October 28, 2010

Boris Johnson: “Kosovo-style social cleansing”

Most disappointing that Boris Johnson should suggest that there is any relevant connection with Kosovo and capping housing benefit at £400 ($600) per week.

Johnson actually was reasonably open-minded in 1999 and went to Beograd during or shortly after the bombing. It would be interesting to know what prompted him to use Kosovo - he is one of the few people in office who might have been expected to see that this shibboleth of Tony Bliar and New Labour is very vulnerable to criticism and hence a way to dismantle the overblown claims and immoral foreign policy they have built on this supposed success...  Tim Fenton

David Cameron scolds Mayor of London Boris Johnson over 'Kosovo' comment

David Cameron has delivered an unprecedented slap-down to Boris Johnson for comparing Government plans to stop housing benefit being claimed on expensive homes to "Kosovo-style social cleansing".

 

By Rosa Prince, Political Correspondent
Published: 6:11PM BST 28 Oct 2010

The Prime Minister was said to be "bristling" with anger after the Mayor of London suggested that capping housing benefit at just under £21,000 a year would lead to the poor being "pushed out" of their homes.

The plans are designed to stop low-income taxpayers subsidising expensive properties for benefits claimants. Ministers estimate that 21,000 people are living in homes for which the state pays more than £400 a week, including 17,000 in the capital.

 In a rare public rebuke, a spokesman for the Prime Minister said Mr Cameron disagreed with the mayor's choice of words and view of the housing benefit policy. Mr Johnson had appeared to suggest that he was seeking to prevent the housing cap being implemented in London.

"The last thing we want to have in our city is a situation such as Paris, where the less well-off are pushed out to the suburbs," he said.

"I'll emphatically resist any attempt to recreate a London where the rich and poor cannot live together.

"What we will not see and not accept is any kind of Kosovo-style social cleansing of

The Prime Minister was said to be "bristling" with anger after the Mayor of London suggested that capping housing benefit at just under £21,000 a year would lead to the poor being "pushed out" of their homes.

The plans are designed to stop low-income taxpayers subsidising expensive properties for benefits claimants. Ministers estimate that 21,000 people are living in homes for which the state pays more than £400 a week, including 17,000 in the capital.

In a rare public rebuke, a spokesman for the Prime Minister said Mr Cameron disagreed with the mayor's choice of words and view of the housing benefit policy. Mr Johnson had appeared to suggest that he was seeking to prevent the housing cap being implemented in London.

"The last thing we want to have in our city is a situation such as Paris, where the less well-off are pushed out to the suburbs," he said.

"I'll emphatically resist any attempt to recreate a London where the rich and poor cannot live together.

"What we will not see and not accept is any kind of Kosovo-style social cleansing of London. On my watch, you are not going to see thousands of families evicted from the place where they have been living and have put down roots."

Within two hours of the comments being broadcast, Mr Cameron's spokesman issued a public rebuke, saying: "The Prime Minister doesn't agree with what Boris Johnson has said or indeed the way he said it.

"He thinks the policy is the right one and he doesn't agree with the way [Mr Johnson] chose his words."

It is the first time that Mr Cameron's growing irritation with the Mayor has been made explicit, and confirms Mr Johnson's position as his only serious rival within the Conservative Party.

The mayor's words were unfortunate given that a day earlier, Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, had described as "deeply offensive" a Labour claim that the poor would be "sociologically cleansed" out of London if housing benefit was cut.

Senior Coalition figures rounded on Mr Johnson. Mr Clegg said: "I disagree with what Boris Johnson said on the policy and very strongly disagree with the way he expressed his views."

As No 10's displeasure was made clear, Mr Johnson issued a statement saying that his words, broadcast on BBC Radio London, had been "taken out of context".

Mr Johnson has had a somewhat fractious relationship with Mr Cameron for some time.

Sources suggested that Mr Johnson's wish to take over more control of London's housing budget would almost certainly now be rejected.

A source said: "The official line is that Boris is Boris, but he has gone too far this time.

"To accuse the Prime Minister of social cleansing is well over the top. It is fair to say that the PM was bristling with anger when he heard." 

Is the fate of the world being decided today in the Indian Ocean


michelcollon.info - Investig'Action

 Is the fate of the world being decided today in the Indian Ocean ?

