December 27, 2018

Arms Sales to Saudis Leave American Fingerprints on Yemen's Carnage

nytimes.com

Arms Sales to Saudis Leave American Fingerprints on Yemen’s Carnage

15-19 minutes


Image

Newly graduated officers of the Royal Saudi Air Force in Riyadh. The F-15 fighter jets behind them are American-made and maintained.CreditCreditFayez Nureldine/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

CAIRO — When a Saudi F-15 warplane takes off from King Khalid air base in southern Saudi Arabia for a bombing run over Yemen, it is not just the plane and the bombs that are American.

American mechanics service the jet and carry out repairs on the ground. American technicians upgrade the targeting software and other classified technology, which Saudis are not allowed to touch. The pilot has likely been trained by the United States Air Force.

And at a flight operations room in the capital, Riyadh, Saudi commanders sit near American military officials who provide intelligence and tactical advice, mainly aimed at stopping the Saudis from killing Yemeni civilians.

American fingerprints are all over the air war in Yemen, where errant strikes by the Saudi-led coalition have killed more than 4,600 civilians, according to a monitoring group. In Washington, that toll has stoked impassioned debate about the pitfalls of America’s alliance with Saudi Arabia under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who relies on American support to keep his warplanes in the air.

Saudi Arabia entered the war in 2015, allying with the United Arab Emirates and a smattering of Yemeni factions with the goal of ousting the Iran-allied Houthi rebels from northern Yemen. Three years on, they have made little progress. At least 60,000 Yemenis have died in the war, and the country stands on the brink of a calamitous famine.

For American officials, the stalled war has become a strategic and moral quagmire. It has upended the assumptions behind the decades-old policy of selling powerful weapons to a wealthy ally that, until recently, rarely used them. It has raised questions about complicity in possible war crimes. And the civilian toll has posed a troubling dilemma: how to support Saudi allies while keeping the war’s excesses at arm’s length.

In interviews, 10 current and former United States officials portrayed a troubled and fractious American response to regular reports of civilians killed in coalition airstrikes.

The Pentagon and State Department have denied knowing whether American bombs were used in the war’s most notorious airstrikes, which have struck weddings, mosques and funerals. However, a former senior State Department official said that the United States had access to records of every airstrike over Yemen since the early days of the war, including the warplane and munitions used.

At the same time, American efforts to advise the Saudis on how to protect civilians often came to naught. The Saudis whitewashed an American-sponsored initiative to investigate errant airstrikes and often ignored a voluminous no-strike list.

“In the end, we concluded that they were just not willing to listen,” said Tom Malinowski, a former assistant secretary of state and an incoming member of Congress from New Jersey. “They were given specific coordinates of targets that should not be struck and they continued to strike them. That struck me as a willful disregard of advice they were getting.”

Yet American military support for the airstrikes continued.

While American officials often protested civilian deaths in public, two presidents ultimately stood by the Saudis. President Obama gave the war his qualified approval to assuage Saudi anger over his Iran nuclear deal. President Trump embraced Prince Mohammed and bragged of multibillion-dollar arms deals with the Saudis.

As bombs fell on Yemen, the United States continued to train the Royal Saudi Air Force. In 2017, the United States military announced a $750 million program focused on how to carry out airstrikes, including avoiding civilian casualties. The same year, Congress authorized the sale of more than $510 million in precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia, which had been suspended by the Obama administration in protest of civilian casualties.

Nearly 100 American military personnel are advising or assisting the coalition war effort, although fewer than 35 are based in Saudi Arabia.

American support for the war met stiff headwinds this fall, when congressional fury over the murder of the Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi combined with worries over civilian deaths in Yemen.

In response, the Trump administration ended American air-to-air refueling of coalition warplanes over Yemen in November but has otherwise continued to support the war. This month, the Senate voted to end American military assistance to the war altogether, a sharp rebuke to the Trump administration, but the bill died when the House refused to consider it.

The civilian toll is still rising. According to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project, November was the most violent month in Yemen since the group began tracking casualties in January 2016. There were 3,058 war-related fatalities in November, it said, including 80 civilians killed in airstrikes.

Image

A factory damaged during airstrikes and fighting in Yemen, where a Saudi-led coalition has killed thousands of civilians in a campaign against Houthi fighters.CreditAgence France-Presse — Getty Images

For decades, the United States sold tens of billions of dollars in arms to Saudi Arabia on an unspoken premise: that they would rarely be used.

The Saudis amassed the world’s third-largest fleet of F-15 jets, after the United States and Israel, but their pilots almost never saw action. They shot down two Iranian jets over the Persian Gulf in 1984, two Iraqi warplanes during the 1991 gulf war and they conducted a handful of bombing raids along the border with Yemen in 2009.

The United States had similar expectations for its arms sales to other Persian Gulf countries.

“There was a belief that these countries wouldn’t end up using this equipment, and we were just selling them expensive paperweights,” said Andrew Miller, a former State Department official now with the Project on Middle East Democracy.

Then came Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

When the prince, then the Saudi defense minister, sent fighter jets to Yemen in March 2015, Pentagon officials were flustered to receive just 48 hours notice of the first strikes against Houthi rebels, two former senior American officials said. American officials were persuaded by Saudi assurances the campaign would be over in weeks.

But as the weeks turned to years, and the prospect of victory receded, the Americans found themselves backing a military campaign that was exacting a steep civilian toll, largely as a result of Saudi and Emirati airstrikes.

American military officials posted to the coalition war room in Riyadh noticed that inexperienced Saudi pilots flew at high altitudes to avoid enemy fire, military officials said. The tactic reduced the risk to the pilots but transferred it to civilians, who were exposed to less accurate bombings.

Coalition planners misidentified targets and their pilots struck them at the wrong time — destroying a vehicle as it passed through a crowded bazaar, for instance, instead of waiting until it reached an open road. The coalition routinely ignored a no-strike list — drawn up by the United States Central Command and the United Nations — of hospitals, schools and other places where civilians gathered.

At times, coalition officers subverted their own chain of command. In one instance, a devastating strike that killed 155 people in a funeral hall was ordered by a junior officer who countermanded an order from a more senior officer, a State Department official said.

The Americans offered help. The State Department financed an investigative body to review errant airstrikes and propose corrective action. Pentagon lawyers trained Saudi officers in the laws of war. Military officers suggested putting gun cameras on Saudi and Emiratis warplanes to see how strikes were being conducted. The coalition balked.

In June 2017, American officials extracted new promises of safeguards, including stricter rules of engagement and an expansion of the no-strike list to about 33,000 targets — provisions that allowed the secretary of state, then Rex W. Tillerson, to win support in Congress for the sale of more than $510 million in precision-guided munitions to the kingdom.

But those measures seemed to make little difference. Just over a year later, in August 2018, a coalition airstrike killed at least 40 boys on a packed school bus in northern Yemen.

Still, American leaders insisted they need to keep helping the Saudi coalition.

America’s role in the war was “absolutely essential” to safeguard civilians, the general in charge of Central Command, Gen. Joseph L. Votel, told a charged Senate hearing in March.

“I think this does give us the best opportunity to address these concerns,” he said.

Image

President Trump, meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia in March, bragged of American arms sales to the kingdom.CreditDoug Mills/The New York Times

In March, Prince Mohammed paid a visit to Washington, where he was feted by President Trump. As the two leaders sat in the White House, Mr. Trump held aloft a chart with price-tagged photos of warplanes and other weapons.

“$3 billion,” Mr. Trump said, pointing to the chart. “$533 million. $525 million. That’s peanuts for you.”

The prince chuckled.

But in Congress, the mood was souring. In the March hearing, senators accused the Pentagon of being complicit in the coalition’s errant bombing, and pressed its leaders on how directly the United States was linked to atrocities.

General Votel said the military knew little about that. The United States did not track whether the coalition jets that it refueled carried out the airstrikes that killed civilians, he said, and did not know when they used American-made bombs. At a briefing in Cairo in August, a senior United States official echoed that assessment.

“I would assume the Saudis have an inventory system that traces that information,” said the official, who spoke anonymously to discuss diplomatically sensitive relations. “But that’s not information that is available to the U.S.”

But Larry Lewis, a State Department adviser on civilian harm who worked with the Saudi-led coalition from 2015 to 2017, said that information was readily available from an early stage.

At the coalition headquarters in Riyadh, he said, American liaison officers had access to a database that detailed every airstrike: warplane, target, munitions used and a brief description of the attack. American officials frequently emailed him copies of a spreadsheet for his own work, he said.

The data could easily be used to pinpoint the role of American warplanes and bombs in any single strike, he said. “If the question was “Hey, was that a U.S. munition they used?” You would know that it was,” he said.

