May 22, 2012

Serbian Election: The End of the Beginning, by S. Trifkovic

Serbian Election: The End of the Beginning

by Srdja Trifkovic • May 21, 2012 • Printer-friendly

 

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning, quipped Churchill in November 1942, following Montgomery's modest success at El Alamein. The same applies to Tomislav Nikolić's victory in the second round of Serbia's presidential election last Sunday.

The defeat of Boris Tadić—amply and inappropriately assisted in the final stages of his campaign by the unspeakable, greasy-haired, gay-pride-marching U.S. ambassadress Mary Worlick—is certainly not the end of the global-imperial lethal grip on Serbia. It is to be hoped that is heralds the beginning of its end, but it certainly is the end of the "pro-Western" regime's four-year-long exercise in self-abasement abroad and ruthless robbery at home.

The robbery included the regime's theft of some hundreds of thousands of opposition votes following the parliamentary election on May 6. For reasons too technically complex to elucidate here—the seedy details are available to the curious (provided they are not faint of heart)—the ruling coalition of thieves and traitors seems poised to form the next government of this long-suffering land, regardless of Sunday's presidential race upset. That upset was only made possible by the fact that in a two-candidate race it is much, much harder to engineer the wholesale robbery (nearing 7 percent of all votes cast) that we have witnessed in the multi-party ballot on May 6.

The yawning gap between Serbia's popular will and Belgrade's declared political outcome was brazenly glossed over in the Western media two weeks ago, however. The Leninist dictum that the morality of an act depends on the progressive status of its perpetrator still applies. In that spirit, Mr. Nikolić's "ultranationalist" credentials of yore are routinely invoked as his defining trait of today. The comparison is somewhat strained, but just imagine our mainstream media insisting that a dubiously reconstructed "Anti-White, Foreign-Born Radical Leftist" was elected President in November 2008.

In media shorthand the accurate description of President-elect Nikolić would be "a pro-EU moderate nationalist." In reality it is hard to be both, of course, but many decent Europeans are trying to square the circle, from Scotland and Catalonia to Poland and Slovakia. The only issue on which the winner draws the line is "Kosovo or Serbia?" Unlike his defeated opponent, he realizes that it is impossible to compromise on a first-order priority—the country's territorial integrity—for the sake of what is a second-order objective of joining an organization. (Whether doing so is on offer, and whether it would confer any benefits on the joiner, is another issue—see my Endless Road interview on RT.) How many eminently clubbable "Europeans" would agree to cede their country's current sovereignty over Alsace-Lorraine, or South Tyrol, or Sudetenland, or Transylvania, or Schleswig-Holstein, or South Dobrudja, or Silesia (to name but a few of historically contentious provinces) for the sake of remaining in "Europe"?

Unsurprisingly, Nikolić's reluctance to do so is deemed extremist and criminal. No Serb unashamed of his name and ancestors will ever be deemed clubbable by those hell-bent on turning Europe into Eurabia and morbidly celebrating the demographic demise of European Americans as a great and glorious historical milestone.

Nikolić is a simple man. He is not a statesman but a politician. He made a shrewd move by splitting away from Vojislav Šešelj and his cult known as the Serbian Radical Party, an increasingly irrelevant cabal of aficionados devoted to the hero-worshipping of their unjustly imprisoned Leader. Does he have the guts and the vision to become a true national leader? It is hard to make predictions, especially about the future. Suffice to say, he has the guts and stamina to withstand a race that was spectacularly dirty—thanks to Boris Tadić and his Democratic Party—even by the Third World standards.

The Nikolić victory will not alter the catastrophic position of Serbia in the short term, her headlong economic, social, and above all moral downfall engendered by the plutocratic rule of Tadić and his "pro-Western" camarilla. That victory nevertheless matters a great deal because it has fundamentally altered the balance of political power in Serbia. For years Tadić and his kitchen cabinet have run the entire gamut of state institutions. For years he has doubled, incredibly, in the self-excluding roles of the president of his Democratic Party (Demokratska stranka, DS) while performing the functions of the head of state, thus effectively controlling the DS-dominated government in brazen violation of his constitutional prerogatives as president. Such twining of functions used to be the hallmark of Tito, Stalin and Enver Hoxha. It is unknown to the world deemed democratic today.

In the end Tadić suffered the fate of Slobodan Milošević. He became cocky, arrogant, and convinced of his own infallability. Just like Milošević, he cut his presidential mandate short, convinced he could manipulate the electorate by controlled media and pliant institutions. Just like Milošević in the fall of 2000, he lost—only one-fifth of all eligible voters supported him—because Serbia is still a real country composed of real people... the efforts of Ms. Mary Worlick and her paymasters notwithstanding.

May 16, 2012

Kosovo: Serb returnees threatened with expulsion

Greetings in our Risen Lord,

 

Christos Anesti!

 

Every time one hears about the idea that Serbs are threatened to leave Kosovo/Metohija hardly will we hear nothing whatsoever in the media of the West or even from the EU, who have all Crucified Kosovo/Metohija and put the Serbs on the Cross and forget about their humanitarian struggles and constant persecution on a daily basis.

 

The way to achieve Independence has been the current situation in the region is that push and make sure ever Serb leaves and thus indicating that the majority is not Serb but Albanian! The West listens to this factor and thus tells the free world –the majority is no longer Serbs!!!!

 

The second thing to bring down the Serbs was to destroy their monasteries, and churches –over 153! Everyone knows how much the Serbs love their Orthodox faith and if they do not have a Church available then they move to another place where this is possible. At the same time it's without a doubt what is at hand at this hour is the West wants to make sure Holy Orthodoxy will perish in the region throughout Kosovo/Metohija!

 

All humanitarian organizations as well as the free should hear these words: Serbs will remain in Kosovo/Metohija!

 

Serbs will not despair!