INTERVIEW OF MOHAMED HASSAN BY GREGOIRE LALIEU & MICHEL COLLON

Straddled by the Islamic arch (which stretches from Somalia to Indonesia, passing through the countries of the Gulf and Central Asia), the region has certainly become the world's new strategic centre of gravity. This new chapter in our series 'Understanding the Muslim world', takes us there on a tour. Mohamed Hassan explains to us how China's economic development is overturning the world balance of power and is freeing the countries of the South from their dependence on the West.

He also lays bare the strategies employed by the US in its efforts to maintain its leadership. And why it is that the US empire is nevertheless destined to die. Finally, he predicts the end of globalisation.
It remains to be seen if their planetary domination will end without a struggle, or whether the gangsters will be shooting hostages. read the interview

Serbia makes another u-turn on Europe

Serbia makes another u-turn on Europe

ZELJKO PANTELIC

Today @ 10:49 CET

Serbs are said to have a long memory which might help the Serbian leadership sell its latest sharp turn over European policy to its citizens.

After the Council of ministers finally forwarded Serbia's application for EU membership to the European Commission, the official position in Belgrade has swung back to euphoric pro-European rhetoric, new unrealistic promises and an understatement of conditions set by the EU for further progress on the road to membership.

Even foreign minister Vuk Jeremic has stopped talking about Kosovo (Photo: United Nations)

Description: http://ads.euobserver.com/www/delivery/lg.php?bannerid=374&campaignid=240&zoneid=35&loc=http%3A%2F%2Fwaz.euobserver.com%2F887%2F31146&cb=9f9bd432a0Just one year ago, Serbian officialdom celebrated the 55th anniversary of the communist takeover with plenty of pomp. Back then, Belgrade was visited by Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, the biggest ally in defending Serbia's sovereignty over Kosovo. It also dropped its previous political motto, 'There is no alternative to the EU', and launched the 'Four pillars policy' calling for close ties with Russia, China, the US and the EU.

Vuk Jeremic and Bozidar Djelic, the Serbian ministers for foreign affairs and for European integration, repeatedly stated that if Belgrade were forced to choose between the EU and Kosovo it would pick the latter.

This year, in less than two months, from July to September, Serbia's foreign policy has completely changed once again.

There are several reasons for this. The first is the opinion of the International Court of Justice which found no violation of international law in Kosovo's declaration of independence. The second is the global financial crisis which showed that the Serbian economy would collapse without good relations with the EU.

Thirdly, the 'Kosovo is more important than Europe' policy failed to lift the popularity of president Boris Tadic's party. On the contrary, the former radical Tomislav Nikolic has taken a lead in the polls with his new Progress party.

Even Mr Jeremic has stopped speaking about Kosovo, after more then 150 lobby trips around the world in one year, to lobby for Serbia's position on its former province. Two of the four pillars (China and Russia) have collapsed and, again, Serbia has found there is no alternative to the EU.

In 2008, after the coalition led by president Tadic won the elections, the Serbian government produced an action plan for EU integration of Serbia. It predicted that the country would be an official EU candidate before the end of 2008, would start negotiations for membership in 2009 and would enter the EU in 2012.

The plan was dropped after a few weeks but Serbian top officials continued to say that the country would be technically ready for EU membership in 2012.

Until a few months ago, official optimism liked to recall the old idea, dusted off by Greece, that in 2014, one century after the start of the First World War, the EU could complete its enlargement by admitting all of the western Balkan countries among its ranks.

Now, Serbian media keep referring to the forwarding of the EU application to the commission in such enthusiastic terms that the uninitiated would be forgiven in assuming that the country had already achieved candidate status. Nobody reported that Serbia had been waiting a record ten months to see its bid take at least the first step; Iceland waited less than one week and it took just four months for Montenegro.

The new proclaimed target date for entry in EU is 2016, which implies that Serbia would be ready in 2014.

Croatia got candidate status in 2004, started to negotiate with the EU in 2005, and is still negotiating today. Just few days ago Jose Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission, refused to name a date for Croatian accession.

The Serbian government has, however, managed to overcome Dutch resistance on the issue of war crimes. "Full cooperation" with the war crimes tribunal in The Hague is a key condition for European integration, but the Netherlands had strongly insisted for the arrest of Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb military commander suspected of war crimes and genocide, to be a precondition of any further steps on Serbia's EU track.

http://waz.euobserver.com/887/31146

http://waz.euobserver.com/887/31146