Capt. Bill Urban, a spokesman for Central Command, did not deny the existence of the database, but said that American officers only used coalition data to carry out their core mission: advising on civilian casualties, sharing intelligence on Houthi threats and coordinating the midair refueling that ended in November.

“I will not speculate on how the United States could have used or compiled the information the Saudi-led coalition shared for some other function,” he said in a statement. “That is not the mission these advisers were invited to Riyadh to perform. That is not the way partnerships work.”

Other officials have said that collating information about use of American munitions in Yemen would be onerous and, ultimately, pointless. “What difference would it make?” the senior United States official in Cairo said.

But legal experts say such information could be significant. Inside the State Department, there have been longstanding worries about potential legal liability for the American role in the war. In August, the United Nations’ human rights body determined that some coalition airstrikes were likely war crimes.

Under American law, customers of American weapons must follow the laws of armed conflict or future sales may be blocked, said Ryan Goodman, a former Defense Department attorney who teaches law at New York University.

Mr. Lewis, who left the State Department in 2017, said that in his experience, individual Saudi officers were often concerned or distressed by airstrikes that killed civilians but there was little institutional effort to reform the system.

The Joint Incidents Assessment Team, the body set up to investigate errant strikes, worked diligently at first, he said. But when its findings were made public, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs had removed any references that were critical of coalition actions.

Asked if that was the case, the Saudi ambassador to Yemen, Mohamed Al Jaber, said, “The JIAT is an independent team,” and he referred any questions to them.

Image

Mourners carried the coffin of the mayor of Sana, the Yemeni capital, who was killed in 2016 by an airstrike that hit a different funeral.CreditKhaled Abdullah/Reuters

Obfuscation and impunity continue to characterize the coalition’s airstrike campaign. The coalition rarely identifies which country carries out an airstrike, although the vast majority are Saudi and Emirati, officials say. In July, King Salman of Saudi Arabia issued an order lifting “all military and disciplinary penalties” for Saudi troops fighting in Yemen, an apparent amnesty for possible war crimes.

Over the summer, as Emirati warplanes pounded the Red Sea port of Hudaydah, General Votel and the defense secretary at the time, Jim Mattis, held at least 10 phone calls or video conferences with Saudi and Emirati leaders, urging them to show restraint, a senior American military official and a senior Western official said.

At least one of the conferences involved Mohammed bin Zayed, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi and the effective leader of the United Arab Emirates.

“The Saudis are decent partners,” Gen. C.Q. Brown Jr., a former top commander of American air forces in the Middle East, said in an interview. “And sometimes our partners don’t always do things we would expect.”

Short of halting all weapons sales, critics say the United States could pressure the Saudis by curtailing its assistance to the air war. Hundreds of American aviation mechanics and other specialists, working under Defense Department contracts, keep the Saudi F-15 fleet in the air. In 2017, Boeing signed a $480 million contract for service repairs to the fleet.

But after the departure of Mr. Mattis, who resigned last week, the Defense Department will be helmed by Patrick M. Shanahan, an arms industry insider. Mr. Shanahan, the acting defense secretary as of Jan 1., spent more than three decades at Boeing, the F-15 manufacturer which has earned further billions from lucrative service contracts in Saudi Arabia.

Pentagon officials said that in his current job as deputy defense secretary, Mr. Shanahan had recused himself from decisions involving Boeing.

Daniel L. Byman, a professor at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service, said that a more robust policy toward Saudi airstrikes would not just be good for Yemeni civilians — it would also help the Saudis.

“This war has been a strategic disaster for the Saudis,” he said. The airstrikes have shown no sign of defeating the Houthis, and the Houthis’ foreign ally, Iran, has gained from Saudi Arabia’s clumsy prosecution of the war.

“The United States needs to use its power to promote peace and stability in Yemen,” Mr. Byman said. “And it needs to protect its allies from themselves.”

Declan Walsh reported from Cairo, and Eric Schmitt from Washington.

Follow Declan Walsh and Eric Schmitt on Twitter: @declanwalsh and @EricSchmittNYT.

A version of this article appears in print on , on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: U.S. Arms Sales To Saudis Leave A Stain in Yemen. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

 

December 22, 2018

Obama State Department Spent $9 Million With Soros To Meddle In Albanian Politics

newzsentinel.com

Obama State Department Spent $9 Million With Soros To Meddle In Albanian Politics

7-9 minutes


President Obama's State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) spent nearly $9 million on an Albanian political reform campaign coordinated with billionaire George Soros, according to 32 pages of State Department documents obtained by Judicial Watch via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. 

Working with Soros' Open Society Foundation, USAID channeled the funds into a "Justice for All" campaign aimed at reforming the socialist government's judicial system in 2016. 

"The Obama admin spent at least $9 million in tax dollars in direct collusion with left-wing billionaire George Soros to back socialist gov in Albania," wrote Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a statement. "The records also detail how the Soros operation helped the State Department review grant applications from other groups for taxpayer funding," Fitton added. 

The Obama admin spent at least $9 million in tax dollars in direct collusion with left-wing billionaire George Soros to back socialist gov in Albania. Outrageous that State allowed the Soros operation to help direct taxpayer funds to other groups,https://t.co/f1rc1ADKEX

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) April 4, 2018

"George Soros is a billionaire and he shouldn't be receiving taxpayer support to advance his radical left agenda to undermine freedom here at home and abroad," said Fitton.

A memo from April 2016 also reveals that the U.S. Embassy in Tirana "sponsored" a survey with the Open Society Foundation to determine whether Albanians had "knowledge, support and expectations on judicial reform." The survey revealed that 91% of respondents believed in the need for judicial reform. A corresponding memo obtained by Judicial Watch dated February 2017 corroborates the arrangement.

The State Department pushed back following the Judicial Watch publication – telling Fox News that the agency did not directly provide grants to Soros's Open Society Foundation (OSF) in Albania. Instead, as the documents show, the US embassy in Tirana and the OSF "each provided funding to a local organization to conduct a public opinion poll on attitudes towards the Judicial Reform effort," according to a February 2017 document. 

Last year Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and five other Senators called on Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to immediately investigate how US taxpayer funds ended up supporting Soros-backed, leftist political groups in several Eastern European countries including Macedonia and Albania.  According to the letter, potentially millions of taxpayer dollars are being funneled through USAID to Soros' Open Society Foundations with the explicit goal of pushing his progressive agenda.

"Foundation Open society-Albania and its experts, with funding from USAID, have created the controversial Strategy Document for Albanian Judicial Reform," the letter read. "Some leaders believe that these 'reforms' are ultimately aimed to give the Prime Minister and left-of-center government full control over the judiciary."

As the Daily Caller's Andrew Kerr notes, Albanian opposition leaders to the ruling left-wing party took to calling the judicial reform effort a "Soros-sponsored reform."

USAID and Soros

As Fox News pointed out at the time, USAID gave nearly $15 million to Soros' Foundation Open Society – Macedonia, and other Soros-linked organizations in the region, in the last 4 years of Obama's presidency alone.

The USAID website shows that between 2012 and 2016, USAID gave almost $5 million in taxpayer cash to FOSM for "The Civil Society Project," which "aims to empower Macedonian citizens to hold government accountable." USAID's website links to www.soros.org.mk, and says the project trained hundreds of young Macedonians "in youth activism and the use of new media instruments."

The State Department told lawmakers that in addition to that project, USAID has recently funded a new Civic Engagement Project which partners with four organizations, including FOSM. The cost is believed to be around $9.5 million.Fox News

Similar efforts in Hungary were blasted in early 2017 by Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who expressed concern about Soros meddling in his country's political fights, and warned about Soros' "trans-border empire." Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó told Fox News last month that they hoped that with a change in administration in Washington, the Soros-led push against their government would decrease.

"I think it is no secret and everyone knows about the very close relationship between the Democrats and George Soros and his foundations. It is obvious that if Hillary Clinton had won then this pressure on us would be much stronger. With Donald Trump winning we have the hope that this pressure will be decreased on us," he said.

Widely cited as an example of Soros' influence during the Obama administration was a 2011 email, published by WikiLeaks, in which Soros urged Hillary Clinton to take action in Albania over recent demonstrations in the capital of Tirana.  Among other things, Soros urged Clinton to "bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha and opposition leader Edi Rama."

Dear Hillary,

A serious situation has arisen in Albania which needs urgent attention at senior levels of the US government. You may know that an opposition demonstration in Tirana on Friday resulted in the deaths of three people and the destruction of property. There are serious concerns about further unrest connected to a counter-demonstration to be organized by the governing party on Wednesday and a follow-up event by the opposition two days later to memorialize the victims. The prospect of tens of thousands of people entering the streets in an already inflamed political environment bodes ill for the return, of public order and the country's fragile democratic process.