 

Serbs will seek to pray anywhere if they have to travel several miles to attend Church!

 

Serbs will remain in Kosovo/Metohija!

 

Serbs will be faithful to their forefathers and to the Holy Orthodox faith they love!

 

Serbs will just eat bread and soup from the fields and go hungry because they know no one cares and have betrayed them all!

 

Serbs will pray and Serbs will not give up!

 

Let the West and let the free world know this for sure!

 

The betrayal of the Serbs must now end today at this hour!

 

Now I humbly ask you during these Holy Paschal days of the Resurrection of our Lord the following let us together offer our prayers for peace and understanding, and that the hour should be to cease from threatening Serbs and realize they will remain!

 

We can help those who are so desperate for our assistance at this time and perhaps you would like to send a loving donation to the Decani Monastery Relief Fund.

 

Please email me: father@serfes.org

 

Thank you and may our Risen Lord watch over us all!

 

Peace to your soul!

 

God love and bless you!

 

Humbly in Christ our Lord,

+ Very Reverend Archimandrite Nektarios Serfes

President of The Decani Monastery Relief Fund

Who prays for you and with you!

 

I have run to the fragrance of your myrrh,

O Christ God, for I have been wounded by your love;

do not part from me, O heavenly Bridegroom.

 

"Wounded by Love," The Life and The Wisdom of Elder Porphyrios

 

See us at facebook.com/orthodoxchurchboise

 

 

Serb returnees feel intimidated after flyers were distributed in their villages in Metohija, calling for them to once again be driven out of their homes.  ...

 

[ NATO's 'allies' (as in 1999) might need NATO's help to 'drive out' the remaining handful of SerbsNATO will be meeting in Chicago next week.   No doubt NATO brass know that their work on behalf of 'the Kosovars' is very much appreciated, and their presence just might be needed to finish the job.  And, to bring a supply of bombs, in case needed. 

 

It's mostly elderly Serbs remaining in Metohija, so it should not require too much more bombing to 'drive the oldsters out'.   ]

 

 

Kosovo: Serb returnees threatened with expulsion

Tanjug     |

KLINA -- Serb returnees feel intimidated after flyers were distributed in their villages in Metohija, calling for them to once again be driven out of their homes.

 

(Tanjug, file)

The flyers were signed by a group calling itself "the Albanian People's Army".

This was confirmed by Jovo Jović, a representative of the village of Klinavac, in the municipality of Klina.

In a statement for the Tanjug news agency on Tuesday, Jović said the flyers, which refer to Serbs as "criminals, either directly or indirectly", are causing fear among the returnees in Klinavac and other nearby villages.

The threats appeared on Monday, and were placed on the thresholds of Serbs' houses in Drsnik, Berkovo and Klina, villages inhabited by a total of some 100 Serb families, Jović explained.

"We are trying not to prejudge anything. We will inform all institutions in Kosovo and central Serbia about this, as we do not want to conceal these serious threats," he underlined.

"We have not reported the case to the police, because we do not trust them. KFOR told us that the police know about this and that they will be patrolling the villages, but we have not run across any of them as yet," Jović added.

Meanwhile, the Ministry for Kosovo and Metohija condemned the threats and called on the EU mission in the province, EULEX, "to find out who was responsible". The ministry also urged the NATO mission, KFOR, "to reinforce their troops in the returnee villages".

Reacting to these reports, a KFOR spokesman told Tanjug that they were "concerned about the emergence of the flyers", but that he would not discuss "any concrete steps KFOR will or will not undertake", saying it concerned "operative issues".

The spokesman also noted that KFOR "takes seriously any security threat".

May 15, 2012

European Elections: Who forgot Serbia?

World » Europe

European Elections: Who forgot Serbia?

07.05.2012

 

Turn on a western TV outlet, open a western newspaper. Two elections: France and Greece. What about Serbia, you know, that "forgotten" nation in the Balkans that shed the blood of hundreds of thousands of its sons and daughters fighting against imperialism and fascism in two world wars? And what about the serious allegations of irregularities?

Turn on a western TV outlet, open a western newspaper. Two elections: France and Greece. What about Serbia, you know, that "forgotten" nation in the Balkans that shed the blood of hundreds of thousands of its sons and daughters fighting against imperialism and fascism in two world wars, the one the west thanked by carving off its southernmost province of Kosovo and recognising it as a "country"?

And what happened in the Serbian elections? The early forecasts give incumbent President Boris Tadic (DS-Demokratska Stranka) a marginal lead (26.8%) over Tomislav Nikolic (SNS-Srpska Napredna Stranka) 25.6%. However, let us see how.

Accusations of serious irregularities have been levelled at Tadic and his party in the elections in which 7,026,579 Serbian citizens had the right to vote for among 12 Presidential candidates and 250 Members of Parliament choosing among 18 electoral lists.

In Novi Sad, several people were detained after offering 2,500 dinars to vote for Tadic, according to b92. Also in Novi Sad, there are accusations that a political rally was held in a concert given by George Balasevic, despite the fact that this took place on Saturday night, when there was a political blackout, or supposed to be. It is claimed that Tadic attended this event and gained political capital from it.

Globally, there are accusations that 261,000 voting papers have gone missing and will be introduced in the ballot boxes. Inside Serbia there is a considerable weight of public opinion which accused the Tadic government of being controlled by foreigners, of usurping the position in government to pander to the caprices of the foreign paymasters and there is a very heavy climate of suspicion that Tadic will try to rig the election.

Watch this space.

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

Pravda.Ru

 

May 14, 2012

Russia Warns Against Training Syrian Rebels In Kosovo

 

http://www.interfax.com/newsinf.asp?pg=2&id=331687

Interfax
May 14, 2012

Moscow opposes plans to train Syrian militants in Kosovo

MOSCOW: The Russian Foreign Ministry is concerned by the reports that Syrian militants will be trained in Kosovo, and has urged the international community to prevent that from happening.

