
good will is acquired by doing someone’s bidding, pro-Americanism is
won for the wrong reasons, and the gratitude will turn the moment we
stop furthering that party’s agenda. In Kosovo, it began happening as
early as 2000, when the Kosovars started calling for the UN and NATO
“occupiers” to get out. Nor do the American and British flags
hanging upside-down
from Pristina’s Victory Hotel bode well for the future of
pro-Americanism in “Kosova”. Meanwhile, the Wahhabi Muslims who started
flooding Kosovo upon our intervention have been making sure that young
Albanians sour on us anyway. In an article titled “
Behind Kosovo’s Façade,” Balkans observer Russell Gordon writes:


 


In
many areas young Kosovo Albanians are being converted to the Wahabist
faction, and are highly visible in their telltale short haircuts,
beards, and ankle-length pants. As well, many Arabs are present from
the
Middle East
and France….Moreover, anti-Western jihadist sermons are now a regular
feature at many of the new mosques. Western military intelligence
officials have stated that the findings of their investigations into
the jihadist terror networks is routinely ignored or blocked by NATO,
UN and US officials.


 


And yet, just one year before his eye-opening bus ride, Mr. Schwartz wrote what many Albanians still claim:


 


There
are not now and never have been, in recent times, ‘Muslim militants’ in
Kosovo, aside from a handful of individuals and some Saudi and other
Gulf Arab-state cells operating through relief agencies…No
‘international Islamist factions’ are present in Kosovo or presently
involved with Kosovo. No ‘international Islamist factions’ were
involved in the Kosovo war…Kosovar Muslims are extremely anti-Islamist
and pro-American.


 


Kosovo is the most heavily-policed, militarily-occupied region in Europe.
It does not now and has never had a ‘fundamentalist minority’ in the
sense the term is now understood, and no serious evidence to the
contrary can be produced.


 


So
what happened? Did the Albanians whom Mr. Schwartz encountered on his
bus trip turn fundamentalist overnight? Not according to a 1992 report
by the Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, as Insight
Magazine
reported:


 


…Islam
experienced an unexpected renaissance in communist Yugoslavia in the
mid-1970s…According to a TFTUW report, the Yugoslav government in
Belgrade was concerned about what it saw as evidence that within its 40
percent Muslim population there were ‘’Muslim terrorists operating
against the West'’ and that ‘’Yugoslav Muslim youths were drawn into
cooperation with and emulation of Arab terrorists.'’


 


Our
NATO invasion only sped up a process that was already well underway.
Here was the scene in 1980s Kosovo, as reported by almost every major
paper at the time. From a 1987
New York Times article:


 


…Slavic
Orthodox churches have been attacked, and flags have been torn down.
Wells have been poisoned and crops burned. Slavic boys have been
knifed, and some young ethnic Albanians have been told by their elders
to rape Serbian girls.



The goal of the radical nationalists among them, one said in an interview, is an ‘’ethnic
Albania that includes western Macedonia, southern Montenegro, part of southern Serbia, Kosovo and Albania
itself.'’



As
Slavs flee the protracted violence, Kosovo is becoming what ethnic
Albanian nationalists have been demanding for years, and especially
strongly since the bloody rioting by ethnic Albanians in Pristina in
1981 — an ‘’ethnically pure'’ Albanian region, a “Republic of Kosovo”
in all but name.



Last summer, the authorities in Kosovo said they documented 40 ethnic Albanian attacks on Slavs in two months…Officials in
Belgrade view the ethnic Albanian challenge as imperiling the foundations of the multinational experiment called federal Yugoslavia
, which consists of six republics and two provinces.



The
federal Secretary for National Defense, Fleet Adm. Branko Mamula… said
ethnic Albanian subversives had been preparing for ‘’killing officers
and soldiers, poisoning food and water, sabotage, breaking into weapons
arsenals and stealing arms and ammunition, desertion and causing
flagrant nationalist incidents in army units.'’



Ethnic Albanians already control almost every phase of life in the autonomous
province of Kosovo
,
including the police, judiciary, civil service, schools and factories.
Non-Albanian visitors almost immediately feel the independence — and
suspicion — of the ethnic Albanian authorities.



The hope is that something will be done…to exert the rule of law in Kosovo while drawing ethnic Albanians back into
Yugoslavia’s mainstream.


 


We certainly precluded that.


 


Between
the plan to kill American soldiers in New Jersey and the Bosnian
jihadist in Utah earlier this year — police still don’t have a motive,
which usually means it’s jihad — the reevaluation of our Balkan
policies almost began. (The Kosovo and
Bosnia connections to the Madrid and London
bombings apparently weren’t enough). But the reevaluation and the
turning of the Kosovo independence tide that it could bring threaten to
once again recede into oblivion, as Americans are coaxed into accepting
the ubiquitous explanation that the Ft. Dix four were an exception, a
fluke, an aberration, and that the genesis of their act has nothing to
do with Albanianism, but with a scourge that Albanians, like everyone
else, suffer from and are averse to: militant Islam.