I believe two things need to be done urgently:

1. Bring the full weight of the international community to bear on Prime Minister Berisha and opposition leader Edi Rama to forestall further public demonstrations and to tone down public pronouncements.

2. Appoint a senior European official as a mediator.

While I am concerned about the rhetoric being used by both sides, I am particularly worried about the actions of the Prime Minister. There is videotape of National Guard members firing on demonstrators from the roof of the Prime Ministry. The Prosecutor (appointed by the Democratic Party) has issued arrest warrants for the individuals in question. The Prime Minister had previously accused the opposition of intentionally murdering these activists as a provocation.

After the tape came out deputies from his party accused the Prosecutor of planning a coup d'etat in collaboration with the opposition, a charge Mr. Berisha repeated today. No arrests have been made as of this writing. The demonstration resulted from opposition protests over the conduct of parliamentary elections in 2009. The political environment has deteriorated ever since and is now approaching levels of 1997, when similar issues caused the country to slide into anarchy and violence. There are signs that Edi Rama's control of his own people is slipping, which may lead to further violence.

The US and the EU must work in complete harmony over this, but given Albania's European aspirations the EU must take the lead. That is why I suggest appointing a mediator such as Carl Bildt. Martti Ahtisaari or Miroslav Lajcak, all of whom have strong connections to the Balkans.

My foundation in Tirana is monitoring the situation closely and can provide independent analysis of the crisis.

Thank you, George Soros

Not surprisingly, within a few days, A U.S. envoy was dispatched.

 

https://newzsentinel.com/2018/04/07/obama-state-department-spent-9-million-with-soros-to-meddle-in-albanian-politics/

 

 

UN face off over Kosovo army vote

neweurope.eu

UN face off over Kosovo army vote

By Alec Mally Director for Global Economic Affairs at IPEDIS

5-6 minutes


Published 06:41 December 22, 2018

Updated 11:56 December 22, 2018


The Kosovo Parliament’s December 14 vote to formally create a military structure triggered the almost-automatic UN Security Council (UNSC) face off December 17 in New York. Nobody was expecting a resolution of the issue in this UNSC debate, but both Serbia and Kosovo remain open to continuing dialogue on normalising relations, the ongoing process of which is a prerequisite to both countries moving toward EU accession.

Tensions remain high

Political friction in the area has been elevated for several weeks.  On November 21 Kosovo announced new tariffs on goods imported from Serbia and Bosnia, increasing them from ten to 100 percent.  Reacting to this, Mayors of four Kosovo Serb-majority regions of northern Kosovo announced their resignations, and the parliaments of their municipalities cut off official communications with the capital, Pristina. In this tense environment, Pristina’s December 14 vote to create a formal military establishment only exacerbated tension.

 Kosovo in the UN – still in limbo

Despite almost 20 years of UN presence on the ground, Kosovo is not a UN member, thanks largely to Serbian and Russian opposition.   Most UNSC debates on Kosovo issues founder on differing interpretations between the western UNSC members (US, UK, France) and Russia of UN Resolution 1244, promulgated after the 1999 war there. Not much changed in the December 17 session.

Security Council face off

UN Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, Jean-Pierre Lacroix called on both sides to avoid taking steps that could worsen the situation in Kosovo.

Russian UN Permanent Representative Vassily Nebenzia characterized the December 14 vote as a violation of UNSCR 1244 and noted “the resolution contains an absolutely clear demand on the demilitarisation of any armed groups of Kosovo Albanians and authorises the presence – on the territory on Kosovo – exclusively of a multinational contingent under international control.” Nebenzia also stated “The emergence of Kosovo armed forces represents a threat to peace and security in the region, fraught with a repetition of the armed conflict.”

The US was represented at the Kosovo debate by the US Mission’s Political Coordinator Rodney Hunter.  In recent years, the United States has actively supported the transformation process for the Kosovo military in the hopes of managing it closely.  Hunter noted at the outset “The United States reaffirms its support for the gradual, transparent transition to a professional, multiethnic, NATO-interoperable force that serves and reflects all of Kosovo’s communities.”

Hunter dealt with the UNSCR 1244 legacy clearly and stridently, noting “The legislation passed by Kosovo’s Assembly last week is fully in line with UNSC Resolution 1244. It is the sovereign right of Kosovo to establish and maintain an armed force.”

Hunter continued “Resolution 1244 authorised the establishment of an international security presence in Kosovo and charged it with demilitarising the Kosovo Liberation Army and other armed Kosovo Albanian groups. These provisions do not apply to the Kosovo Security Force. The Kosovo Security Force is neither the “KLA” nor an “armed Kosovo Albanian group.” The Kosovo Security Force is a separate, multiethnic force established following Kosovo’s 2008 independence, which the International Court of Justice clearly ruled in 2010 did not violate international law or Resolution 1244.”

Belgrade and Pristina make their case

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic called on the UN to take a bigger role in the ongoing work to normalize relations between Belgrade and Pristina, stating “Serbia is always ready to resume the process of dialogue.” Vucic told the UNSC that no international document authorises Pristina to form its own army. “Unexpectedly, they got huge support for that from Western countries,” Vucic complained.

In the debate, Kosovo’s President, Hashim Thaci, stated that his country is a sovereign nation and as such had an unquestioned right to form its own army. “If Kosovo made a mistake it is only that it waited for five years … to establish an army.” Thaci added: “It is belated because we waited for goodwill from those who never showed goodwill towards Kosovo.”

 

December 14, 2018

NYTimes.: Kosovo Parliament Votes to Create an Army, Defying Serbia and NATO

nytimes.com

Kosovo Parliament Votes to Create an Army, Defying Serbia and NATO

7-9 minutes


Austrian members of NATO peacekeeping forces stood watch in the ethnically divided city of Mitrovica, Kosovo, on Friday. Kosovo voted to create its own army from its 3,000-member security forces.CreditDjordje Savic/EPA, via Shutterstock

Image

Austrian members of NATO peacekeeping forces stood watch in the ethnically divided city of Mitrovica, Kosovo, on Friday. Kosovo voted to create its own army from its 3,000-member security forces.CreditCreditDjordje Savic/EPA, via Shutterstock

PRISTINA, Kosovo — Kosovo's Parliament overwhelmingly approved legislation on Friday to form an army, prompting criticism from NATO and European Union officials and angering neighboring Serbia, which said it was prepared to use its own army to protect ethnic Serbs in Kosovo.

All 107 lawmakers present in Kosovo's 120-seat Parliament, which is dominated by ethnic Albanian parties, voted to back the government's plan to transform the 3,000-strong, lightly armed Kosovo Security Force into an army that would grow to 5,000 active troops and 3,000 reservists in the next decade.

Kosovo Serb lawmakers did not attend the session.

Aleksandar Vucic, Serbia's president, said in the town of Trstenik in central Serbia on the eve of the vote, "Not a single act in the international law gives them the right to form an army."

"Everything that Pristina does — and evidently it does it all with support of the U.S. and Britain — is against the law," Mr. Vucic added.

Serbia's foreign minister, Ivica Dacic, said that Belgrade would request an emergency United Nations Security Council session over what he said was "the grossest violation" of the resolution governing such a formation.

"It is the most direct threat to peace and stability in the region," Mr. Dacic said, according to Serbia's state-run Tanjug news agency.

Serbia's prime minister, Ana Brnabic, said the formation of a Kosovo army ran counter to efforts at stability in the volatile Balkans, according to The Associated Press. She added that she hoped Belgrade would not have to use any of its 28,000 troops to protect the Serbian minority in Kosovo, although "this is currently one of the options on the table."

Officials in Kosovo had sought to defuse anger ahead of the vote. "Our army comes in peace," Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj said in an interview on Thursday. He accused officials in Belgrade, the Serbian capital, of spreading false allegations through the government-controlled news media that a Kosovo army would be a threat to Serbs and its neighbors.

"The narrative that Kosovo would use its military forces against Kosovo Serbs and its neighbors is an unfounded narrative," Mr. Haradinaj said. "It's a modern, multiethnic army that has grown up together with NATO and KFOR, their soldiers and officers in our country."

KFOR is the name of the NATO peacekeeping mission in Kosovo. There are about 5,000 such troops in Kosovo, including some 600 American soldiers.

According to Kosovo's Constitution, drafted after the Serbian Army and police forces were driven out in the summer of 1999, NATO is the only armed force allowed to operate in the country. Its troops have disarmed and disbanded the ethnic Albanian guerrilla force known as the Kosovo Liberation Army, which had fought the Serb Army in the 1989-99 war for independence.