"Lately there have been media reports about contacts between Syrian opposition representatives and the authorities of the so-called Republic of Kosovo. This is not just about 'exchange of experience' in organizing separatist movements aimed at toppling existing regimes, it is also about training Syrian militants in Kosovo," the ministry said in a statement issued on Monday.

They intend to use areas that are geographically similar to the Syrian landscape, the ministry said. It is likely that training centers will be opened at the former bases of the Kosovo Liberation Army.

"Such intentions raise concerns. They run counter to the efforts of United Nations-Arab League Special Envoy Kofi Annan, backed by the entire international community. Moreover, turning Kosovo into an international site for training militants from various militant groups could become a serious destabilizing factor spreading beyond the Balkan region," the statement said.

"We are calling on international organizations present in the province to take whatever steps necessary to foil such schemes," the Russian Foreign Ministry said.

----------------------------------------------------------

http://en.rian.ru/russia/20120514/173451677.html

Russian Information Agency Novosti
May 14, 2012

Russia Warns Against Training Syrian Rebels in Kosovo

The Russian Foreign Ministry on Monday urged international bodies operating in Kosovo to prevent the region from turning into a training ground for Syrian rebels.

A delegation from the Syrian opposition visited Kosovo in April to allegedly make a deal on exchanging experience in guerilla warfare against ruling authorities.

So far, the fractured Syrian opposition has been unable to form a steady front against the forces of President Bashar al-Assad.

The Russian ministry said in a statement that the talks covered not only the ways of organizing armed resistance against authorities but also the training of Syrian militants in Kosovo.

"There are plans to use the areas [in Kosovo] that resemble the terrain in Syria. The possibility of setting up training camps at the former bases of the Kosovo Liberation Army [KLA] is also being discussed," the statement said.

"Transforming Kosovo into an international training ground for armed militants may become a serious destabilizing factor that could extend beyond the Balkans," the document said. "We urge international bodies operating in Kosovo to take all necessary steps to prevent these plans."

The ethnic Albanian KLA fought a separatist war against the regime of President Slobodan Milosevic in 1998-99. About 10,000 people died in the Kosovo conflict.

Kosovo declared its independence from Serbia in February 2008.

Both Serbia and Russia have refused to recognize Kosovo's independence.

___

May 11, 2012

Edmonton Journal (Letters): Less rewriting of Serb past - by Amb. James Bissett

 

 Friday, May 11, 2012, 4:45 PM

Note:  Many thanks to former Amb. Bissett for taking the time to reply to Srdja Pavlovic's piece of lying propaganda, published the other day.  

 

Below is Mr. Bissett's letter:

  

...  Perhaps the professor should do more research and less rewriting.

 

[ Amen to that! ]

 

 

Edmonton Journal May 11, 2012

Re: "Rewriting the past a bad idea; Don't use Nazi-era figures for modern agendas," by Srdja Pavlovic, Ideas, May 9.

If Srdja Pavlovic thinks rewriting the past is a bad idea he shouldn't do it. His condemnation of Serbian guerrilla leader Dragoslav Mihailovic as a convicted war criminal and Nazi sympathizer is a blatant rewrite of history and contrary to the facts.

Mihailovic was one of the first resistance leaders in Europe to fight the Nazi occupiers.

He did this when Muslims in Bosnia were enlisting by the thousands into the 13th Waffen SS Division Handschar and the Croatian puppet leader, Anton Pavlic, and his fascist Ustashi were slaughtering the Jewish, Roma, and Serbian populations of Croatia.

During the early months after the Nazi invasion, only Mihailovic's Serbs were fighting the occupiers. His communist enemies and the ones who brought him before a typical communist show trial after the war and executed him did not begin to fight the Germans until ordered to by their boss, Josef Stalin.

On May 25, 1942, Time magazine featured Mihailovic on its cover, describing how the Germans placed a price of $1 million on his head and how his resistance fighters were holding down seven German divisions who otherwise could have been on the Russian front.

Some war criminal! Some Nazi sympathizer!

Perhaps the professor should do more research and less rewriting.

James Bissett, former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, Ottawa

© Copyright (c) The Edmonton Journal

 

Prof. Jasmina Vujic: Systematic Efforts not to Allow Serbian Diaspora to Vote in Serbian Elections

Systematic Efforts not to Allow Serbian Diaspora to Vote in Serbian Elections


The Serbian nation is considered to have a sizable Diaspora. The number of expatriate Serbs around the globe is estimated at around 3.5 million - about a third of the nation - primarily located in North America, Germany, Austria, Australia and New Zealand. The period after WW II also saw subsequent waves of emigration, first sparked by political motives, and later shifting more to socio-economic grounds. The latter eventually affected the intellectual elite as well, resulting in an increasing and serious "brain drain" over the past two decades. Since the October 2000 democratic changes in Serbia and Montenegro, the Serbian Diaspora hoped for a better relationship with the Homeland, and for joint work on further development of democratic civil society and crucial economic reforms in order to speed up the painful transitional period.

As one of two representatives of the Serbian Diaspora from USA in the Diaspora Council that was established by President Kostunica in 2002, and as a Vice-President of that Council, I worked very hard in promoting the rights of Serbs abroad to citizenship, voting rights, denationalization, and rehabilitation of wrongly accused, and participation in the economic, social, cultural and moral renewal of the Serbian nation. The Council proposed many ways how the Serbian Diaspora could effectively contribute to the rebuilding of the Serbian nation with their knowledge, experience, and worldwide connections.

After more then 10 years, very little of what was promised to the Serbian Diaspora was fulfilled. Although the Serbian government admitted that without ongoing financial help from the Diaspora, entire regions of Serbia would have been reduced to poverty, and that in 2011 at least 5.5 billion of dollars was obtained from Diaspora, still the Serbian Diaspora investors have been treated as second-class investors. Experts from the Serbian Diaspora (engineers, scientists, professors, businessmen,..) have not been welcomed in Serbia, and even the most basic right of the citizens of one country, the right to vote, has been denied to the Serbian Diaspora.