 


“Few ethnic Albanians embrace militant Islam,” assured the aforementioned AP report. “Most are moderate or secular.”


 


That
line, present in every news item about Albanian or Bosnian Muslims for
the past decade, has been repeated ad nauseum by the many Albanians
interviewed for various follow-up articles to the
Ft. Dix
story, with many insisting that this kind of religiousness is “not
Albanian.” But when you cast your lot with the radicals who help your
land grab, when you accept help from them and align your early goals
with theirs, do you really think they won’t come to collect?


 


When Albanians object to depictions of them based on events in recent years, their sentences start with “Albanians have never been…”, or “Albanians historically
are not…” — without understanding that they should be speaking in the
past tense. However this “nominally” Muslim population started out,
there is only one direction for it to go  from here. (Besides, the
long-existent mosques serving the Albanian communities of
Staten Island and New Jersey, not to mention the Albanian-American Islamic Cultural Centers that dot the American landscape, belie the “nominal” claim.)


 


Not
being religious, and not being even a “cultural Muslim”, didn’t keep
former Kosovo prime minister Ramush Haradinaj (currently on trial for
war crimes) from meeting with
bin Laden in Tirana in 1995, along with his fellow non-religious Christian-killer (and Albright darling) Hashim Thaci – at the Albanian president’s offices (Sali Berisha, who is now the Albanian prime minister).


 


And as we know by now, one doesn’t need to be a practicing Muslim to feel aggrieved when Muslims are arrested for plotting or committing terrorism:


 


“We all have been supporters of America. We were always thankful to America for its support during the wars in Kosovo and Macedonia,” a cousin, Elez Duka, 29, told The Associated Press.


 


“These
are simple, ordinary people and they’ve got nothing to do with
terrorism. I expect their release and I expect an apology,” he said,
waving his hands. “I see injustice. These are ridiculous charges.”


 


His
indignation captured the mood among Muslims in Kosovo, Macedonia and
Albania — places that have repeatedly expressed gratitude to the United
States for intervening in the 1998-99 Kosovo war and a 2001 ethnic
conflict that pushed Macedonia to the brink of civil war.



“I don’t see that they committed any act or that (the authorities) have facts,” he said. “They live in
America
and grew up in the American culture. How can you say they are
anti-American? These accusations are totally unfounded. They have
recordings of words, not deeds.”


 


As
this report illustrates, even nominally Muslim pro-Americanism is a
brittle thing. And as soon as you deviate from the agenda, the
honeymoon is over.


 


The
same report quotes Kosovo “Prime Minister” Agim Ceku, who wrote a
letter to the U.S. mission in Pristina, “expressing the ‘extraordinary
feeling that Kosovo’s people have for the U.S.’ Ceku also denounced
what he called ‘the disgusting idea’ that Albanians could be involved
in an attack ‘against a nation that has been very generous so far.’”


 


So far.


 


That means more is expected, and when those are the terms of “friendship”, the future for a pro-American Kosova doesn’t look bright.


 


When
the architects of our Kosovo war continually boast that not a single
American life was lost in their “successful” war, the appropriate
response is “Not yet.” The Albanian strategy in Kosovo in fact has been
a replay of the Oslo accords: Accept Western/infidel help for as long
as it furthers your territorial ambitions; then, once the great powers
are no longer willing to carry you to the next stage, revert to
“traditional” methods and take up arms against them. This has been the
modus operandi of Islamic conquest for the past several decades. So
either we’re looking at a striking confluence of methodology between
Islam and “Albanianism” -- which is strongly bound by nationalist and
clan loyalties --  or its’ no coincidence at all.


 


Those
Albanian weapons, meanwhile, have been turned against the area’s
Western benefactors for some time already. When shot at by Albanians in
trying to protect Serbs, KFOR troops are
directed
to flee rather than return fire, which would draw attention to the
region and beg the question, “Why are the people we went to war for
shooting at us?”


 


In addition to the intermittent threats to go to war against NATO (which is in addition to actually shooting
at peacekeepers since 2001), it turns out that both KLA and its
mujahideen accomplices were fighting Americans at the same time that
Americans were fighting the Serbs for them. As one American peacekeeper
who was deployed to the area admitted last week in an article meant to
defend
Albanians, “One of our central missions was to protect ancient
Christian churches that the Mujahideen were blowing up. Our area
experienced the occasional IED and drive by shooting almost never aimed
at US forces.”