Belgrade does not recognize the independence of Kosovo, a former Serbian province that it lost two decades ago after an uprising by ethnic Albanians and a campaign of NATO airstrikes led by the United States.

Jens Stoltenberg, NATO's secretary general, had warned the government in Pristina, the Kosovo capital, that the country would "face serious consequences."

After the vote, he said in a statement on Twitter: "I regret that the decision to initiate a change of the Kosovo Security Force mandate was made despite the concerns expressed by NATO. All sides must ensure that today's decision will not further increase tensions in the region."

But the United States backed the formation of an army. The American ambassador to Kosovo, Philip Kosnett, previously said that it was "only natural for Kosovo as a sovereign, independent country to have a self-defense capability."

Mr. Kosnett said in a Twitter message on Friday, "The U.S. will be there with you." He noted that Kosovo's transition to an army would take 10 years.

The United States Embassy in Pristina said in a statement, "We call on the government of Kosovo to continue its close coordination with NATO allies and partners and to engage in outreach to minority communities now and throughout the yearslong process ahead."

The vote to form an army is one of a series of tit-for-tat moves that have brought to a standstill European Union-sponsored dialogue on normalizing relations between Serbia and Kosovo. Serbia successfully lobbied to keep Kosovo out of Interpol and has waged a campaign to persuade countries around the world to revoke recognition of statehood for Kosovo.

Kosovo's government has hit back, imposing a 100 percent tariff on Serbian goods, a move that could hurt its sluggish economy. Mr. Haradinaj has vowed that the tax will be lifted only in exchange for Belgrade's full recognition of statehood.

"Kosovo will stand for its right to defend itself," Mr. Haradinaj said, adding that "we had no choice but to stand up for ourselves."

"This extraordinary development is great news for Kosovo's consolidation as a state," he said about Friday's vote in a Twitter message.

The tax and the move to form an army are popular in Kosovo, which has a population of 1.8 million people, predominantly ethnic Albanian. But commentators said they may not translate into increased support for Mr. Haradinaj and President Hashim Thaci, who has been talking to his Serbian counterpart about an unpopular land swap deal.

"It's very popular to strike at Serbia," said Agron Bajrami, the editor of Koha Ditore, one of Kosovo's largest daily newspapers. "But people are not blind to political maneuvering in a very sensitive situation and the overpromising of the two politicians who remain the symbol of corrupt governance in Kosovo."

Mr. Bajrami said Serbia's belligerent words did not mean that another war was imminent. Serbia knows that any military movements would set off a dispute with NATO, he said. For its part, he said, Kosovo is well aware that its security forces would be no match for Serbia's military, which the Russians have recently armed with additional fighter planes.

"Passing the laws on Friday to transform our security force doesn't mean that on Saturday there will be an army ready to act," Mr. Bajrami said.

"This is the first step, and a very symbolic one," he added. "It's a step which is necessary to confirm Kosovo's statehood. Serbia does not accept Kosovo as a state, so they are opposing the creation of another of its institutions, which is the army, vigorously."

SEE MY OPTIONS

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/14/world/europe/kosovo-army-serbia-nato.html

December 13, 2018

Washington Makes Jihad in Kosovo to Control Oil - Excerpt of my Bestseller Book: The Lost Hegemon

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

Chapter Nine:

 

 

"Holy War" and Heroin

in Kosovo and the Caucasus

 

 

 

"After bombing Yugoslavia into submission, NATO then stood by and submissively allowed the KLA to murder, pillage and burn. The KLA was given a free hand to do as they wished. Almost all of the non-Albanian population was ethnically cleansed from Kosovo under the watchful eyes of 40,000 NATO troops.

—James Bissett, former Canadian Ambassador to Yugoslavia and Albania to Canadian newspaper

 

 

 

Jihad and CIA Go to Kosovo

The actual fighting in Bosnia-Herzegovina ended with the signing of the Dayton Accords in Paris on December 14, 1995 that put an end to the three-and-a-half-year long Bosnian War and opened the long-term NATO occupation of the country. NATO, and not the European Union, was in control. Bosnia-Herzegovina, once a multiethnic federal state, was established as a de facto Muslim state, in effect, a client state under control of the IMF and of NATO.

Even before the Bosnian fighting ceased, Washington had shifted its attention to Kosovo, whose Albanian ethnic population was also predominantly Muslim and which had been part of Serbia more or less since the Middle Ages. The second front was being prepared in NATO's war against Serbia. The Clinton Administration had learned around that time of vast oil and gas reserves in the Caspian Sea and wanted to secure a pipeline through the Balkans to control that oil and, above all, keep it from the Russians.[1]

 

In December 1995, the American Petroleum Institute in Washington, an organization representing the major US oil companies, had issued an estimate that the Caspian Basin, north of Afghanistan, contained "two-thirds of the world's known reserves, or 659 billion barrels."[2] The Caucasus was becoming a US strategic "area of interest," to put it mildly.

 

A retired Croatian Army Major personally told this author, in Zagreb in 2006, of a private conversation he had had in 1995, just after the abrupt end of the Bosnian war. The Croatian military man asked a senior CIA officer in Zagreb whom he knew from the Bosnian War why it was that the US was so suddenly ending the fighting in Bosnia. The CIA man replied to the effect that, at that point, Washington found it far more important to secure a permanent military base in Kosovo, from where they would be able to control the entire region, including the Middle East and the Caucasus.[3]​​​​​​​

 

Image

​​​​​​​The tiny mountain area of Kosovo was split from Serbia to become a huge NATO base.

 

 

The Clinton Administration's Pentagon had farmed out the training of what would come to be called the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) to a US private mercenary group made up of former US Special Forces and military. According to former US Army Captain David Hackworth, retired US military officers working for the private US military contractor MPRI (Military Professional Resources Incorporated) not only trained KLA personnel, Sunni Muslim in origin, but even fought alongside them against the Yugoslav government forces.[4]

 

Former NSA official Wayne Madsen reported that what the US and Western media called the "Kosovo Liberation Army" was, in fact, a grouping of mafia clans in Kosovo who had been known drug traffickers well before working for the US. Madsen noted that covert support to the KLA was established around 1996 in the wake of the NATO Bosnia occupation as a "joint endeavor between the CIA and Germany's Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND). The task to create and finance the KLA was initially given to Germany: They used German uniforms, East German weapons, and were financed in part by drug money, according to intelligence analyst John Whitley."[5]

 

In Kosovo, the Clinton Administration had no interest in backing moderates who were open to a diplomatic solution with Belgrade. The KLA leaders whom Washington chose were accused of assassinating moderate Kosovo Albanians, including some of those who agreed to the Rambouillet peace accords. According to Albanian State Television, the KLA had sentenced the democratically elected president of the Republic of Kosovo, Ibrahim Rugova, to death in absentia. During the Rambouillet peace talks, Washington deliberately froze out Kosovo moderates in favor of the Jihadists of the KLA mafia, who were guaranteed not to go for peace.[6] Washington wanted war, and the KLA Muslims were its warriors.

 

By 1998, as the KLA matured its killing and sabotage skills under training from Pentagon contractor MPRI, the US and Germany recruited Mujahideen mercenaries from Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Bosnia, and elsewhere to train the KLA in guerrilla and diversion tactics. It was financed by Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.[7] One of the leaders of an elite KLA unit during the Kosovo conflict was Mohammed al-Zawahiri, brother of Egyptian Jihadist and Afghan and Bosnia veteran Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden's lieutenant at that time.

 

From Terrorists to Heroin-Pushing "Freedom Fighters"

During the war, the KLA jihadists collaborated with the NATO troops, and they were designated by NATO as "freedom fighters."

 

In May 1999, in the midst of the NATO "humanitarian" bombing of Yugoslavia—by then reduced to only Serbia and Montenegro—The Washington Times newspaper published documentation that Clinton Administration officials were well aware that their Kosovo allies, the KLA, were trafficking in heroin. The paper reported from the documents it had obtained that

 

Drug agents in five countries, including the United States, believe the KLA has aligned itself with an extensive organized crime network centered in Albania that smuggles heroin and some cocaine to buyers throughout Western Europe and, to a lesser extent, the United States. The documents tie members of the Albanian Mafia to a drug smuggling cartel based in Kosovo's provincial capital, Pristina. The cartel is manned by ethnic Albanians who are members of the Kosovo National Front, whose armed wing is the KLA. The documents show it is one of the most powerful heroin smuggling organizations in the world (emphasis added—F.W.E.). . . . Movement of drugs over a collection of land and sea routes from Turkey through Bulgaria, Greece and Yugoslavia to Western Europe and elsewhere is so frequent and massive that intelligence officials have dubbed the circuit the "Balkan Route."[8]

 

The shocking report was ignored by mainstream media, as well as by the Clinton Administration.