In 2002, the Diaspora Council proposed that the Serbian citizens abroad could vote either in Serbian embassies and consulates, or by mail ballot or by electronic voting. Only the first option was accepted, which created tremendous problems for the majority of Serbian Diaspora due to a very limiting number of voting locations, large distances that the voter needed to travel  (sometimes, thousands of kilometers), and a very complicated process off registration to vote.

I will only present several examples from my own experience with voting. The Western USA including California where I live, are under the jurisdiction of the Consulate General of Republic of Serbia in Chicago. One of the two voting location for the Serbian elections in 2007 was open there. I went through the lengthy registration process, and flew to Chicago to vote. However, nobody was able to vote, because the voting lists from Chicago jurisdiction were sent to Washington Embassy and, from Washington jurisdiction to Chicago. In 2008, me and several colleagues were able to collect enough registered voters, and the voting location was opened in the Silicone Valley, where at least several hundred young Serbian engineers live and work. All of us had to again go through the lengthy registration procedure. However, the lists of registered voters were again not accurate, so that the large percentage of those who registered to vote were not on the lists.

In the most recent elections that were held on May 5-6, 2012, basically nobody from California was able to vote. Information about the elections and the procedure how to register was sent very late, in my case only one day before the registration deadline. For the third time we had to go through the lengthy registration procedure. In addition, it was not specified that the deadline was midnight of April 14 (but Belgrade time), so that California voters deadline for registration was shortened by 9 hours. Many of those registered on April 14 were denied registration for being late. However, the same people were already registered to vote in 2008! Until 2 to 3 days before the election date (May 5), nobody informed the voters in California if and where they could vote. Only then, a small percentage of registered voters received information that they need to travel to Chicago to vote. It was already late for people to find any reasonably priced tickets to fly to Chicago. Additional complication was that traveling and personal documents for Serbian citizens were changed several times over the last 10 years. The last change – the biometric documents – required  people to travel to Chicago to get the new documents, which many were not able to do.

For the 2012 elections, the number of voting location for the Serbian Diaspora was reduced by more than 2 (no voting locations for Australia, and only 3 or 4 for Northern America), and the procedure was twice as complicated. The end result is that less than 1000 Serbian citizens around the world were able to cast their ballots. All of the above could have been prevented if mail ballot or electronic voting was allowed. After more that 10 years of advocating simplified ways of voting for the Serbian Diaspora, I must say that somebody obviously does not want to allow it.

Prof. Jasmina Vujic, California, USA, May 10, 2012

__._,_.___

April 30, 2012

Serbia Is at Crossroads, while Kosovo is Unstable

Serbia Is at Crossroads, while Kosovo is Unstable

Published: April 30, 2012 18:38, Adelina Marini, Sofia

In the Western Balkans there is a feeling of new hope but there also is a feeling that only a spark would be enough to inflame the old hostilities again. The EU is too consumed by its own problems, popular discontent is rising, the nationalists score success after success. USA is far away and it has already changed its foreign policy focus - it is now watching the Pacific region and China in particular. Russia is also busy with the developments in the Middle East, Iran and North Korea. And the Western Balkans' neighbouring countries continue to be too insecure what they want from life. Such is the situation on the Balkan peninsula a few days before extremely important and even crucial elections in Serbia on May 6th - the day when there will be not less important and crucial elections in Greece and France. Crucial, because on the outcome of the elections will depend the future of relations between Serbia and Kosovo. This was made clear by two politicians - a Serb and a Kosovar. The former is a former official and is pro-European and the latter - incumbent and sober realist.

 

CONTINUED……………. http://www.euinside.eu/en/faces/serbia-is-at-crossroads-and-kosovo-is-unstable

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SJ-8kOmqtoY

 

April 26, 2012

Transitional justice and the Hague Tribunal – justice impossible?

Transitional justice and the Hague Tribunal – justice impossible?

Posted on April 23rd, 2012 in the category Conflict by TransConflict Subscribe to the transconflict RSS feed

2 Comments

Prosecuting war crimes is only one of the prerequisites for transitional justice; the lack of other effective mechanisms at the national and regional level explains, in part, the shortcomings of transitional justice in the former Yugoslavia.

By Danijela Dobrota

Transitional justice is one of the terms most frequently used by politicians (particularly when elections approach), the media and relevant stakeholders in the region. It is often reiterated that the Balkans ought to make an attempt to ensure transitional justice, leading to reconciliation and a better future; with the Hague Tribunal widely perceived as the main instrument for transitional justice.

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (hereinafter the ICTY or Tribunal) was established with the aim of prosecuting persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the region as of  January 1st 1991. The term 'transitional justice' is frequently mentioned and yet, interestingly enough, not really explained to the public. For Sottas, "transitional justice aims to restore victims' dignity, build confidence between previously warring groups and foster the institutional changes needed to bring about a new relationship within the population, in order to usher in the rule of law without endorsing practices that amount to total or partial impunity." (1)

There are numerous definitions which vary on different points. All of them agree, however, that the proper criminal prosecution of war crimes is only one of the prerequisites for transitional justice. Moreover, the existence of more than one effective transitional justice mechanism on the national level is crucial. And this is exactly where the problem with the ICTY and Balkans lies.

From the very definitions and examples, it becomes clear that the ICTY is just one of the elements of transitional policy; one that is far from sufficient to ensure transitional justice. Though there have been attempts to establish other transitional justice instruments within the region, such as Truth Commissions, these have never become fully-functional. Whilst there are many national and regional NGOs dealing with issues of reconciliation, confronting the past and war crimes trials, most are perceived as highly-partial; hence their legitimacy and ability to make a real difference remains questionable.