 


This would help explain how an Albanian applicant to al Qaeda could claim, “I have Kosovo Liberation Army combat experience against Serb and American forces. I need no further training. I recommend (suicide) operations against (amusement) parks like Disney.” (Emphasis added.)


 


And, writes Serbianna.com’s Mickey Bozinovich:


 


[The]
recent beating of an American peacekeeper by local Albanian Muslims
illustrates the fragility of the American military position in that
province if Muslim Albanian drug interests are threatened: an unnamed
American soldier was found off duty at a gas station and beaten silly
by Muslim Albanians because his unit took part in foiling an
unidentified illegal plot.


 


During
a February mission to Brussels, after getting the usual empty
assurances of protections for Kosovo’s non-Albanian minority, American
Council for Kosovo Director Jim Jatras asked a Hungarian member of the
European Parliament, “Isn’t all this talk of protections for Serbs a
tacit admission that among the Kosovo Albanians are a lot of violent
and intolerant people? Why would you reward their violence with state
power?”


 


Looking Jatras in the eye, the parliamentarian replied, “Because we’re afraid of them.”


 


Afraid…of pro-American people?


 


If
pro-Americanism is what we so desperately seek, what about the
pro-American deed of rescuing 500 American pilots shot down in
Yugoslavia
during WWII? The airmen were rescued by the Serb Draza Mihailovich and
his anti-Axis guerillas. The late U.S. Major Richard Felman wrote:


 


A
few days after the Germans had seen us bail out and counted ten
parachutes, they sent an ultimatum to the Chetnik [Serb] Commander in
the hills to either turn over my crew of ten to them or they would wipe
out an entire village of 200 women and children…But Gen. [Draza]
Mihailovich would hear none of it… He told us how life is just as
precious to the Serb as it is to the American.


 


Mihailovich’s
resistance to Nazi forces “would have far-reaching implications for the
outcome of the entire war,” explained Aleksandra Rebic, a military
daughter who lived down the street from one of the rescued men. Of the
500 Americans rescued, she
wrote:


 


They
would be nursed back to health by the Serbs loyal to Mihailovich, who
at great risk to themselves, would shelter, feed, and protect these men
who were foreigners on their soil. 500 American young men would return
home to become fathers and husbands and later grandfathers who would
tell their children and grandchildren the story of how their lives had
been saved so many thousands of miles away by a man named Draza
Mihailovich.


 


Writes author William Dorich:


 


The
Serbs lost 52% of their adult male population fighting in the First
World War as American allies. Twenty-four years later the Serbs were
the only people in the Balkans to declare war on Nazi Germany. Hitler
bombed the “open city” of
Belgrade
on Palm Sunday in 1942, killing 17,000 Serbs in one day. Surrender
followed ten days later as the Nazis invaded. The Serbs lost another
one-third of their population in the Holocaust again fighting as
American allies, especially against their own Croat, Bosnian Muslim and
Albanian Nazis.


 


Then there are always pro-American acts of omission. While we see more and more reports of terrorism being plotted against the U.S. from the “unlikely” Balkan quarters of Kosovo, Bosnia and Albania,
there seems to be a lack of anti-U.S. Serb terror in the works. Except,
of course, in the movies and TV shows we write about them.


 


But
no, we preferred, and prefer, to cast our lot with the Balkans’ most
primitive elements — sacrificing friends to make friends of our
enemies. Men who severed Christian heads, killed federal employees who
were Albanian for “collaborating”, and violently
purged
their own ranks are the “statesmen” whom Condoleezza Rice and Nicholas
Burns meet with regularly, the men we’ve set up as the legitimate
rulers of an ethnically pure pro-American Kosovo, and who were honored
guests at the 2004 Democratic Convention.


 


Rather
than rule of law, religious freedom, ethnic diversity, equal justice
and civil rights, Kosovo is governed by lawless, tribalistic,
blood-code-following, clan-oriented mob justice. While reports out of
Serbia concern debates in public schools over Evolution versus
Intelligent Design theory — similar to our own — a typical report out
of Kosovo concerned a debate over
whether to kill the KFOR (NATO) mascot because the dog was Serbian.


 


“We’re
defending our way of life,” our leaders told us in 1999. Perversely
enshrining those ‘common values,’ a crude replica of the Statue of
Liberty overlooks our mono-ethnic handiwork from atop the Victory Hotel
where the American flag hangs upside-down just a few yards below.
Nearby are
Bill Clinton Boulevard and Wesley Clark Avenue
— tributes cited recently as examples of the area’s pro-Americanism.
(There are also streets named for Eliot Engel, Bob Dole and Madeleine
Albright.) Meanwhile, the former terrorists whom we installed as the
“Kosovo Protection Force” and as the legitimate government of the
province attend annual July 4th celebrations at the U.S. Consulate in
Pristina. One proposed banner for the competition to design “Kosova’s”
new flag mimics the American flag, with the two-headed black Albanian
eagle in the corner where the 50 stars would be, plus red and white
stripes.


