http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article606.html
MAINSTREAM (INDIA)
Vol XLVI, No 15
Is Kosovo the End of Europe?
Saturday 29 March 2008, by Ash Narain Roy
Rene Magritte, the celebrated Belgian surrealist painter, once painted an
apple and wrote on it, "This is not an apple." He did the same on a pipe.
Today, he could as well paint his country, Belgium, and certainly Kosovo,
the youngest nation in the world, and write, "This is not a country."
Belgium is collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions, with its
majority Dutch-speaking, many French-speaking and few German-speaking
citizens unable to decide what and for whom the state stands for. Kosovo is
a self-inflicted pain and the world will not be able to withstand it given
the can of worms its creation has opened. Mitrovica, witnessing intense
violence, may emerge as a flashpoint of new conflict. Serbia is thinking of
inviting Russian troops into Serb-dominated northern Kosovo as peacekeepers
that may undermine the authority of the NATO-led KFOR peacekeeping mission,
creating the potential for conflict leading to the partition of Kosovo.
Kosovo's independence has dealt a blow to the nation-state. Many wonder if
the nation-state in the 21st century is going out of fashion and whether a
model of multi-cultural living, the hallmark of the nation-state, is on way
to redundancy. In any case, China and Russia seem moving towards 19th
century-style nationalism, militarism and assertive-ness. Many states would
follow them.
Kosovo's declaration of independence has won enthusiastic to grudging
approval from some and vociferous to mild disapproval from others depending
on which side of the fence one is sitting. But it has placed India on the
horns of a dilemma. New Delhi is only studying the evolving situation as
there are "several issues" involved in the declaration. There was a time
when India took pride in being right than in being diplomatic. Today hard
realities of "national interests" and pragmatism have become the main
yardstick of its foreign policy. Silence and discretion are in, moralising
is out. That perhaps explains what Shashi Tharoor says, why India feels
comfortable with the "Burmese junta, than its janata". India's flirtations
with the US and the desire to occupy the UN high table with the help of
Washington are also coming in the way of taking a principled stand on global
issues.
But New Delhi's virtual silence on Kosovo is fraught with far-reaching
consequences. It is unfortunate that even on an issue that concerns its own
minorities and sub-national movements, India has chosen to look the other
way. As the CPI-M mouthpiece People's Democracy says, "at least on such a
vital issue as the sovereignty of countries with minority populations and
the challenges to a basic principle of international law, India should speak
up." Kosovo has created a new precedent and twisted international law that
separatists all over the world would use to further their interests.
Kashmiri separatists like Syed Ali Shah Geelani, Shabbir Shah and Yasin
Malik have already said that they see Kosovo as a ray of hope. North-East
militants and the Naxalites would not be far behind in extracting some
mileage out of Kosovo. Spain's Basque and Catalan separatists have also
welcomed Kosovo's independence with a banner like, "Today Kosovo. Tomorrow
Catalonia". Ethnic Albanians in Macedonia have also intensified their
autonomy demands, an obvious road to independence. Many believe the upsurge
of violence in Tibet is not unrelated to Kosovo.
WHAT is the American gameplan in Kosovo? Russia certainly sees a red signal.
Kosovo is a dress-rehearsal for redrawing boundaries in Eurasia and the
Middle East. It is a new balkanisation, part of American and German
geo-strategic plan, to tame Russia. The goal is to drive a wedge in the
Balkans to advance a spurious form of European integration. A clear pattern
is discernible. Since the former Yugoslavia was a thorn in the
American-German flesh, it has been systematically targeted. The NATO bombing
of Yugoslavia in 1999 was a well-devised plan. It was no coincidence that
Bosnia-Herzegovina was divided along ethnic and religious lines-Serb, Croat,
Bosniak, Christians and Muslims. To these ethnic-religious divides have been
added further sectarian divisions within Christianity-Eastern Orthodoxy
versus Roman Catholicism.
Facts speak for themselves. Bosnia's Constitution was written at a US Air
Force base in Dayton, Ohio by American and European experts. Efforts are now
on to establish a Greater Albania which will bring together what are now
Albania and Kosovo as well as adjacent parts of Serbia and Montenegro,
Western Macedonia and the north-western regions of Greece.
Kosovo has created a new divide even in the ranks of European states. While,
Germany, Britain, Italy and France have recognised Kosovo, countries like
Spain, Greece, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania and Cyprus have opposed Kosovo's
independence. There is a perception among multinational, multi-ethnic and
multicultural states that Kosovo's independence will give a new lease of
life to separatists in their own midst-Basques in Spain, Tiroleans in Italy,
Hungarians in Romania and the like.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has reacted most vehemently calling
Kosovo's independence as the "beginning of the end of Europe". Moscow is
right in maintaining that Kosovo's independence will rekindle fire in the
frozen conflict zones-Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria etc. Way back
in 1992, South Ossetia had declared independence from Georgia. Only thanks
to the presence of Russian peacekeepers a bigger conflict was avoided.