 

In 1998, a year before the illegal NATO bombing of Yugoslavia to "prevent ethnic cleansing" of the Kosovo population by Serbia, the US State Department had even listed the KLA as an international terrorist organization, saying it had bankrolled its operations with proceeds from the international heroin trade and from loans from known Mujahideen terrorists, including Osama bin Laden. "They were terrorists in 1998 and now, because of politics, they're freedom fighters," said one top US drug official, who asked not to be identified.[9] Obviously, not all of the Washington bureaucracy was as enthusiastic about the KLA as Clinton and his inner circle were.

 

A US Government Drug Enforcement Administration report on the KLA and its heroin traffic noted at the time that a majority of heroin seized in Europe was transported over the Balkan Route. The DEA report said drug smuggling organizations composed of Kosovo's ethnic Albanians were considered "second only to Turkish gangs as the predominant heroin smugglers along the Balkan Route." Furthermore, the report noted, "Kosovo traffickers were noted for their use of violence and for their involvement in international weapons trafficking."[10]

 

Leading KLA members were trained in camps run by Osama bin Laden and his number two man, Egyptian former Muslim Brotherhood member, Ayman al-Zawahiri. The heroin that the KLA smuggled into the West came from Afghanistan, where bin Laden and the Mujahideen were still entrenched and working with Hekmatyar's heroin gang after the 1989 expulsion of the Soviets. Annually, the KLA-mafia Kosovo networks ran some $2 billion a year in heroin from Afghanistan to the West.[11] The CIA was getting multiple payoffs—first from its war in Afghanistan financed by heroin proceeds, secondly by shifting those Mujahideen fighters to the Balkans to merge with the KLA heroin distribution networks in Europe.

 

KLA fighters were ruthless. Even Human Rights Watch, a Washington NGO backing Kosovo and the KLA, documented that "The KLA was responsible for serious abuses. . . including abductions and murders of Serbs and ethnic Albanians considered collaborators with the state. . . attacks on Serbs, Roma, and other non-Albanians, as well as ethnic Albanian political rivals. . . widespread and systematic burning and looting of homes belonging to Serbs, Roma, and other minorities and the destruction of Orthodox churches and monasteries."[12]

 

In short, the US knew exactly who they were backing with the KLA. James Bissett, Canadian Ambassador to Yugoslavia and Albania, wrote in 2001 that, "as early as 1998, the Central Intelligence Agency assisted by the British Special Air Service were arming and training Kosovo Liberation Army members in Albania to foment armed rebellion in Kosovo. . . . The hope was that with Kosovo in flames NATO could intervene."[13] And intervene it did, massively violating both its own NATO Charter and the United Nations Charter in the process. Clinton "democracy" made its own rules of international law, which reduced to the age old adage "might makes right."

 

Ethnic Cleansing, but of Serbs . . .

With the jihadist-trained Muslim KLA fighters training their sights on Serb targets for assassination, the US was hoping to provoke Milosevic's army into a major response in order to justify a new NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. In February 1996, the KLA, ready to test its new terror skills given by the Saudi Mujahideen and US advisers, made a series of attacks against police stations and Yugoslav government officers in Kosovo, then part of Yugoslavia.

 

Agim Ҫeku, the military commander of the KLA, was a veteran of the Krajina Croatian ethnic cleansing, which drove an estimated 350,000 ethnic Serbs from their homes into predominantly Serb parts of Yugoslavia. The same Pentagon contractor, MPRI, who trained Ҫeku's KLA, had trained the Croatian Army for what was called Operation Storm and Strike.[14] The Pentagon and CIA role in the KLA operation was massive.

 

Image

The KLA Jihadist Mafiosi (UҪK in Albanian) got a logo befitting a Habsburg Austro-Hungarian monarch.

 

 

The US-directed KLA kidnapping of Serb Yugoslav security forces resulted in a significant increase in Yugoslav government casualties. That, in turn, led to the hoped-for major Yugoslavian reprisals. By early March 1996, these terror and counterterror operations led Serb inhabitants of numerous Kosovo villages to flee to other villages, cities, or the hills for refuge from KLA brutality. The "KLA provocations, as personally witnessed in ambushes of security patrols which inflicted fatal and other casualties, were clear violations of the previous October's agreement [and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1199]," noted Roland Keith, then a field office director of the OSCE's Kosovo Verification Mission.[15]

 

A report from the US Committee for Refugees spoke of, "Kosovo Liberation Army. . . attacks aimed at trying to 'cleanse' Kosovo of its ethnic Serb population." The UN High Commissioner for Refugees estimated that 55,000 refugees, most Kosovo Serbs, had fled their Kosovo homes to Montenegro and Central Serbia. "Over 90 mixed villages in Kosovo have now been emptied of Serb inhabitants and other Serbs continue leaving, either to be displaced in other parts of Kosovo or fleeing into central Serbia." The NATO North Atlantic Council stated that KLA was "the main initiator of the violence" and that it had "launched what appears to be a deliberate campaign of provocation."[16]

By 1998, the KLA escalated its attacks on Belgrade Serb government officials in Kosovo. By that time, the KLA had a mere 500 trained fighters. Then as the USA, Germany, and Great Britain sent arms shipments and provided training to the KLA, they built it up into a major guerrilla army, with as many as 30,000 members at the peak.[17]

 

German intelligence, in coordination with Washington, played a major role in building the KLA into a fighting force. In 1996, the British weekly The European carried an article by a French expert stating, "German civil and military intelligence services have been involved in training and equipping the rebels with the aim of cementing German influence in the Balkan area. . .The birth of the KLA in 1996 coincided with the appointment of Hansjoerg Geiger as the new head of the BND (German secret service). . .The BND men were in charge of selecting recruits for the KLA command structure from the 500,000 Kosovars in Albania."[18]

 

The US and German intervention using the KLA Jihadists turned a small conflict into a major crisis. As a pretext, NATO relied on the crisis it itself had created in order to justify waging a war of aggression against Yugoslavia.

 

By 1999, the Clinton Administration was ready to push a reluctant NATO to launch what would be only the second air strike in NATO history, the first being that in Bosnia-Herzegovina four years earlier. The 1999 NATO strikes were done in violation of the UN Charter, of the UN Security Council wishes, and of the NATO Charter itself that only permits military action in event of a strike against a NATO member country.

 

Using the invented pretext that Milosevic's Serb Army was engaging in massive ethnic cleansing of Kosovo Albanian Muslims and that they threatened a "humanitarian catastrophe," President Bill Clinton ordered air strikes against civilian as well as government targets across Serbia in what it called Operation Noble Anvil, with no regard to the UN or to other uneasy NATO members. Nothing about that anvil was noble.

 

Astonishing to many, Clinton's near-unilateral decision to bomb Belgrade, a decision that had earlier been strongly opposed by the Helmut Kohl government in Germany, found support from a newly elected "Red-Green" coalition in Germany of Social Democrat Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Green Party Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer. Fischer, remarkably to those who knew German party politics, had managed to arm-twist his traditionally anti-war Green party into backing the illegal NATO bombing, giving Clinton a badly needed NATO foreign ally.[19]

 

Clinton brazenly lied to the American people, claiming that the events of the Serbs in Kosovo were comparable to the Holocaust. CNN reported, "Accusing Serbia of 'ethnic cleansing' in Kosovo similar to the genocide of Jews in World War II, an impassioned President Clinton sought Tuesday to rally public support for his decision to send US forces into combat against Yugoslavia, a prospect that seemed increasingly likely with the breakdown of a diplomatic peace effort."[20]

 

Clinton's State Department claimed Serbian troops had committed genocide. In May 1996, US Defense Secretary William S. Cohen suggested that there might be up to 100,000 Albanian fatalities. However, five months after the end of NATO bombing, only 2,108 bodies were ever found—tragic but hardly genocide in terms of a theater of war.[21]

 

The US-led bombing strikes lasted from March 24, 1999, to June 10, 1999. Belgrade was devastated including with bombs containing radioactive depleted uranium. On the understanding that the United Nations would enforce order in Kosovo were Milosevic to remove Yugoslav troops, Milosevic withdrew, and the decade long war in Yugoslavia ended.

 

By then, Washington had what it wanted: Kosovo as a new US military bastion in the Balkans, a de facto defeated Serbian resistance to the US Balkanization, and the destruction of the Yugoslav Third Way guided economy model.