 


Great.
The narco-terrorist gangster state we created is pro-American. Are we
so desperate for an endorsement that we must grasp it even if it comes
from a terror-friendly horde, our support of whom is already coming
home to roost?


 


Here is a description of the lifestyles of the families of the Ft. Dix suspects from The Washington Post:


 


…Living
among those varied families for the past seven years were the Dukas, a
three-generational clan of ethnic Albanians. Their Muslim religious
garb, repeated minor run-ins with the law, and a brood of up to 20
children, grandchildren and other relatives…


 


And from the AP:


 


…the
women in the ethnic Albanian family wore head scarves. They kept farm
animals in the backyard until others in the neighborhood of tidy
two-story houses complained…Neighbors there said four or five families
appeared to be living in the house...


 


Among
Albanians, Bosnians, Croats and Serbs — even with all the documented
and imagined crimes attributed to the Serbs — the Serbs were the
Balkans’ most civilized element. Add up Serb crimes, multiply them by
10, and they’re still not as scary as the people they were fighting.
(Or do we need to get into the
skull-crushing, eye-gouging, bloody-knife-licking,  using the “Serb-cutter”, raping-and-burning, neck-sawing, beheading and disemboweling
that Bosnians, Croats and Albanians engaged in?) So now ask why Serbs
were so hated by those they were fighting. And ask why KLA targeted
Americans and Serbs together.


 


Before
you accept Albanian pro-Americanism, you must first ask what made
Albanians anti-Serb. Then you must look at photos of what the KLA did
to its enemies, so that when you’re exchanging niceties and recipes
with your Albanian neighbors, keep in mind that, by and large, the KLA
terrorists remain their national heroes.



http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=28414





Powered by ScribeFire.

May 20, 2007

Kosovo and the Post-Soviet “Unrecognized” – Time for Moscow to Make Up Its Mind




Western
countries continue to push persistently for the adoption of the
Ahtisaari plan for Kosovo. Russia’s initiative to send a UN Security
Council mission to the province was no more than a temporary and
tactical success of Moscow. The possibility of Kosovo’s independence
remains on the agenda, and the Western community appears to be
concentrating its efforts in this direction. Condoleezza Rice was
expected to attempt to coerce Russia into accepting the “final
resolution” on the Kosovo problem before the end of May during her May
14-15 Moscow visit, so as to prevent Russia from vetoing the UN
Security Council Resolution granting independence to Kosovo.

Washington is in a hurry. In this context, all of the previous
steps taken by international organizations, including the UN Security
Council Resolution 1244, which has been adopted in 1999 and declared
Kosovo an inseparable part of Yugoslavia (Serbia), merely seem to
disguise the many-years-long process of putting to practice a plan to
cut off Kosovo from Serbia and to expel the Serb population from the
province. Currently, we witness a phase of the plan’s implementation.
The Moscow leadership is expected to “convince” the Serbs as former
Russian PM V. Chernomyrdin has done in the past.

At the same time, Western politicians keep telling that the
Kosovo independence will by no means set a precedent for the
unrecognized post-Soviet Republics. It is hard to say whether the
notion is a case of a self-hypnosis or of a downright cheat. Clearly,
the resolution on Kosovo, proposed by Washington, will require an open
demonstration of a total disregard for the international law, and will
inevitably have a long-term effect on the entire international legal
framework.

The contours of the Kosovo independence are getting
increasingly obvious, and the West has to explain why residents of
South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Transdnistria, Karabakh, or of a number of
cultural and historical regions of the “old” Europe (the May 3 triumph
of Scotch nationalists sends a clear message) are not allowed to get
what Albanian terrorists and drug dealers have.

Alla Yaz’kova writes: “A surge of crime was all that Europe got
from the Kosovo conflict. There is nothing in Kosovo except for drug
trafficking and other illegal businesses. Perhaps, the reason why the
US supports the plan is that some 500,000 Albanians reside in it, and
this diaspora has an influential lobby in the US Congress”. But this is
no news. We no longer hear the old promises that both Albanians and
Serbs will benefit in case Kosovo is recognized, since, allegedly, this
will open for them the way to Europe, where they will eventually live
in peace and happiness in the common European home.

It must be admitted that, by backing the current Pristina
authorities, the supranational Brussels organizations, together with
the US, prepare the old Europe for a surge of “drug trafficking and
other illegal businesses”, as Mrs. Yaz’kova now realizes. Previously,
she had no doubts concerning the “conditional independence” of Kosovo:
“… what is conditional independence? Chiefly, it means not being a
subject of the international law – that is, Kosovo will not be
represented in the UN as an independent country, which will limit
dramatically its potential to carry out international activities… As
for the complete independence, Kosovo will be able to gain it only upon
joining the EU together with other West-Balkan countries including
Serbia.”1 Nothing of the kind is going to happen!