Being the only more or less efficient transitional justice instrument, one can easily conclude that the Tribunal took on more than it could contend with and that, from one point of view,  was doomed to fail with respect to its overly ambitious goals. For instance, "Professor Bassiouni notes that one of the primary purposes of an accountability regime like the ICTY is to 'establish a record of truth. The ICTY sought to emulate the Nuremberg experience in creating a lasting and truthful historical record of the atrocities and not follow the footsteps of countless 'forgotten atrocities'." (2)

Leaving aside the fact that there was little to emulate from the Nuremberg Trials, one can easily argue, especially taking into account the complexity of Balkans conflicts, that there is not one single truth, but a multitude of competing versions. To believe that a court – which should be a strictly legal organ – can determine the truth is, therefore, highly ambitious. The nature of a very complicated international criminal trial very often limits the discovery of truth. This is especially true with respect to the ICTY, which represents a highly compelling experiment and mixture of common and civil law systems. More importantly, newly-appointed judges may not be willing to hand down decisions that are too politically controversial. (3)

In this regard, the Tribunal has been more successful in determining the truth regarding crimes committed by one of the three conflicting parties, whilst the crimes committed by other conflicting parties remain rather underexplored. One can wonder, therefore, if the Hague Tribunal – like the Nuremberg Tribunal sixty years ago – also applies victors' justice. Nonetheless, as my criminal law professor once emphasized, it is not possible for any criminal system – let alone a young and fragile international court, such as the ICTY – to prosecute all perpetrators.

More importantly, one needs to look at the bigger picture and imagine what the situation would be like if there was no Hague Tribunal; particularly given that national judiciaries were not – and still are not – fully able to deal with war crimes trials. Whilst the Tribunal has plenty of flaws, it gently pushed the region to talk about what happened during the nineties, meaning that the region cannot simply turn a blind eye as happened after World War Two. After all, it all comes down to a basic question – is it better to have some justice or no justice at all?

The problem is that there are not enough effective transitional justice mechanisms, meaning that that region continues to rely upon external factors to help solve its lingering problems, particularly where reconciliation is concerned. In order to successfully confront the troublesome legacy of the nineties – and in order not to keep repeating the mistakes of the past – internally-driven initiatives on the national and regional levels are essential.

Finally, and as Harvard professor, Michael Ignatieff, stated, 'what seems apparent in the former Yugoslavia is that the past continues to torment because it is not the past. These places are…living in a time in which the past and present are continuous, agglutinated mass of fantasies, distortions, myths, and lies. Reporters in the Balkans wars often observed that when they were told stories about atrocities they were occasionally uncertain whether these stories had occurred yesterday or in 1941, or 1841, or 1441.'

Danijela Dobrota is a lawyer from Belgrade.

To learn more about the Balkans, please refer to TransConflict's reading list series by clicking here.

To keep up-to-date with the work of TransConflict, please click here. If you are interested in supporting TransConflict, please click here.

Bibliography


1. E. Sottas, 'Transitional Justice and Sanctions', International Review of the Red Cross, Volume 90, Number 870, June 2008, Page 371


2. A.A. Schvey, 'Striving for Accountability in the Former Yugoslavia', 'Accountability for Atrocities: National and International Responses', Edited by J. E. Stromseth, page 56


3. J. Sarkin, 'Comparing and Contrasting the Approach to Transitional Justice in South Africa and Rwanda: Choosing Between Truth, Reconciliation and Justice', Page 330

http://www.transconflict.com/2012/04/transitional-justice-and-the-hague-tribunal-justice-impossible-234/

April 19, 2012

UN envoy recalls time when being anti-Serb was "preferable"

UN envoy recalls time when being anti-Serb was "preferable"

Source: Tanjug

PRAGUE -- Bosnian war-era UN envoy Thorvald Stoltenberg says diplomats were better off being against Serbs - in order to avoid criticism and ensure acceptance.

 

Thorvald Stoltenberg (Harry Wad, file)

The former Norwegian foreign minister told RFE in an interview 20 years after the start of the 1992-95 war in Bosnia that he "knew from the first day of the war" that in order to be completely accepted and avoid criticism, "one had to be against Serbs, support Bosniaks (Muslims), and look the other way when it comes to Croats".

Those diplomats, "such as himself", who chose to support a side "based on concrete developments in the field", faced fierce criticism, he added.

Stoltenberg said he was deemed to be "pro-Serb" because of his desire to remain unbiased, and added that he was also forced to give up on speaking the Serbian language - which he had learned during his previous diplomatic post in Belgrade - and switch to English. This came because he was criticized that "when he spoke Serbo-Croatian, he spoke the Serbian variant too much, and the Croatian too little".

"Specifically, my accent was too Serbian. For this reason I started speaking English, so my knowledge of Serbo-Croatian didn't help much in the negotiations," the Norwegian diplomat recalled, and stressed that he never wished - then or now - to be a judge, but worked to contribute to ending the war, in his role of a UN envoy.

According to Stoltenberg, a failed peace plan hammered out in 1993 was more favorable for Bosniaks than the one accepted in Dayton two years later - during which time thousands of people died and tens of thousands more were displaced. However, he revealed, the United States had suggested to the Bosniak side to reject the 1993 plan:

"The reason given was that the territory that would belong to Bosniaks was too small. The agreement envisaged that they should receive 33.3 percent of the territory. Today, after Dayton (peace accords), they essentially control between 26 and 28 percent of the country. The 1993 agreement also envisaged the creation of tree units within Bosnia-Herzegovina: Bosniak, Serb, and Croat."

He further commented on the role of the United States by saying that they "at the time made reaching an agreement more difficult". The former UN envoy said he at first hoped that Washington would take part in the negotiations sooner, but that he accepted then U.S. President Bill Clinton's argument that the war "a European issue".