 

Aftermath in Kosovo

Two years after the war, James Bissett, former Canadian Ambassador to Yugoslavia and Albania, wrote,

 

After bombing Yugoslavia into submission, NATO then stood by and submissively allowed the KLA to murder, pillage and burn. The KLA was given a free hand to do as they wished. Almost all of the non-Albanian population was ethnically cleansed from Kosovo under the watchful eyes of 40,000 NATO troops. Moreover, in defiance of United Nations resolution 1244 which brought an end to the fighting, NATO adamantly refused to disarm the KLA fighters. Instead, NATO converted this ragtag band of terrorists into the Kosovo Protection Force—allegedly to maintain peace and order in Kosovo.[22]

 

 

The former leaders of the KLA, now calling themselves the Government of Kosovo, also thrived in their old heroin smuggling, with clear support of the CIA and US Government, which had arranged for the KLA leaders to take over political control of a new Kosovo government. In 2000, Mother Jones magazine reported that after the NATO bombing in support of the KLA, Afghan heroin, much of it distributed by Kosovar Albanians, now accounted for almost 20 percent of the heroin seized in America—nearly double the percentage four years earlier. In Europe, the estimate was "Kosovo Albanians control 40% of Europe's heroin."[23]

 

"Jihadistan"

The outcome of the war also left the Saudi-backed al-Qaeda's jihadists far more strongly entrenched in the Balkans than they ever had been. In the words of Profesr John Schindler, Bosnia, "the most pro-Western society in the umma [Muslim world] was converted into a Jihadistan through domestic deceit, violent conflict, and misguided international intervention."[24]

 

Saudi Arabia, a major financier of the Mujahideen in the Balkans, began a major effort building mosques in former Yugoslavia, some 150 new glossy mosques all over tiny Bosnia and now in Kosovo, to spread the strict fanatical Saudi Wahabist Islam in a region where Muslims had been, by tradition, moderate and peaceful. In Sarajevo, the capitol of Bosnia, they built a grandiose $30 million King Fahd mosque. Saudi mosques, which began appearing all over Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo, were complete with Saudi fanatical Wahhabite Imams who preached the fundamentalist Jihad ideology. As a US-backed Prime Minister, Hashim Thaҫi encouraged the Saudi connection, especially Saudi money.[25]

 

Image

Kosovo warlord Hashim Thaҫi in Saudi Arabia to meet King Abdullah to solicit money.

 

More than a decade after the war ended, Kosovo journalists found a Saudi-based Wahhabi group exercising alarming financial influence over the highest Kosovo Islamic leadership. Kosovo's chief Muslim cleric, Naim Ternava, was accused of accepting backing from Wahhabi elements in Saudi Arabia.

The Kosovar investigative journalists showed that Ternava's religious administration approved payments for local mosques by Al Waqf Al Islami (AWAI—The Islamic Foundation), based in Jeddah.[26] Saudi Arabia was one of the first countries, in addition to the United States, to recognize the self-proclaimed Republic of Kosovo, run by mafia gangster boss Prime Minister Hashim Thaçi, the former political leader of the KLA.

 

After the war, Kosovo unemployment was running at a depression level of 45 percent. It was ripe for being bought or so fundamentalist Saudis reckoned. "What I saw during the past 10 years was a strong infiltration of Saudi money," said Flaka Surroi, owner of Kosovo's independent Koha Media. "They brought in the mosques, they brought in their dogma and ideology at the same time. They identified the poorest people in the communities, they offered them a steady salary every month just so they take over the ideology and start wearing the veil."[27]

 

KLA Foxes Guard the Henhouse

In elections in Kosovo in 2007, Thaçi declared his party victor despite the fact that only 45 percent turned out to vote and that his party got of that only 34 percent of the vote, meaning he had de facto a mere 15 percent popular support. It had been agreed with Washington beforehand that he would take over. Democracy was not as important to the US in Kosovo as was power. NATO had already slated the KLA "provisional government" (PGK) to run civilian state institutions. Following NATO's military occupation of Kosovo, the KLA took over municipal governments and public services, including schools and hospitals.

 

With the withdrawal of Yugoslav troops and police, the KLA immediately took control of Kosovo's police stations, something tantamount to asking Al Capone's men to take charge of the Chicago police during Prohibition. Under the formal authority of the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) had the task of training and installing a 4,000-strong police force with a mandate to "protect civilians" under the jurisdiction of the KLA-controlled "Ministry of Public Order." The KLA-controlled police force was also responsible for the massacres of civilians organized in the immediate wake of NATO's military occupation of Kosovo.[28]​​​​​​​

 

Image

 President of the US George W. Bush shakes hands with Kosovo President Fatmir Sejdiu (center) and Kosovo Prime Minister Hashim Thaçi (left) during a meeting in the White House on July 21, 2008, after Kosovo declared independence.

 

Washington de facto installed the former KLA as the government of Kosovo with Thaçi as its "boss." Thaçi became the leader of the so-called "Democratic Party of Kosovo" and Prime Minister of Kosovo after January 2008.

 

The KLA's former military head, Agim Çeku, became Prime Minister of Kosovo after the war. The move caused some controversy in Serbia, where he was regarded as a war criminal for his role leading the Croatian Army in "Operation Storm," the ethnic cleansing of the Serb villages in Croatia.

 

On February 17, 2008, without any public discussion or legal basis, Thaçi declared Kosovo independent from Serbia, over the objections not only of Russia and Serbia but of many other EU states. Thaçi then became Prime Minister of the newly independent "state." Soon, Thaçi began regular trips as Prime Minister of the Republic of Kosovo to Saudi Arabia, one of the first nations to recognize the Kosovo rump state, in order to cash in on Saudi petrodollars. Thaçi and the Saudis became "soul brothers," and the fanatical Wahhabite ideology began to spread to Kosovo as a result.[29]

 

Some people outside Kosovo were not entirely comfortable with Thaçi. A report to the Council of Europe issued in December 2010 stated that Hashim Thaçi was the leader of the "Drenica Group" in charge of trafficking human organs taken from Serbian prisoners, as well as heroin and arms. Washington paid no mind. Thaçi was their man in Kosovo.[30]

 

Washington's argument for extending NATO eastward had advanced significantly in the process of the Yugoslav war. Hungary, Poland, and the Czech Republic became prospective NATO partners, something inconceivable just five years earlier.

 

The Bosnian War of 1992–1995 was the crucible for growing a Global Islamic Jihad movement, one which the CIA and Pentagon covertly backed through Saudi Arabia and other proxies, in order to advance their agenda in the post-Cold War world.

 

Thousands of tons of bombs later, and after an estimated $40 billion of destruction to the economy and infrastructure of Serbia, the Pentagon began the construction of one of the largest US military bases anywhere in the world: Camp Bond Steel near Gnjilane in southeast Kosovo. It was a vast fortress housing up to 7,000 soldiers, an airfield, and a state-of-the-art telecommunications center that gave the United States a commanding and clearly permanent military presence in the strategic Balkans within air reach of the increasingly strategic Caspian Sea.

 

In June 1999, no sooner was the bombing of Serbia over than the US government announced it was funding a feasibility study for an AMBO pipeline by a US-registered Albanian Macedonian Bulgarian Oil Corporation (AMBO). The project was backed by the US government. Washington proposed to run it from the Bulgarian Black Sea port of Burgas via the Republic of Macedonia to the Albanian Adriatic port of Vlorë. The 912-kilometer pipeline was to bypass the Turkish Straits, as well as Russia, in transportation of Caspian oil to the West.

 

CIA's Jihadists secure US oil control

The next step in Washington's new Eurasian strategy was to make certain the oil in the Caspian and Caucasus regions belonged to the Anglo-American oil majors and not the Russians, as during the Cold War.

 

Referring to imposition of NATO control over Serbia and Kosovo a senior US government official Joseph Grandmaison declared, "The prospect that the US government would guarantee security in the region and also provide financial guarantees, now makes it (AMBO) a much more attractive proposition." The AMBO engineering feasibility study had been undertaken by Halliburton Corporation's Brown & Root when Dick Cheney was head of Halliburton.[31]

 

With Camp Bond Steel as a firm base in the Balkans after the Yugoslav wars, Washington and their Jihadists turned their attention to Russia and the former states of the Soviet Union with predominant Muslim populations. Chechnya, a significantly Muslim part of Russia through which a vital Russian oil pipeline from the Caspian oil fields ran, became the next target of Washington's Jihad network as the US moved in to control the vast oilfields of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan, two former Soviet states.[32]

 

 

As the Bosnian and Kosovo wars were being wound down by NATO, US intelligence services found another target for their Mujahideen Holy Warriors—the Caucasus, the mountainous area of the former Soviet Union bordering Turkey, Iran, and, now, the newly-proclaimed Russian Federation.