The post-Soviet states which project the developments around
this Serbian province on their own unsettled ethnic conflicts are
waiting for the resolution of the Kosovo problem with great concern.

Recently, Moscow was visited for consultations by Araz Azimov,
Azerbaijan’s Deputy Foreign Minister. In a lecture given at the Moscow
Institute of Foreign Relations he said: “Azerbaijan has concerns
related to the Kosovo problem. Naturally we are worried both by the
geopolitical divorce with Serbia in the middle of Europe and by certain
tendencies originating from the Ahtisaari plan. However, from my point
of view, the Ahtisaari plan is gradually dying. I hope that many of the
EU members understand that a great mistake is made or is proposed to be
made by a plan of a de facto stimulation of separatism, since the
perspective of Kosovo’s joining the EU and of a EU patronage over
Kosovo, inherent in the Ahtisaari plan, can foster likewise tendencies
in other contexts. Naturally, we cannot but worry about this… ”

Any direct analogies between Kosovo and Karabakh, which are
commonplace in papers dealing with the “unrecognized states” issue, are
entirely artificial, but in a number of respects juxtaposition is
inevitable. For example, the tragedy of the Serbian historical and
cultural heritage in Kosovo makes one recall the destruction of the
Armenian landmarks in the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic. Similarly,
the Armenians in Karabakh avoided the destiny of the Krajna and Kosovo
Serbs solely because they had protected their right to live freely on
their lands in an armed conflict …

Nevertheless, nothing good can be expected from searches for
analogies which every side still sees in a different light. What is
necessary is a new complex approach to the complicated problem of the
“unrecognized”. The Russian expert community has suggested a number of
times that the principle of not using force, as well as of not
threatening to use it, must be adopted as a basic one in resolving
conflicts, and that a universal scale of criteria for recognizing or
not recognizing specific state and quasi-state formations must be
developed2. Any attempts to resolve problems of unrecognized
states by force and rough political pressure, or using unilateralist
politically-motivated (non-legal) arguments, have no future.

What will Condoleezza Rice be told about this in Moscow?

D. Sedov, a political writer, wrote in a paper published at the site of the Strategic Culture Foundation:
“It is time for Moscow to decide on its position on self-proclaimed
states. The future of these territories depends largely on Moscow’s
ability to take decisive steps. Nobody doubts that everything actually
depends on Moscow… In case we choose not to accept the option proposed
by the US and to assert that Kosovo sets a precedent, a more open and
active position will be needed… However, this interpretation is flawed.
Kosovo absolutely cannot be compared with the problematic territories
of the post-Soviet space… Today’s Kosovo is nothing but a criminal
enclave led by terrorists and murderers… Kosovo “politicians” are
bandits hired by the US in order to turn the territory into a US ground
aircraft carrier. This was the main objective of the offensive against
Yugoslavia, and this was why they needed to make Kosovo independent
from Belgrade… The US, inspired by the chimerical goal of the global
dominance, will soon crack down on Iran. A new global drama will begin.
And what about us – shall we watch the developments from a distance
even in the areas crucial to Russia’s national interests – in
Transdnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and so on?”


_________________

1 Research Notes of the Eastern Europe Institute. Issue 1. Unrecognized States. P. 56.

2 V. Kazimirov. The “Political Atlas” of Conflicts and the Two Helsinki Principles. http//www.regnum.ru/news/814011.html








http://en.fondsk.ru/print.php?id=736





Powered by ScribeFire.

May 13, 2007

Bitter road to baghdad began in belgrade



Bitter road
to baghdad began in belgrade






By Malcolm Rifkind



Last Updated: 11:36pm BST 12/05/2007



 








John Major once remarked to me that one doesn't win a
general election on foreign policy. "No," I replied, "but one
can lose it." Reputations can be lost just as easily as elections.


Tony Blair won't have any more elections to fight but his
legacy will be dominated more by his foreign policy than has that of any
British prime minister since Sir Anthony Eden. He will not find the
comparison very comfortable.


It was never meant to have been like that. He started his
decade in power with an extraordinary degree of popularity and power not just
at home but also abroad.


If it has since soured, that should, however, not blind us
to the positive aspects of his international role. Not least of these has
been his global prominence. Britain, as a middling power, cannot assume that
its prime minister will be known throughout the world.


Who knows the name of the Chinese president, the Japanese
or the Italian prime ministers? For 10 years, the world has known about Tony
Blair. Like him or loathe him, that has helped project Britain as a country
with a significant role in world affairs.