"I though that to be a fair approach. However, the U.S. did not completely withdraw from the region, they stood on the sidelines, giving instructions to some of the participants, which, in fact, made reaching a deal more difficult," he was quoted as saying.

As for Bosnia's future - considering that the country is still divided along ethnic lines, and dysfunctional as a state, Stoltenberg said it was up to the people in Bosnia to make decisions about "life in peace" - rather than anyone else, the United States included.

"I am convinced that all these issues will be solved, and without war. I do not consider the situation in Bosnia-Herzegovina to be the most dangerous in the Balkans," Stoltenberg revealed, and added that he was "much more concerned about the situation in Kosovo," but did not further elaborate on his stance regarding the province.

http://www.b92.net/eng/news/world-article.php?yyyy=2012&mm=04

Secessionist Threat In Macedonia: New War In Balkans?

http://www.adnkronos.com/IGN/Aki/English/Security/Macedonia-Mysterious-army-threatens-liberation-of-Albanian-lands_313214443368.html

ADN Kronos
April 17, 2012

Macedonia: Mysterious 'army' threatens 'liberation of Albanian lands'

====

Ethnic Albanians rebelled in 2001...gaining concessions from the government under international [NATO, U.S., EU] mediation. But tensions have been running high ever since.

====

Skopje: Tensions were high in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia on Tuesday, less than a week after the murder of five Macedonians near the capital of Skopje, as a mysterious "army" threatened a "liberation of occupied Albanian lands"

The until recently unknown "The Army for Liberation of Occupied Albanian Lands", in a statement published by the Macedonian media, gave the government an ultimatum to withdraw in two weeks from what it called "occupied Albanians lands" or face reprisals.

The "army' said it has decided at a meeting of its "general staff" it would attack "Slavo-Macedonian police and military structures" if they don't withdraw from the territory inhabited by ethnic Albanians.

Ethnic Albanians, who make about 25 percent of Macedonia's two million population, are concentrated mostly in the west of the country bordering Albania, but there are numerous cities, like Skopje, with a mixed population.

Five Macedonian youths and a middle aged man were killed last week near a lake north of Skopje while fishing and local media speculated the murders were ethnically motivated.

The police still haven't discovered the perpetrators and about one thousand Macedonians protested in Skopje Monday evening, smashing windows at a government building and clashing with police.

Six people, including three policemen, were injured in the clashes and fourteen protesters were arrested as police blocked demonstrators from marching onto Albanian section of the city.

Ethnic Albanians rebelled in 2001...gaining concessions from the government under international [NATO, U.S., EU] mediation. But tensions have been running high ever since.

Macedonians are Slavs and the mysterious army has accused prime minister Nikola Gruevski of "daily violations of the rights of Albanians", of "spreading anti-Albanian ideology, staging attacks on innocent Albanians and of blocking Albanian villages".

"We have been silent long enough, the silence is now over," the statement said. It vowed to "revenge brothers" and to "respond on fire with fire, an eye for an eye and an arm for an arm".

April 17, 2012

Letter: NATO Should Just Go Away

 

http://heraldnews.suntimes.com/opinions/letters/11877919-474/letters-nato-should-just-go-away.html

Joliet Herald News
April 17, 2012

Letter: NATO should just go away

From the ashes of World War II rose the great superpower rivalry — the Cold War between the U.S. and Soviet Union. The U.S. formed NATO, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. The U.S.S.R. formed the Warsaw Pact, building up the largest concentration of military machines ever, along the Iron Curtain.

Eventually, the Soviet Union went bankrupt and the Cold War came to a screeching halt, scrapping the Warsaw Pact.

So what's happened to NATO? To my amazement, it's grown larger, with soldiers all over the world and no end in sight. The U.S., already nearly half the world's "kill power," combines with NATO nations for a whopping three-quarters of the world's military spending.

The four big NATO wars: Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan are outside the defense of the original borders in violation of the treaty, and further agreements are being broken as NATO pushes missile systems inside former Soviet territory.

These wars have been one lie after another, and the results have been considerably less than a resounding victory. As soon as we start ignoring the disaster of one war, NATO is ramping up for another.

As with the Warsaw Pact at the end of the Cold War, why in blazes didn't NATO just go away? Most press coverage of the pending NATO summit in May focuses solely on the supposed violence of protesters — as if we now need NATO to keep them from overthrowing the government.

We all need to meet in Chicago on May 20 for that summit at McCormick Place to ask why NATO should even exist. We need to agitate for scrapping NATO before it bankrupts us on another cold war or, worse, another world war or little wars that add up to a really big war.

Gary Jones
Joliet

April 13, 2012

Kosovo's "Mafia State" and Camp Bondsteel: Towards a Permanent US Military Presence in Southeast Europe

 

www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=30262

Kosovo's "Mafia State" and Camp Bondsteel: Towards a Permanent US Military Presence in Southeast Europe

Washington's Bizarre Kosovo Strategy could destroy NATO

 

By F. William Engdahl

Global Research, April 12, 2012

 

 

In one of the more bizarre foreign policy announcements of a bizarre Obama Administration, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has announced that Washington will "help" Kosovo to join NATO as well as the European Union. She made the pledge after a recent Washington meeting with Kosovan Prime Minister Hashim Thaci in Washington where she praised the progress of the Thaci government in its progress in "European integration and economic development." 1

 

Her announcement no doubt caused serious gas pains among government and military officials in the various capitals of European NATO. Few people  appreciate just how mad Clinton's plan to push Kosovo into NATO and the EU is.

 

Basic Kosovo geopolitics

 

The controversial piece of real estate today called Kosovo was a part of Yugoslavia and tied to Serbia until the NATO bombing campaign in 1999 demolished what remained of Milosevic's Serbia and  opened the way for the United States, with the dubious assist of EU nations, above all Germany, to carve up the former Yugoslavia into tiny, dependent pseudo states. Kosovo became one, as did Macedonia. Slovenia and Croatia had earlier split off from Yugoslavia with a strong assist from the German Foreign Ministry.