​​​​​​​

Image

When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, the US deployed Mujahideen to grab the vast oil assets of Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea in the Caucasus.

 

 

During the Clinton Administration in the mid-to-late 1990s, geophysical tests by Halliburton and the major US and British oil companies confirmed vast untapped oil and gas reserves in the Caspian Basin in the Caspian Sea between Azerbaijan, Russia, Kazakhstan, Iran, and Turkmenistan. Less than a decade before, the reserves had all been a part of the Soviet Union. No more. US and British major oil companies—Amoco and BP—immediately moved in to fill the vacuum.

 

Western geophysical estimates by Halliburton, Dick Cheney's firm, and others put the possible oil reserves of the Caspian Basin at around 200 billion barrels of oil, comparable to a new Saudi Arabia, as well as natural gas reserves estimated by the US Department of Energy to be comparable to those of North America.[33] The market value of the combined oil and gas resources at the then oil and gas prices of around $20 a barrel was estimated at $5 trillion. The Clinton Administration shifted focus from Russia to the states of the Caspian.[34]

 

In 1995, the US-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce was created to lobby the Clinton Administration for a strong US intervention into the Caspian Sea region, including the Caucasus. The Chamber was no collection of lightweights. It included some of the most influential figures in Washington, including then CEO of Halliburton Corp. Dick Cheney, the man later to drive the George W. Bush Administration into the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Chamber was chaired by former Secretary of State and Texas power broker James Baker III. It included such Washington influential people as Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, and General Brent Scowcroft. They were power brokers no US President could ignore lightly. Soon, Clinton's focus turned from Yugoslavia and the Balkans to the Caucasus and a new war for control of oil and gas in the Caspian Basin.

 

The Caucasus Pipeline War

In 1998, just as he was preparing to bomb Kosovo, Clinton appointed two key people to develop a US energy strategy for the Caucasus and Caspian: Richard Morningstar and Morningstar's old college pal, Matt Bryza.

 

From 1997 to 1998, Bryza was advisor to Ambassador Richard Morningstar, coordinating US efforts in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Morningstar was appointed by the Clinton administration as the Special Advisor to the President and the Secretary of State for Caspian Basin Energy Diplomacy in 1998, where he was one of the chief architects of US Caspian strategic energy plans. The idea was to develop pipelines independent of Russia from the Caspian Sea through the South Caucasus to Europe.

 

Morningstar and Bryza played a key role in bringing to life the main project of the US-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce: to build what came to be known as the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline, "the world's most political pipeline," bringing Baku oil from Azerbaijan through Georgia to Turkey and the Mediterranean. Both had intimate ties to Dick Cheney and to Richard Perle, an Assistant Defense Secretary under Reagan, and an early backer as of using Mujahideen Jihadists to attack the Soviets in Afghanistan.[35]

 

To prepare the political stage for a US-British-controlled oil pipeline in the backyard of Russia required some help. The CIA and Pentagon turned to their recent Mujahideen allies, who had done so well for them in Bosnia and Kosovo.[36]

 

Osama bin Laden, who had been orchestrating Washington's growing Global Jihad from his US-approved safe haven in Khartoum in Muslim Brotherhood-controlled Sudan, began in 1995 turning his attention and his Mujahideen cadre to a sensitive, largely Muslim part of the Russian Federation in the Caucasus—Chechnya.[37]

 

Chechnya had traditionally been a predominantly Sufi Muslim society, where religion was private and personal not political and evangelical. The infiltration of the US-sponsored Mujahideen operatives linked to Osama bin Laden from the early 1990s transformed the character of the Chechen resistance movement, spreading al-Qaeda's hardline Wahhabite Islamist ideology. US intelligence ties had been established in the early 1990s in Azerbaijan under General Richard Secord's Mega Oil operation. From there, Mujahideen activities had quickly extended into Dagestan and Chechnya, turning Baku into a shipping point for Afghan heroin to the Chechen Mujahideen mafia.[38]

 

The only existing oil pipeline from Baku in the Caspian was Russian, and it ran through Chechnya's capital, Grozny. It was a 100,000 barrel/day pipeline from the Soviet era that took Azeri oil north via Machatschkala, the capital of Russia's Dagestan province, and across 146 kilometers of Chechen territory to the Black Sea Russian port of Novorossiysk. The pipeline was a major competition and obstacle to the alternative route of Bryza and Morningstar and the British and US oil majors.[39]

 

Bin Laden brought in an old Jihad crony, Ibn al-Khattab, to become the Commander, or Emir, of Jihadist Mujahideen in Chechnya together with Chechen warlord Shamil Basayev.

​​​​​​​

Image

 Osama bin Laden was brought into contact with Chechen Islamic Jihadist Ibn al Khattab (above) to start the US-backed Chechen war against Moscow after 1995.

 

 

Ibn al-Khattab had been born in Saudi Arabia and had fought with bin Laden's Mujahideen in Afghanistan in the 1980s, as well as in the US-steered war in Bosnia.[40] The Saudi government gave significant financial support to Ibn al-Khattab's Chechen Jihad against Moscow, and to his organization called the Islamic International Brigade, in coordination with Washington. His Islamic International Brigade in the Caucasus consisted of an estimated 1,500 Jihadists recruited from Chechnya, Dagestan, Arabs, Turks, and other foreign Muslims.

Saudi sheikhs declared the Chechen resistance a legitimate Jihad, or Holy War, and private Saudi donors sent money to Khattab and his Chechen colleagues. Mujahideen wounded in Chechnya were sent to Saudi Arabia for medical treatment. Former US FBI agent Ali Soufan stated that "the United States had been on the side of Muslims in Afghanistan, Bosnia, and Chechnya."[41] In fact, they had financed, transported, and armed them.

 

The CIA airlifted the Afghan-based Mujahideen into the Caucasus, where they were smuggled across the Georgian border into Chechnya. Another main Chechen Jihadist terror training base was in NATO-member country Turkey. At the time, Saudi intelligence and the CIA were in intimate collaboration regarding the use of Mujahideen and Osama bin Laden's Holy Warrior terrorists.[42]

 

In 1991, the leaders of Central Asia were approached by major US and British oil companies during ongoing negotiations between Kazakhstan and the US oil company Chevron. George H.W. Bush, by then US President, actively backed the plans of US oil companies to exploit and, above all, control the resources of the Caspian region, as well as to build a pipeline not controlled by Moscow that could bring the oil and gas production to the West.[43]

 

In that same year, 1991, Richard Secord, Heinie Aderholt, and Ed Dearborn—veterans of US covert intelligence operations in Laos and, later, of Oliver North's illegal guns-for-drugs operations with the Nicaraguan Contras—came to Baku under the cover of an oil company named MEGA Oil. George H.W. Bush backed the idea of a project to build a US-controlled oil pipeline stretching from Azerbaijan across the Caucasus to Turkey.

 

MEGA never found oil, but its airlifts of Mujahideen into the Caucasus to create terror and chaos along the route of the Russian oil pipeline in Chechnya and Dagestan helped to bring Azerbaijan and its oil firmly into the US sphere with the construction of the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline from Baku through Georgia to Ceyhan in Turkey.[44]

 

MEGA operatives in Azerbaijan engaged in military training. They reportedly passed "brown bags filled with cash" to members of the Azeri government and, above all, set up an airline based on the model of Air America, which soon was picking up hundreds of Mujahideen mercenaries in Afghanistan and flying them secretly into the Caucasus.

​​​​​​​

Image

Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, Mujahideen warlord, controlling Afghan heroin traffic in 1988 with CIA Deputy Director Richard Kerr.

 

 

Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who at that time was still allied with bin Laden, recruited Afghan mercenaries to fight against Russia and its Armenian allies in Azerbaijan and Chechnya. Hekmatyar, naturally, used the new Caucasus link to flood Western countries with his Afghan heroin, all with full US knowledge. The heroin went through Baku into Chechnya, Russia, on to Europe and even North America.[45]

 

Demonizing Putin

At the same time the CIA and Pentagon were pouring Jihadists into Russia's Chechnya, they set up a propaganda arm in Washington to make the case for Chechen independence from the "brutal" Russian occupation. It was run as part of a US intelligence organization named Freedom House and was called the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC).

 

Its members were some of the bloodiest war hawks in the United States of the time: Richard Perle, a notorious neoconservative who was a Pentagon adviser; Elliott Abrams of Iran-Contra scandal fame; Kenneth Adelman, former US ambassador to the UN, who egged on the 2003 invasion of Iraq by predicting it would be "a cakewalk"; Frank Gaffney of the neoconservative militarist Centre for Security Policy; Bruce Jackson, former US military intelligence officer and one-time vice-president of Lockheed Martin, now president of the US Committee on NATO; and James Woolsey, former CIA director.[46]

In short, the peace they advocated was Russian surrender.