Blair's contribution has also been serious rather than
symbolic. One has only to compare him with Jacques Chirac. While the French
President delighted in grand initiatives presented for the greater glory of
France, Blair has made a series of thoughtful speeches offering a sober
analysis of the world we live in and how Britain can play its part in
building a global response to global problems.


While the rhetoric has been splendid there has been little
attempt to exaggerate Britain's power and his proposals have, for the most
part, been put in an international context.


That is the case for the defence. The charge against Blair
is, however, far more serious. It does not relate to the Prime Minister's
integrity or noble intentions. What has been of far greater concern has been
his faulty analysis and poor judgement.


When he came to power he brought with him no experience
and little prior interest in foreign affairs. Despite that, he has acted as
his own foreign secretary and has largely ignored the collective advice of
diplomats, academics and others with relevant expertise.


The Prime Minister made two fundamental errors in the
first few years that he was in power. First, he concluded that a commitment
to human rights and democratic values justified, and required, a policy of
military intervention around the world.


This was in accord with his own personality. He has
approached foreign policy with all the zeal of a Victorian missionary. His is
a muscular Christianity that was evident from early in his premiership. The
most important example was Kosovo, which Blair believes was a great success.
In fact, by his own declared objectives, it was a significant failure. It
demonstrated that when you begin a war against a country that has not
attacked you, you lose control of the consequences, which may be very
different from those you intended.


Nato's war against Serbia had two purposes. One was to
restore Kosovo's autonomy within Serbia; the other was to prevent ethnic
cleansing. Instead, Kosovo is now demanding, and will obtain, full
independence, further fragmenting the Balkans. The ethnic cleansing of the
Kosovo Albanians has been replaced by the ethnic cleansing of the Kosovo
Serbs.


Kosovo was important, not just in itself but because it
confirmed Blair in his simplistic belief that complex international problems
can be resolved by Western military might. In a very real sense, the road to
Baghdad began in Belgrade. This led to Blair's second fundamental error. The
end of the Cold War had concluded the global battle between Communism and
capitalism, and between totalitarianism and democracy. The old certainties as
to who we were and who the enemy was had disappeared. But 9/11 changed all
that.


Since the attack on the Twin Towers, both the rhetoric and
strategy of Blair and Bush have been black and white: a global War on Terror,
a new battle between good and evil. Chechnya, Palestine and Kashmir have all
had to be fitted onto this template when, in reality, they are quite
different issues. The result has been a simplistic distortion of a complex
world.


The consequence has also been the disaster of Iraq, which,
quite rightly, will define Blair's legacy. Going to war is always a difficult
decision. But when you go to war against a country that has not attacked you,
without the support of the UN Security Council and with your own country and
party deeply divided, you have to be sure that you get it right. Blair and
Bush have got it terribly wrong.


The result has been more than 100,000 killed, two million
refugees fled abroad, a failed state in the heart of the Middle East, and
Iran having been helped by Blair and Bush to become the most powerful state
in the region. Blair's Iraq policy has been worse than a crime, it has been a
blunder. Then again, some may argue it is the other way around.


I began by comparing Blair with Eden. Maybe Neville
Chamberlain would have been more appropriate. While no one can accuse Blair
of appeasement, in every other respect the similarities are striking. Blair
and Chamberlain: two prime ministers, both inexperienced in foreign policy,
both convinced of their own rectitude, both disdainful of advice, both unable
to acknowledge error, both contemptuous of their foreign secretaries and both
believing in their own personal destiny. For Chamberlain read Munich; for
Blair read Baghdad. Both were decent men out of their depth.


At least Neville Chamberlain paved the way for Winston
Churchill. As we wait for Gordon Brown to enter Downing Street, I realise
that this is where the comparison ends.


Sir Malcolm Rifkind MP was Foreign Secretary from 1995 to
1997




 



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/13/blairf.xml







Powered by ScribeFire.

May 09, 2007

TERRORISM: U.S. ARMY BASE PLOT 'CONFIRMS EXISTENCE OF WHITE AL-QAEDA' BALKAN EXPERTS SAY






















TERRORISM: U.S. ARMY BASE PLOT 'CONFIRMS EXISTENCE OF WHITE AL-QAEDA'
BALKAN EXPERTS SAY












 

























Belgrade, 9 May (AKI) - The arrest of four ethnic Albanians, a Jordanian
and a Turk in the United States on Tuesday on suspicion of planning a
terrorist attack at the United States army base in Fort Dix, New Jersey,
confirms the existence of a "white Al-Qaeda", Balkan terrorism
expert Darko Trifunovic told Adnkronos International (AKI) on Wednesday.
Trifunovic said the arrests showed "white Al-Qaeda at work." He
compared the Fort Dix plot to a February attack in Salt Lake City when a
Bosnian Muslim youth, Sulejman Talovic went on a shopping mall shooting
rampage. Six people including Talovic were killed another four were injured
in the attack.