 

Some brief review of the circumstances leading to the secession of Kosovo from Yugoslavia will help locate how risky a NATO membership or EU membership would be for the future of Europe. Hashim Thaci the current Kosovo Prime Minister, got his job, so to speak, through the US State Department and not via free democratic Kosovo elections. Kosovo is not recognized as a legitimate state by either Russia or Serbia or over one hundred other nations. However, it was immediately recognized when it declared independence in 2008 by the Bush Administration and by Berlin.

 

Membership into the EU for Kosovo would be welcoming another failed state, something which may not bother US Secretary Clinton, but which the EU at this juncture definitely can do without. Best estimates place unemployment in the country at as much as 60%. That is not just Third World level. The economy was always the poorest in Yugoslavia and today it is worse. Yet the real issue in terms of the future of EU peace and security is the nature of the Kosovo state that has been created by Washington since the late 1990's.

 

Mafia State and Camp Bondsteel

 

Kosovo is a tiny parcel of land in one of the most strategic locations in all Europe from a geopolitical standpoint of the US military objective of controlling oil flows and political developments from the oil-rich Middle East to Russia and Western Europe. The current US-led recognition of the self-declared Republic of Kosovo is a continuation of US policy for the Balkans since the illegal 1999 US-led NATO bombing of Serbia—a NATO "out-of-area" deployment never approved by the UN Security Council, allegedly on the premise that Milosevic's army was on the verge of carrying out a genocidal massacre of Kosovo Albanians.

 

Some months before the US-led bombing of Serbian targets, one of the heaviest bombings since World War II, a senior US intelligence official in private conversation told Croatian senior army officers in Zagreb about Washington's strategy for former Yugoslavia. According to these reports, communicated privately to this author, the Pentagon goal already in late 1998 was to take control of Kosovo in order to secure a military base to control the entire southeast European region down to the Middle East oil lands.

 

Since June 1999 when the NATO Kosovo Force (KFOR) occupied Kosovo, then an integral part of then-Yugoslavia, Kosovo was technically under a United Nations mandate, UN Security Council Resolution 1244. Russia and China also agreed to that mandate, which specifies the role of KFOR to ensure an end to inter-ethnic fighting and atrocities between the Serb minority population, others and the Kosovo Albanian Islamic majority. Under 1244 Kosovo would remain part of Serbia pending a peaceful resolution of its status. That UN Resolution was blatantly ignored by the US, German and other EU parties in 2008.

 

Germany's and Washington's prompt recognition of Kosovo's independence in February 2008, significantly, came days after elections for President in Serbia confirmed pro-Washington Boris Tadic had won a second four year term. With Tadic's post secured, Washington could count on a compliant Serbian reaction to its support for Kosovo.   

 

Immediately after the bombing of Serbia in 1999 the Pentagon seized a 1000 acre large parcel of land in Kosovo at Uresevic near the border to Macedonia, and awarded a contract to Halliburton when Dick Cheney was CEO there, to build one of the largest US overseas military bases in the world, Camp Bondsteel, with more than 7000 troops today.

 

The Pentagon has already secured seven new military bases in Bulgaria and Romania on the Black Sea in the Northern Balkans, including the Graf Ignatievo and Bezmer airbases in Bulgaria and Mihail Kogalniceanu Air Base in Romania, which are used for "downrange" military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. The Romanian installation hosts the Pentagon's Joint Task Force–East. The US's colossal Camp Bondsteel in Kosovo and the use and upgrading of Croatian and Montenegrin Adriatic harbors for US Navy deployments complete the militarization of the Balkans.[ii]

 

The US strategic agenda for Kosovo is primarily military, secondarily, it seems, narcotics trafficking. Its prime focus is against Russia and for control of oil flows from the Caspian Sea to the Middle East into Western Europe. By declaring its independence, Washington gains a weak state which it can fully control. So long as it remained a part of Serbia, that NATO military control would be politically insecure. Today Kosovo is controlled as a military satrapy of NATO, whose KFOR has 16,000 troops there for a tiny population of 2 million. Its Camp Bondsteel is one of a string of so-called forward operating bases and "lily pads" as Donald Rumsfeld called them, for military action to the east and south. Now formally bringing Kosovo into the EU and to NATO will solidify that military base now that the Republic of Georgia under US protégé Saakashvili failed so miserably in 2008 to fill that NATO role.

 

Heroin Transport Corridor

 

US-NATO military control of Kosovo serves several purposes for Washington's greater geo-strategic agenda. First it enables greater US control over potential oil and gas pipeline routes into the EU from the Caspian and Middle East as well as control of the transport corridors linking the EU to the Black Sea.

 

It also protects the multi-billion dollar heroin trade, which, significantly, has grown to record dimensions in Afghanistan according to UN narcotics officials, since the US occupation. Kosovo and Albania are major heroin transit routes into Europe. According to a 2008 US State Department annual report on international narcotics traffic, several key drug trafficking routes pass through the Balkans. Kosovo is mentioned as a key point for the transfer of heroin from Turkey and Afghanistan to Western Europe. Those drugs flow under the watchful eye of the Thaci government.

 

Since its dealings with the Meo tribesmen in Laos during the Vietnam era, the CIA has protected narcotics traffic in key locations in order partly to finance its covert operations. The scale of international narcotics traffic today is such that major US banks such as Citigroup are reported to derive a significant share of their profits from laundering the proceeds. 

 

One of the notable features of the indecent rush by Washington and other states to immediately recognize the independence of Kosovo is the fact that they well knew its government and both major political parties were in fact run by Kosovo Albanian organized crime.