Russia has not recognised South Ossetia as yet, but it could exercise that
option. Moscow has also hinted that the Kosovo precedent could be invoked in
Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh. In fact, Moscow has decided to
withdraw from a CIS treaty imposing sanctions against Georgia's breakaway
region of Abkhazia. It is not hard to imagine what happens if Russia decides
to use the Kosovo approach to resolving conflicts in its own backyard. Even
supposing Russian troops are sent to Serb-dominated northern Kosovo, it
could create a flashpoint of conflict.
Is the US trying to appease the Muslim world by its support for Kosovo and
thus seeking to make up for the folly of the Iraq war? It is possible that
some Muslim regimes may see the American gameplan in that light. But what
kind of message is Washington conveying to the Iraqi Kurds? The US says it
is backing a federal Iraq where Arabs, Kurds, Turkomans, Assyrians as also
Shias and Sunnis could live together. Can Iraqis be blamed for thinking that
the federal formula is a cover to break the country?
The West's stance is inconsistent and self-contradictory. If it supports
Kosovo's independence, why does it oppose the independence of Flanders in
Belgium? Few believe Kosovo will actually be free; it will become a
protectorate of the EU. What is worse, Kosovo is likely to see the
Serb-dominated parts walking away. In pursuing their geo-strategic
interests, the US and Germany may end up reviving old chauvinist passions
and creating a monster that may turn their dream into a nightmare. It is too
dangerous to fiddle with the Balkans' fault lines. The US smiles at Kosovo
only to frown at Russia. Come on America! Your bare teeth are showing.
The author is the Associate Director, Institute of Social Sciences, New
Delhi.
MAINSTREAM (INDIA)
Vol XLVI, No 15
Is Kosovo the End of Europe?
Saturday 29 March 2008, by Ash Narain Roy
Rene Magritte, the celebrated Belgian surrealist painter, once painted an
apple and wrote on it, "This is not an apple." He did the same on a pipe.
Today, he could as well paint his country, Belgium, and certainly Kosovo,
the youngest nation in the world, and write, "This is not a country."
Belgium is collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions, with its
majority Dutch-speaking, many French-speaking and few German-speaking
citizens unable to decide what and for whom the state stands for. Kosovo is
a self-inflicted pain and the world will not be able to withstand it given
the can of worms its creation has opened. Mitrovica, witnessing intense
violence, may emerge as a flashpoint of new conflict. Serbia is thinking of
inviting Russian troops into Serb-dominated northern Kosovo as peacekeepers
that may undermine the authority of the NATO-led KFOR peacekeeping mission,
creating the potential for conflict leading to the partition of Kosovo.
Kosovo's independence has dealt a blow to the nation-state. Many wonder if
the nation-state in the 21st century is going out of fashion and whether a
model of multi-cultural living, the hallmark of the nation-state, is on way
to redundancy. In any case, China and Russia seem moving towards 19th
century-style nationalism, militarism and assertive-ness. Many states would
follow them.
Kosovo's declaration of independence has won enthusiastic to grudging
approval from some and vociferous to mild disapproval from others depending
on which side of the fence one is sitting. But it has placed India on the
horns of a dilemma. New Delhi is only studying the evolving situation as
there are "several issues" involved in the declaration. There was a time
when India took pride in being right than in being diplomatic. Today hard
realities of "national interests" and pragmatism have become the main
yardstick of its foreign policy. Silence and discretion are in, moralising
is out. That perhaps explains what Shashi Tharoor says, why India feels
comfortable with the "Burmese junta, than its janata". India's flirtations
with the US and the desire to occupy the UN high table with the help of
Washington are also coming in the way of taking a principled stand on global
issues.
But New Delhi's virtual silence on Kosovo is fraught with far-reaching
consequences. It is unfortunate that even on an issue that concerns its own
minorities and sub-national movements, India has chosen to look the other
way. As the CPI-M mouthpiece People's Democracy says, "at least on such a
vital issue as the sovereignty of countries with minority populations and
the challenges to a basic principle of international law, India should speak
up." Kosovo has created a new precedent and twisted international law that
separatists all over the world would use to further their interests.
Kashmiri separatists like Syed Ali Shah Geelani, Shabbir Shah and Yasin
Malik have already said that they see Kosovo as a ray of hope. North-East
militants and the Naxalites would not be far behind in extracting some
mileage out of Kosovo. Spain's Basque and Catalan separatists have also
welcomed Kosovo's independence with a banner like, "Today Kosovo. Tomorrow
Catalonia". Ethnic Albanians in Macedonia have also intensified their
autonomy demands, an obvious road to independence. Many believe the upsurge
of violence in Tibet is not unrelated to Kosovo.