Trifunovic, a professor at Belgrade University's Faculty of Security Studies,
was the first to develop a theory of "white Al-Qaeda", which he
said was introduced to the Balkans during 1992-1995 civil war in Bosnia when
thousands of 'mujahadeen' from Islamic countries came to fight on the side of
local Muslims. Many mujahadeen have remained in the country, and are believed
to been indoctrinating local youths with radical Islam and even operating
terrorist training camps, Trifunovic said, quoting western and Balkans
intelligence sources.   





Al-Qaeda has adopted a new tactics of using white European youths for
terrorist attacks, "because of their non-Arabic appearance,"
Trifunovic told AKI. "The strategy is to   indoctrinate or
poison the hearts and minds of youngsters to psyche them up for the future
terror operations," Trifunovic said.





"And that is exactly what is now happening in the United States,"
he added. The US authorities arrested three ethnic Albanian brothers from
Serbia's breakaway Kosovo province, Sain, Elvir and Dritan Duka, another
ethnic Albanian, Agron Abdulahu, a Jordanian, Mohamad Ibrahim Shnewer, and
Serdar Tatar, a Turk.   


 


Michael Drewniak, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's office in Newark, New
Jersey, said the suspects "were planning an attack on Fort Dix in which
they would kill as many soldiers as possible". Drewniak described the
group as "Islamist militants from the former Yugoslavia and the Middle
East," who apparently had no ties to international terrorist
organisations, but were organised on a local level.





Several of the suspects said they were ready to kill and die ''in the name of
Allah,'' according to court papers. The defendants, all men in their 20s,
reportedly include a pizza deliveryman suspected of using his job to scout
out Fort Dix, three builders and taxi-driver. They were arrested while trying
to buy AK-47 assault weapons and M-16s from an informant, authorities said.





Many Balkan terrorism experts have been warning for years that Al-Qaeda had
active cells in Muslim-majority Kosovo and a training camp in the village of
Ropotovo. Kosovo has been under United Nations control 1999, when NATO
airstrikes drove Serbian forces out of the province amid ethnic fighting and
allegations of gross human rights abuses.





International officials have ignored the warnings and minimised the danger
Al-Qaeda poses, according to Balkan analysts.


 


In a joint NATO-Bulgarian report in March 2005, the head of Bulgarian state
security Kirco Kirov cited Kosovo as a "direct source of regional
instability and a hub for international terrorism." The report called
for joint action by all European countries.


 


The US authorities said that Abdulahu was a sharp shooter in the Kosovo
Liberation Army (KLA) before fleeing to the US. Fort Dix is a training ground
for American soldiers and reservists before they are sent to fight in Iraq
and Afghanistan, but in 1999 it served as a shelter for thousands of ethnic
Albanian refugees from Kosovo.


 


Serb immigrants' web sites noted that US officials carefully avoided
identifying the four ethnic Albanians as such, calling them only
"Islamic militants from former Yugoslavia." A commentator on the
SerbBlog said that Washington, which backs independence for Kosovo, is
embarrassed by the discovery of the Fort Dix plot, "because the truth
might mess up the PR for Kosovo Albanians getting to rip off a piece of Serbia
to create their own country - a move that has the full support of the US
State Department."


 


Belgrade military analyst Zoran Dragisic said the Fort Dix plot "once
again shows that Islamist terrorism is highly organised - from Kosovo to
America - and the US intelligence services know this very well." Dragsic
expressed doubt, however, that the latest incident would change the American
stance on Kosovo, "because Washington doesn't change its positions
easily."


 


http://www.adnki.com/index_2Level_English.php?cat=Politics&loid=8.0.412776154&par=0








(Vpr/Aki)





__._,_.___



Powered by ScribeFire.

May 05, 2007

On Kosovo, Ambassador Churkin Foreshadows a Veto

On Kosovo, Ambassador Churkin Foreshadows a Veto



After the Soviet Union disintegrated, ethnic Russians fled the newly independent states, Ambassador Vitaly

Churkin said on Wednesday, analogizing that to what the remaining Serbs in Kosovo would do if independence were granted.


Less than five percent of the Serbs who left Kosovo have returned,
Amb. Churkin said. In a five minute response to questions from Inner
City Press, Churkin focused on what he calls the non-compliance with
the Security Council's previous resolution 1244, and the lack of a
"normal life" in Kosovo at present. Video here, from Minute 2:49 to
8:15.



This is not the time, Amb. Churkin said, for the Council
to impose a solution, i.e. independence. "The international community
should respect itself," he said, and should make sure that its previous
resolution is complied with before considering enacting a new
resolution.