 

The ACPC launched a highly successful international media campaign to demonize Russia. With a war-weary Russian population increasingly against a new military war in Chechnya after the Afghan debacle, Boris Yeltsin's government declared a ceasefire with the Chechens in 1996 and signed a peace treaty a year later in 1997.

 

Russian military deaths were estimated to be as high as 14,000. Chechen militants killed as many as 15,000. Some 100,000 civilians were killed, with possibly over 200,000 injured and more than 500,000 people displaced by the new US-instigated war. The Russian Baku oil pipeline route was off the table, just as Washington wanted. The way was clear for BP and ExxonMobil to go ahead with their risky alternative route through Georgia.

 

By that time Washington had begun to develop a new strategy in addition to using the predominantly Arab Jihadists of Osama bin Laden and the Mujahideen.

 

Senior CIA Islam experts began to turn to Turkey, also, like Saudi Arabia, a Sunni Muslim country but with one advantage over the Arabs: the Turkish Ottoman Empire had stretched originally as far as China and across Central Asia. Washington began to actively build a Turk option for waging Jihad across Central Asia and, ultimately, to China in order to control Eurasia. A barely educated, reclusive Turkish Imam named Fethullah Gülen would be their vehicle.

 

 

 

 

 

Endnotes:


 

 

 


[1] F. William Engdahl, op. cit.

 

[2] American Petroleum Institute, December, 1995, Caspian Sea Said to Contain Two Thirds of Worlds Known Oil Reserves, accessed in http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?timeline=complete_911_timeline&startpos=700#amidlate90sturkishfronts.

 

[3] Conversation of the author in Croatia in 2006 with "Major A.," a senior Croatian officer involved in procurement of weapons for the Croatian Army in the early 1990s.

 

[4] Peter Dale Scott, The US Al Qaeda Alliance: Bosnia, Kosovo and Now Libya. Washington's On-Going Collusion with Terrorists, Global Research, July 29, 2011, accessed in http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-us-al-qaeda-alliance-bosnia-kosovo-and-now-libya-washington-s-on-going-collusion-with-terrorists.

 

[5] Wayne Madsen, US and Germany Trained and Developed the KLA, The Progressive, August, 1999, accessed in http://www.projectcensored.org/22-us-and-germany-trained-and-developed-the-kla/.

 

[6] Wayne Madsen, The US Connections To The KLA, 18 September, 2012, accessed in http://serbianfbreporter.wordpress.com/2012/09/18/the-u-s-connections-to-the-kla/.

 

[7] Wayne Madsen, US and Germany Trained . . . , op. cit.

 

[8] Jerry Seper, KLA Finances Fight with Heroin Sales: Terror Group Is Linked to Crime Network, The Washington Times (Washington, DC), May 3, 1999, accessed in http://www.sarantakos.com/kosovo/ks18kla.html.

 

[9] Ibid.

 

[10] Ibid.

 

[11] Peter Dale Scott, op. cit.

 

[12] Human Rights Watch, Under Orders: War Comes in Kosovo, accessed in http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/kosovo/undword.htm.

 

[13] James Bissett, WE CREATED A MONSTER, Toronto Star, July 31, 2001, accessed in

http://web.archive.org/web/20080510052014/http:/www.deltax.net/bissett/a-monster.htm.

 

[14] Wayne Madsen, op. cit.

 

[15] Roland Keith, Failure of Diplomacy, Returning OSCE Human Rights Monitor Offers A View From the Ground in Kosovo, The Democrat, May 1999.

 

[16] Cited in Kosovo Liberation Army, accessed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosovo_Liberation_Army.

 

[17] Gregory Elich, War Criminals Real and Imagined, Centre for Research on Globalisation, globalresearch.ca, 18 November 2001, accessed in http://globalresearch.ca/articles/ELI111A.html.

 

[18] Roger Fallgot, How Germany Backed KLA, The European, 21–27 September 2008, pp. 21–27.

 

[19] In an interesting note that is difficult to verify, this author was told by a very reliable source inside the higher levels of the German SPD socialist party of Schroeder that, shortly before the October 1998 German elections that replaced Kohl with a Schroeder-Fischer coalition, the two were called to the Clinton White House for a private discussion of the upcoming German elections. Reportedly, Clinton offered substantial support in money and other things to ensure the victory of Schroeder-Fischer on the quid pro quo proviso, among others, that a Schroeder government backed the US in Kosovo. In the event, Fischer brought his Green party behind the NATO bombing and Schroeder sent German troops to Kosovo.

 

[20] Stephen Erlanger, Early Count Hints at Fewer Kosovo Deaths, The New York Times, November 11, 1999, p. A6.

 

[21] Ibid.

 

[22] James Bissett, op. cit.

 

[23] Peter Klebnikov, Heroin Heroes, Mother Jones, January/February 2000. Clinton, at the same time, mounted a vigorous campaign against Colombian heroin, conveniently increasing the demand for Afghan heroin.

 

[24] John Schindler, Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al-Qa'ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad, Zenith Press, 2007, p. 324.

 

[25] Sylvia Poggioli, Radical Islam Uses Balkan Poor To Wield Influence, NPR, October 25, 2010, accessed in http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130801242.

 

[26] Stephen Schwartz, How Radical Islam Infiltrates Kosovo, August 30, 2012, Weekly Standard, accessed in http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/how-radical-islam-infiltrates-kosovo_651173.html.

 

[27] Sylvia Poggioli, op. cit.

 

[28] Michel Chossudovsky, "Kosovo 'Freedom Fighters' Financed by Organized Crime," Covert Action Quarterly, Spring-Summer 1999 accessed in http://www.projectcensored.org/22-us-and-germany-trained-and-developed-the-kla/.

 

[29] Roberta Fedele, Kosovo courts Saudi investments, Saudi Gazette, June 17, 2012, accessed in http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20120617127191.

 

[30] Paul Lawis, Kosovo PM is head of human organ and arms ring Council of Europe reports, London Guardian, 14 December, 2010.

 

[31] F. William Engdahl, op. cit. p. 241.

 

32 Wayne Madsen, Washington's «Civil Society» and CIA Financing of Chechen and Other Caucasus Regional Terrorists, Strategic Culture Foundation, 29 April, 2013, accessed in http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2013/04/29/washington-civil-society-cia-financing-chechen-other-regional-terrorists.html.

 

[33] Fiona Hill and Regine Spector, The Caspian Basin and Asian Energy Markets, The Brookings Institution, Washington, September 2001, accessed in http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2001/09/globaleconomics-hill.

 

[34] Joe Barnes, Unlocking the Assets: Energy and the Future of Central Asia and the Caucasus—National Interests in the Caspian Basin, James Baker III Institute for Public Policy, April, 1998, accessed in http://bakerinstitute.org/media/files/Research/95010710/u-s-interests-in-the-caspian-basin-getting-beyond-the-hype.pdf.

 

[35] Sibel Edmonds, Obama Appoints a Not-Too-Long-Ago-Hatched Neocon Larva, 27 July, 2010, accessed in

http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2010/07/27/obama-appoints-a-not-too-long-ago-hatched-neocon-larva/.

 

[36] Ibid.

 

[37] Peter Dale Scott, The Falsified War on Terror . . . , op. cit.

 

[38] Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, Our terrorists, New Internationalist, October 1, 2009, accessed in http://newint.org/features/2009/10/01/blowback-extended-version/#sthash.uCpcnKXP.dpuf.

 

[39] Thomas I. Steinberg, Warum Tschetschenien?, Junge Welt, Berlin, September 25, 2004, accessed in http://www.steinbergrecherche.com/tschetschenien.htm.

 

[40] Wikipedia, Ibn al Khattab, accessed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_al-Khattab.

 

[41] Peter Dale Scott, The Falsified War . . . , op. cit.

 

[42] Sibel Edmonds, US NATO Chechen Militia Joint Operations Base, Boiling Frogs Post, November 22, 2011, accessed in http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2011/11/22/bfp-exclusive-us-nato-chechen-militia-joint-operations-base/.

 

[43] Peter Dale Scott, USA and Al Qaeda Relations . . . , op. cit.

 

[44] Ibid.

 

[45] Ibid.

 

[46] Sibel Edmonds, US NATO Chechyn . . . , op. cit.

 

 

 

 

Image

 

 

 

 

 

 

Strasse der Republik 17
Wiesbaden Hessen 65203
GERMANY