WHAT is the American gameplan in Kosovo? Russia certainly sees a red signal.
Kosovo is a dress-rehearsal for redrawing boundaries in Eurasia and the
Middle East. It is a new balkanisation, part of American and German
geo-strategic plan, to tame Russia. The goal is to drive a wedge in the
Balkans to advance a spurious form of European integration. A clear pattern
is discernible. Since the former Yugoslavia was a thorn in the
American-German flesh, it has been systematically targeted. The NATO bombing
of Yugoslavia in 1999 was a well-devised plan. It was no coincidence that
Bosnia-Herzegovina was divided along ethnic and religious lines-Serb, Croat,
Bosniak, Christians and Muslims. To these ethnic-religious divides have been
added further sectarian divisions within Christianity-Eastern Orthodoxy
versus Roman Catholicism.
Facts speak for themselves. Bosnia's Constitution was written at a US Air
Force base in Dayton, Ohio by American and European experts. Efforts are now
on to establish a Greater Albania which will bring together what are now
Albania and Kosovo as well as adjacent parts of Serbia and Montenegro,
Western Macedonia and the north-western regions of Greece.
Kosovo has created a new divide even in the ranks of European states. While,
Germany, Britain, Italy and France have recognised Kosovo, countries like
Spain, Greece, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania and Cyprus have opposed Kosovo's
independence. There is a perception among multinational, multi-ethnic and
multicultural states that Kosovo's independence will give a new lease of
life to separatists in their own midst-Basques in Spain, Tiroleans in Italy,
Hungarians in Romania and the like.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has reacted most vehemently calling
Kosovo's independence as the "beginning of the end of Europe". Moscow is
right in maintaining that Kosovo's independence will rekindle fire in the
frozen conflict zones-Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria etc. Way back
in 1992, South Ossetia had declared independence from Georgia. Only thanks
to the presence of Russian peacekeepers a bigger conflict was avoided.
Russia has not recognised South Ossetia as yet, but it could exercise that
option. Moscow has also hinted that the Kosovo precedent could be invoked in
Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh. In fact, Moscow has decided to
withdraw from a CIS treaty imposing sanctions against Georgia's breakaway
region of Abkhazia. It is not hard to imagine what happens if Russia decides
to use the Kosovo approach to resolving conflicts in its own backyard. Even
supposing Russian troops are sent to Serb-dominated northern Kosovo, it
could create a flashpoint of conflict.
Is the US trying to appease the Muslim world by its support for Kosovo and
thus seeking to make up for the folly of the Iraq war? It is possible that
some Muslim regimes may see the American gameplan in that light. But what
kind of message is Washington conveying to the Iraqi Kurds? The US says it
is backing a federal Iraq where Arabs, Kurds, Turkomans, Assyrians as also
Shias and Sunnis could live together. Can Iraqis be blamed for thinking that
the federal formula is a cover to break the country?
The West's stance is inconsistent and self-contradictory. If it supports
Kosovo's independence, why does it oppose the independence of Flanders in
Belgium? Few believe Kosovo will actually be free; it will become a
protectorate of the EU. What is worse, Kosovo is likely to see the
Serb-dominated parts walking away. In pursuing their geo-strategic
interests, the US and Germany may end up reviving old chauvinist passions
and creating a monster that may turn their dream into a nightmare. It is too
dangerous to fiddle with the Balkans' fault lines. The US smiles at Kosovo
only to frown at Russia. Come on America! Your bare teeth are showing.
The author is the Associate Director, Institute of Social Sciences, New
Delhi.
1 comment:
“The West’s stance is inconsistent and self-contradictory. If it supports Kosovo’s independence, why does it oppose the independence of Flanders in Belgium?”
I would add the lack of support for Tibet’s independence (who wants to deal with China), no serious support for an independent Palestine, Kurdistan, Tamil region in Sri Lanka, and many others.
The current world order is based on realism, or Realpolitik, the oldest and most used theory of international relations. The realist approach views states as rational and unitary factors focused solely on self-interests, national security, and balance of power.
Realism influences states to pursue their national interests even if they are contrary to the interests of other states and peoples. Morals, ethics, and legality are the least important principles for realists.
The West is not driven by humanitarianism in Kosovo. Kosovo is important to the West only because it is a battleground where they are opposing Russia.
SAVO HELETA
Author of "Not My Turn to Die:
Memoirs of a Broken Childhood in Bosnia"
http://savoheleta.livejournal.com
Post a Comment