News analysis: While Kosovo comparisons, when made,
are generally to Georgia's flanks Abkhazia and South Ossetia, to
Transdniester and even Nagorno-Karabakh and Western Sahara, Amb.
Churkin's call to assess and ensure compliance with previous
resolutions brought to mind to this report the Council's blithe
approach to Somalia. The Council imposed an arms embargo, then scoffed
at its own experts reports that all sides were violating the embargo.
In December 2006, when Ethiopian troops crossed the border and drove on
Mogadishu, the Council did nothing. Even now, when those troops and the
UN-supported Transitional Federal Government are shelling civilian
neighborhoods and blocking UN humanitarian shipments, the Council does
nothing.



Kosovo, however, is in Europe, if not in the EU. In
Russia, the Serbs have a veto wielding ally on the Security Council.
The U.S. deploys vetoes for Israel -- why not Russian for the Serbs? 
Russia's acceptance of language in the most recent Abkhazia resolution
bowing down to the territorial integrity of Georgia was a clue: Russia
will demand no less than the support of Serbia's integrity.



Wednesday
Amb. Churkin deployed the word pogrom, as in "the anti-Serb pogroms of
2004." He spoke of Serbs' fear, and of the international presence doing
nothing as these pogroms occurred. This is strong language and would
seem to foreshadow a veto.



Another correspondent, slated to
leave the UN press corps at the end of the month, told Amb. Churkin,
"you do not like using Chapter VII," the section of the UN Charter that
lets the Council order that things be done. "Be sure you attribute that
right," Amb. Churkin joked. We are: he used the word pogrom.
Developing..

http://www.lobi.com.mk/default-EN.asp?ItemID=5C7ABD66C0F0E54E997333E00AB688F4







Powered by ScribeFire.

April 30, 2007

Islamists plan violence after Kosovo goes independent


Islamists
plan violence after Kosovo goes independent

April 30, 2007 -- In a Kosovo town of Gnjilane on April 16, top echelons
of the ethnic Albanian extremist leadership had a secret meeting where
they unveiled a plan code named "Small Serbia" that plans to activate al
Qaeda cells across the Balkans once Kosovo Albanians declare independence,
writes Marko Lopusina, a reporter for a Belgrade independent weekly Telegraph.

According to the information Lopusina obtained, the intelligence about
the Kosovo Albanian military plan and the meeting has been acquired by
the Spanish and French intelligence agents that have infiltrated al Qaeda
cells in the Balkans in the aftermath of al Qaeda attacks on Spain and
Muslim riots in France.

"It has been shown that individuals in al Qaeda attacks on Spain and
France came from Bosnia and Kosovo, and that has led these agents to spy
on these cells in the Balkans," says an unidentified intelligence officer
from Belgrade.

"In the course of monitoring their own terrorists, Spanish and French
uncovered that Islamists in the Balkans and those in Europe are in a tight
cooperation," says the officer.

According to Eliza Manningham-Buller, Director General of the Security
Service MI5, British agents have, so far, uncovered 30 large terrorist
operations that al Qaeda is planning from Balkans and some 1,600 Islamists
are being monitored. The intended target is Europe.

According to the reports, ethnic Albanian terrorists from Kosovo and
Macedonia have paid 100,000 Euros for a recent transfer of wahhabists extremist
gunmen from Tuzla in Bosnia and from the emerging extremist hotbed in Serbia's
southern city of Novi Pazar.

Sources indicate that the intent is to make Novi Pazar a logistic center
for all of the Islamists in Europe.

"There are indications that the Wahhabis of Novi Pazar have interpreted
recent statements by the German Ambassador in Serbia, Zobel, as a green
light to initiate violence against Serbia," says Darko Trifunivic, an expert
on Islamic terrorism in the Balkans.

German ambassador Andreas Zobel recently said that "Insisting on Kosovo
as part of Serbian territory would destabilize Serbia, because then the
issue of Vojvodina could open up, which is a new province in Serbia."

"This is not a threat," said Zobel.

In March, Serbian police has uncovered a Muslim terror camp and during
the gun battle that killed the leader, the brother of the killed leader
escaped to Kosovo and is being protected by local ethnic Albanian extremists.

At the funeral of Dženaz Ismail Prentic, the slain al Qaeda leader from
Novi Pazar, hundreds of locals came to pay their respects, and his body
covered in black has been carried throughout the town in a long drawn parade.

At Gnjilane meeting, sources have told Lopusina, the alleged independent
NGOs would initiate demands that southern Serbia requires cultural and
national autonomy which will be followed by demands from the local armed
Muslim Albanians that will be will be followed by armed violence.

NATO troops in Kosovo have been informed of this plan, writes Lopusina.

http://www.serbianna.com/news/2007/01613.shtml






Powered by ScribeFire.