 

Hashim Thaci, Prime Minister of Kosovo and head of the Democratic Party of Kosovo, is the former leader of the terrorist organization which the US and NATO trained and called the Kosovo Liberation Army, KLA, or in Albanian, UCK. In Kosovo crime circles he is known as Hashim "The Snake" for his personal ruthlessness against opponents.

 

In 1997, President Clinton's Special Balkans Envoy, Robert Gelbard described the KLA as, "without any question a terrorist group." It was far more. It was a klan-based mafia, impossible therefore to infiltrate, which controlled the underground black economy of Kosovo. Today the Democratic Party of Thaci, according to European police sources, retains its links to organized crime.

 

A February 22, 2005 German BND report, labeled Top Secret, which has since been leaked, stated, "Über die Key-Player (wie z. B. Haliti, Thaci, Haradinaj) bestehen engste Verflechtungen zwischen Politik, Wirtschaft und international operierenden OK-Strukturen im Kosovo. Die dahinter stehenden kriminellen Netzwerke fördern dort die politische Instabilität. Sie haben kein Interesse am Aufbau einer funktionierenden staatlichen Ordnung, durch die ihre florierenden Geschäfte beeinträchtigt werden können." (OK=Organized Kriminalität). (Translation: "Through the key players—for example Thaci, Haliti, Haradinaj—there is the closest interlink between politics, the economy and international organized crime in Kosovo. The criminal organizations in the background there foster political instability. They have no interest at all in the building of a functioning orderly state that could be detrimental to their booming business."3

 

The KLA began action in 1996 with the bombing of refugee camps housing Serbian refugees from the wars in Bosnia and Croatia. The KLA repeatedly called for the "liberation" of areas of Montenegro, Macedonia and parts of Northern Greece. Thaci is hardly a figure of regional stability to put it mildly. 

 

The 44 year old Thaci was a personal protégé of Clinton Secretary of State Madeleine Albright during the 1990s, when he was a mere 30-year old gangster. The KLA was supported from the outset by the CIA and the German BND. During the 1999 war the KLA was directly supported by NATO. At the time he was picked up by the USA in the mid-1990s, Thaci was founder of the Drenica Group, a criminal syndicate in Kosovo with ties to Albanian, Macedonian and Italian organized mafias.  A classified January 2007 report prepared for the EU Commission, labeled "VS-Nur für den Dienstgebrauch" was leaked to the media. It detailed the organized criminal activity of KLA and its successor Democratic Party under Thaci.

 

A December 2010 Council of Europe report, released a day after Kosovo's election commission said Mr Thaci's party won the first post-independence election, accused Western powers of complicity in ignoring the activities of the crime ring headed by Thaci: "Thaci and these other 'Drenica Group' members are consistently named as 'key players' in intelligence reports on Kosovo's mafia-like structures of organised crime," the report said. "We found that the 'Drenica Group' had as its chief – or, to use the terminology of organised crime networks, its 'boss' – the renowned political operator ... Hashim Thaci." 4

 

The report stated that Thaci exerted "violent control" over the heroin trade. Dick Marty, the European Union investigator, presented the report to European diplomats from all member states. The response was silence. Washington was behind Thaci.5

 

The same Council of Europe report on Kosovo organized crime accused Thaci's mafia organization of dealing in trade in human organs. Figures from Thaçi's inner circle were accused of taking captives across the border into Albania after the war, where a number of Serbs are said to have been murdered for their kidneys that were sold on the black market. In one case revealed in legal proceedings in a Pristina district court in 2008 organs were said to have been taken from impoverished victims at a clinic known as Medicus – linked to Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) organ harvesting in 2000.6

 

The question then becomes, why are Washington, NATO, the EU and inclusive and importantly, the German Government, so eager to legitimize the breakaway Kosovo? A Kosovo run internally by organized criminal networks is easy for NATO to control. It insures a weak state which is far easier to bring under NATO domination. Combined with NATO control over Afghanistan where the Kosovo heroin controlled by Prime Minister Thaci originates, the Pentagon is building a web of encirclement around Russia that is anything but peaceful. 

 

The Thaci dependence on US and NATO good graces insures Thaci's government will do what it is asked. That, in turn, assures the US a major military gain consolidating its permanent presence in the strategically vital southeast Europe. It is a major step in consolidating NATO control of Eurasia, and gives the US a large swing its way in the European balance of power. Little wonder Moscow has not welcomed the development, nor have numerous other states. The US is literally playing with dynamite, potentially as well with nuclear war in the Balkans.     

*F. William Engdahl is author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order. He may be contacted via his website,
www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net


Notes

1 RIA Novosti, US to Help Kosovo Join EU NATO: Clinton, April 5, 2012, accessed in 
http://en.rian.ru/world/20120405/172621125.html.

 

2 Rick Rozoff, Pentagon and NATO Complete Their Conquest of The Balkans, Global Research, November 28, 2009, accessed in 
www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16311.

 

3 Tom Burghardt, The End of the Affair: The BND, CIA and Kosovo's Deep State, accessed in

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/The_End_of_the_Affair%3F_The_BND%2C_CIA_and_Kosovo%27s_Deep_State.

 

4 The Telegraph, Kosovo's prime minister 'key player in mafia-like gang,' December 14, 2010, accessed in 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/kosovo/8202700/Kosovos-prime-minister-key-player-in-mafia-like-gang.html.

 

5 Ibid. 

 

6  Paul Lewis, Kosovo PM is head of human organ and arms ring Council of Europe reports, The Guardian, 14 December 2010.

 


Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in this article.

To become a Member of Global Research

The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact: crgeditor@yahoo.com 

www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

For media inquiries: crgeditor@yahoo.com

© Copyright F. William Engdahl, Global Research, 2012 

The url address of this article is: www.globalresearch.ca/PrintArticle.php?articleId=30262



© Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
Web site engine by Polygraphx Multimedia © Copyright 2005-2007